/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

When did Kim become anointed? Was it at birth or later in adulthood? Has any council pronounced an infallible declaration on this?

>says south korean spy agency
Lol

>>2689561
North korea has been ruled by the kim family since its inception theres no reason to believe thats going to change as long as theres still a kim in charge.

>>2689548
it's just like le monarchy!!
Boring. Get better material.
Picrel, KJU personally taking you on one last funride before you go in to the dump.

>>2689637
accidental bump. my apologies comrades.

>>2689637
>it's just like le monarchy!!
I mean how is it not.

>>2689575
One day you will be BTFOd by a non-kim head of party just like the same claims were btfo in Cuba after Raul.

Nice """"""AES""""" you got there, multipoltards.

Ya know she has to get elected right?

monarchy is better because it is more diverse
in democracy the outcome is always the same

>>2689713
<n-n-no don't look at the economics, at the development, the organisation
<le kim is all that's important here!
One day we shall farm you, for science!

>>2689720
yes. build the pizza hut, kim.

I guess I’ll be the one to say it, nepo baby

>>2689706
I eagerly await that day tho i sadly dont see that happening

>>2689720
>DPRK has a popular leader
LMAO

>>2689575
kims are mascots, figureheads, who cares. the real work of running the state is done by other people.

>>2689575
look beyond the superficial

>>2689684
see >>2689742

>>2689742
The american people voted trump in power.
Cant say the same for north korea.

>>2689548
>communo-monarchism
Lassallebros…

>>2689747
>Stalin is le monarch because the libs didn't VOOT in an interclass bourgeois election
ok lib

>>2689754
Its funny how stalinoids are against elections because they always lose them lol.

>>2689756
>if you let the bourgeoisie run in elections and vote vote, the communists lose because the elections become rigged in the favor of whoever has the most money to spend on campaigning and advertising and the prole don't vote because they're at work and don't want to wait in line for hours to choose between bourgeois candidates.
wow, fascinating, tell us more. You look at america and see that the candidate with more funding wins 95% of the time. really interesting stuff.

>>2689747
Does it matter?
The people running the show are not acting in the interests of those who elected them but the donor class.
I rather have no voting but whoever ends up on the top is obligated to work for the people's interests.
This is the difference between the form and content of "democracy".

>>2689759
Whatever helps you cope with the fact nobody likes you guys irl.

>>2689751
FUcking based.
Lasalle was right.
Marx was just a 19th century 4chud.

I always new a monarchy was the right governance for communism.
>Stalin was a Monarch.
>Xi is a monarch and so is Kim.
>Tito and Hoxha were both Monarchs. >Ulbricht and Honecker were Monarchs.
When Tito died and they switched to a rotating presidency every month (lol) the country turned to shit and fell apart because there was no longer monarchy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mladorossy

Even in Workers and Resources Soviet Republic you play as a communist God King.

Monarcho-Communism is the future.
If we switch to Monarcho-Communism, Jesus Christ will come down from heaven and lead the world towards immortality and cosmic domination.

<We need a MONBOL flag

If you want a monarchist larper perspective on North Korea (who actually thinks it kind of is): >>>/siberia/723215

>>2689760
>The people running the show are not acting in the interests
And what guarantee the guys who are in power who arent even elected and dont even have to pretend to be beholden to populace will? The only thing unelected rulerdom is beholden to and guaranteed to act in the interests of (atleast if they're smart) is the military or whatever group has the most guns.

>>2689770
the problem with monarchy is one generation you get a reluctant leader with common sense and empathy for Le People and the next generation you get an inbred freak who does Epstein shit

>>2689779
>And what guarantee the guys who are in power who arent even elected
That Kim Jong Un was not in the Epstein files.

>>2689786
And?

>>2689784
Yeah but that's the same shit with all systems. Stalin's sons turned out to be ok (vasya was disgraced by corn lord because he was questioning his dad's death, he started drinking after the death). Kim Jong Un seems to be ok. Let's be real, democratic systems naturally select for who is the best opportunist and public manipulator. At least with communist monarchies you have some pressure put on your kids.

>>2689787
If he was a person who hated his people he would be in the files. Why do you think absolute power is somehow bad? Like why would someone turn into a psycho with absolute power? I have played video games with absolute power and I felt bad for hurting video game characters, i just want to build things and help people. You hurt people out of powerlessness or when the system you are ruling becomes too complex. Fix the system and grant yourself absolute power then you will feel the pulse of the populace and you will naturally feel good about yourself. City builders exist for a reason.

