[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


 

Interregnum Edition

#01 https://archive.ph/4Dq3L
#02 https://archive.ph/sntTt
#03 https://archive.ph/AoX8t
#04 https://archive.ph/mHlP7
#05 https://archive.ph/NEiRq
#06 https://archive.ph/bWfbJ
#07 NEVER EXISTED?
#08 DELETED FOR SOME REASON! >>2623774
#09 https://archive.ph/iarMN Senior Numba Nine 03-01-26 13:34:18
#09 https://archive.ph/P84hH Junior Numba Nine 03-01-26 19:13:34
#10 https://archive.ph/kh1wf
#11 https://archive.ph/JvoVM
#12 https://archive.ph/JWBNL

Previous Thread >>2629519
552 posts and 128 image replies omitted.

>>2634430
stirner never led a nation, or a successful revolution, or really anything. the cpc has

Talking about Stalin and how much he ruled in the vuvuzela thread makes me feel warm and fuzzy. I have something akin to "affection" for you faggots but it's not exactly that. More like a shit you took that you're happy about but it's still disgusting and you'd rather not mention it

>>2634446
You will be ok.

>>2634443
The cultural revolution was the greatest thing to happen in leftism, it should have never ended

>>2634451
The vast majority of the proletariate was fucking pissed about it, Mao admitted this directly. He said it TO the red guard themselves
And I quote:

>You have been involved in the Cultural Revolution for two years: struggle-

criticism-transformation [dou-pi-gai]. Now, first, you are not struggling;
second, you are not criticizing, and, third, you are not transforming. Or
rather, you are struggling, but it is an armed struggle. The people are
not happy, the workers are not happy, the peasants are not happy, city
residents are not happy, students in most schools are not happy, most of
the students in your schools are also not happy. Even within the faction
that supports you, there are unhappy people. Is this the way to unify the
world?

It sucked dick.

>>2634451
>"bombard the headquarters!"
>but also give everyone security detail
>kill the landlords and distribute the land to peasants
>make class war against the bourgeoisie but since they are gone say the peasants with land are the new elites

>>2634459
forgot to fix the linebreaks when copypasting from the PDF award

ive been there

>>2634459
>Then in 1966 came the “cultural revolution”, which lasted a whole decade, a real disaster for China. During that period many veteran cadres suffered persecution, including me. I was labelled the "No. 2 Capitalist Roader" after Liu Shaoqi. Liu was called "commander-in-chief of the bourgeois headquarters" and I "deputy commander- in-chief". Many strange things happened in those days. For instance, people were told that they should be content with poverty and backwardness and that it was better to be poor under socialism and communism than to be rich under capitalism. That was the sort of rubbish peddled by the Gang of Four. There is no such thing as socialism and communism with poverty. The ideal of Marxists is to realize communism. According to Marx, communist society is a society in which the principle of from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs is applied. What is the principle of to each according to his needs? How can we apply this principle without highly developed productive forces and vast material wealth? According to Marxism, communist society is a society in which there is overwhelming material abundance. Socialism is the first stage of communism; it means expanding the productive forces, and it represents a long historical period. Only if we constantly expand the productive forces can we finally achieve communism. The Gang of Four's absurd theory of socialism and communism led only to poverty and stagnation. […] Certain individuals, pretending to support the reform and the open policy, call for wholesale Westernization of China in an attempt to lead the country towards capitalism. These people don't really support our policies; they are only trying vainly to change the nature of our society. If China were totally Westernized and went capitalist, it would be absolutely impossible for us to modernize. The problem we have to solve is how to enable our one billion people to cast off poverty and become prosperous. If we adopted the capitalist system in China, probably a small number of people would be enriched, while the overwhelming majority would remain in a permanent state of poverty. If that happened, there would be a revolution in China. China's modernization can be achieved only through socialism, not capitalism. There have been people who have tried to introduce capitalism into China, and they have always failed.

-Deng Xiaoping, We shall draw on historical experience and guard against wrong tendencies, April 30, 1987

>>2634463
I know dude but I don't want to delete and repost. I was pissed when I saw it

>>2634465
ive doen it so many times i gave up on green texting copypasteing


>>2634451
It was so great that absolutely no one can explain what it was. 50 years later. Neither its glazers nor its haters can give a reasonable, sensible account of the not-great not-proletarian Cultural Revolution.

