>>2911387Problem is, the GUR officials are the ones advocating for mass mobilizations.
See for instance chudanov:
>We must dare to say honestly: you cannot mobilise fewer than 30 thousand people a month. That is the minimum necessary to sustain what we have. (TWO WEEKS AGO)One could argue he's not GUR, but ex-GUR (LOL, LMAO, EVEN)
You also have, Valentyn Manko, commander of Assault Forces, said in late 2025 that fully manning all brigades would require up to 70,000 recruits a month. Though not GUR, it's a military officer.
You have also Oleksandr Pivnenko, National Guard commander, stating that "continuous mobilization is a necessary condition for holding the front and achieving victory" and noted that 70% of National Guard personnel arrived since 2022 through moblization, against a 20 to 30% through voluntary recruitment.
Meanwhile, from the SBU you have Nalyvaichenko (Valentyn Nalyvaichenko),
a guy, btw handed over the cia secret documents without "proper handling" (UA prosecution accusation, 2013 - yes under Yanukovich), in 2024 saying that washington needed to allow ukraine to use eestern weapons against targets inside Russian territory.
So I'd say there's no spat between the two about mobilizations.
The question would be, could federov plant dissidents inside the military forces?