>>2689789
Notice how you are conditioned to fight and be afraid of being killed in like FPS games but when you are playing strategy games with overwhelming power you kinda feel bad for defeating a weakling. Even if he was a nuisance before.

>>2689789
>If he was a person who hated his people he would be in the files.
That doesnt even make any sense wtf does kim jong un hypotetically raping foreign children have to do with him hating his people.
>have played video games with absolute power and I felt bad for hurting video game characters, i just want to build things and help people.
And how i am supposed to trust you? Trust you with the fate of and lives of everyone?
I think stalinoids are bigger cattle than even chuds are since they seem to be completely okay with the proles or even themselves having no choice in who lords over them. Out of some deluded belief that they may oneday get to achieve the position of leader and rule over everyone else.
Kinda similar to how right-wingers get tricked into defending billionaries in hopes they will one day be one of them.

>>2689763
>Whatever helps you cope with the fact nobody likes you guys irl.
Cool bro, tell us more about unpopular the party is in the DPRK.

>>2689803
<Kim hates his le people thats why the party has enhanced socialist construction and people first socialism just because he fucking hates them, okay?!
Jesus only know how you find this site, i'm surprised you can even operate a coputer.

>>2689805
Yeah the north korean communist party is so popular they even allow bourgeuise candidates to run because they know they're so popular with the people that they're no threat.
Oh wait a minute they dont and all potential candidates for election are handpicked by them instead whoops.

>>2689808
When did i ever say any of that?

Wrong. Communist Korea is not monarchy. Communist Korea is democratic dictatorship of proletariat which build consolidation of revolution by maintaining continuity of revolutionary leadership through mass-line, not birth right. The Party elect leader.

>>2689817
Strange because so far the leadership of the party has been passed down due to birthright and it seems to be so for the foreseeable future.

>>2689812
<unironic bourgeois election enjoyer
please leave

>>2689837
Look at all those unelected politicians.

>>2689812
DPRK literally has a multi-party system with a socdem party and a religious socialist party

>>2689839
>socdem party and a religious socialist party
Yeah two puppet parties under the control of the communist party.

>>2689803
Au contraire my fren.
I am under no illusion that I will ever become the top dictator whatever. All I want is to make sure the top dictator acts in my interests. If that is too hard for you to understand, what can I say?

>>2689844
>All I want is to make sure the top dictator acts in my interests
Uh-huh and how will you accomplish that?

>>2689843
The democrat and republican parties are two puppets under control of the epstein class.

>>2689847
And?

>>2689846
By making his job of managing the coordination aspects of the economy easier? You do know it's hard to manage people and sometimes you just want everyone to do the right thing and help each other + self organize. Also make sure the dictator is one of us low-level people that way he will always feel like he is grounded. The only thing I cannot figure out is to prevent petty squabbles corruption where you use dictatorial powers to gain edge in local feud. I guess the only way to solve this is by hiding the dictators power levels so nobody knows who the dictator is.

>>2689561
You said the same thing abour DPRK soldiers in Ukraine

>>2689848
>and?
Are you reddit brained? Where is this supposed "real democracy" that exists? There is no democracy in the west so you should stop using it as an argument for why DPRK is not democratic.

>>2689812
Why would they allow capitalists in their state capitalism? they already have the monopoly.

>>2689843
Why should parties campaigning for the restoration of the bourgeoisie exist in a socialist society? Who does that benefit and how does that make the lives of proletarians better?
A popular front with a dominant communist party and minority interest groups is a good way to allow some pluralism without letting reactionaries have a say for no reason but "liberal democracy is good because it just is, okay?!"

>>2689855
You could have multiple socialist parties competing against each other in elections

>>2689856
Or you could just have internal debate in a vanguard party. Still not seeing how a multi-party system is essential beyond some liberal nonsense about a "marketplace of ideas" or how having a dozen variations of the same product under different labels makes for something meaningful.

>>2689858
>Or you could just have internal debate in a vanguard party.
What the fuck would be the point of that? What guarantee will there be that there will be debate what guarantee will there bee that the debate is over topics the proletariat care about what guarantee is their the conclusion they reach will be in proleteriats best interest what guarantee will there be that the conclusion will be what the proleteriat wants?
>multi-party system
I see no harm in it either.

>>2689865
>What guarantee will there be
Proletarian participation in the system. Not circling a differently colored box every 4 years

>>2689838
>Look at all those unelected politicians.
Those are voting delegates you retard.

