>Kanye West should never have been invited to headline Wireless.
>This government stands firmly with the Jewish community, and we will not stop in our fight to confront and defeat the poison of antisemitism.
>We will always take the action necessary to protect the public and uphold our values.https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/2041515702855643347Well that's one 'American boy' we don't want in this country.
578 posts and 84 image replies omitted.>>2790916Why should there be resistance? What good does it do?
The 6 Palestine Action activists who raided an Elbit genocide machine factory are facing a retrial after already spending a year in prison.
If convicted they and 18 other PA supporters will be sentenced for terrorism in addition to the publicly available charges.
Notice how I said "publicly available charges"?
That's because the terrorism charges weren't supposed to be made public at all.
The terrorism charges were a little bonus supposed to be kept secret from the British public by the state and Labour Party. A nice little suprise for us to learn after the fact, if they're found guilty for the Elbit break in.
Zarah Sultana, whatever you may think of her these days, used parliamentary privilege to reveal this information about the secret terrorism charges.
And even then, it is still illegal right now for the British media to report on this matter, or for anyone to air the remarks she made in parliament.
You can however find her remarks if you search foreign media, I've heard some Irish news sites have the video of her revealing what I've just shared ITT.
So yeah, the jury will not be told that the PA members are also being sentenced for terrorism, only about breaking into the Elbit building. In effect they'll make a verdict on charges they're not even being informed of.
The defendants themselves have also been banned from explaining this in the courtroom, in further attempts to keep the juries in the dark. Absolutely mental.
I am getting jew fatigue
>>2790855the masculine urge to cruise with the boys
>>2791334>Critical support to the remnants of the British Empire against American-Argentinian imperialismDown with it
>>2791334Whatever hurts our state, hurts our military, goes against and weakens British imperalism and ability to wage neocolonialism is good.
Anyway, that is not the case here, the falklands quote, it is just a threat against Britain and other European nations to get them back in line relative to the war against Iran, and in line with the NATO policy the trump admin seeks.
I mean back during the Rubio speech at the Munich Security Conference, the European ruling class were applauding his pro imperialist unlimited genocide on the global south rhetoric. Europe agreed then, they will agree again now.
Plus we have been involved directly and indirectly in the war against Iran while our executive lie about not being involved. (See:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_ySucsF6Yw)
>>2791334Argentinians STILL want these piece of shit islands they never had any presence in anyway? If so it's proof that third-world machismo is a mindset and you don't need to be brown for retarded stunt like this.
Hope Kveir nuke Milei.
>>2791334engloids should be forced to give up every island they occupy TBH. first based thing trumps ever done
>>2791351sorry did you still want to keep that imperial legacy? too bad welcome to the 21st century
Anyone who supports Britain having the falklands is not a serious anti imperialist. If you want Britain, our state to be weaker in terms of image and military should be against this. If you want an end to British imperialism and neocolonialism, you cannot surely support Britain having a TINY SETTLER COLONY for what fucking reason, a military base to project power in the south atlantic.
>>2791350True, they should all become "independant" (usa puppet states)
>>2791356Maybe places like the Chagos should belong to their own people, not military bases whored out to Americans and used ourselves right now against Iran.
>>2791356>usa puppet stateslike the britoids are now? they chug american cock more than anyone else
>>2791355it was literally uninhabited before europeans came. argentina is a settler colony too BTW. if they could have calmed their autism thatcher probably would have sold it to them back when nobody gave a shit about the falklands.
>>2791369>it was literally uninhabited before europeans camethis argument has never excused colonialism
>>2791371how exactly does it not?
>>2791353The indigenous people of the Falklands are the Falklanders. Critical support for the UK against Argentinazian kkkolonialism!
>>2791371The difference is the Falklands actually were uninhabited, not just depopulated by disease like North America and southern Africa. If the Falklanders are colonisers, who did they colonise?
>>2791374how exactly would it? you presented this argument first. explain how britoids exploiting the falklands for its strategic and economic booty is somehow not colonialism just because natives weren't involved? Are the spaniards suddenly not colonialists because they took empty bermuda? retard
>>2791380how exactly is 'exploiting' some uninhabited any different from a country exploiting a random part of the metropole?
>>2791385military bases? listening stations for intelligence agencies? ports and runways to resupply the imperialist coalition in a future war? tax evasion?use your imagination
>>2791392ok, and military aggression is bad but that doesn't really have anything to do with colonialism. why should argentina have it? so they can put listening stations there instead?