>>2634464
Mao was a paranoid hot-head for sure. But Deng stuck around and continued the work no matter how much shit he got. He was very committed and well meaning, and he saved China 100%. They have their problems, but it's hard to blame them when they've only been a country since the 50s, having to completely build from the ground up. I know for certain that no matter what happens, at least China will survive.

>>2634472
there's plenty of material out there on it, books and documentaries; what do you mean? some of it was effective and some of it was ineffective.

>>2634464
Based.
Are there any writings by the so calles Gang of Four which are not simply superficial sloganeering, but an actual explanation of their views of socialism and whay path they want to put China on?

>>2634474
Yeah there's plenty of material; none of which can make sense of what it was. Mao was a great warrior-poet, but a tad bit too poetic for my taste.
The boring silent bureaucrats have less sex-appeal, but they are better suited to run countries.

File: 1767869332119.pdf (1.82 MB, 180x255, Shanghai_Commune.pdf)

>>2634472
It was an attempt at negation of the revolutionary government. Which in itself was an untended consequence of Mao's concept of new democracy. The Red Guards actually looked to the French Insurrectionary Commune for inspiration and set to placing party members on trial. This is what frightened the supposed revolutionary members of the CCP. Very little english language literature exists on it, but if you know CPUSA old heads, you can occasionally find people who were teaching English in Shanghai and other cities at the time. I've yet to meet someone who did not describe almost in awe as the greatest mobilization of people they ever witnessed. Even a die-hard blue maga bitch I met refused to criticize the Cultural Revolution when pressed.

>>2634480
(summarized by ai and too lazy to post the source because it's fox news)

>According to the unclassified US diplomatic cable, the source, a Peking University professor, indicated that people in his social circle at the time, particularly women, found Xi to be boring because he:

>Could not discuss movies.
>Did not drink or do drugs.
>Was generally taciturn and hard to read.


This is the way of the true Statesman. The revolutionary is a warrior poet, but his time comes to an end after the smoke has cleared.

>>2634488
I think your warrior poet thing is overstated. Lenin didn't drink/smoke, focused more on nonfiction than fiction, and was a huge nerd. And yet he presided over the revolutionary phase, while Stalin was more of a "fun guy" and a "dude bro" yet ended up being the statesman for nerarly 30 years.

>>2634484
I'm sure there's a lot to learn about the cultural revolution from a sociological perspective, like a case study.
But as far as practicality for the Chinese Nation and their need to consolidate defenses against imperialism, it was far too risky to let play out for they may have almost inevitably come under fire by the West and Britain and swept aside.

>>2634484
sorry, you don't want a situation where retarded teenagers who just became communists are putting actual communists with 30 years of experience who fought against the Japanese in the World Anti-Fascist War on trial. It's very easy to say someone has "become revisionist" or "betrayed the revolution" when you haven't lived through history or had to make actual governing decisions.

>>2634491
Ok fair point but also, Stalin was there for the revolution, and was doing a lot of the dirty work like robbing banks to fund it etc. Also Trotsky was the real vociferous hot-head and as you can see, was not the statesman.
The cooler head did prevail in both cases.

>>2634495
either way what i'm saying is just spitballing truisms that don't really mean anything. I just thought it was funny to point out that women think Xi is boring lol. It's a fun little tidbit

>>2634432
think this summarizes it:

https://x.com/upholdreality/status/1921736261074579785

The red flag fell over the Kremlin in 1991.

The West declared victory. China took notes.

For three decades, the CPC has dissected why the USSR collapsed—not because socialism failed, but because its guardians surrendered.

Here’s what China learned. 🧵

1 — Bread, Then Ballots: How Economic Mismanagement Triggered Collapse

China's first lesson: economic reform must consolidate socialism—not dismantle it.

Gorbachev reversed this logic, liberalizing politics before resolving stagnation.

“Gorbachev was pushing political reform ahead of economic reform; China under Deng was promoting economic reform ahead of political reform.” — Victor Gao

Perestroika unleashed market chaos without structure. Supply chains collapsed. Prices exploded.

