>>45885>>45914Flares are so much better than baggy/loose pants
i stopped having unrealistic fashion goals when i realized social medias definition of drip is metrosexual nycslop anyways
>>42523>"Muh reddit" I'm so tired of these buzzwords, speak like a human
>>46214that post could be generated by AI after parsing /r/malefashionadvice thoever
>>46188school shooter ah fit
>>46216looks like some sort of quarter button combat overshirt
>>46218its not a trench coat over an edgy band tshirt tho
as far quality goes, a pair of carhartt pants from the last 15 years might as well be made out of rice paper. the hype from the last decade is the usual social media nonsense and idek how its lasted this long
>>46219>its not a trench coat over an edgy band tshirt thoYou're right. The right has more of "that guy everyone warns you about in your local goth scene" energy.
>>46295i just sleep in my underwear and a one of my old tees, which aren't even oversized. i'm thinking about getting some lose fitting tank tops for summer though
>nightgownmy intuition would be that they haven't been common since the 90s outside of children's fashion and lingerie (like those knee-length ones with thin straps). i don't know if this is specific to my country, but we just have a lot more female-coded pyjamas
>precumstop hondosing yourself
>>46296nightgowns are kindve a vintage thing, besides chemise or negligee, but i want to look like a victorian ghost
>hondosingi had to look up what this means and wikipedia dictionary has a whole section for 4chan /lgbt/ slang now wtf 😭😭😭😭
>>46372at this point archive scan accounts r the only ones worth looking at, best shit i see comes from reg ppl w max 3-5k followers
>>46176This. Flares have all the advantages of slim/skinny & baggy/loose fit + they work w most footwear
>>46296>>46297My autistic situationship wore a nightgown. It was so hot…
Fashion is bourgeois
is there a single depop seller out there who will actually give clothing measurements when you ask instead of treating it like an act of molestation
i cant believe raf simons was ever popular and his clothes resold for tens of thousands of dollars lmao, raf put direct references to the things he liked onto his clothes because he wasn't skilled / smart / talented enough to do otherwise unlike other designers who understand how to transform those references into something new
raf likes new order so what does he do? he makes a jacket in the style that was popular in manchester at the time (fishtail parka) and then literally puts a new order graphic onto it. there's nothing new or unique about this jacket. he literally just found a vintage one and copied it, then printed a graphic on it. the only reason it's a "raf simons" fish tail parka is because he wrote his name on the inside of it. no real design work or transformation has taken place. his referencing is extremely direct
Low-rise pants shouldn't even exist.
>>46519>>46526I'm going to guess they thought of either Stirner or Spamton.
>>46566>HardAnon, what? He's not even wearing knees.
Fashion-fags get more ridiculous every year.
Anyone else notice how shit the quality of store bought clothes are now (at least in the uk)? Like i used to buy tshirts and collared shirts from places like m&s and next but after a few wash cycles they go to shit (for collared shirts the fabric goes loose and starts leaving hug gaps around the neckline and tshirt collars become crumpled and warped).
Feels like you have to shell out shitloads of money just to get anything that'll last more than 6 months
>>46821should add it's the OSCill X Feiyue Labourer jacket
Unique IPs: 34