/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

>>2807950
You're still an anarchist in actual fact.

>>2807951
Indeed. But the conditions of today make it necessary to be more anarchist than "anarchism", more communist than "communism".

>>2807950

That's cool ngl. I forgot the userbase of leftypol is substantially older than me, haha! Most anarchists/communists are <30 years of age, from my observation.

What's your next video idea

>>2802836
this person is going to start calling herself a fascist in a year tops

>>2807956
This is why you're not allowed on the bordy dumbfuck

>>2808143
>>2808143
> you're not allowed
I can go on there whenever I want.
I don't because you're a pathetic clique of reddit kids, you're sectarian as the worst tankcels on here, your in-lingo and "ironic" zionism is cringe, and it's literally a hugbox for cumtown-loving transhumanists on SSRIs. You will never be the Real Movement.

>>2808131
A tale as old as time

>>2807724
>My analysis of politics doesn't go against science either.
>Not going against science and being logically consistent and sound == science to you
<I had given the implication it had been thoroughly practiced previously and you ignored that
Part of being scientific is that it has to be practiced repeatedly as well to confirm it’s validity. You anarchists have not done that yourselves.
>Read God and State by Bakunin
The pedophile? I think i’ll pass.
>>2807817
>calling yourself an anarchist is very attractive to liberals because
It’s a very liberal position that poses no threat to capital, hence why it’s tolerated to a certain degree in comparison to communist ideology as a whole.

>>2808131
oh em jee! this is so surprising!!! i never would of guessed!!

Waste of time

>>2808131

Yeah because I said something that's impossible to verify on an imageboard

I have an anti-persona persona. You don't know me. You don't know if I said that to fit in as a cool response in the fascist imageboard. You actually have to pay attention to the ideas I put forth.

>>2808599
>You don't know if I said that to fit in as a cool response in the fascist imageboard.
You say it like this would make it any less worse. Kys

>>2808270
"Dialectical materialism has thoroughly practiced", how? Through the USSR? Lol. If something has been practiced before repeatedly to you, doesn't "go against science" (whatever that means), and is logically consistent/sound + correct, == scientific to you. A joke definition employed by sophists.

You refuse to have high enough openness to read something you think you'll disagree with. Midwit level autism score at best.

I was describing the breadtube pipeline.My 8th video is on this. What you're saying on this is completely ahistorical. Learn about the history of anarchism, especially regarding the massive anarchist influence in workers' movements.

The truth is that in public, both a communist and an anarchist tattoo on a person will be tolerated socially (the anarchist one moreso, and I can make a video on why anarchism is 'tolerated' more), but a swastika on your chest will get you escorted out of the facility, I suppose nazi ideology poses the most threat to capital then!

>>2808621
This uygha is 16 btw. Youre all talking to a 16yo westoid

>>2808612
The concept of detournement is lost on leftists.

Lamest fucking milieu on earth. No subtext. No reading between the lines. I say explicitly "I am going to merge the algorithms and end echo-chambers" and you don't start to think about HOW one would have to go about doing that.

>>2808624
And losing the debate. Address the ideas uygha.

>>2808117
I upload one video a week. The next one is coming out tomorrow :)

Let's just say, I will upset a lot of e-girls. The right-wing ones especially will seethe.

>>2808626
>>2808627
>I was just pretending to be retarded to le subvert :)
Sorry you're actually retarded. And literally a child
>DEBATE ME BRO
Waste of time. You don't matter. I have better things to do. I will however shit on you for my own amusement

>>2808641
Namecalling instead of addressing my points.

I know why leftypol was created. You retards couldn't handle the heat on /pol/. The fascists out debated you so you grovel here.

>>2808647
This you?

>>2808659
Haha, I knew you would make that joke! It was only a matter of time. I was thinking of it earlier today. I know I will get accused of being jewish from the right-wing as well. It is only a matter of time.

>>2808667
I was calling you a debate addict but it doesnt surprise me that a fascist westoid can only think in terms of whats jewish and what isnt

>>2808671
What? I'm predicting the responses I get from others. This is something that will happen btw. I will get a lot of ben shapiro comparisons made, and from that, I will get called jewish as well.

What music are you into Diod? Are there any shows in your area? Go see them. Dont waste your youth arguing with imageboard lost and the damned.
And if you still insists on sticking around, we have ongoing discussion on topic of yumejoshi drawings in our incel thread >>>/siberia/775087, please give us feedback if they correctly represent woman's taste.

>>2808709
This tbh, if you are going to engage in vulgar philosophical discourse do it once every two or three weeks max, learn a trade and go to the gym and stripclub instead

>>2808709
No shows in my area. I like this one Turkish post punk band. I also listen to a lot of classical music, but I can't afford to go to an orchestra :c

>>2808712
> stripclub
> learn a trade

I am not taking advice from anons online. I'm not taking advice from people I don't want to be like.

>>2808720
Ok then then stay in front of a computer wasting your youth

>>2808723
Reading books online. Do you think I just argue with people all day? Everything I do has a purpose. I stay only within this thread for a reason. I am bumping it.