"The privatization reform led to a serious polarization of the distribution of wealth, a lack of socialist ideals and beliefs, an extremely chaotic sense of ethics and morality, and an all-round regression of the social spirit." — Li Shenming/Chen Zhihua

The acute failure wasn’t socialism itself, but reform without sequence, without control.

2 — Historical Nihilism: How the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Lost the Will to Rule

The CPC’s second lesson: revolutions die when they lose faith in themselves.

“There are multiple factors contributing to the disintegration of the Soviet Union, a very important one being Khrushchev throwing away Stalin’s knife and Gorbachev’s open betrayal of Marxism-Leninism.” - CPC leader Hu Jintao

“Khrushchev’s denunciation ‘shook the foundations’ of Soviet authority.” — Hu Jintao

Gorbachev’s glasnost reforms—intended as renewal—accelerated ideological collapse.

"After the legalization of private newspapers and the privatization of state-run media, the main media in the Soviet Union were soon controlled by private capital and elite forces inside and outside the Soviet Union.

Capital at home and abroad tried its best to vilify and subvert the socialist system and preach the glorification of the eternal rule of capitalism…

With the implementation of the policy of "openness without restrictions," a vigorous trend of historical nihilism that negated the CPSU and the Soviet Union rapidly spread to the historiographical, theoretical, and ideological circles." — Li Shenming/Chen Zhihua

“An important reason [for the Soviet collapse] was that their ideals and convictions wavered.” — Xi Jinping

A party that discredits its own history cannot hold power.

Historical nihilism was suicide by self-critique.

3 — From One Party to No Party: How the CPSU Dismantled Itself

The CPSU didn’t fall to a revolution. It collapsed because no one defended it—not the Party, not the people, not the army.

Gorbachev’s reforms eroded Party control: contested elections, a presidency outside the Party, pluralist elites.

"The so-called Gorbachev-style socialism was just a slogan, he himself did not have a well-formed concept.

At that time Gorbachev also came up with this slogan, ‘More socialism, more democracy’. This is a very stupid way of putting it. Is there socialism or is there not socialism?

The reference to more or less is nonsense.

So when the question was raised as to what is 'more socialism', Gorbachev, the proponent of this formulation, himself spread his arms and didn't know how to answer." — Aleksandr Kapto, Former Head of CPSU Central Committee’s Ideological Department

When the Party’s authority dissolved, the state followed.

Reform without discipline became liquidation.

4 — One Union, Fifteen Flags: How the USSR Imploded from the Periphery

The Soviet Union constitutionally allowed its republics to secede. And when the center weakened, they did.

“Even a symbolic secession clause can become a real dagger when central authority wanes.” — Global Times

Gorbachev’s decentralization enabled nationalist movements to legally dissolve the Union.

“Moscow’s failure to ‘subordinate ethnic identity and stamp out local nationalisms’ was a primary reason the federation dissolved.” — Prof. Ma Rong, Peking University

Beijing responded by rejecting Soviet-style federalism.

China recognizes ethnic diversity—but sovereignty is indivisible. National cohesion is a red line.

5 — Overreach, Not Encirclement: How the USSR Exhausted Itself Geopolitically

The USSR wasn’t simply outgunned—it overextended itself trying to match imperial pressure on imperial terms.

Arms races, Afghanistan, client-state subsidies—it drained itself.

Military spending rose to an estimated 15–17% of Soviet GDP by the 1980s, a colossal allocation that starved civilian sectors.

The CPC sees this as partially self-inflicted. The West pushed, but the USSR walked into the trap.

The Chinese lesson: strength begins with development, not illusions of trust or military footprint.

6 — Dollar Wars: How U.S. Finance Helped Break the Soviet Economy

The CPC also studied how the USSR was broken by oil shocks and credit warfare.

In the 1980s, oil revenues were the USSR’s lifeline. When Saudi overproduction—backed by the U.S.—crashed prices, Soviet income collapsed.

“The Soviet economy was ‘fragile’ by the 1980s, overly dependent on resource exports and burdened by costly obligations.” — CCTV / Global Times

Desperate, Soviet leaders turned to Western credit—but loans came with strings: liberalization, privatization, and chaos.

Core lesson: never let your economy be hostage to foreign currencies, foreign markets, or foreign lenders.

