I have an anarchist YouTube channel.
I have a unique analysis on things. I'm not an ancom. You could describe me as an individualist anarchist or as a primitivist anarchist.
Check it out and tell me what you think!
https://www.youtube.com/@diodtheanarchistGet with MLism or at least Libertarian socialism
>>2802323 (me)
Listened to the vid and you might actually be a child fr lol
>The red pill is analysis first and foremost. Same with Marxism. In the same way one can be an anarchist and agree with the Marxist analysis of capitalism, it is also possible to be an anarchist that agrees with a lot of the red pill.>And of course, agreeing with some, most, or even all of an analysis does not mean that one agrees with all, or even any current interpretations of that analysis.>In the same way, you can be a Marxist but not a Leninist. I can agree with much of red pill analysis and disagree immensely with most red pill influencers.Incredibly funny stuff, off to a great start
OP remind me of a type of online poster, no extinct, that was very common between 2008 and 2018 or so.
The lolgo kuntbot /lit/tard.
>>2802334They still exist, the right wingers who try to desperately distance themselves from demented boomers with whom they share 95% of their political beliefs and brain parasites, so they make up these labels for themselves and namedrop random philosophers they heard about from twitter.
>>2802341AI voice.
>>2802345Nah it's my real voice. I'm not beating the anarkiddie allegations anytime soon. So what do you think of the points I made specifically?
>>2802326Yes. Those are my tweets. Problem? I love being an anarkkkracker
>>2802197I already addressed that in my "why politics has no answer" video.
Most people are goyim slaves and that's *because* of rulership. I am against all forms of rulership on principle.
>>2802376>Nah it's my real voiceCould you do me a favour then? Post a short audio here, for example reading your comment, but try to change inflection during reading, volume, whisper and shout, maybe cough in the middle. Things AI would struggle with.
I remember watching your post-leftism video back in the day, when I didn't read a single word of political theory and when my political beliefs was just LARP. Why did you decide to change channels?
>>2802395I got banned for promoting terrorism. Not even joking. Can't do shit on youtube.
>>2802380Alright kid, I'll give the advice that only authoritarianism socialism works, literally nothing else, especially for the third-world, also don't hate out with the degens of this site
Come to the Communization Theory Thread /CT
>>2802393And now you just made me sad. Jesus Christ girl, what are you doing with your life, you are letting twitter algorithm melt your brain. Do you think boomer who watcher Fox News 8 hours a day is of sound mind? You are doing the exact same thing to yourself.
>>2802401I mean yeah no doubt it 'works' better in the most literal sense of the word. It's easier to achieve and it scales better. It's just not what I desire.
>>2802404Awwwe thanks anon. I only started using twitter two months ago. I'm frying my brain only to help achieve my political goals. It has a greater purpose.
I'm surprisingly good at compartmentalizing things and not letting them get to me. I can see racewar and genderwar slop on my tl all day and it doesn't affect me. Probably because I already have videos in queue that I made explaining these phenomena .
>>2802405nta, but if you don't desire something that works what's the point?
>>2802408The joy of revolt against the modern world.
>>2802409But you're not really revolting against anything if it doesn't work tho no? It's just stating some random stuff
>>2802406>I can see racewar and genderwar slop on my tl all day and it doesn't affect me.I checked your twitter account, it clearly does. You make like 30 posts a day, and its all race and gender slop.
As for contend of your videos, you speak of things you clearly didnt bother to do much research on. I listen to you and its twitter speaking. Or youtube. Social media discourse hodgepodge. That is not to say you should become a digital hermit, but limit time you put into it, and curate the quality. Find intelligent honest people, not groyper engagement farms.
>>2802417If I can get myself to not need to work a job to live, that is revolt. If enough people do that, the entire system collapses. Of course, we would have to build our own support networks (mutual aid) to go along with that. My videos will merge the algorithms so this can be started to be done en masse.
>>2802418Yeah, I retweet/ quote tweet both rightwing and leftwing stuff for algorithmic reasons.
And yes, on your note. I could stand to put less time into it. 20% of the effort gives 80% of the reward, but I do want to grind this out for the time being. Don't worry, I have in the past taken breaks from digital media and I can do so again. Where do you find these intelligent, honest people, anon?
>>2802422>Where do you find these intelligent, honest people, anon?Wouldnt know really, I dont have social media. But I do lurk couple accounts,
https://nitter.poast.org/hellspatisserie and
https://nitter.poast.org/SedimentedGeist are the two I would recommend, have some insightful takes and literature recommendations, well read trans women into marxism and psychoanalysis. You might find a little classier social network through them.
I would challenge your assertion that before the industrial revolution, women were simply furniture. From classic texts like the Iliad (800 BCE) we see women occupy positions of power, in the Olympian hierarchy, but also in the Temples, as priestesses (after the Solar cultus of the late Roman Period, the divine feminine has been censored from worship, except in Mary/Isis). We also see the use of maidservants, and concubines, along with the central Matriarch of the wife, which is an historical advancement from earlier polygamy (such as reflected between Old and New Testament). Zeus shows fear toward his wife's nagging and so seeks to trick her, all while she tricks him by seduction. Zeus also shows fear toward Nyx (Night), a primordial goddess. Athena is the strongest and most primary fighter in the Battle of Troy, even defeating Ares using Diomedes. Plato also reproduces the Aryan mythology of a divine feminine in the Fates (e.g. the Celtic Morrigan and the Norse Norns). In the earliest extant literature of human civilisation, The Epic of Gilgamesh (2000 BCE) we see how the temple prostitute (a holy role in the church) initiates Enkidu into civilisation, and later is served with the Eucharist (bread and wine). So, "the oldest job in the world", prostitution, is not to be glossed over, and Marx further generalises all wage labour as extending from it;
<Prostitution is only a specific expression of the general prostitution of the labourerhttps://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/comm.htmWe read in Genesis the development of gender roles and divisions of labour, where after Adam and Eve are dressed, they are assigned (i) birth and (ii) toil. Xenophon (360 BCE) also situates man and women as operating different divisions of labour, designated between the internal and external oikos (household), which is to say, (i) hunting and (ii) gathering. Xenophon's text "The Economist" (360 BCE) is also fascinating, since it directly invokes the fact that women back then were wearing make-up and high-heels (Chapter X):
<I must tell you, Socrates, I one day noticed she was much enamelled with white lead, no doubt to enhance the natural whiteness of her skin; she had rouged herself with alkanet profusely, doubtless to give more colour to her cheeks than truth would warrant; she was wearing high-heeled shoes, in order to seem taller than she was by nature.https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1173/1173-h/1173-h.htmSo, the ancients can teach the moderns.
We have spoken of gender differences, but in equality, we see how Aristotle describes marriage as a "constitutional" relationship (e.g. contract) rather than that of a slave and master. With Zeus too, we see man disempowered by the sharing of powers by monogamy. So, monogamous marriage is the first feminist invention, which the Romans even saw practiced among the German barbarians. The power of woman in her usurpation of the man is commented upon by Romans (500-215 BCE);
<All mankind rules its women, and we rule all mankind, but our women rule us […] Wife, the Athenians rule the Hellenes, I rule the Athenians, thou rulest me, and thy son thee. Therefore let him make sparing use of that authority which makes him, child though he is, the most powerful of the Helleneshttps://lexundria.com/plut_cat_ma/8/<Suffer [women] once to arrive at an equality with you, and they will from that moment become your superiors.https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_World%27s_Famous_Orations/Volume_2/In_Support_of_the_Oppian_LawSo then, men have always felt oppressed by this means of equality with women, which shows the reality of their immediate power over men, beginning in marriage. So then, women have always laboured and had power.
>>2802408what are third-worlders are supposed to do then?
>>2802197>Get with MLism Failed dead ideology.
>or at least Libertarian socialismSynonym for anarchism.
>>2802420>If I can get myself to not need to work a job to live, that is revolt. If enough people do that, the entire system collapses. Can you expand on this?
Become a trot instead
Cute voice. Thats about it honestly.
>>2802443NEETing is the ultimate rebellion. You should become a NEET
>>2802437No doubt, women have worked throughout history. And thank you for the detailed post response with your history knowledge, anon.
But, I think my assertion still stands. Women slave away far more now than they used to. People spend just as much time on laundry as they did in the 50s, because people buy more clothes and wash them more often now. Except, in the present day, women slave away at their wage jobs. People now work far more than they used to. People are "busy" all the time in such a way that only advanced technology facilitates. My super cool redpilled anarchist analysis is that industrialization led to this, which messed up the dynamics between men and women (that's the redpill part).
>>2802420You are circling back to trying to describe something that works, by suggesting stuff that doesn't work.
You not having a job is not revolt, you still live and operate under the system of modernity, capitalism, and will need to survive. Any suggestion that starts with "if enough people" is dead in the water and a moot point. It's idealism
On your latest video, I remind myself of the comments made by Plato in Statesman, that by definition, the best form of government is a benevolent dictatorship, since the best people should have the most power (this is not an opinion, but a self-evident fact by the way) - this is somewhart regulated in Republic, where the monarchy becomes an oligarchy of ideal "guardians". All in all, Plato sees that political formation is inherently imperfect, and cyclical of perpetual class struggle (what Polybius later terms "anacyclosis"). The real reason politics has no answer is because there cannot be an ideal state made actual on earth, and so all states crumble into each other.
This is why politics, like anything, has seasons, of virtue and villainy, and so politics is impermanent, while as you say, things like ethics is superior to it. Socrates for example, regarded the fact of his immortality in the dignity of his own soul, like Christ. Being good is its own reward, since you cannot fear the death of your soul. Being good is better than being safe, and I think you may be expressing this in your video; that the comforts of civilisation come at a cost of the lack of liberty. If I was in charge, I would immediately remove all public security cameras, because when you have these zero-trust instruments, you are living in a human zoo, not an open frontier.
>>2802438stuff that works
>>2802443Yes. While the majority of the population will never become anarchists, the truth is that the economy needs people working/buying stuff or it collapses. If we created our own "stuff libraries" where we essentially put the principles of a socialist world into practice, along with other methods of mutual aid, we can become closer to this reality. It's far fetched, and large-scale, but that is true.