>>2808632
your political program is impressive. making meaningless peple seethe. at least the ten that even bother watching your videos

>>2808716
>I like this one Turkish post punk band.
She Past Away is a nice band. There's hope for you yet kiddo. Learning to play an instrument and starting a band or solo project is a much better hobby than trying to be an eceleb. It'll be a lot less cringe to look back on when you're older. Try it and thank me later.
Also give this track a spin I think you will like it. (Oldschool postpunk from Poland)

>>2808621
>Through the USSR?
Smooth brain, why you think the USSR would be a valid answer to that question? It wouldn’t even tell the exact testing processes for it. Dialectical materialism has been applied repeatedly to real world concepts and situations many times over. It’s repeated application without fail in both theoretical and real world practice is a testament of it’s validity. You yourself haven’t even scratched it, merely mull over semantics to avoid your own deconstruction.
>If something has been practiced before repeatedly to you, doesn't "go against science" (whatever that means), and is logically consistent/sound + correct, == scientific to you
Actually fucking stupid.
<scientific adjective
<conducted in the manner of science or according to results of investigation by science : practicing or using thorough or systematic methods
Read more anarkiddie.
>You refuse to have high enough openness to read something you think you'll disagree with
Read Mein Kampf and get back to me on that.
>I was describing the breadtube pipeline
You were describing nonsense
>What you're saying on this is completely ahistorical
Stop throwing words out like they’re nothing
>The truth is that in public, both a communist and an anarchist tattoo on a person will be tolerated socially
Quit backtracking
>>2808647
>The fascists out debated you so you grovel here
Scratch a liberal…

>>2801999
Name?

>>2806629
holy pick me. OP is a certified minor on HRT.

>>2808809
I read later sections of Mein Kampf. The beginning is biographical slop, but it is a good read to learn about Hitler's reasoning. Read more, fag.

> It wouldn’t even tell the exact testing processes for it. Dialectical materialism has been applied repeatedly to real world concepts and situations many times over.

You provide no examples. Dialectical materialism is not "scientific", even by your own accord.

Actual midwit. Sorry man.

>>2808961
Diod :)

https://www.youtube.com/@diodtheanarchist

On your latest video, I would begin from first principles; what is humility and what is the role of sexuality in civilisation?

We see in myth, Adam and Eve become aware of their nakedness only after they gain knowledge, and so cover themselves in fig leaves; afterwards, they are covered in animal skins. Later, we see Ham cursed for coming into knowledge of the "nakedness" of his father, Noah. The knowledge of nakedness is not simply aesthetic, but active, for it said that Adam and Eve "knew each other" when they copulate, and so "knowledge" is associated with Eros, such that the "forbidden fruit" is the primary prohibition, and the initiation into apparent nakedness. We see in the writings of Freud, eroticism is not essential to the organism (such that libido is inorganic, as it is expressed in the Death Drive), and so it is understood symbolically (for indeed, all eroticism requires the vehicle of fantasy). He sees that civilisation is nothing besides the development of a primary repression (often ritualised as the prohibition of incest by totems). We see for example, the protogenoi, titans and gods as incestuous; brothers marrying sisters, and so on - but by the time we get to Oedipus, incest is reviled as contrary to nature in mythical narrative. Adam and Eve are certainly brother and sister (or even father and daughter, if we view Eve as generated from Adam's rib). Abel, Cain and Seth are thus products of incest, but we see that Cain (as the father of civilisation; e.g. the father of agriculture, cities and craft) attains a wife from outside of his immediate family (i.e. his mother), and so already in Cain is the development of civilisation by the traversity into otherness, and the prohibition of incest. Incest as the primary sexual union thus, must be broken to develop society.

The prohibition of incest by the regulation of mating also leads to further dynamics, as Freud views it - that where sex is managed from above, it also cultivates a monopoly; thus, we have polygamy by a "primal father" (e.g. Cronos) who is cast down by Zeus, and from whence, the union of marriage is constituted, to properly manage the competition of mates by monogamy. Thus, primary regulations creates monopoly, and this is further advanced by the institution of marriage. Marriage is fraught with internal contradictions however, since the wife competes with daughters, and the husband competes with sons. We see for example, that when Lot's wife is killed, his daughters seduce him, and he bears children with them. We of course see with Oedipus that the son sleeps with his mother after killing his father. So then, prohibition eroticises, and builds upon an original conservation of libido; Freud even says that machines represent the externalisation of organic drives (a la the alienation of labour). We certainly see the erotic character of so much industrial production in its architecture.