>>2689865
>What the fuck would be the point of that?
Successful socialist construction.
These things are a means to an ends. To liberals democracy is simply a show to no ends.

>>2689871
>Proletarian participation in the system
How?

>>2689876
>Successful socialist construction.
And why could that not be achieved with a multi-socialist party system?

>>2689872
8th Party Congress had 5,000 delegates BTW.

>>2689878
>And why could that not be achieved with a multi-socialist party system?
Why change what is working? What is the material reasons for doing so?

>>2689877
You have workplace organizations that are politically active and have the power to elect and recall deputies. Despite your biased liberal view of Stalinist USSR, that actually functioned pretty well there and it had more deputies on all levels recalled annually by the demand of soviets than any liberal-democratic country.

>And why could that not be achieved with a multi-socialist party system?
It could be. I'm personally not saying that a multi-party system (as long as reactionaries are excluded) is inherently bad, I just believe it's pretty immaterial and the organization of the parliament is way down in the list of priorities concerning socialist counstruction.

>>2689883
Must be an easy job becayse the drpk only allows one candidate to be on the ballet.

>>2689858
You'll still have major political disagreements in a socialist society. And if you don't let representatives sort out their differences legitimately and above ground they will kill each other as many socialist states proved. It's about conflict mediation and ensuring political representation

>>2689884
>Why change what is working?
Hows it working? What is the purpose of even having elections if you dont allow the voters to even have a choice.

>>2689888
You can't negotiate out of fundamental political disagreements.

Liberal democracies kill people over irreconcilable political disagreements all the time.
There is no middleground compromise in a class war

>>2689770
The point isn't the competence of the individual but to stop careerists Machiavellians trying to climb the political ladder

>>2689892
Guess you dont mind if i kill you then.

>What do you think of communo-monarchism?
Theoretically possible in theory. Not politically desirable.

>>2689895
It is what it is.
Millions of proletarians are being killed by capitalism already, why clutch pearls over political violence?

>>2689885
>You have workplace organizations that are politically active and have the power to elect and recall deputies.
Yeah they have to power to elect not the power to choose who they want to elect making the afromentioned power pointless.
> levels recalled annually by the demand of soviets than any liberal-democratic country.
Like who? I'll guarantee all these recalled deputies were all had powerful political enemies.
And almost never because their voterbase.
>I just believe it's pretty immaterial and the organization of the parliament is way down in the list of priorities concerning socialist counstruction.
Yeah true honestly why even organize a parliament in the first place? And why care if people to take a shit in the middle-of the street aswell given that its not important priority to building socialism.

>>2689906
>Millions of proletarians are being killed by capitalism already,
True and communist states should seek to replicate it by killing other communists over disagreements and then killing proleterians aswell if they disagree aswell.

>>2689850
and indeed, they were not in ukraine but in kursk

>>2689908
Duplicitous or mistaken friends are more dangerous than honest enemies.

You have burgeois moralism.

>>2689889
>Hows it working?
How is it not?

>>2689923
Beacause the whole point of democracy is to provide a legitimate mechanism for collective self-governance, ensuring that power remains accountable to the people.
If you're not trying to achieve that then what even is the point of your democracy?

>>2689742

but saved anyway

>>2689922
>burgeois moralism
Well whatever it is im glad i'm not sociopath like you.

>>2689929
Sorry, it's not really bourgeois moralism, it's what the bourgeoisie teach to their cattle, they themselves have no such reservations, they play to win

>>2689926
>If you're not trying to achieve that then what even is the point of your democracy?
Lmao. Idealist trash. You have not a single care for what is built.

>>2689947
Dont worry I wont have any either when i kill you.

>>2689952
Ofcourse its idealist. All ideologies are
But again explain what the point of your fake democracy if you dont even bother to try to make it actually democratic.

>>2689957
Freedom is insight into necessity

>>2689960
What?

>>2689957
Communism isn't an ideology you absolute fucking retard

>>2689966
Yes it is.

>>2689734
Basically. Kind of like that one grandson of Mao who's a PLA general despite doing nothing, the family name alone gives him a massive advantage in prestige.

>>2689962
Liberals and marxists have fundamentally different and incompatible concepts of freedom, explaining which would entail a marxism 101 lecture.

Basically, freedom is not about vooting or having your individual will represented, it's about the concrete freedom to understand and affect the world through reason (theory) and tools (owning the means of production). Someone who is free not to be bombed by the US because they have nukes has concrete freedom, someone who gets to voote and get "represented" is only free abstractly.