More realistically however is small-scale anarchy. I could buy a piece of land, have my /leftypol/ buds live together in it, and defend it with guns so cops can't enter. A free territory of our own. Anything is worth it to not be a slave.
>>2802470No, industrialization didn't led to that. What led to that was the creation of the federal reserve and destruction of currency, that ultimately led to lower wages, therefore more individuals on the familiar unit has to work to achieve the same end results. You're confusing technique with economics.
>>2802486Technological progress (material conditions) dictate everything.
>>2802479Yes.
And especially yes again on the part about security cameras.
>>2802470Well, there are two types of labour; paid and unpaid.
Advocates in the early 20th century promoted child benefits for mothers, such as Gesell (1918) who saw it as a Darwinist intervention, for women to select mates more freely. Later feminist writers spoke of paying women for housework, which would destroy the capitalist system (in their opinion). Introducing women into the workforce gives them a wage, but it also cuts the wage of men by default, and extracts a surplus by income tax. Regardless, do you think women should get a child or marriage benefit (e.g. a housewife wage), to reward them for this role, or should they not get paid?
>>2802488No, then why in Haiti people live in huts even when we as a society already discovered nuclear fission and advanced thermodynamics?
>>2802488>technofetishismThey had steam engine in ancient greece my nyugha
>>2802437Diomedes beat Ares by himself though
>>2802490Within the context of our current society, I think we should educate all people on prenups so couples can choose what % of the husband's wage the wife desires for staying at home. It depends on the family and their circumstances, ultimately. There can't be a general law made for it.
>>2802494Nope - Athena took control of Diomedes to allow the spear to pierce Ares.
>>2802470>People are "busy" all the time in such a way that only advanced technology facilitates>industrialization led to thisTechnically true in a historical causality sort of way, but also obscures social relations that actually cause that. Most people work more by virtue of most people no longer working subsistence agriculture, where obviously the amount of labour you possibly can put into it is limited by amount of land. However wage workers, tenants or slaves on plantations or manorial estates where they were subjected to direct management of land owners performed long hours of hard labour.
>>2802500True, and, no doubt, the only way you can send an email response back to your boss when it's 8pm at home, is if email exists.
>>2802448Thanks anon, at least I have that going for me haha
How old are you? Are you single?
>>2802522Anon here developing parasocial relationships
>>2802522I'm 19. Yes I'm single. But I'm not looking for anybody right now. I'm going to be celibate until I'm 23 or 24 until I get married. I want to reach my political goals first. Don't get too attached to me, only my ideas.
>>2802544Oh yes, I am familiarized already with both of them. Thank you anon :)
>>2802505Where the hell do you live where you are even expected to do that? Anyway, yes it created possibility for more top-down control, but also of emancipation from it.
I think this is my biggest gripe with anarchist and certain flavour of communist, they seek liberation through labour, not from it. Work is inherently oppressive. Even if we could all live as a pre-industrial agricultural workers, it wouldnt be desirable, what difference does it make to me whether satisfaction of my desires is constrained by natural necessity or social institutions?
>>2802550Cool history lesson article anon
Americans are not doing revolution, lol. They are too lazy and many of them can't even run up a flight of stairs with exhaustion. My small-scale anarchy is the best I can do. We are not recreating 1917 Russia.
>>2802558Health, first of all. Our current mode of production leads to many mental health issues and physical ailments. Did you read industrial society and its future yet?
https://www.thetedkarchive.com/library/industrial-society-and-its-future Okay so there's a lot of things I could criticize here but I'm just going to start with this: in what way is "red pill ideology" compatible with Marxism? Assuming that you're a woman, why would you embrace a tendency that is aligned with male chauvinism?
>>2802535>I'm 19>I'm not looking for anybody>I'm going to be celibate until I'm 23 or 24 until I get marriedGirl you are going to end up a divorcee by 30.
>>2802566Yes I did. It highlights why any anti-tech or primitivist movements are a futile struggle. If technology was adopted under pressures of convenience and competition, then creating circumstances which intensify those pressures will not lead to abandonment of technology. Cat is out of the bag, the only way is forward.
>>2802571Analysis can be blended with other analysis. I don't agree with the solutions that "red pill" influencers espouse.
>>2802575Yeah I know. We're not getting my wholesome chungus hunter gatherer form of society back. I identify with his analysis. He doesn't even really say to specifically go back to hunter gatherer society. His work IS analysis.
And what is this about me being a divorcee? :^)
>>2802585>And what is this about me being a divorcee?Do you know how to make a sandwich? Then is fine.
>>2802590Yes ^_^
Baloney is my favorite. And PB&J.
>>2802585>I identify with his analysisWhat about his analysis? That industrial technology leads to more domination? That has been a topic long before his time.
>And what is this about me being a divorcee? :^)If you are going to remain celibate until you decide to marry, you are almost guaranteed to end up in a marriage that will crash and burn within couple years.
>>2802596>If you are going to remain celibate until you decide to marry, you are almost guaranteed to end up in a marriage that will crash and burn within couple years.Dude, no one wants to marry with used goods
>>2802596Living life as primitive man would be better than this. That's analysis that enrages many people still to this day.
I'll probably have sex when I'm engaged to test the waters. Don't worry about me anon :)
>>2802601>Living life as primitive man would be better than thisThat is not an analysis but expressing a personal preference. And if living like a primitive is your desire, you already can. Throw you clothes out and go forage berries in a forest. You make video essays in spare time, you have no desire to live a pre-industrial lifestyle, at most you wish for a rural house with a large garden.
>>2802578But the Red Pill isn't "analysis" except perhaps in the broadest way possible. Marxists and the revolutionary left in general make use of materialist analysis to understand the world and relations between humans. The "red pill" is more of a form of pseudo-analysis at best where one looks for a satisfying conspiracy narrative for a particular subject, frequently overlapping with either manosphere shit or straight up nazism. There's no real reason to apply the term "red pill" here
>>28026171) Yes it is
2) Living like primitive man is illegal. You have to pay taxes. You have to buy property to have the space to roam around, which you have to pay taxes for.
Actual standard liberal tier argument tbh.
>>2802624There is a real reason, if you want to merge the algorithms. It's cool that as an anarchist, I can be in right-wing spaces and show them a different perspective.
>>2802627>You have to pay taxesNo you dont, you live off land with no income or contact with institutions. What you think a taxman is hounding crackheads living in shack in Louisiana outskirts?
>You have to buy property to have the space to roam aroundAssuming you are an american (or really from anywhere outside of Europe), there are plenty empty spaces around nobody is going to find you. And if they do, well getting chased off your land was part of primitive lifestyle as well.
>>2802628I hate to be the one to break it to you, but you're not reaching these people. Most people who are rightoids, especially the ones on twitter, have no interest in materialist analysis and certainly no interest in hearing from an "enemy" ideology. The right wing worldview revolves around worship of force for its own sake and of "natural" hierarchy, so as an anarchist it doesn't matter what you use to appeal to them they'll just write you off as a degenerate. That's of course assuming they dont already because you're a woman. The "best" case scenario for trying to synthesize leftism and rightism to appeal to rightoids is an incoherent schizophrenic mess like LaRouchite or Duginist ideology which appropriates leftist rhetoric for right wing purposes. Also twitter algorithms are hot garbage, you'd unironically have a better chance spreading your ideas on Bluesky, which is saying a lot.
>>2802647this. there's a reason why poeple have been doing this left-right synthesis thing for years and it never really goes anywhere despite every generation thinking its discovered the wheel.
in the 80s the new right was praising USSR. francies yokley parker was floating around the 3rd world praising people like nasser and castro. reactionaries are boomer brained morons who get heroin injections into their brains from fox, newsmax, facebook, social media. these ug-brained people have always existed in the 50s, 60s, 70s when they were listening to casette tapes, and hate mags. nothing new under the sun
>>2802647You'd be surprised. Virtually my entire audience is right wing or apolitical men. Plenty of people are willing to hear me out. I posted on an explicitly fascist imageboard too, and aside from half the guys telling me to post tits, I got feedback on my ideas as well.
Honestly, my opinions are quite standard for an individualist anarchist, but my reach to different political groups depend on how I market my ideas. I have leftists that follow me as well. I could be something like a more radical shoe0nhead, where people who disagree with my politics listen to me because they enjoy listening to me speak.
>>2802636I still have to pay taxes for the previous year that I worked lolol
The free spaces to roam around? The natural resources that were once plentiful are now depleted, and national park rangers telling me to get out of the national park wasn't a part of the primitive lifestyle either.
>>2802677>Virtually my entire audience is right wingCant imagine why…
>>2802684Yeah yeah exactly. This is a strength though. Leftists should not be preaching to the choir.
>>2801999> I'm not an ancom. You could describe me as an individualist anarchist or as a primitivist anarchist.so a reactionary that should be shot. Do the world a favor and do the deed yourself
>>2802691Very funny anon. Address the ideas.
Stirner used to hang out with communists and hegelians. So is not that crazy.
>>2802685Look, you will never gather leftist audience because leftism has a solid theoretical basis (whatever you think about its correctness aside). Nobody who even casually reads real books, be they marxist, liberal, anarchist, is going to be impressed by semi-coherent ramble of your videos. And I do not want to discourage you from making them, but do try find some academic texts relevant to the topics.
>>2802712Oh for sure, I will never stop reading. Do you think a more explicitly leftist audience would watch my videos if I mentioned certain leftist authors in the titles of the videos?
>>2802720I dont know, possibly, if people are interested in the topic then mentioning the topic in the title would help. I do know that if they click on the video and get hit by Fuentez praise and wojack meme within first 10 second they are not going to stay.
At the end of the day, if your goals is to gather left/right mixed audience, it is never going to happen, those two groups are not interested in the same things, you have to choose if you wish to cater to one or the other. Or dont, do your thing, but you will still end up with one or the other, never both.
