/meta/ - Ruthless criticism of all that exists (in leftypol.org)

>>43547
>But imagine one of these women walked around completely nude or wearing some fetish gear or whatever is the most provocative in their countries, in some backwater neighborhood. What would be the reaction if they got attacked?
not denying that this in particular would be rather bizarre behavior with consequences that could be foreseen, but it does not excuse the attacker(s) nor should it have any effect on their sentence
also what kind of woman (outside of sex work) would actually do that in a "backwater neighborhood", given that it's the country/culture she's a part of? in my opinion, this raises some concerns about her mental health or overall situation, should that thing ever happen. for me, if i saw a nude woman in a crime-ridden neighborhood i would assume she's a runaway from someplace very dire and is in need of immediate help or is a hard drug addict if she demonstrates the typical movements and habit of such

>These faggots seriously go like "Uhhh this is a public space! I can film you without your permission!" Like I doubt they even check if that is the law in the specific country they're visiting.
honestly i completely agree with condemning this behavior, even more so in the age of ai deepfakes. the world would surely be a little more of a nice place if every country had enforceable legislation against filming people without their consent

Can I get a months ban to help with social media addiction?

I reported CP on the maim board 5 hours ago and it still is there, wtf man

Mods someone is doxxing me on /brg/, please act

>>43503
>They really did remove Alunya from the favicon, and anons called me crazy when I said they were going to remove her.
TBH, since Leftypol has became everything it was founded to oppose, I actually support them doing this. It doesn't deserve Alunya.
>>43559
Good luck. They thought it was a good idea to open up /latam/ when they apparently don't have Spanish or Portuguese-speaking mods.

>>43560
>when they apparently don't have Spanish or Portuguese-speaking mods.
Errou!

>>43567
>soymaxxed
Be for real lol

fix the N word filter. it's too overzealous. I can't even say chickeuygh or Arnold Schwarzeuyghur. including screenshot for proof.

>>43566
what was the joke?
who got doxxed?
context is important.

>>43571

>what was the joke?

There's this fag that spergs out from time to time on /brg/ spamming the same shit about "hetmoids" again and again, so i posted a picture of lamp saying i'm breaking it on his face. This is in reference to an occasion where a group of gays was attacked by some lunatic a decade or so ago with a lamp.

>who got doxxed?

Me

>>43571
"doxxed" guy found leftypol from god knows where and has been spamming and ragebaiting /latam/ for the past year. none of his posts have any quality whatsoever, his "effort"posts are obvious run-of-the-mill stuff like "the left shouldn't support criminals!!!" or ISG drama but 90% of the time he is just sperging out at everyone with 15-year-old 4chin vocabulary, such as telling trans people to cut themselves, posting images of gay people dying from aids, seething about him being banned from reddit that no one cares about, calling women "femoid", hating on average workers with right-wing jargon, etc. anons have asked him to stop and mods have banned him several times.
he gets really frustrated when he's banned and says that we can't take a joke. thing is, nobody has ever laughed at his posts. it's not like he posts elaborated dark humor or something, he simply says shit like "kill yourself transhumanist" and then angrily posts that it was just a joke when he's banned.
he wasn't really doxxed since it was just some ordinary pics being posted, no full names, addresses or whatever. but now that the joke's on him he's really butthurt.

>>43574
Seems about right.

>>43574

>telling trans people to cut themselves

Never happened btw

>>43574

Also this

>15-year-old 4chin vocabulary

Is such a weird thing to bitch and moan about, considering this is an imageboard, and you'll find that lingo spreads through most of it. People on the english speaking boards say shit like "trvth nvke"; writing like that started with reactionaries calling Europe "Evropa" on their silly boards and websites, AFAIK. Other shit that people use like jannies, something-pilled, something-maxxed, etc., is used outside of IBs.

This shit is just cultural lag: the brazillian online left still associates things like "pilled" to the manosphere, even if other people use it ironically or in jest, so they assume that anyone saying it must be an Andrew Tate simp. In essence, they are trapped in 2019 and didn't have the 5th head of Marxism, Nick Mullen to explain to them that saying "fag" and "retard" is okay now.

>>43580
It was only a 3 hour ban, don't be a melt. I would have done the same if you said that to a guy for no reason.

>>43577
You should probably lurk more.
>>>/leftypol/
>>>/siberia/

>>43574
What a king

>>43586
Based mod

>>43588
Then why are you complaining about what you should be allowed to post or not if you're a newfag

reactionary incel nonsense spam on /siberia/ particularly in >>>/siberia/729387
btw muh wall/egg carton discourse is incel delusion created to cope with male pattern baldness and age-related sperm quality decline

>>43593
t. autism sperm fan
>But a large 2014 study based on Swedish medical records hinted that the odds of autism among children born to fathers older than 45 are about 75 percent higher than for children born to fathers in their early 20s. And a 2010 analysis of Swedish data found that men over 55 are four times as likely to have a child with autism as men under 30.
>The most prominent hypothesis is that the sperm of older men has accumulated many spontaneous mutations that the men pass along to their children.