>>2689747
1. This doesn't change the fact that Trump has more unrestrained power than Kim does, which he is demonstrating to the fullest by swinging his dick around everywhere with nobody in the American government able to stop him despite the supposed "checks and balances".
2. 35% of America didn't even vote
3. The better-funded candidate almost always wins so it's pretty clear that "the American people" are stupid af and just vote for whoever can fund more ads and media campaigns.

>>2689975
Okay i understand.
But that still doesnt answer the question as to what the point of the fake democracy even is.

>>2689977
One party system does not mean no party autocracy. People cannot vote in a different party - the ideology and central directive towards socialism always remains the same. However, they still have influence over the system through electing local officials who form the lowest level of government(some of whom will climb to the top)

>>2689977
The purpose of the process is not to generate democracy through some participatory mechanism, it's to administer the state.

The reason you don't need more than one party is because decisions can be made among party members through reason and scientific analysis to come to a correct decision, not by having a quasi darwinistic "marketplace of ideas" where parties with ossified, static political opinions compete for power.

Think about what a party even is. It's an organ for representing the interests of a certain class. The purpose of a socialist state is to rationally plan the economy for the benefit of the working class, not to be a political arena for which class "wins" its representation and gets to be at the wheel

>>2689980
>However, they still have influence over the system through electing local
They do technically elect them yes, but the officials they are allowed to elect are handpicked by the party and again theres only possible candidate on the ballot aswell
So really they dont have say in anything.

>>2689993
Are you saying the party handpicks every little candidate for every little town or village?

>>2689997
Yes that is literally how it works in all communist countries.

>>2689989
Again how does this process help govern the state?
Having farce elections where the choice has already been made for the voters and the voters dont have a choice who to vote for.

>>2690004
Damn that's a lot of micromanagement

>>2690004
No, the central party does not in fact vet and screen and handpick every little candidate lol. Are you referring to how the people running must(obviously) be a party member?

>>2690012
Could you name some examples of this? Cause in the electoral systems of the ussr china vietnam and north korea the candidates for even mayoral and provincial offices are all chosen by the communist party officials.

>>2690010
Not really its not like xi jinping himslef is personally choosing the mayoral canidate of bumfuckgongzhinxong town.

>>2689548
the chairman of a revolutionary organisation is like a father to his children and sometimes he needs to instill some strict discipline

>>2690020
Then who does?

>>2690034
The local CCP party comitee for a city, town or province reccomends a candidate to the ccp organizational department who then approves or rejects them.

>>2690049
How many mbers does this "ccp" have?

>>2689548
>What do you think of communo-monarchism?
<implying nk is remotely communist
NK is not a monarchy, it's more of a family corporate business in nation form.

>>2689739
>kims are mascots, figureheads, who cares. the real work of running the state is done by other people.
Britain is aes too by these standards. 💀💀💀

>>2690052
I dont know? Google it

>>2690021
revolutionary gay sex cults

>>2690060
I already know the answer

>>2690063
Good for you?

>>2689548
I'm glad someone is bringing this up because im working on a fantasy alt history world and a government like this comes about at the end of the story so i wanna know what would happen after

>>2690049
What's the problem with such decisions being made by people who have had actual political training and been vetted?

>>2690078
Nothing i guess though its not democratic at all and the elections are really nothing more than a farce
The proles also get no say but hey who the fuck cares about them lol.

>>2690081
Can you explain why is voting democratic?

>>2690081
I don't want my country to be run by unqualified retards, and most chinese agree, gherefore it's democratic.

And you can just join the party if you want such rexponsibilities, 6% of the entire chinese population is in the party.

Next you're going to say each individual not having a say about where manholes are installed in the streets is undemocratic. There's people whose job it is to make such decisions

>>2690081
glow!! glow! I can see the glow radiating from you!

>>2690088
>yoi can't know anything about reality unless you determine it by vooooooting
Liberal metaphysics

>ccp is terrified
All 100 million of them?

>>2689742
Kim Jong Un is the head of state.

Let's just look at the DPRK State Constitution first:
Notable articles–
The Preamble: Kim Il Sung the Founding Father

Workers' Party Dictatorship of the Proletariat
Article 4: Sovereignty is in the workers (Worker's Party)
Article 5: Democratic Centralism
Article 11 & Article 12 (asserting worker's party leadership)

Ideological conformity
Article 81-82: Ideological / Political conformity.