>>2802732Yeah that's a legitimate concern. Ok, I'll cool it with the references to specific online content creators, unless it's a central tenant of the video. I probably should have just said "conservatives" instead of "fuentes", tbh.
>>2802720Leftists love pseudo-intelectualism, so yes.
>>2802732jack of all trades, master of none
>>2802742Legitimate concern, but I think I can carve out my own niche. There are no post left anarchist "influencers", after all.
>>2802747What about ancaps?
>>2802755I find them gross. I prefer to call them propertarians or rothbardians.
But they're welcome to watch my stuff too.
>>2802756Aren't you an stirnerian anarchist?
i would say go to /dead/ but it lives up to its name a bit too well
>>2802758Basically yeah. I just don't call myself that since it's kinda larpy ngl.
>>2802747If you are trying to turn this into a monetizable career, you would see better return on investment putting your entire paycheck into scratch-off tickets. If you have something that interests you, make videos about that, dont try to cater to some market niche in hopes of becoming internet famous, your odds of that are so low you might as well not consider it a possibility at all.
>>2802763Oh I know, I'm not expecting to make a living doing this. I care only for maximum spread of my ideas.
>>2802762Stirner was basically the father of anarcho-capitalism, so that's why I found it odd you don't like them.
>>2802768He really wasn't but ok.
Read the Unique and Its Property, specifically the translation by Wolfi Landstreicher.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/max-stirner-the-unique-and-its-property >>2802766Same difference. The ideas are not going to spread because you are not bringing anything new to the table, they have already been formulated better somewhere else, and nobody cared, because they are not very good ideas (as far as political relevance goes).
>>2802773I'll prove you wrong anon. Also, popularity != quality. L for groupthink.
>>2802769No, I read it. But what I mean, Stirner is closer to ancaps due to the high emphasis on radical individualism.
>>2802778 In that sense I can see that, but ancaps aren't philosophically coherent. They should read Tucker or Proudhon and become anti capitalist, free market anarchists.
>>2802777You are the one who said you want popularity, talking about market niches and audience reach. My recommendation is do whatever you enjoy and dont expect anything out of it. Are you in college? If yes, seek out some left-leaning student orgs, book clubs, anarchist gatherings, you will some more-or-less like minded people, work on projects together. Giving a lecture about post-left anarchism to a small local audience is going to do more spreading ideas than being just another voice in an algorithmic cacophony. And contact with real people will help you refine your ideas to make the video better too.
>>2802780
Yes, exactly! And thank you for that historical background, OP. I didn't know that about Victor Serge. I also knew that nihilism was a revolutionary philosophical current, but I didn't know about that connection that Marxism has with nihilism.
>The separation of Marxism, nihilism, and individualism is not a material fact. It is a dogma maintained by those who have not yet developed their own dialectical materialism. They have substituted the study of rigid categories for the study of motion, contradiction, and becoming. They have chosen a class in an RPG instead of engaging in the class struggle.
Yes, exactly. And I think merging the algorithms/ending echo chambers would indeed bring the revolutionary tradition back to a single, turbulent river instead of how it is now, in its separate currents (echo-chambers).
>>2802785Good advice OP. Ultimately, making at least these video scripts would help with talking to people IRL about these ideas. Everything is intertwined.
You are almost on the correct materialist trajectory, OP. Most of those who now presume to correct you lack the living dialectic required for such a task. They do not possess a developed, self‑conscious dialectical materialism. They have not yet undertaken the ruthless critique of their own bourgeois subconscious, nor have they mapped the terrain of their own ideological conditioning. Their attempts to guide you toward "the light" are therefore exercises in false authority, they reach for a lantern they themselves have not yet learned to light.
The contemporary left is populated by religious consumers, not dialectical materialists. They select an ideology as one selects a character class in a digital game Marxist‑Leninist, anarchist, Trotskyist and then faithfully rehearse the pre‑approved talking points, behavioral scripts, and sectarian boundaries of that identity. This is not revolutionary consciousness. This is the commodity form extended into the realm of ideas. The spectacle sells rebellion as a product, and people consume them. These individuals do not study dialectical materialism. They consume ideology. And in doing so, they naturalize a false separation between Marxism, nihilism, and individualism.
The materialist truth is otherwise. These currents are not separate streams. They are a single, turbulent river and any revolutionary who fails to grasp this is operating with a crippled dialectic.
The modern revolutionary tradition begins not with Marx’s Capital but with the nihilist fury of Sergey Nechayev’s Catechism of a Revolutionary (1869). That text, which called for the “merciless destruction” of the state and the total subordination of the revolutionary to the cause, directly shaped the Russian underground. Vladimir Lenin himself was profoundly influenced by the nihilist novel What Is to Be Done? by Nikolai Chernyshevsky a work that depicts a revolutionary ascetic who steels himself against all sentimental attachment. Lenin adopted the title for his own 1902 pamphlet, consciously placing himself in the nihilist lineage.
More concretely, Lenin’s older brother, Alexander Ulyanov, was a leader of a nihilist conspiracy to assassinate Tsar Alexander III. He was hanged in 1887. This was not a distant influence. It was a familial immolation that forged Lenin’s revolutionary will. The Bolsheviks’ centralism and ruthlessness were not a break from nihilism; they were its institutional expression.
The ghost of Max Stirner’s radical individualism walked beside the founders of scientific socialism. In 1844, Friedrich Engels wrote to Marx that he was “entirely in agreement” with Stirner’s The Ego and Its Own, praising the work’s radical critique of ideology. Indeed, contemporary dialecticians have argued that Stirner’s egoism is nothing other than “Marx’s communism seen from the first‑person singular perspective.” The abolition of private property is not the negation of the self; it is the condition for the self’s full realization. The egoist who owns themselves and the communist who abolishes exploitation are fighting the same enemy, the spook of alienated social relations.
Even the so called “illegalist” anarchists, individualists who embraced expropriation and direct action did not remain outside the communist current. Victor Serge, a participant in the Bonnot Gang, later traveled to Russia and joined the Bolshevik revolution. He was not a traitor to individualism; he was an egoist who understood that the overthrow of the bourgeois state was a necessary condition for his own freedom. Tens of thousands of anarchists fought alongside the Red Army because they recognized that the dictatorship of the proletariat, for all its contradictions, was a material step toward the destruction of all hierarchy. The dispute between the red and black army wasn't an ideological group, it was regional, factional.
The revolutionary lineage of Russian nihilism crossed the Atlantic and found a new home in the Black Panther Party. In 1969 exactly one century after its first publication the Panthers republished Nechayev’s Catechism of a Revolutionary. They were the first U.S. publishers to translate key Russian nihilist texts into English. The Panther leadership’s fascination with the Catechism was not an eccentricity. It was a recognition that the nihilist ethos total commitment, the rejection of bourgeois morality, the willingness to meet violence with violence was the necessary subjective factor for a colonized people to break their chains. Huey P newton himself said the book should be like "the bible to all revolutionaries".
Juche teaches that the individual is not an atom but a cell in the collective organism of the nation and the class. But this is not a command to dissolve the self. It is the recognition that the self’s power is multiplied through self‑reliance, the capacity of a network to produce its own food, security, and meaning. A solitary egoist is a philosopher, like neitzesche. A network of egoists is a force, a movement.
The individual cannot be free unless the collective of which they are a part has the power to defend itself against capital and the state. The realization that your ownness is not diminished by others but completed by them.
The separation of Marxism, nihilism, and individualism is not a material fact. It is a dogma maintained by those who have not yet developed their own dialectical materialism. They have substituted the study of rigid categories for the study of motion, contradiction, and becoming. They have chosen a class in an RPG instead of engaging in the class struggle.
A genuine dialectician sees the unity beneath the apparent opposition. Every example I gave is the living proof that the revolutionary tradition is a single, turbulent river. To separate its currents is to kill its flow. Communism is individualism, true individualism is communism. Capitalism suppresses the individual, falsifies their ego with spooks that infect it; these spooks need to be attacked and removed from our subconscious.
>>2802677I promise I'm not trying to be mean, but most of those people are primarily interested in you not for your ideas but because they see you as a vulnerable young woman that they can mold into some kind of based tradwife who will espouse their preferred form of rightoid rhetoric. They have little to no real interest in anarchism because their bigoted worldviews fundamentally clash with it.
But in general, regardless of political alignment, most people on the internet are not actually listening to political youtubers for "new ideas". They're either looking for someone who reflects the ideas they already have back at them but "smartly" or someone malleable that they can get to be a parrot of their ideas. This isn't to discourage you from making political content altogether, but that's the harsh reality of the situation especially as a woman
>>2801999>primitivist anarchistNo such thing, you're a reactionary.
>New Leftist YoutuberFascist thumbnails, fascist content.
>>2802544Just another Varg clone.
>Derrick JensenReactionary pseudo-intellectual academic, transphobe.
>>2802806this entire thread is bots and so are you fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off fuck off
>>2802806I am sleep deprived haha. Sorry. I am OP. hahahaha
>>2802801This is completely true. I've thought about it. But I also think this is my secret advantage. People will keep watching because they think they can "recruit" me. Being a woman is a double edged sword.
>>2802805Define fascism, retard. If you can't even do that, don't throw it around as an insult.
this whole thread is bait and i honestly OP is a bot because otherwise OP would he an absolute retard
>>2802827I literally posted my voice on here to show that I'm the person from the videos. But ok.
https://zzzchan.xyz/fascist/thread/13783.html#bottomThis retardette publishized herself on a literal fascist board lmao
>I even note in the video how I respect fascists more than right-wing "libertarians"/propertarians.>>2802814On zzzchan he also got thousands of replies
>>2802835
Yeah. Does posting somewhere make you a fascist? Define fascist, retard.
What part of "merging the algorithms" do you not understand?
No one has ever loved me, please give me attention
>>2802839>Does posting somewhere make you a fascist?You are a fascist collaborator anarchist pseud and will be thrown into a gulag after the revolution
>>2802840Very funny. Address the ideas.