7 — Peaceful Evolution: How the West Won the Information War

The USSR didn’t just lose a battle of arms. It lost a battle of ideas.

Western liberalism entered via glasnost, NGOs, dissidents, and cultural infiltration. The CPSU disarmed itself ideologically—and the West filled the vacuum.

“The CPSU’s removal of the seal of Marxism and Leninism in the ideological field… set free the demon, which destroyed it. The collapse of thoughts brought the collapse of the CPSU.” — CPC Documentary

Western NGOs, spies, and propaganda efforts incubated a pro-Western fifth column within the USSR.

Ideological security is national security. If your enemies teach your youth what to believe, you’ve already lost.

8 — No One Resisted: The Final Lesson of Soviet Collapse

When the end came, no one defended the Soviet Union. 19 million Party members stood down. The military didn’t act. The state evaporated without resistance.

The Party had died long before the flag came down.

“In the end, nobody was a real man, nobody came out to resist.” — Xi Jinping

The CPC sees this as the endgame of ideological surrender, strategic confusion, and liberal reform: not death by external blow—but collapse from within.

"Individuals from Khrushchev to Gorbachev slowly distorted, castrated, falsified, and betrayed the correct theoretical foundation laid by Lenin for the CPSU…

If the foundation is not strong, the earth moves and the mountain shakes. Having lost the theoretical basis of Marxism-Leninism, the Soviet Union’s collapse was inevitable." — CPC documentary

From Beijing's 2006 documentary 'Preparing For Danger In Times Of Safety – Historic Lessons Learned from the Demise of Soviet Communism':

"From the 1991 Soviet disintegration to the end of the 20th century, Russia’s gross domestic product (GDP) declined by 52% compared with the GDP level in 1990, while it declined only 22% during the war years from 1941 to 1945.

Over the same period (1991 to the end of the 20th century), Russian industrial production decreased by 64.5%, and agricultural production by 60.4%.

As the ruble devaluated, prices rose 5000 times.

Since 1992, the Russian population has been declining. In 1990 average life expectancy in Russia was 69.2 years, but it fell to 65.3 years in 2001, almost 4 year’s decline. The male life expectancy in some parts dropped a full 10 years.

The disintegration of the CPSU and the Soviet Union has brought disastrous consequences to the people and the country, far beyond these figures and situations."

Old head neo-cons like Bill Kristol seem to think Trump fucked up regime change in Venezuela.

File: 1767871259682.png (53.49 KB, 888x886, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2634507
>The red flag fell over the Kremlin in 1991.

>The West declared victory. China took notes.


>For three decades, the CPC has dissected why the USSR collapsed—not because socialism failed, but because its guardians surrendered.


>Here’s what China learned. 🧵


>1 — Bread, Then Ballots: How Economic Mismanagement Triggered Collapse


>China's first lesson: economic reform must consolidate socialism—not dismantle it.


>Gorbachev reversed this logic, liberalizing politics before resolving stagnation.


>“Gorbachev was pushing political reform ahead of economic reform; China under Deng was promoting economic reform ahead of political reform.” — Victor Gao


>Perestroika unleashed market chaos without structure. Supply chains collapsed. Prices exploded.


>"The privatization reform led to a serious polarization of the distribution of wealth, a lack of socialist ideals and beliefs, an extremely chaotic sense of ethics and morality, and an all-round regression of the social spirit." — Li Shenming/Chen Zhihua


>The acute failure wasn’t socialism itself, but reform without sequence, without control.


>2 — Historical Nihilism: How the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Lost the Will to Rule


>The CPC’s second lesson: revolutions die when they lose faith in themselves.


>“There are multiple factors contributing to the disintegration of the Soviet Union, a very important one being Khrushchev throwing away Stalin’s knife and Gorbachev’s open betrayal of Marxism-Leninism.” - CPC leader Hu Jintao


>“Khrushchev’s denunciation ‘shook the foundations’ of Soviet authority.” — Hu Jintao


>Gorbachev’s glasnost reforms—intended as renewal—accelerated ideological collapse.


>"After the legalization of private newspapers and the privatization of state-run media, the main media in the Soviet Union were soon controlled by private capital and elite forces inside and outside the Soviet Union.


