>>2865382that's a cool opinion but I actually do think we need to stand up against the outright assault on LGBT by popular society. maybe if it was 10 years ago I would have agreed with you. there wasn't even any corporations there anyways, all local organisations like CAB, drug program, charities, etc etc.
>>2861569Gal reminds me of Muke
I think it's her way of speaking.
>>2865399Yeah I do understand what you were saying I was just being needlessly hostile. Though I personally will never go to a pride march.
>>2865006My dad chose this random London team to support called Charlton and Crystal Palace were their biggest rivals, though nowadays Charlton fell off very hard so they don't even get to play Crystal Palace. He never lived in the Charlton area btw he just chose them because they were underdogs or something. Anyway so I grew up being told Crystal Palace and Chelsea fans are all upper class tories and I thought they were basically comic book villains for a long time.
>>2865399Open queerphobia where I live has got as bad as the overt racism, it’s mental
>>2865421I never would have expected things could backslide this far, I always figured LGBT acceptance was a kind of inevitable historic trajectory, society has been so mindraped by Elon Musk et al. I can't even blame the tabloids alone because even under the Murdochreich of the 2000s things improved a lot.
>>2865420>Anyway so I grew up being told Crystal Palace and Chelsea fans are all upper class tories and I thought they were basically comic book villains for a long time.Crystal Palace doesn't really
look posh to me in the way that Chelsea does. Like it's this south London team while upper-class Tories are more of a West London thing (?), but I don't know the U.K. landscape very well. It's funny it's named after the actual Crystal Palace which Karl Marx visited during the height of a particular period of 19th century bourgeois megalomania. I might relate to that though because I root for the Cowboys. An English fan here for the World Cup took the piss out of the billionaire owner of team on the local news in a way that only the English really know how to do.
>>2865144They were giving out The Spark everywhere reckon 20-30 of them.
>>2865451We should just have a British football team, hardly as if Wales are ever going to qualify for anything
>>2865424>>2865399Yh, and what’s baffling is that so many of the rich oligarchs bankrolling the British section of the ChudIntern as well as part of its mockingbird influencer network are themselves gay, like Oli London, Dan Wootton, Peter Whittle, Douglas Murray, Julie Bindel, Peter Thiel, etc… are openly gay and yet won’t say a thing against homophobic gammons that they support.
But maybe not, considering that it’s not like they’ll be targets of homophobia any time soon.
Then again, bourgeois gays coexisting with homophobia isn’t exactly unknown in Britain whether it’s Enoch Powell supporting the repeal of anti-sodomy laws, the infamous student-student and student-teacher buggering in British boarding schools, etc…
So yh, it’s a very cynical ploy. And I’ve got no sympathy for the bourgeois gays tbh.
>>2865399Homophobia and now transphobia have always been much more demented, antisocial and obsessive than racism ever was but vague brown people feelings will always trump top-down anti-lgbt practice for virtually any progressives so that is the logical result.
>>2865694>But maybe not, considering that it’s not like they’ll be targets of homophobia any time soon.It wouldnt be very hard for any regime to send CPS after their kids and jail them for pedophilia, real or invented. The majority of nihilists among them won't suffer because they built nothing and "après moi, le déluge" is their slogan but people like Thiel could greatly suffer from what he advocates becoming the unchallenged norm. Idiosyncratic San Francisco liberalism have it's limits.
>>2865701>Homophobia and now transphobia have always been much more demented, antisocial and obsessive than racism ever was but vague brown people feelings will always trump top-down anti-lgbt practice for virtually any progressives so that is the logical result.As far as idpol goes, I think it’s not really because British society is somehow more homophobic than racist, as much as the fact that race is more polarising than LGBT+ rights so society will naturally discuss more about race than gender/sexual diversity, especially trans rights. Granted, it can’t be denied that the white British lumpen are increasingly openly homophobic, but I would be lying if I said that homophilia is too entrenched in British politics for homophobia to be ever viable. Could be wrong though.