>>2802844Yeah, because posting somewhere is "collaboration". Quit larping, faggot.
stinky butt balls poopie shit. and thats not just gay — its faggotry
>>2802857Remember, you don't actually know anything about me. You can't verify any of this information. At some point, you will have to pay attention to the ideas presented.
whys this person talking to themselves kek
>>2802863No, I've never heard of him before. But now I have, thank you anon. Is he an old leftypol guy?
>>2802859>The only class system I believe on is a distinction between citizen/non-citizen and foreigners.>Yes, I am a barbarian. 99% of human history was in stateless tribes, and it's far healthier than civilization, so I guess you can consider me something of a traditionalist. >Not traditionalist in that strict ideological sense. I mean, quite literally, I support a form of society that is far more traditional than this current one.>'m not a voluntaryist. I prefer reading fascist (like Evola) stuff so much more.>very socially progressive ancoms/leftcoms can either become convinced by my arguments (I'm like a bridge between left and right) or get pushed out of the left altogetherI got tired
>>2802865>Is he an old leftypol guy?Yep. Along with Bat'ko, Xexizy, Schnitz and co.
>>2802868Oh, cool. I've heard of the others, but not him. :)
>>2802866Address this
>>2802870 and get a trip
>>2802871The first quote isn't even mine, it was a response someone had to me. Can you read, man?
And yeah, I said what I said.
>>2802872thats what im saying dawg
>>2802836>I'm an atheist, but with this I can larp better about christianism than 99% of heretic protestantsAnd later on, if you like evola, guenon and all this bunch of esoteric autistic uyghurs you can understand the lore more easily. Evola has a book about the holy grial, which is a huge rabbit hole for schizos.
This bitch is obsessed with Evola
>>2802877That greentext isn't something I said. It was a response to me. Learn to read, faggot.
>>2802859Upload your videos outside of fedtube and I may waste my time watching them (a general good tip overall if you want people from imageboards to watch you)
>>2802880Yeah I'll crosspost on rumble/odyssey too. That was my initial plan, but I wanted to see how YouTube would go first. Thanks anon.
>>2802883That's not something I said. I don't tell people to kill themselves.
>>2802882Why don't you post to peertube?
>>2802886i know you wouldn't. which is why i did. fake OP
>>2802599As far as I am concerned, wife is not an entry level position. Why would you want someone with no experience?
>>2802887Yeah I can do that too. Plenty of options.
>>2802888Imitation is the highest form of flattery…
>>2802692Why should the proletariat waste its time with reactionaries that want to set back communism for thousands of years?
>>2802893so you're complimenting me? thanks then
>>2802894Because merging the algorithms would increase class consciousness. Leftists shouldn't only be speaking to other leftists.
I'll check it out tomorrow but tbh my expectations for anything on youtube is extremely low. Also this board will hate you
but +5 points for not showing face
>>2802544raw meat stuff is gigacringe tbh, I like the postciv crowd but the anticiv/primitivists are icky most of the time although I can sympathise with their positions
anyway this thread was weird, definitely more entertaining then every other varient of /usapol/. I have a few questions for op but I have to watch the vids first and right now I need to sleep
>>2802901Thank you anon :] I appreciate it!
OP is just a right-wing girl that serial repost FYP rightist opinion on twitter and who adopted a retarded idiosyncratic non-ideology on discord btw.
https://x.com/DiodLeAnarchistI would have sex with her obviously underage self but i'm just saying.
Anarchists, lmao
>>2802930i would rape your grandma if i had the chance and will rape you
>>2802934Yeah I'm a stereotype. I have fun with it though. Leftypol should lighten up :)
What's your discord OP?
>>2802941Dm me on twitter. I don't use discord that often. I made it because people kept asking, haha.
>>2802941@suck_AD1ckuygh4
Hilarious, you metamorphise the concept of the political into a fetishistic schema within the first video by placing it is as an arbitrary abstraction
Do you have any interesting opinions worth listening to
>muh ethnically homogeneous society
Is there any actual reason to think this would be better? Values matter so much more than skin-color I don't understand why so many people pretend like there's any actual merit to the "stick to your race" shit
>>2802942you have to open your DMs
>>2802948Yeah, my 8th video is a critique of breadtube, and my 6th is a takedown of richard spencer.
>>2802948calm down on the big words you might make OP (me) have a stroke
>>2802950It's a preference that most people have. I'm Albanian and I would rather to speak to other Albanian people.
>>2802952Link the breadtube critique
>>2802957I wrote the script. Subscribe to my channel to see it. I haven't made it yet. That's my only non-recorded video from my first 12.
You should transition and become my bulky hairy bolshevik boyfriend
Neat.
Two demands:
- Don't show your face. The world doesn't need more fleshtubers.
- If you need to embody your voice make a pngtuber model. Otherwise please just have the video show the subject you're talking about.
>>2802961Can you summarise your critique of breadtube here. What works are your referencing?
>>2802962we should as the same, one person.
selfcest is the purest form of love as we're the only people to truly understand ourself
Breadtube with evolian characteristics
>>2802963 (me)
Found the link, good editing style.
>>2802965It would ruin the whole point if I laid it all out here, but let's just say that I include a critique of solarpunk and the way that "breadtubers" have spread what they call "anarchism".
>>2802968Thank you! And don't worry, I am against being a fleshtuber on principle. Do you not like the self portrait I use? Some of my more later videos (not uploaded yet) have less of my portrait and more of a black screen.
>>2802971tbh I hadn't processed that painting was supposed to represent you until you mentioned it, but it's quite nice. Reminds me of early Patricia Taxxon.
>>2802956Idk for me the whole appeal of leftist politics is that it's grounded in materialism when you start bringing in feelings it becomes a lot less interesting to me. Ig what I'm trying to say is that I don't think race is a real biological reality when it comes to how we socialize. I see this kind of talk similar to how I view religious people or moralists.
>>2802981your mom would say different
>>2802978>>2802971I should mention that I would consider what you're doing with having a slide with the portrait to be a kind of pngtuber. It's not a little guy bouncing at the corner, it's still serving the same function.
>>2802950This is true and something right-wingers cannot ever be honest about even when they are actively proving us right.
Chud will always choose Based Brown even in a state of critical racial replacement over White Transsexual even if said White Transsexual want the ethnostate too, ideology will come first.
We have witnessed this time and time again in different cultural landscapes yet we still get sensible young emofag pushing third-position mystical jigaboo.
>>2802950More importantly, if there was a racially homogenous society its member wouldnt become not racist by virtue of having nobody to hate, but reorient their racism towards others of their own race. The disease is in their head.
>>2802990i was planning on making a v-tuber but instead of a character, it is my own puckering anus
>>2802966Ts so fire fr bro. I want already to transition and being able to fuck with my brother
We should get complementary phallos
>>2803038People pretending to be me on here are weird. You aren't fooling anyone.
>>2802982Yeah. Ultimately race is not a main focus of mine because with free association, you can talk to whoever you want anyways. Both racist and non racist people benefit from this.
>>2802990Yeah! It's like a more classy version of being a pngtuber.
>>2803049That's insane. You fetishize me, insult me, pretend to be me, and now you want me to be trans to satisfy your own sick desires? You should be ashamed of yourself. Get out of here.
>>2803049>I agree with Proudhon on women and maybe jewsTf is your xitter account
>Anybody who posts these political compass memes needs to get shotB-based? I hope you are against the political compass as a whole
>>2803053I obviously don't want you to be trans, retard. I could fuck all men I wanted
>>2803055Yes. I am against the political compass as a whole. I actually made my own, not retarded version. It's farther back in my twitter media.
My xitter account is for merging the algorithms. It's a little wild, but I stand by pretty much everything.
>>2803065It's a good thought experiment. My version doesn't have the x axis as the economic axis. I'll find it and share it with you guys.
>>2803080That's WASP coded of me hahaha
I've heard people say "an historical"
Forgive me for the grammatical error anon.
>>2803073Left wing economic policy being inherently anti-autoritarian decent-ish argument (although trying to map various real regimes would quickly reveal not comprehensive enough), but what is the point of keeping two axis, when they both represent anti-autoritarianism? Flattening it into a single dimension would make the compass more coherent without losing anything.
>>2803059
being attracted to vunerable children is bourgeoisie and you will be forced into a gulag once the revolution comes
>>2803095The purpose of the chart is to show how things interplay in the real world vs in theory. That's a useful thing for a chart to depict. Depicting whether an ideology is vaguely "authoritarian" or not isn't. How would you draw the chart anon?
>>2803099If that is what you want to show, why cut off the corners for being "contradictory"? Isnt that the whole point of the chart? Anarcho-capitalism should be then kept there, as it represents that incongruence between theory and practice.
>>2803116Because anarcho-capitalism has never been tried, and if it were tried in the way rothbardians like it (they celebrate throwing communists off of helicopters), it would be extremely authoritarian. I included anarcho-capitalism in the chart.
>>2803121What I am asking is, why is there "inherently self contradictory" area cut off from the rest of the chart, when the point of the chart is to map degree of contradiction? Why isnt for example bottom left corner coloured as contradictory, since anarcho-communism also hasnt been tried, and argument could be made it either uses autoritarian methods to coordinate economic equality (no longer being anarcho), or fails to enforce it and ceases to be communism.
>>2803133Because anarcho-communism isn't authoritarian in practice, lol. Say what you want about ancoms, but they don't rule over others.
Something that is anti-authoritarian in theory but not in practice is a self contradictory ideology, and vice versa.
>>2803142>Because anarcho-communism isn't authoritarian in practice, lolCould you give me some examples?
Or why is neo-liberalism as quite authoritarian in theory, its preachers consider it as the best tool to maximalise individual freedom. Out of contemporary political systems, fascism is the only one whose proponents would openly proclaim it autoritarian, as they are mentally ill cucks.
>>2803149Yeah, fascists are the most honest about it. Hence their place in the top right corner of my chart. Any political ideology that supports authority is authoritarian. And if you actually press a neo-liberal on their beliefs, it's quite clear that they believe that the boot to be stepped on with should exist. They will always argue in defense of authority.
As for anarcho-communism, I'm sure some ancom can spawn in here and tell you about all the cool anarcho-communist experiments in the past. Where would you place it on the chart, anon?