>Capital at home and abroad tried its best to vilify and subvert the socialist system and preach the glorification of the eternal rule of capitalism…


>With the implementation of the policy of "openness without restrictions," a vigorous trend of historical nihilism that negated the CPSU and the Soviet Union rapidly spread to the historiographical, theoretical, and ideological circles." — Li Shenming/Chen Zhihua


>“An important reason [for the Soviet collapse] was that their ideals and convictions wavered.” — Xi Jinping


>A party that discredits its own history cannot hold power.


>Historical nihilism was suicide by self-critique.


>3 — From One Party to No Party: How the CPSU Dismantled Itself


>The CPSU didn’t fall to a revolution. It collapsed because no one defended it—not the Party, not the people, not the army.


>Gorbachev’s reforms eroded Party control: contested elections, a presidency outside the Party, pluralist elites.


>"The so-called Gorbachev-style socialism was just a slogan, he himself did not have a well-formed concept.


>At that time Gorbachev also came up with this slogan, ‘More socialism, more democracy’. This is a very stupid way of putting it. Is there socialism or is there not socialism?


>The reference to more or less is nonsense.


>So when the question was raised as to what is 'more socialism', Gorbachev, the proponent of this formulation, himself spread his arms and didn't know how to answer." — Aleksandr Kapto, Former Head of CPSU Central Committee’s Ideological Department


>When the Party’s authority dissolved, the state followed.


>Reform without discipline became liquidation.


>4 — One Union, Fifteen Flags: How the USSR Imploded from the Periphery


>The Soviet Union constitutionally allowed its republics to secede. And when the center weakened, they did.


>“Even a symbolic secession clause can become a real dagger when central authority wanes.” — Global Times


>Gorbachev’s decentralization enabled nationalist movements to legally dissolve the Union.


>“Moscow’s failure to ‘subordinate ethnic identity and stamp out local nationalisms’ was a primary reason the federation dissolved.” — Prof. Ma Rong, Peking University


>Beijing responded by rejecting Soviet-style federalism.


>China recognizes ethnic diversity—but sovereignty is indivisible. National cohesion is a red line.


>5 — Overreach, Not Encirclement: How the USSR Exhausted Itself Geopolitically


>The USSR wasn’t simply outgunned—it overextended itself trying to match imperial pressure on imperial terms.


>Arms races, Afghanistan, client-state subsidies—it drained itself.


>Military spending rose to an estimated 15–17% of Soviet GDP by the 1980s, a colossal allocation that starved civilian sectors.


>The CPC sees this as partially self-inflicted. The West pushed, but the USSR walked into the trap.


>The Chinese lesson: strength begins with development, not illusions of trust or military footprint.


>6 — Dollar Wars: How U.S. Finance Helped Break the Soviet Economy


>The CPC also studied how the USSR was broken by oil shocks and credit warfare.


>In the 1980s, oil revenues were the USSR’s lifeline. When Saudi overproduction—backed by the U.S.—crashed prices, Soviet income collapsed.


>“The Soviet economy was ‘fragile’ by the 1980s, overly dependent on resource exports and burdened by costly obligations.” — CCTV / Global Times


>Desperate, Soviet leaders turned to Western credit—but loans came with strings: liberalization, privatization, and chaos.


>Core lesson: never let your economy be hostage to foreign currencies, foreign markets, or foreign lenders.


>7 — Peaceful Evolution: How the West Won the Information War


>The USSR didn’t just lose a battle of arms. It lost a battle of ideas.


>Western liberalism entered via glasnost, NGOs, dissidents, and cultural infiltration. The CPSU disarmed itself ideologically—and the West filled the vacuum.


>“The CPSU’s removal of the seal of Marxism and Leninism in the ideological field… set free the demon, which destroyed it. The collapse of thoughts brought the collapse of the CPSU.” — CPC Documentary


>Western NGOs, spies, and propaganda efforts incubated a pro-Western fifth column within the USSR.


>Ideological security is national security. If your enemies teach your youth what to believe, you’ve already lost.


>8 — No One Resisted: The Final Lesson of Soviet Collapse


>When the end came, no one defended the Soviet Union. 19 million Party members stood down. The military didn’t act. The state evaporated without resistance.