The Supreme People's Assembly sovereignty asserted
Article 87: SPA (Supreme People's Assembly is the highest organ of State power.
Article 88: Legislative power is exercised by SPA; Standing Committee of SPA
may also exercise when not in session.
Article 90: SPA is elected for a term of 5 years;

Article 91 for Supreme People's Assembly:
- 1. Amend or supplement the Constitution
- 2. Adopt, amend, or supplement laws
- 3. Approve the major laws by Standing Committee when not in session.
- 4. Establish the basic principles of the State's domestic / foreign policies.
- 5. Elect or recall the President of the State Affairs Commission (The Leader)
- 6. Elect or recall the Chairman of the Standing Committee of the SPA.
- 7. Elect or recall the Vice President & members of the State Affairs Commission
On the recommendation of the President of the State Affairs Commission (The Leader)
- 8. Elect or recall the Vice-chairman, Secretary General, & members of the
Standing Committee of the SPA.
- 9. Elect or recall the Premier of the Cabinet.
- 10. Appoint Vice-Premiers, Chairmen, Ministers, & other members of Cabinet on
Recommendation of the Premier of the Cabinet
- 11. Appoint or remove the Prosecutor General of the Central Public Prosecutors Office.
12. Elect or recall the President of the Central Court
13. Eeect or recall the Chairmen, Vice-Chairmen, * members of the Committees of the Supreme People's Assembly
14. Deliberate & approve the State plan for the development of the national economy
15. deliberate & approve the State budget & the report on its implementing
16. Hear a report on the work of the Cabinet & the central bodies.
17. Decide on ratification & nullification of treaties suggested to the SPA.

Article 95: Items to be considered at the SPA are submitted by:
- The President of the State Affairs Commission (Leader)
- State Affairs Commission
- Standing Committee of the SPA
- The Cabinet & Committees of the SPA
- Also by the deputies

The Leader articles
Article 100. The President of the State Affairs Commission is the Leader & represents the State. (Head of State)
Article 101: The Leader is elected at the SPA according to the unanimous will
of all Korean people.
Article 102: Supreme Leader's term of office is the same as SPA.
(The term of office of SPA & Supreme Leader are together; 5 years).
Article 103: The Leader is commander-in-chief & directs armed forces.
Article 104: The Leader has authority to–
- 1. Direct the overall affairs of the State
- 2. Personally guide the work of the State Affairs Commission
- 3. Make public the laws & ordinance of the SPA & the major decrees / decisions
of the State Affairs Commission
- 4. Appoint or remove key cadres of the State
5. Appoint or recall diplomatic representatives in other countries.
6. Ratify or rescind major treaties w/ other countries.
7. Exercise the right of granting special pardon.
8. Proclaim state of emergency, state of war & mobilization.
9. Organize & direct the National Defence Committee in war-time.
…
Article 105: (or sometimes Article 104?) Supreme Leader issues orders.
Article 106: The Supreme Leader is accountable to the SPA.
(Supreme People's Assembly).

State Affairs Commission (headed by the leader)
Article 107: The State Affairs Commission is the Supreme Policy-oriented leadership body
Of State power.
Article 109: The term of the State Affairs is the same as that of the SPA.
(SPA / Supreme People's Assembly).
Article 110: State Affairs Commission has the duties & authority to:
- 1. Discuss & decide important policies of the State
- 2. Exercise supervision over the fulfilment of orders of the Supreme Leader
- 3. Abrogate decisions & directives of State organs which run counter to
the orders of the Supreme Leader & the State Affairs Commission.
- 4. Appoint or remove Vice-premiers, chairmen, ministers, & other members of the Cabinet
on the recommendation of the Preimer of the Cabinet WHEN the SPA is not in session.
Article 111. State Affairs Commission issues decrees, decisions, & directives.
Article 112. State Affairs Commission is accountable to the SPA (Supreme People's Assembly).

Notable powers in the Leader?
- Make laws?
:(SPA has that power as the supreme sovereign body, although Leader can submit items for discussion to SPA & discuss/decide important policies in the State Affairs Commission); "3. Make public the laws & ordinance of the SPA & the major decrees / decisions of the State Affairs Commission"

-Declare war/peace?
: - Can ratify or rescind major treaties w/ other countries – / Proclaim state of emergency, state of war & mobilization. / Perhaps has control of nuclear weapons?