>>2803160Trying to measure authoritarianism "in theory" is just not very useful, everybody is anti-authoritarian, except for authority the consider legitimate. Submission to authority as a value in itself is uniquely right wing phenomenon, nobody else considers it a good thing. It is a personality syndrome, not a coherent political program.
>As for anarcho-communism, I'm sure some ancom can spawn in here and tell you about all the cool anarcho-communist experiments in the past.Yeah, they will tell you about Catalonian horizontally organized death squads and labour camps. I would not put it on the chart at all, as in practice it has either no been tried, or if it was it wasnt very anti-autoritarian.
If you wish to stick to this kind of theory vs practice analysis, I would go back to the drawing table and figure out how to operationalise them.
Also this thing is just not a replacement for common political compass, but a different measure altogether.
>>2803160For example you could use F scale to measure average autoritarianism, then ask them about their attitude to various real life regimes to gauge their actual political conviction (i.e. guy who sympathises with Nazi germany is going to be labeled a fascist), plot results on
y axis, and then put regimes in autoritarian/anti-autoritarian practice
x axis based on your judgement.
>>2803187>Yeah, they will tell you about Catalonian horizontally organized death squads and labour camps.That was an anarcho-syndicalist project.
>>2803187I'm not an ancom, but Durruti was based. Sadly he was killed by stalinists.
>>2803187A slave revolt is always justified
>>2803254Is not, historically nothing good has ever come from a slave revolt.
>>2803266If you want to be a slave and work for me just say so
>>2803276Are you a woman?
>>2803278No I'm a fat guy, but it doesn't matter since slaves don't get to choose, if you were my slave you would be doing dangerous work
>>2803280do you have a fat cock as well
If one is both
- an egoist and
- in favor of a drastic reduction of the global population to something much smaller than half
that is probably a contradictory stance, because one is likely to be in the vanishing part.
>>2803398The second is just analysis. It's not like I can personally kill off that many people. And realistically if you're a communist, the same thing applies. It's not just primitivists.
>>2803421I'm saying YOU are getting killed in that scenario you dork.
>>2803425You too bro. It would be worth it. The world population for humans should not be more than a million, ideally.
>>2802326wtf leftypol and pol summarized in one single tweet
>>2802326>anarchist cuddling with fascismmany such cases
>>2802393go and do something productive. read and have a peaceful life this type of bullshit only ruins life. atleast experience life till 24, then think about getting into this shit. First be a good human being, that is more important.
>>2802796stop simping for egirls anon, touch grass
>>2802406>I'm surprisingly good at compartmentalizing things and not letting them get to me. I can see racewar and genderwar slop on my tl all day and it doesn't affect me.I was also like this when I was 13 on imageboards and such places, and also reading reactionary writers. I'm 25 now and while those things never got to me, I kind of regret wasting that much time on this garbage. It didn't make me a reactionary but it for sure made me more cynical, grumpy, smug, confrontational etc.
I know you won't listen to me but I guarantee 10 years from now you'll look back and think "damn, I should've touched grass and played with the other kids". Politics is just not something you can grasp if you aren't part of the workforce. Philosophy is largely useless as well, very little of it is enriching.
Or maybe you'll make it big as a right wing grifter and collect 5k USD monthly on Patreon from paypiggies.
>>2803775>Politics is just not something you can grasp if you aren't part of the workforce. Philosophy is largely useless as well, very little of it is enriching.Why should anyone listen to you after saying this?
How many workforces were Marx and Engels part of? Lol.
>>2803781Engels was bourgeois and Marx was a journalist by profession and then, in practice, a freelance writer. Don't take this comment to say the unemployed don't count either. What I mean is that European children are not economically active and even if they were, it would have been for a very brief period of time.
>>2803782>>2803781By the way kill yourself for implying Marx wasn't a worker.
>>2803782Right, so according to you, Marx and Engels couldn't properly grasp politics. And all their appeals to philosophical tradition were useless.
>>2803783Marx was never a productive worker in his life - you are the one making this some sort of qualification.
>>2803787>productive workersSo teachers and medical doctors aren't workers either?
>And all their appeals to philosophical tradition were useless.Who here said this?
I'm so tired of talking to pedantic, confrontational retards on the internet. I have better stuff to do with my time.
>>2803791>So teachers and medical doctors aren't workers either?They don't produce value; they circulate value as much as Twitch Streamers or street beggars do.
>Who here said this?Your words 5 seconds ago:
>>2803775>Philosophy is largely uselessStop being such a defensive hypocrite.
>>2803793It IS largely useless and Marx is in agreement. I think your autism's dichotomous thinking is distracting you from my actual point.
>They don't produce valueAware.
>>2803801>It is largely uselessYour words 5 seconds ago:
>>2803791>Who here said this?You can't keep your story straight.
>actual pointThis was your point:
>>2803775>Politics is just not something you can grasp if you aren't part of the workforce. Philosophy is largely useless as well.Which is clearly bullshit.
>>2803807Consider going through a neuropsychological evaluation, the diagnosis could change your life.
>>2801999>SYNTHESIZING ANARCHISM AND THE RED PILLStop flashing memes so quickly, I want to read them but I can't. Also reading this thread, you remind me of Soph.
>>2803842Hahaha self love. You love to see it! :)
>>2803813My plan is to make my videos extremely rewatchable. Go through the entire video first, without pausing, then when you listen to it again, pause for all the references in the background ^^
>>2803745ᴉuᴉlossnW quoted (misunderstood) Stirner to spread Fascism. I'm quoting Spencer to spread Anarchy (in my future videos). Detournement is not something leftists fully understand yet.
>>2803873Have you ever read Sorel, by any chance? He's much more relevant to the revolutionary left and anarchism than people realize, but we've allowed him to be appropriated by fascists because of his hatred of parliamentarianism
>>2803875No, not yet. But I should. I only heard of him as a fascist theorist. Thank you anon :)
If only there was a strong leftyGOD to take my virginity… *sigh*
>>2803912I didn't even call myself that and men are fetishizing me, already. Fuck off dude.
gb2 twitter uygha u don't even know how to trip
You're just the girl version of the burger king foot lettuce voice
>>2803948What does that even mean
I've never heard of that meme before
>>2803955You are not zennial enough to understand.
>>2803957is it when that guy on 4chan stepped on burger king lettuce and got fired for it? I never saw the video of it
>>2803961His voice is like that of a valley girl. It's kind of funny. You think I sound like that anon?
>>2803962You sound exactly like this
>>2803432>The world population for humans should not be more than a million, ideally.Source: Shadow the Hedgehog
>>2803093I looked it up and "a unique" was actually correct, because it starts with a consonant *sound*. It's about the sound, not the letter it starts with. You learn something new every day.
>>2806139Well she is from political ideology catgirls so…
Or is she just a general communist? That's Rodina. Alunya very clearly dresses like an ancom. There is another, similarly short character that represents Anarchism generally in the series as well.
>>2806143Oh! I didn't know that anon. Thank you :)
She does aesthetically look anarchist though, so surely you understand my confusion. Also, I've noticed that ancoms on twitter use the hammer and sickle too (mainly the very very progressive ones). Is that related to this at all?
>>2802326<what is the difference between a 160 million year old comb jelly who possess muscles and a simple nervous system, another who is sponge who is an immobile filter-feeder, and another primitive multicellular organism that does not fit neatly into the sponge or ctenophore categories. We are primordial ooze descended, young, spiritually gifted curious genetic mutants under the sea who SHOULD be bubbling at one another accomplish shared, select goalsYou will never be a proletarian, you lack the class consciousness and militant discipline of willingness to be subordinated to a central committee 🪸🫧
>>2803868>My plan is to make my videos extremely rewatchable. Go through the entire video first, without pausing, then when you listen to it again, pause for all the references in the background ^^leftist content creation is like if a cow is like "what if I created really good sausage so that Porky didn't eat me?" Pixar style neoliberal ideology
Mods permaban everyone on this thread and delete it. Reported btw
>>2806161>You will never be a proletarian, you lack the class consciousness and militant discipline of willingness to be subordinated to a central committee 🪸🫧So based. I will never be a slave.
>>2806541Ie, you want to be a slave owner.
There are only two.classes, you either with us slaves or against us uygha
>>2806544What part of "I will not rule and I will not be ruled" do you not understand? That's anarchism.
>>2806546>neither washington nor moscowThere's no third position, chuddie
>>2806574I will make anarchism THE third position.
But I get it. You care about being on the "right" side of global geopolitics than you do your own ability to not be a slave. "Uncritical support for peoples' movements" is more important to you than actual class consciousness.
>>2806584Are you even politically active outside this YT LARP?
>>2806587I don't have the IRL chance to. And most leftist IRL organizations don't do much either. College campus bookclubs don't do anything worthwhile. The truth is that merging the algorithms would put a wrench in the "alt right pipeline", and that IS praxis.
Miss Diod, what is your opinion on this thread >>>/siberia/780352 and the moids question in general?
>>2806623>"hetero males are a political abomination because they're fascist "Stopped reading there. "Fascism is when bad thing" is a plague among the left. If women had the testosterone that men had, I think they would commit a higher proportion of grievous crimes. Women don't do extreme things because they aggregate toward the mean, and are very consensus minded.
The truth is that revolution is a masculine act. No misandrist leftist foid whining will change that.
>>2806589Okay. Thanks for letting everyone know to disregard you.
We have a saying in the Anarchist space, 'Politics is Action'. Your self-identification and youtube slop are meaningless.
>>2806629>The truth is that revolution is a masculine act. No misandrist leftist foid whining will change that.Confirmed for literal mental retardation.
>>2806637You can't actually address what I'm saying. Just petty insults. Typical.
>>2806629Wtf I love OP now.
>>2806658It's a broken clock moment
>>2806683>>2806658I think more people will realize that I have far more of these "broken clock" moments than they would expect. And thank you,
>>2806658 <3
>>2806697I'm well aware, lol. Obviously women will have to take part in any kind of revolution that takes place. However, if you actually think about the core of what makes masculinity *masculine*, it is an outward, unrelenting force. Meanwhile, femininity is stabilizing and seeks homeostasis. Revolution is masculine in its energy.