It reminds me of how in the USA, during the controversial overturning of Roe v Wade by the SCOTUS under Biden, both the GOP and the Dems prioritised the defence of gay and interracial marriages over abortion rights.
What does it say about American society? Two things:
- At least in America, race and queerness are far more polarising than gender relations are so American society cares more about race and queerness than feminism which goes both ways since the deep entrenchment of feminism combined with gender being less polarising as discourse generates societal apathy on feminist issues
- Feminists are paper tigers, contrary to what MRAs always say. If they were as powerful as MRAs say, Roe v Wade wouldn’t have been overturned. And I would say the same goes in the UK, where feminists are heavily reliant on the ChudIntern, oligarchs, establishment and boomer support for their power. If that is gone, what then?
Leftypol quick who was the Black ML in labour in the 2010s? Was a Corbyn supporter but kept on getting heat for being an actual ML.
>>2865451I clocked that wild shit. Apparently there is a growing "Loyal" firm tendency in Welsh football. Seen Swansea Loyalists too.
>>2865723That is the most early 2010s video possible how the fuck is it only 3 months old???
>>2865723It's the Hufflepuff, fam!
>>2865723Amazing, this is almost on Connor O'Malley's level, I'd figured the British would never achieve that grade of cultural development.
>>2865723My ex sent me this video after two years of not talking
>>2865873that was me. hey babe. it's been too long since I felt your insides with my magic rod
>>2865794we were making stuff like this in the 00s.
>>2866644>communist terroristDoes such a thing actually have precedence in history?
Lenin spoke directly against it - only anarchists and fascists think vigilante justice is praxis.
>>2866675Yeah, the student movements of the 1950s-1990s urban guerillas did a lot of stuff like this, look at the german movement (Red Army Faction)
>>2866675Is an assassination really terrorism? I'm pretty sure communists have assassinated a bunch of people.
>>2866690terrorism is typically defined as politically motivated murder
>>2866688are maoists really communists, though?
>>2866694>terrorism is typically defined as politically motivated murderSo killing Trotsky was terrorism?
>>2866694>terrorism is typically defined as politically motivated murder<Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims.[1] The term is used in this regard primarily to refer to intentional violence during peacetime or in the context of war against non-combatants.[2] There are various different definitions of terrorism, with no universal agreement about it.[3][4][5] Different definitions of terrorism emphasize its randomness, its aim to instill fear, and its broader impact beyond its immediate victims.[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TerrorismMost people define terrorism as when you kill random people for political ends, you know, to like sew terror in the general populace?
>>2866699also yeah most communists would likely disavow this action even as the guy likely was a sole operator doing this without the backing of the wider public or an organization, if they are a communist they have just agitated the state against communists for no good reason without an org to follow through with it.
>>2866694>terrorism is typically defined as politically motivated murderLet's be real here, terrorism is whatever the state says it is, there is no "real" definition that is actually applied coherently by anyone
>>2866700Anne Widdecome isn't a 'random person' though. She was a rightoid politician.
>>2866735Yeah that's what I'm saying. I wouldn't count a targeted assassination as terrorism.
>>2866740They'll count anything as terrorism. They'll count throwing milk shakes at politicians as terrorism.
It is our woman-hating genderwoo-loving society that killed Ann Widdecombe.
>>2866747Its true and the reason why I dont think this is really terrorism is because it doesnt have the backing of any communist party, period. Its just a lone actor who has a copy of the manifesto who the state is likely going to use as a casius bell to make being a communist proscribed.
>>2866736Define "terrorism", then.
Someone had to do it.
>>2866755I just said. I would say it is killing random members of the public in number so as to instill general terror among a population that it could happen to them too.
>The police investigation into the death of Ann Widdecombe is examining whether a leftwing or single-issue cause may lie behind her killing, the Guardian has learned.
Oh no.
>>2866818Farage sacrificed her to Moloch to avoid the embarrassment of losing his seat to Count Binface
We need a new thread
Unique IPs: 25