>The Party had died long before the flag came down.


>“In the end, nobody was a real man, nobody came out to resist.” — Xi Jinping


>The CPC sees this as the endgame of ideological surrender, strategic confusion, and liberal reform: not death by external blow—but collapse from within.


>"Individuals from Khrushchev to Gorbachev slowly distorted, castrated, falsified, and betrayed the correct theoretical foundation laid by Lenin for the CPSU…


>If the foundation is not strong, the earth moves and the mountain shakes. Having lost the theoretical basis of Marxism-Leninism, the Soviet Union’s collapse was inevitable." — CPC documentary


>From Beijing's 2006 documentary 'Preparing For Danger In Times Of Safety – Historic Lessons Learned from the Demise of Soviet Communism':


>"From the 1991 Soviet disintegration to the end of the 20th century, Russia’s gross domestic product (GDP) declined by 52% compared with the GDP level in 1990, while it declined only 22% during the war years from 1941 to 1945.


>Over the same period (1991 to the end of the 20th century), Russian industrial production decreased by 64.5%, and agricultural production by 60.4%.


>As the ruble devaluated, prices rose 5000 times.


>Since 1992, the Russian population has been declining. In 1990 average life expectancy in Russia was 69.2 years, but it fell to 65.3 years in 2001, almost 4 year’s decline. The male life expectancy in some parts dropped a full 10 years.


>The disintegration of the CPSU and the Soviet Union has brought disastrous consequences to the people and the country, far beyond these figures and situations."

Nosfetatu weighs in on the kidnapping of Maduro and the implications for U.S. interests.

>>2634440
>>2634443
>[China is] fucking invincible right now
"Invincible" yet adamant in upholding capitalism with their western imperialist brothers in peace, representative multi-party democracy, human rights, wage labor, production for exchange, capital export, anti-revolutionary internationalism… Curious. Almost like you have the mindset of a baby. Does the "jiggling of the keys" [mass-mediated Chinese soft power] entertain?
>After destalinization of USSR and their revisionist turn, China HAD to split
>And the cultural revolution WAS a mistake!
Fact: the Chinese "deStalinized" following the attempt of Mao and the CULTURAL REVOLUTION GROUP of opposing the rightists in a LINE STRUGGLE WITHIN THE CPC. The US, west and the CPC right-wing "deStalinized", wrecked the USSR and eastern bloc together and the Chinese proletariat was hyperexploited by international capital. WE ARE HERE and the CPC refuses to dialectically adjust to the left again as the imperialist west have been carrying out a second cold war for a decade that is only getting more aggressive with time.
WAKE UP.
>>2634444
We ALL need to be realistic and adopt a Comintern line! Stop bullshitting ourselves for fucks sake! I am so tired of this "pray to social-imperialism for ignore us and sell us Ziotok miracles and diplomatic best wishes" crap.
>>2634451
>>2634459
He tried and you can't comprehend the consequences of it failing because you are mentally weak and think historical materialism is about you cheering on team A vs team B on a screen. You are the dictionary definition of an idiot.
>>2634462
Yes bombard the headquarters of wreckers of the proletarian dictatorship and central planning. Go fuck yourself.
>make class war against the bourgeoisie but since they are gone say the peasants with land are the new elites
They were so gone that now a class collaborationist "Communist Party" with a bureaucrat-capitalist central committee can prostitute its working class to western imperialist corporations and a domestic bourgeoisie that work them so hard with so little benefits that they rival any south asian or african dirt-poor country in terms of average annual workinghours, we should cry tears of joy by how invincible and badass they are and they're definitely gonna send those dongfeng missiles to DC tomorrow and press the communism button post-haste! I've definitely internalized the lessons of Marxist critique of religion, idealism, utilize a historical materialist analysis of states and comprehend the centrality of PROLETARIAN DICTATORSHIP AND COMMUNIST PRODUCTION FOR USE IN A POST-ELECTRIFIED, DIGITIZED, NUCLEAR AGE.
>>2634473
>I know for certain that no matter what happens, at least China will survive.
YOU ARE HAVE REPLACED MATERIAL ANALYSIS WITH RELIGIOUS DEVOTION AND DESERVE ONLY MOCKERY.
>>2634476
>Dialectical conflict of two aspects
>aspect one: "Based [implying "correct", yet…]"
"aspect two: "Are there any writings by the so calles Gang of Four which are not simply superficial sloganeering, but an actual explanation of their views of socialism and whay path they want to put China on?"
No investigation, yet so arrogantly ignorant… So infuriating.
https://www.bannedthought.net/China/MaoEra/PoliticalEconomy/FundamentalsOfPoliticalEconomy-Shanghai-1974-English-OCR-SinglePage.pdf
>>2634480
>Yeah there's plenty of material; none of which can make sense of what it was
You refuse to learn what it was, because you abhor historical materialism and scientific socialism. You simply want to "bet" on a winning team. Well guess what. Many half-baked morons like you bet high on the post-Stalin USSR as well.
>>2634492
>I'm sure there's a lot to learn about the cultural revolution from a sociological perspective, like a case study.
Nah bro never been made before. Simply don't look it up. You've got this, commissar! Vibes!