>>2806688Worst poster on this site loves you now, hope you are proud of yourself.
>>2806706How is he the worst poster? I don't know about specific posters on here. (Not online enough for that, haha)
Inter jewish nigger conflict btw
>>2806712How common are leftcoms on this site btw? I always got the impression that the radical online left was split into the two main camps of MLs and ancoms. And even on twitter, leftcoms seem to be quite rare and only have very small accounts.
>>2806719He is not a leftcom, he is just an annoying guy who uses that flair.
>>2806720Sure but I am still curious about the political demographics of this site
>>2806719This board is mainly made up of angsty third worldists and M-Ls, that why any deviation from their ideology triggers them so much
>>2806720I am, my horoscope said so
>>2806726Actually? There's also ourchan, which I know is entirely MLs, and I know about leftychan. I've seen a lot of anarchists here too, but I guess I'd have to ask leftychan about their demographics (though I know leftychan arose out of leftypol, so it is probably similar despite having a post-left section of their website)
Are leftcoms really just the ineffective centrists of the left? A small minority?
>>2806726I am a deviation from that and you annoy me more than any zigger could.
>>2806731I just refuse to support the 3rd world bourg in their fight "agains imperialism" and refuse to make any conscessionsnto capitalists in the form of "market socialism".
Simple as.
>>2806740So based.
Why don't leftcoms just become anarchists? (Funny question, I know)
>>2806743I don't like hairy armpits or hairy vaginas on women.
>>2806743Anarchists are not particularly scientific
>>2806748Bourgeois taste tbh
XD
>>2806751And what is that supposed to mean? I think this is the funniest cope ever from Marxists, tbh. "Dialectical materialism is a science", but anarchism is such a broad philosophical framework that you can agree with dialectical materialism and be an anarchist. Anarchists historically have been materialists (Bakunin's God and State is an example), and disagreeing with "dialectical materialism" doesn't make you less or more "scientific", lol. Marxists seem to use "science" as a way to prop up their beliefs in the same way redditors do. "I heckin' love science" until somebody shows them actual hard science.
>>2806761I was writing a lengthy reply but I realized that if I contradicted you in amy way I would instantly get banned so please keep shitting up the website
>>2806768Why do you blame me for the actions of the jannies?
>>2802535You should still gain some experience, otherwise you are kind of unprepared and oblivious for your first relationship at 23/24, which will then likelier be a failed relationship or simply a subpar one. It's also harder to get into a relationship at all if you are that inexperienced by then.
As an anarch-ist, OP, would you agree that we spend 95% of our lives in a state of anarchy? To me, anarchy cannot be a politics; it is an anti-politics; it is what remains after politics is sorted out. I associate it thus with the realm of civil society, which extends to the realm of commodity exchange. I would also add Marx's words here:
<This sphere that we are deserting, within whose boundaries the sale and purchase of labour-power goes on, is in fact a very Eden of the innate rights of man. There alone rule Freedom, Equality, Property and Bentham. Freedom, because both buyer and seller of a commodity, say of labour-power, are constrained only by their own free will. They contract as free agents, and the agreement they come to, is but the form in which they give legal expression to their common will. Equality, because each enters into relation with the other, as with a simple owner of commodities, and they exchange equivalent for equivalent. Property, because each disposes only of what is his own. And Bentham, because each looks only to himself. The only force that brings them together and puts them in relation with each other, is the selfishness, the gain and the private interests of each. Each looks to himself only, and no one troubles himself about the rest, and just because they do so, do they all, in accordance with the pre-established harmony of things, or under the auspices of an all-shrewd providence, work together to their mutual advantage, for the common weal and in the interest of all.https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch06.htmWe thus realise our freedom by this mode of intercourse.
>>2806767>but anarchism is such a broad philosophicalToo broad, veering to the point of meaninglessness.
>Anarchists historically have been materialistsHaving some materialist ideas does not necessarily make you a materialist yourself.
>and disagreeing with "dialectical materialism" doesn't make you less or more "scientific”It does actually
>Marxists seem to use "science" as a way to prop up their beliefs in the same way redditors doCool story bro
>"I heckin' love science" until somebody shows them actual hard science.Since you speak so confidently about it, you go ahead and fish out that “actual hard science” right now.
>>2802331That's actually true though
>>2806783Anarchism is a political philosophy against all forms of authority. That's why different strains of anarchism exist (anarcho-communist, syndicalist, primitivist, individualist, etc..)
The onus is on you to prove that dialectical materialism is a "science", lol.
Biology, physics, chemistry, etc.. are actual sciences. Not your modernist conception and analysis of history.
>>2806780No, we do not spend 95% of our lives in a state of anarchy. Authority is all around us and encompasses every aspect of our lives.
But it is true that you could call me anti-political. Anarchy as anti-politics makes sense.
>>2806815Don't let ML chuds discourage you, they're probably deradicalised /pol/acks who still cling to authority figures and state worship
>>2806815Even if we sleep for 6 hours a day, we are then spending at least 25% of our lives in anarchy.
<According to the annual Online Nation report by Ofcom, UK adult spend an average of 4 hours 20 minutes online across different devices like tablets, laptops and smartphones in 2024.https://www.digitalinformationworld.com/2024/11/how-much-time-are-uk-adults-spending.html?m=1Lets say that we subtract sleep and we are left with 18 hours, we then freely consume digital content for over 20% of the waking day.
>>2806815>Anarchy as anti-politics makes sense.Doesnt that make it impotent to actually enforce its ideals upon reality? Anarchism was the first label I acquired after becoming politically conscious, and still sympathize with it on philosophical level, however at some point I realized you cant change the world like that. You need actual political program, theory of change, concrete goals. Anarchist ideals are nice, but dont answer questions like how to manage global supply chains, how to distribute and produce goods, or what political structures lead to desired outcomes.
>>2806823The answer is quite obvious; global production is only able to be facilitated by states, so a world of anarchy could not allow global production.
>>2806827Yes. I also state this in my 3rd video.
>>2806830>>2806827Right. But we are not in the world of anarchy without global production. We are at point A, and want to get to point B. A is your starting point, you need to be first able to function at that point in order to get to B. So if you want to bring current globalised production closer to homeland, you need to build up infrastructure, acquire technology, acquire know-how, train workers. It is process that takes time. Process that has to happen under currently existing conditions of global production.
>>2806832Means and ends have to be connected. You can't build up a society with technology (that inherently requires authoritarian supply chains to exist) to get to a society without that.
>>2806812>Anarchism is a political philosophy against all forms of authorityCertainly not petite bourgeoisie authority.
>The onus is on you to prove that dialectical materialism is a "science"No “hard science” huh
>Biology, physics, chemistry, etc.. are actual sciences.No love for the soft sciences huh
>>2806948I love how you didn't actually address the first two points and just made a joke for the third
Or were they all jokes? They weren't very funny.
>>2806958I called you a hypocritical liberal on the first. You don’t actually give a rats ass about overarching authority, your class theory is too much of a mess for that anyways.
The second and last points were in fact addressments on you have failed to provide the “hard science” you spoke highly about earlier and the fact that had failed to account for softer sciences as well.
>>2806964Insults and not supporting the claim you originally made.
Prove that dialectical materialism is a science. You can't.
>>2803432So, your philosophy is:
<1. Authoritarianism is bad.<2. Billions must die in a gigaholocaust.<3. I'm an epic egoist.<4. I will also die in the gigaholocaust, but this is good, because it will be for the greater good which will exist when I'm no more around to experience it.And you deliver all this wisdom in redpill meme speak, a language as fresh as the mummified amputated dicks of the Wachowskis. The Matrix was a movie from
1999. Literally older than you. You come into the online spaces of adult men, many of whom are balding, and doing this reverse how-do-you-do-fellow-kids bit. WTF. I feel molested.
>>2806995To make my ideal form of society a reality, yes. Billions must die. The same applies to actual communism. It's not happening. Basic logistics disagree with communists and anarchists with their pipe-dream fantasy ideals.
I'm glad you feel molested.
>>2806984>Insults and not supporting the claim you originally made. Insult? No. Merely an apt description of your actual position
>Prove that dialectical materialism is a science. The world is material. All activity is a result of the motion of matter. Society evolves from internal contradictions. To say otherwise is to essentially believe in magic.
>>2807006>The same applies to actual communismCommunism does not require the death of billions you glorified liberal.
>Basic logistics disagreeBold claim with no backing to it.
>>2807030Is communism a stateless, classless society, yes or no? If you were to snap your fingers right now and make capitalism not exist, billions would die.
"The world is material. All activity is a result of the motion of matter. Society evolves from internal contradictions"
Yes, that is the analysis of dialectical materialism. Now what about that analysis makes it a science specifically?
>>2807035>Is communism a stateless, classless society, yes or no?You’re not beating the petite bourgeois allegations with the exclusion of moneyless you know? Anyways, yes.
>If you were to snap your fingersYou are failing to convince me you don’t believe in magic.
>billions would dieNo shit, really? You need a revolution first.
>Yes, that is the analysis of dialectical materialism. Now what about that analysis makes it a science specifically?Yeah no, you definitely believe in magic. You just think things happen for no reason. The chain reactions after the Big Bang? Nothing burger.
Tensions of the french revolution? Nothing happened. Everything we’re made out of? Complete bullshit.
>>2807043Yeah bro because we will have a world wide revolution that makes communism happen everywhere while keeping capitalist supply chains so 8+ billion people can still exist.
It's YOU uygha, who believes in magic.
I never said I disagreed with that high level overview of dialectical materialism. I asked you a simple question: what about that ANALYSIS makes it a SCIENCE specifically?
>>2807047>Yeah bro because we will have a world wide revolution that makes communism happen everywhere while keeping capitalist supply chains so 8+ billion people can still exist.Someone is particularly narrow minded with their imagination. Revolution is situational. If you read the theory, you would know that.