-Appoint magistates/state officials?
: -4. Appoint or remove key cadres of the State / members of State Affairs Commission, etc

Give pardons
: - 7. Exercise the right of granting special pardon.

Then there's democratic centralism: once party doctrine is decided, all party members are obliged to follow–and DPRK basically is a one-party state, the majority of the SPA are party members and obliged to follow party doctrine, so in a way there are mechanisms of the Party ideology itself behind the DPRK State Constitution as extra layers.

It is debatable how much influence Kim Jong Un really has or if he is just like the King of Britain in being a figurehead mostly.

>>2690091
>vooting is unfair and doesnt count because i always keep losing them cries the ML'oid
If some random questionarie is actually true it would be quite ironic as the chinese government doesnt trust its people one bit.

>>2690100
Marxism values correctness over sentiment, it's not called "scientific socialism" for nothing.
Alien concept to a liberal, I know.

>>2690106
Then why does the correct assertation that china is undemocratic bother you?
Unlike the people here the CCP themselves are under no illusion that the reason they're in power is trough a popular mandate and not the fact they have an iron grip on and control all forms of political power, wealth and media in the country along with the military.

<picrel
Waow, thanks evil AI machine (BasedBasedBasedBased).
>>2690094
>he is just like the King of Britain in being a figurehead mostly
king is a large scale slum landlord so i'd say Big Kim has less power.

>>2690109
It's dialectical.

Also, liberals don't have a monopoly on the concept of "democracy".
Socialism is a dictatorship of the proletariat with some democratic mechanisms for the ruling class (proles in this case)
Just like capitalism isa dictatorship of the bourgeoisie with some democratic mechanisms for the ruling class (capitalists & donors)

They serve different purposes thrrefore don't have to be the same.
It's not like in capitalist countries you can just elect a communist government by popular will, so why the hypocrisy?

>>2690110
Juche is just by the book marxism-leninism with some bombastic stylistic flourishes, dunno why self professed marxists doubt this at all, they could just read it directly and see for themselves.

>>2689834
Wrong. Proletarian dictatorship is comprised of descendants of Revolution elected by proletarian democracy, not birthright. There is no legal birthright in Communist Korea. Communist meritocracy is not monarchy

Article 76.
Revolutionary fighters, the families of revolutionary and patriotic martyrs, the families of soldiers of the People’s Army and soldiers disabled on duty enjoy the special protection of the State and society.

>>2690056
That is actually retarded logic. Britain other "people" are capitalists who run the show

>>2690129
Working for them so far. They don't have to worry about getting bombed by the democratic west, pager-bombed by the west's genocidal colony, and having their country turned into a whorehouse managed by descendants of repressed fascists.

>>2690120
Even though I agree that it is just Marxism-Leninsm, DPRK has denied that it is Marxism-Leninism since around the time of KJI. Read pages 13 to 19.

>>2690110
>king is a large scale slum landlord so i'd say Big Kim has less power.
By convention, King receives 'advice' (it isn't really advice, they sort of have to follow the advice).
The royalty haven't been so powerful much after 1688.

>>2689548
>Kim Jong Un chooses teen daughter as heir, says Seoul
It's her turn

>>2690146
what does that gotta do with slum landlording?
Also ignoring extensive political advocacy and so on, btw
Fundamentally disingenuous.

>>2690161
According to AI, KJU has more wealth than Charles III.

>>2690166
Counting "unaccounted" assets for thee, but not for mee

>>2689706
yeah nah yi ruled joseon for 500 years and would be ruling to this very day had japanese not make them abdicate
north korea is the same hermit kingdom so things will be the same

>>2690166
This is like that youtube video that said Stalin was the richest man ever because he "owned" the entire soviet union

>>2690166
The royals have teams of people who create shell companies nonstop and move money through accounts for them. There's no way we really know the full extent of their fortune.

>>2689747
We share a board with people who actually unironically think such childish nonsense as "the american people voted trump into power" lmfao.

It's bleak out here man

>>2690333
when the fuck did i bomb norks?
anyway:
>hereditary rule
>isolationist
>chinese client
>position in life measured can be measures in distance to royal palace
<not joseon 2.0, you evil imperialist

Amerikkkan subhumans have no right to speak. They will bully, rape and murder with impunity and then dare to criticise their victims.

>>2690410
Dumb motherfucker.
This is your brain on NK News.
Not even once, anons.

Alunya and Grace are somewhere drinking together in a big party

>>2690412
You wont do shit.