Systemic compromises require systemic corrections.

>>2634484
Thanks for the resource and anecdote but wtf does 'blue maga' mean please?
t. Not a yank

>>2634538
>no investigation yet arrogant
Yeah fucking moron thats why i asked for resources, because i did not find any myself
What was arrogant about that request?

>>2634538
>completely schizo angry effortpost
>thinking china is social imperialist, capitalist, and revisionist

Aint reading all that

More FAX from Dr. Decodé!!

>>2634552
Im was accepted to study under Dr Décodé and conduct joint research with with starting March this year!!!!

>>2634451
>leftism
kys: >>2611371

>>2634550
>Suburbanite Gacha Addict wants to spam his ignorant political hot takes non-stop with no pushback
Not your Discord chat. You the one copy-pasting unconfigured AI wall earlier? Yes I want to throw you off a bridge.

File: 1767874926721-0.png (1.36 MB, 983x817, 965.png)

File: 1767874926721-1.jpg (355.35 KB, 1600x1600, a12.jpg)


>>2634552
>>2634552
This is an AI generated channel btw. It's not the real guy


>[Albanian folk music] "Deshmorit te Atdheut":
https://youtu.be/HymQ9Tyq5aM

Don't forget: you have to make it fall, comrades.

>>2634550
But Chyna is literally a capitalist nation.

great stuff, worth listening to.
Not AI like the other retard posting videos.

>>2634581
obviously, but it still drops truth nukes so who cares. if it's OK to vtube it's OK to do this. I bet Decode is Awakening Richard.

>>2634644
>Decode is wrong because AI!!!
who cares. it's just the new version of vtubing or tubing as a drawsona

File: 1767881134812.png (1.56 MB, 1316x910, 1cf.png)

>>2634654
if the guy cant be bothered to draw his rantsona for his own video. i am not going to be bothered to watch it

>>2634661
if you aren't personally handpainting your rantsona on your local cave walls, you are using too much tech

File: 1767881699888-0.png (41.58 KB, 351x483, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1767881699888-1.jpg (197.36 KB, 1080x1931, G-JHj5SXgAAGaZV.jpg)

hmmmmm

>>2634654
If somebody is going to hide behind AI, Pretend to be credentialed and never show their face or voice, nobody is going to trust them, yes.
Back to /ISG/ with your 'muh vtubing muh drawsona' nobody here cares about or even to know what these things mean.

>>2634553
Dr Décodé is incredible

NEW THREAD >>2634712
NEW THREAD >>2634712
NEW THREAD >>2634712
NEW THREAD >>2634712
NEW THREAD >>2634712
NEW THREAD >>2634712
NEW THREAD >>2634712
NEW THREAD >>2634712
NEW THREAD >>2634712
NEW THREAD >>2634712

>>2634672
>i can't say why he's wrong or attack his arguments, so I'll get mad at the tech he uses to make his vids

you are also without credentials and you hide behind anonymity also. we all do. noibody cares about bourgeois credentialism anymore. anyone can say shit. a pedophile who somehow bankrupted casinos runs my country and a busdriver ran venezuela. you have no real arguments about why decode is wrong because you won't even digest the material. in the time you spent bitching, you could have just ignored it and moved on with your life


Unique IPs: 20

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]