>It's YOU uygha, who believes in magic. >I never said I disagreed with that high level overview of dialectical materialismNot explicitly, but you wouldn’t be having this moronic conversation if the opposite was true.
>I asked you a simple questionYou asked a dumb question coming from you.
>what about that ANALYSIS makes it a SCIENCE specificallyYou sneaky anarkiddie rat. I’ve been thinking of scientific instead of science since the beginning of this discussion. It’s not a science, it’s scientific philosophical methodology you dumbass.
>>2807064"Dialectical materialism is a science" is an opinion I hear from Marxists very often, and you seemed to be to be agreeing with that premise for your argument, but okay, correct analysis = scientific to you. Great. What makes something "scientific" to you?
>>2807071>What makes something "scientific" to you?Not answering a question semi related to the discussion. Don’t have to, don’t want to. What makes dialectical materialism scientific you mean? It’s relation to science is one yet to be separated, and it has been practiced thoroughly with consistent results.
I have a question of my own. Do you think existence is material?
>>2807086> It’s relation to science is one yet to be separated, and it has been practiced thoroughly with consistent results. What the hell does that even mean regarding dialectical materialism?
>>2807094>What the hell does that even mean regarding dialectical materialism?It means it doesn’t go against science and it doesn’t contradict itself. It’s logically consistent and sound.
>>2807099Something being logically consistent and sound doesn't make it "scientific"
>>2806565Posting on leftypol so that tracks
>>2807100>Something being logically consistent and sound doesn't make it "scientific- Repeatedly, it does. As I said earlier (the part you cropped out), it doesn’t go against the sciences. Therefore, it’s usability by the sciences remains fully. I had given the implication it had been thoroughly practiced previously and you ignored that. Of course.
- You didn’t answer my question
Anarchism remains a broad meaningless spectrum of petulant petite bourgeois liberal teenager ideologies.
You know what would be a cool youtube series. a deep dive into the politics of video games like final fantasy or the tales of series
>>2807336Definitely would be interested in the politics of final fantasy series
>>2807337i think it's a pretty cool idea
>>2807336>>2807337FF12 would be a good starting point. It has a suprisingly mature and nuanced story for an FF game, where the
villain is a kind of Prometheus who wants to steal nuclear power and nuclear bombs from powerful godlike beings who manipulate humanity >>2807335My analysis of politics doesn't go against science either. I guess Diod is "scientific", lmao. Not going against science and being logically consistent and sound == science to you. Great!
The world is material. Read God and State by Bakunin, faggot.
>>2807724Not going against science and being logically consistent and sound == scientific to you. Great!
Fixed typo but you clearly understand the point.
>>2807724>>2807724>You could describe me as an individualist anarchist or as a primitivist anarchist.>>2807724>My analysis of politics doesn't go against science either.Which is it kid? Read Freddy Perlman or something
And check out:
>>>/dead/ >>2807757/dead/ seems goated. Thanks anon!
>>2807762No prob champ, hope you enjoy
>>2806743>Why don't leftcoms just become anarchists?A lot of us were anarchists for a long time and still lurk around in anarchist spaces spreading subversion and challenging the reformist, nationalist, and liberal positions which can be found there. It's not a question of anarchism vs marxism or authoritarianism vs anti-authoritarianism, it's a question of revolutionaries vs counterrevolutionary opportunists
>>2807806Interesting. Tbf, calling yourself an anarchist is very attractive to liberals because you don't have to deal with the baggage of the USSR from calling yourself a communist outright. It's an easy way to declare yourself as a radical. Anarchism has become "safe edgy".
>>2807817>Tbf, calling yourself an anarchist is very attractive to liberalsYeah sometimes I still call myself an anarchist to get laid at a crust show or an art exhibition.
Anarchists and anarchopunks are my crew they just have bad theory and I've moved on to better theory.
>>2807828Implying you're a liberal kekw ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
>>2806947Yeah, connected causally, not means = ends.
>>2807855I still don't fully understand your ideological position, tbh. What specific label do you call yourself?
>>2807860Internationalist (anationalist) communist
>>2807867Interesting
All communists are internationalists though, it's just that you have to focus on the class struggle in your country first.
>>2807867not an ideology (ideology means false consciousness) or a label btw. My comrades and I are simply communists who uphold the intransigent principles of communism
>>2807872>your countryWhat country? The proletariat has no country. I have lived all over the world and my struggle is the global struggle of the proletariat
i luv nu leftypol. foid teen pseud rambles on about her frankenstein of idealist ideologies >300 replies without any substance whatsoever.
>>2807883You can't actually address any of my arguments lol
>>2807885>"I think the ideal for society is an ethnically homogeneous tribe"Kinda sus tbh. Embrace globohomo
>>2807890what are you trying to get at here? this?:
>and first of all on a national scaleis simply outdated. Only a global proletarian movement can abolish capital.
>>2807893nothing ever happens.
>>2807898Things are always happening. The problem is how to make happenings extend
>>2807904Algorithmic merge. Everybody must be exposed to communist viewpoints AND vice versa.
>>2807912It's not simply a battle of ideas. Positions change more often due to material conditions than ideological persuasions. The class moves organically in reaction to the stimuli. Revolutionary activity is more about pointing out the pitfalls than it is about expounding the end-point.
>>2807925You became a communist because of things you saw online lol
>>2807941Not at all. I've always been a communist (even when I called myself an anarchist) because of my material experiences IRL. The internet was not so all-pervasive when I was your age, it was not easy to find texts or communicate with comrades without direct IRL contact. We met at demos, sometimes in jail, discussed face-to-face and passed each other the books and zines which were available.
>>2807950You're still an anarchist in actual fact.
>>2807951Indeed. But the conditions of today make it necessary to be more anarchist than "anarchism", more communist than "communism".
>>2807950That's cool ngl. I forgot the userbase of leftypol is substantially older than me, haha! Most anarchists/communists are <30 years of age, from my observation.
>>2807956This is why you're not allowed on the bordy dumbfuck
>>2808143>>2808143> you're not allowedI can go on there whenever I want.
I don't because you're a pathetic clique of reddit kids, you're sectarian as the worst tankcels on here, your in-lingo and "ironic" zionism is cringe, and it's literally a hugbox for cumtown-loving transhumanists on SSRIs. You will never be the Real Movement.
>>2807724>My analysis of politics doesn't go against science either.>Not going against science and being logically consistent and sound == science to you<I had given the implication it had been thoroughly practiced previously and you ignored thatPart of being scientific is that it has to be practiced repeatedly as well to confirm it’s validity. You anarchists have not done that yourselves.
>Read God and State by BakuninThe pedophile? I think i’ll pass.
>>2807817>calling yourself an anarchist is very attractive to liberals because It’s a very liberal position that poses no threat to capital, hence why it’s tolerated to a certain degree in comparison to communist ideology as a whole.
>>2808131oh em jee! this is so surprising!!! i never would of guessed!!
Waste of time
>X DAYS LATER, PETTY BOURG SPAM THREAD FOR SOME PSEUD IS STILL BUMPING
>MEANWHILE EVERY THEORY THREAD GETS FLOODED WITH Agent KochinskiITE TIER "CONTRIBUTIONS" AND SLID TO BOTTOM BY GEOPOL NEWS ADDICT GENERALS. ZERO ACTIVITY ON /EDU/. PORN AND /POL/ POSTS EVERY MINUTE ON /SIBERIA/.
>>2808131Yeah because I said something that's impossible to verify on an imageboard
I have an anti-persona persona. You don't know me. You don't know if I said that to fit in as a cool response in the fascist imageboard. You actually have to pay attention to the ideas I put forth.
>>2808599>You don't know if I said that to fit in as a cool response in the fascist imageboard.You say it like this would make it any less worse. Kys
>>2808270"Dialectical materialism has thoroughly practiced", how? Through the USSR? Lol. If something has been practiced before repeatedly to you, doesn't "go against science" (whatever that means), and is logically consistent/sound + correct, == scientific to you. A joke definition employed by sophists.
You refuse to have high enough openness to read something you think you'll disagree with. Midwit level autism score at best.
I was describing the breadtube pipeline.My 8th video is on this. What you're saying on this is completely ahistorical. Learn about the history of anarchism, especially regarding the massive anarchist influence in workers' movements.
The truth is that in public, both a communist and an anarchist tattoo on a person will be tolerated socially (the anarchist one moreso, and I can make a video on why anarchism is 'tolerated' more), but a swastika on your chest will get you escorted out of the facility, I suppose nazi ideology poses the most threat to capital then!
>>2808621This uygha is 16 btw. Youre all talking to a 16yo westoid
>>2808612The concept of detournement is lost on leftists.
Lamest fucking milieu on earth. No subtext. No reading between the lines. I say explicitly "I am going to merge the algorithms and end echo-chambers" and you don't start to think about HOW one would have to go about doing that.
>>2808624And losing the debate. Address the ideas uygha.
>>2808117I upload one video a week. The next one is coming out tomorrow :)
Let's just say, I will upset a lot of e-girls. The right-wing ones especially will seethe.
>>2808626>>2808627>I was just pretending to be retarded to le subvert :)Sorry you're actually retarded. And literally a child
>DEBATE ME BROWaste of time. You don't matter. I have better things to do. I will however shit on you for my own amusement
>>2808641Namecalling instead of addressing my points.
I know why leftypol was created. You retards couldn't handle the heat on /pol/. The fascists out debated you so you grovel here.
>>2808659Haha, I knew you would make that joke! It was only a matter of time. I was thinking of it earlier today. I know I will get accused of being jewish from the right-wing as well. It is only a matter of time.
>>2808667I was calling you a debate addict but it doesnt surprise me that a fascist westoid can only think in terms of whats jewish and what isnt
>>2808671What? I'm predicting the responses I get from others. This is something that will happen btw. I will get a lot of ben shapiro comparisons made, and from that, I will get called jewish as well.
What music are you into Diod? Are there any shows in your area? Go see them. Dont waste your youth arguing with imageboard lost and the damned.
And if you still insists on sticking around, we have ongoing discussion on topic of yumejoshi drawings in our incel thread
>>>/siberia/775087, please give us feedback if they correctly represent woman's taste.