>>2791393colonialism has never been separated from violence. you are a liberal
>why should argentina have it? so they can put listening stations there instead?i dont care what exploited nations do. whats important is to take everything possible away from the imperialist gangsters raping the planet
>>2791393Probably because its like close to there coast lol, should Argentina get claim to the Orkney islands?
>should Argentina get claim to the Orkney islandsif they were there first then yeah I guess
>>2791395ok sure, colonialism is connected to imperialism but I mean the kind of 'exterminate/enslave the natives' that people usually mean when they say it.
look it's not a terrible argument to say that countries shouldn't own bits of the world that are far away from them. but it's hardly a consistent standard to only apply that to the UK.
>>2791403>but it's hardly a consistent standard to only apply that to the UK.would be a silly thing to do, america is much more egregious in this regard
>>2791439why are you giving exposure to this literal who then.
>>2791440I suppose i should shit up the thread with a hundred posts about transgender people or mass immigration instead, the way it usually is
>>2791439this is leftybritpol.
>>2791446You mean /TERF/?
>>2791442look a bunch of retired CPB/CPB-ML 70 year old geriatrics need somewhere to post while waiting out their facebook bans ok?
Zack Polanski is the uglyest man i've ever seen he look like early PS2 graphics
>>2791521he doesnt pass the physiognomy check,
which is why i cant support him
I do not want to support in any way the Empire that is the UK, but the indigenous people in the Falklands are the English and Scottish. Anti-colonialism needs to be applied equally in every situation or you end up with genocide, and so I cannot support Argentine claims on the Falklands.
>>2791439So close and yet so far. That’s nazbols for ya. Btw, I’m surprised that Academic Agent became a Stalin-stan despite being educated in Austrian economics. Criss-cross theory perhaps?
Fuck electoralism. Only trans-inclusive Juche can save Britain any more.
Falkland Islanders treat Maggie Thatcher like a god.
Very disgusting and bizarre to witness coming from a community that was raped and destroyed by her.
TERF "charity" For Women Scotland de-facto endorses the Tories
A) remember there are clowns here who'll tell you these middle class reactionaries are actually left wing
B) very funny that labour have bent over backwards to pander to them and only got backhanded compliments in return
In the abstract the falklanders should be British but in a greater-good sense Britain should lose them. Thatcher keeping the Falklands but giving away Hong Kong should be regarded as the rankest treachery in our history and instead she's feted by our should-be nationalists.
She is the greatest triumph of style over substance, the fullest vindication of politics as personality test over ideology or class interest: loved by cunts who, if they really believed their cunt ideas, would hate her.
>>2791751I think people need to come to terms that the fact that TERFs are heavily into neoliberalism and Zionism isn’t any coincidence, because let’s face it:
TERF-ism isn’t just the end result of embittered British middle & upper-class of the Gen X cohort turning into gammons because white female idpol is a sacred cow in Albion as well as resentment against younger leftists that makes them feel “left behind” due to their inability to question their priors what with being old and all that, or white middle class foids turning into such radlibs that they now are the far-right’s white women caucus, but also it’s also the end-product of a top-down agenda by plutocrats in Britain to push for Neo-Victorian prudishness and soft-Zionism under the skin suit of “women’s rights”. As shown by how radfems have been silent on the plight of Palestinian and Lebanese and Iranian women who suffer under the genocidal tyranny of Israel over west Asia, the overturning of Roe v Wade, the suffering of working-class women under the capitalist regime, and the killing of Renee Good at the hands of the ICE Gestapo, TERF-ism much like “radical feminism” are just different strands of the same messed up radlib ailment and idpol brainrot, and so it’s natural that they turn into reactionaries.
Not surprising as radfems emerged out of the rejection of both liberal and Marxist frameworks for women’s rights.
>>2791793It should also be noted that Glinner isn’t some fringe crackpot, considering how he is one of the leading TERF figures in the UK and Ireland as well as having connections with Alamo’s every TERF in the British isles.
>>2791793I have to defend bro liberalism here. Say what you will about market fetishists, they're not TERFs. If a trans person has money, the neoliberal answer is that the state should let them do whatever they want. Not a liberationist perspective by any means, but you can see how someone can come to it without an underlying personality disorder or lifetime of petty resentments.
Unique IPs: 22