On modesty in dress, we see that Eliezer gifts Rebekah a nose ring and bracelets, demonstrating the luxury dress of the ancient world. We read in Xenophon (360 BCE) the presence of make-up and high-heeled shoes in ancient Greece. Here, the artificial already reigns, such that Herodotus (400 BCE) records the Enarees, who are transsexual priestesses in Scythia, and who do so by the mode of dress. So then, gender roles by dress codes are firmly established, and connote the body underneath, lets say - for this is the function of clothing; to reveal by obscurity (or what Lacan terms the Objet Petit a). We see this performed by Prometheus, who tricks Zeus by giving an offering of outward pleasantness by inward lack, but this is the structure of desire; an anticipation upon an empty object, the same way Aristotle discusses "catharsis", as a tension which is relieved. This is the Freudian orgasm, which extinguishes the erotic.

So then, clothing in general reveals as it obscures, and the more of what is denied, the more which is desired. This is why a scantily-clad woman is often more erotic than a naked woman. The purpose of humility then, is not to extinguish erotic desire, but to inflame it. For example, we live in a 'degenerate' society, yet there are less and less rapes, because of the abundance of effective prostitution. The older generation complains that people prefer to masturbate rather than have sex, and so we see a syzygy afoot; that the older people want a more erotic society, which means a more conservative society, by counter-inuition. We can then distinguish between the "erotic" and "sexual". Sexuality is a function of organisms, but eroticism is phantasmatic of the denial of sexuality, by clothing. So then, the first sin comes from the first prohibition, which creates the obscuration of sexuality. The more we obscure, the more we desire.

So then, when you speak of humility, you rightly attribute it to the protection of women from competition, and so also raising their price in the sexual marketplace. The desire to be scarce and exclusive, and so to want to be wanted is most understandable. Its harder for a man to love a whore, rather than the chaste.

>>2809953
Yes, exactly! We live in a more sexUAL society, and a less SEXY one! Eroticism in civilization is the only way to live with the 'sexual repression' required for civilization to exist and still live a happy life for most people, I think.

>>2809972
Yes; sexual vs sexy is certainly concise. Žižek as a conservative understands this most utterly; that there is a deficiency (e.g. a boredom) in positive excess, while what excites stimulation is mediated by negativity. An example is in how Žižek describes a male porn star who was impotent on set, and so who watched porn to get an erection. Here, the object could not cause its own desire, but had to be narrativised in its fantasy. This is also why all pornography has a story, and all sexual performance is symbolised. In terms of social discourse too, flirting does not work by direction, but indirection, and so euphemism and play reveal by obscuration, like clothing, which in covering the body, cause a desire for it. We see in animals also, the complex rituals of attaining a mate, like singing and dancing in birds. So, sexual selection is not rationally constituted (otherwise girls would like the 'nice guys', but we know they don't).
>Eroticism in civilization is the only way to live with the 'sexual repression' required for civilization to exist and still live a happy life for most people, I think.
I think that we should just ban porn, and replace it with erotic art. Porn is manifest uncreativity.

>>2809998
Yes, more sexy nude paintings please! And paintings of nearly nude women with drapery on them <3

If communists want to spread revolutionary consciousness, we can do so through attacking the porn industry. It will also help with algorithmic merge.

Diod!
I wonder what you think of this gentleman?
Can the urbanites be saved with the tedpill?

>>2814655
Props to him!

I think /some/ urbanites can be saved with the tedpill. Most are doomed though.

>>2815411
First priority of the urbanite going into nature is to burn down all the forests because kaczynskites are subhuman species traitors

I think the contradiction you're looking at in your latest video is between the red pill and the black pill. Clav is blackpilled, and so thinks looks determine everything. He is seemingly a man without hobbies or interests, besides investing in his looks, and so as you say, he becomes a wax statue of a man; a purely formal entity without content. Now, the red pill can be equally delusional, in imagining that by improving your inner life that you can attract women, almost magnetically, like the semen retention copes. The truth is that neither are satisfying of the whole truth because both are frameworks, and all frameworks are absolutist. These days, I am drawn to the blue pill; not because I think being a "nice guy" is a viable strategy of sexual selection, but only that the unironic mantra of "be yourself" is healthiest, since if we are not ourselves, who are we? We are something that exists for other people.

Now, as a sub-5 male, I have only attracted sub-5 women my entire life (e.g. conventionally unattractive, old, transgender, etc.) and so I see how the cards are stacked, that in a free sexual market, supply meets demand, and I think people just have to make peace with that. You attract a reflection of your own essence; if you have bad friends, you will have a bad life, and so on. The ancient device of "hubris" plays a part in this; when we imagine ourselves greater than we are, we suffer the error of our own folly, and transhumanism, as the highest stage of civilisation, demonstrates this fact. The denial of our own nature leads to misery. So, to end on a blue pill take; Clavicular needs therapy, not drugs. 🙂👍

>>2817237
Hey, cool it with the over-civilised remarks.

You have no intellectual value
I am turning that avatar drawing into porn
quit trying to do politics
activism is an illness

>>2817450
>Clavicular needs therapy, not drugs.
Drugs are the only true therapy, psychoactive drugs, not facial reconstruction shit

>>2819367
Thanks, I'll post it on twitter. Fix up the shoulder area though. You didn't get rid of the other shoulder I originally drew. And fix the collarbones if her body is tilted like that.