>>2808709This tbh, if you are going to engage in vulgar philosophical discourse do it once every two or three weeks max, learn a trade and go to the gym and stripclub instead
>>2808709No shows in my area. I like this one Turkish post punk band. I also listen to a lot of classical music, but I can't afford to go to an orchestra :c
>>2808712> stripclub> learn a tradeI am not taking advice from anons online. I'm not taking advice from people I don't want to be like.
>>2808720Ok then then stay in front of a computer wasting your youth
>>2808723Reading books online. Do you think I just argue with people all day? Everything I do has a purpose. I stay only within this thread for a reason. I am bumping it.
>>2808632your political program is impressive. making meaningless peple seethe. at least the ten that even bother watching your videos
>>2808716>I like this one Turkish post punk band.She Past Away is a nice band. There's hope for you yet kiddo. Learning to play an instrument and starting a band or solo project is a much better hobby than trying to be an eceleb. It'll be a lot less cringe to look back on when you're older. Try it and thank me later.
Also give this track a spin I think you will like it. (Oldschool postpunk from Poland)
>>2808621>Through the USSR? Smooth brain, why you think the USSR would be a valid answer to that question? It wouldn’t even tell the exact testing processes for it. Dialectical materialism has been applied repeatedly to real world concepts and situations many times over. It’s repeated application without fail in both theoretical and real world practice is a testament of it’s validity. You yourself haven’t even scratched it, merely mull over semantics to avoid your own deconstruction.
>If something has been practiced before repeatedly to you, doesn't "go against science" (whatever that means), and is logically consistent/sound + correct, == scientific to youActually fucking stupid.
<scientific adjective<conducted in the manner of science or according to results of investigation by science : practicing or using thorough or systematic methodsRead more anarkiddie.
>You refuse to have high enough openness to read something you think you'll disagree withRead Mein Kampf and get back to me on that.
>I was describing the breadtube pipelineYou were describing nonsense
>What you're saying on this is completely ahistoricalStop throwing words out like they’re nothing
>The truth is that in public, both a communist and an anarchist tattoo on a person will be tolerated sociallyQuit backtracking
>>2808647>The fascists out debated you so you grovel hereScratch a liberal…
>>2806629holy pick me. OP is a certified minor on HRT.
>>2808809I read later sections of Mein Kampf. The beginning is biographical slop, but it is a good read to learn about Hitler's reasoning. Read more, fag.
> It wouldn’t even tell the exact testing processes for it. Dialectical materialism has been applied repeatedly to real world concepts and situations many times over. You provide no examples. Dialectical materialism is not "scientific", even by your own accord.
Actual midwit. Sorry man.
On your latest video, I would begin from first principles; what is humility and what is the role of sexuality in civilisation?
We see in myth, Adam and Eve become aware of their nakedness only after they gain knowledge, and so cover themselves in fig leaves; afterwards, they are covered in animal skins. Later, we see Ham cursed for coming into knowledge of the "nakedness" of his father, Noah. The knowledge of nakedness is not simply aesthetic, but active, for it said that Adam and Eve "knew each other" when they copulate, and so "knowledge" is associated with Eros, such that the "forbidden fruit" is the primary prohibition, and the initiation into apparent nakedness. We see in the writings of Freud, eroticism is not essential to the organism (such that libido is inorganic, as it is expressed in the Death Drive), and so it is understood symbolically (for indeed, all eroticism requires the vehicle of fantasy). He sees that civilisation is nothing besides the development of a primary repression (often ritualised as the prohibition of incest by totems). We see for example, the protogenoi, titans and gods as incestuous; brothers marrying sisters, and so on - but by the time we get to Oedipus, incest is reviled as contrary to nature in mythical narrative. Adam and Eve are certainly brother and sister (or even father and daughter, if we view Eve as generated from Adam's rib). Abel, Cain and Seth are thus products of incest, but we see that Cain (as the father of civilisation; e.g. the father of agriculture, cities and craft) attains a wife from outside of his immediate family (i.e. his mother), and so already in Cain is the development of civilisation by the traversity into otherness, and the prohibition of incest. Incest as the primary sexual union thus, must be broken to develop society.
The prohibition of incest by the regulation of mating also leads to further dynamics, as Freud views it - that where sex is managed from above, it also cultivates a monopoly; thus, we have polygamy by a "primal father" (e.g. Cronos) who is cast down by Zeus, and from whence, the union of marriage is constituted, to properly manage the competition of mates by monogamy. Thus, primary regulations creates monopoly, and this is further advanced by the institution of marriage. Marriage is fraught with internal contradictions however, since the wife competes with daughters, and the husband competes with sons. We see for example, that when Lot's wife is killed, his daughters seduce him, and he bears children with them. We of course see with Oedipus that the son sleeps with his mother after killing his father. So then, prohibition eroticises, and builds upon an original conservation of libido; Freud even says that machines represent the externalisation of organic drives (a la the alienation of labour). We certainly see the erotic character of so much industrial production in its architecture.
On modesty in dress, we see that Eliezer gifts Rebekah a nose ring and bracelets, demonstrating the luxury dress of the ancient world. We read in Xenophon (360 BCE) the presence of make-up and high-heeled shoes in ancient Greece. Here, the artificial already reigns, such that Herodotus (400 BCE) records the Enarees, who are transsexual priestesses in Scythia, and who do so by the mode of dress. So then, gender roles by dress codes are firmly established, and connote the body underneath, lets say - for this is the function of clothing; to reveal by obscurity (or what Lacan terms the Objet Petit a). We see this performed by Prometheus, who tricks Zeus by giving an offering of outward pleasantness by inward lack, but this is the structure of desire; an anticipation upon an empty object, the same way Aristotle discusses "catharsis", as a tension which is relieved. This is the Freudian orgasm, which extinguishes the erotic.
So then, clothing in general reveals as it obscures, and the more of what is denied, the more which is desired. This is why a scantily-clad woman is often more erotic than a naked woman. The purpose of humility then, is not to extinguish erotic desire, but to inflame it. For example, we live in a 'degenerate' society, yet there are less and less rapes, because of the abundance of effective prostitution. The older generation complains that people prefer to masturbate rather than have sex, and so we see a syzygy afoot; that the older people want a more erotic society, which means a more conservative society, by counter-inuition. We can then distinguish between the "erotic" and "sexual". Sexuality is a function of organisms, but eroticism is phantasmatic of the denial of sexuality, by clothing. So then, the first sin comes from the first prohibition, which creates the obscuration of sexuality. The more we obscure, the more we desire.
So then, when you speak of humility, you rightly attribute it to the protection of women from competition, and so also raising their price in the sexual marketplace. The desire to be scarce and exclusive, and so to want to be wanted is most understandable. Its harder for a man to love a whore, rather than the chaste.
>>2809953Yes, exactly! We live in a more sexUAL society, and a less SEXY one! Eroticism in civilization is the only way to live with the 'sexual repression' required for civilization to exist and still live a happy life for most people, I think.
>>2809972Yes; sexual vs sexy is certainly concise. Žižek as a conservative understands this most utterly; that there is a deficiency (e.g. a boredom) in positive excess, while what excites stimulation is mediated by negativity. An example is in how Žižek describes a male porn star who was impotent on set, and so who watched porn to get an erection. Here, the object could not cause its own desire, but had to be narrativised in its fantasy. This is also why all pornography has a story, and all sexual performance is symbolised. In terms of social discourse too, flirting does not work by direction, but indirection, and so euphemism and play reveal by obscuration, like clothing, which in covering the body, cause a desire for it. We see in animals also, the complex rituals of attaining a mate, like singing and dancing in birds. So, sexual selection is not rationally constituted (otherwise girls would like the 'nice guys', but we know they don't).
>Eroticism in civilization is the only way to live with the 'sexual repression' required for civilization to exist and still live a happy life for most people, I think.I think that we should just ban porn, and replace it with erotic art. Porn is manifest uncreativity.
>>2809998Yes, more sexy nude paintings please! And paintings of nearly nude women with drapery on them <3
If communists want to spread revolutionary consciousness, we can do so through attacking the porn industry. It will also help with algorithmic merge.
>>2814655Props to him!
I think /some/ urbanites can be saved with the tedpill. Most are doomed though.
>>2815411First priority of the urbanite going into nature is to burn down all the forests because kaczynskites are subhuman species traitors
I think the contradiction you're looking at in your latest video is between the red pill and the black pill. Clav is blackpilled, and so thinks looks determine everything. He is seemingly a man without hobbies or interests, besides investing in his looks, and so as you say, he becomes a wax statue of a man; a purely formal entity without content. Now, the red pill can be equally delusional, in imagining that by improving your inner life that you can attract women, almost magnetically, like the semen retention copes. The truth is that neither are satisfying of the whole truth because both are frameworks, and all frameworks are absolutist. These days, I am drawn to the blue pill; not because I think being a "nice guy" is a viable strategy of sexual selection, but only that the unironic mantra of "be yourself" is healthiest, since if we are not ourselves, who are we? We are something that exists for other people.
Now, as a sub-5 male, I have only attracted sub-5 women my entire life (e.g. conventionally unattractive, old, transgender, etc.) and so I see how the cards are stacked, that in a free sexual market, supply meets demand, and I think people just have to make peace with that. You attract a reflection of your own essence; if you have bad friends, you will have a bad life, and so on. The ancient device of "hubris" plays a part in this; when we imagine ourselves greater than we are, we suffer the error of our own folly, and transhumanism, as the highest stage of civilisation, demonstrates this fact. The denial of our own nature leads to misery. So, to end on a blue pill take; Clavicular needs therapy, not drugs. 🙂👍
>>2817237Hey, cool it with the over-civilised remarks.
>>2817450>Clavicular needs therapy, not drugs.Drugs are the only true therapy, psychoactive drugs, not facial reconstruction shit
>>2819367Thanks, I'll post it on twitter. Fix up the shoulder area though. You didn't get rid of the other shoulder I originally drew. And fix the collarbones if her body is tilted like that.
Unique IPs: 109