>>43595
>I date a lot of young women
cool story bro, much believe
>I would exterminate every single psychiatrist if it was up to me.
agreed tbh

>>43589

>newfag

Omg that's 4chan vocabulary, mods quick do something!!!!

>>43304
mods, nonce shit on front page

MODS!!!!

>>43604

Hey man can you please be patient, the mod team is busy working hard to remove people using 4chan vocabulary like "newfag"' and "jannie"

clean up the usa thread

what the fuck are you doing. clean up the usa thread

Why the fuck did you delete my thread? Was it because I put a funny image on it?

>>43610
yeah basically

>>43611
Why am I not allowed to put funny images on my thread opener?

>>43612
it just kinda seemed like a typical /pol/ spam thing

>Your ban was filed on Wednesday 19 November, 2025 and expires 4 days from now, which is on Wednesday 3 December, 2025
>You appealed this ban onThursday 27 November, 2025and it was denied. You may not appeal this ban again.
<ID 96734

Welp, looks like the nodes out on /siberia/ for another week :/

just a heads up i dunno. there is some drama involving BE and some breadtuber being discussed in the isg thread and that's fine or whatever. but people on this site and in the isg thread are incapable of discussing the arguments of said breadtuber and are attacking her identity and aesthetics. idk if you care or whatever but that's gonna make the site look bad whatever

>>43616 (me)
examples of said posts (in the /isg/ thread):
>>2579158
>>2579159
>>2579160
>>2579165
>>2579145
>>2579150
>>2579141

btw a question should be added to the faq page about how to link posts across boards

Why is the homosexual jannie banning people for "low quality posting" on siberia?

>>43617
>>>/leftypol/2579158
>>>/leftypol/2579159
>>>/leftypol/2579160
>>>/leftypol/2579165
>>>/leftypol/2579145
>>>/leftypol/2579150
>>>/leftypol/2579141
>>43618
We only accept the highest-quality posting on /siberia/. What is and is not worthy of it is ultimately to our discretion.

1) This was very obviously a joke, parodying the "100 million members of the CPC" line that keeps getting thrown around.
2) This is objectively not what spam is.

This is a shame to see, as moderation had improved significantly in the past months until recently. Now we're lapsing back towards pointless deletions and bans. No /leftypol/ allowed.

I demand accountability from the retarded mod issuing a 5 week ban as a personal vendetta.

My post was not "reactionary" you dipshit. The only person who replied to my post immediately understood the point I was trying to make about NATO deliberately dragging out the conflict and how it's all kabuki theater. I've attached a second screenshot with the only person who replied to me showing that the average thread member in that thread understood my point unlike the dumbass mod who insta banned.

Furthermore:

1. Since when do Mods DELETE the posts they ban? I'm a veteran from the fucking 8chan days and as far as I can recall, whether it was under Space, old BO, Bunkerchan, and even here on /leftypol/ until recently, unless the post is literal porn/illegal content or soyjack spam, banned posts are supposed to STAY UP with the ban message inscribed in red underneath so that other members receive some transparency on what the fuck the mods are doing.

2. Banning for ALL SECTIONS, not just the forum that was "violated", is deliberate censorship. This is why I am accusing the mod of a personal vendetta because besides the ridiculous ban time, banning from ALL boards also prevents people without VPNs from being able to lodge appeals in the Meta forum. I have never bothered with VPNs on /leftypol/ stretching back to the 8chan days, but if this abhorrent behavior is not reigned in by the mod in question or anyone else, I will switch over to forced VPN posting for the rest of my time because clearly a certain someone cannot be trusted to avoid abusing the moderator position they were granted.

3. I demand that regardless of everything else, that this moderator be forced out immediately from his position because he has clearly not read the rules of the board and is not abiding by them. Specifically, he has violated Rule 7, 16, and 17.

>>43625
Once Cyberbarbarian does his once a year check in you're fucking done you power tripping retard. Imagine being entrusted with mod privileges and then not even fucking following your own rules. Siberia has always been a joke/offtopic board and you're trying to moderate it as strictly as /leftypol/. Not even old BO on 8chan was so retarded as to try to censor videogame or meme threads. You're either a fed trying to undermine the site by forcing ultra serious discussion at all times on all forums, or legitimately so stupid that you need to be immediately removed for the safety of the rest of the community.

>>43626
I just lifted the ban but it had already expired so you should be good. Sorry for the inconvenience.

>>43628
Your post is fine. It's not the reason you're banned.
>Since when do Mods DELETE the posts they ban?
It's not best practice to feed trolls with a big, red, attention-grabbing stamp. We also don't like to allow ban-evaders to keep posting. If you're already been banned, expect your future posts to be deleted aswell. Just take a break and don't do it again next time.

>>43629
/siberia/ is more loosely moderated but it's not an all-allowed board.

>>43627
A 3-hour ban? Come now, I am much more generous than that. Not my ban.
>>43628
Browsing through your post history, you had some stinkers and a prior ban history I decided to act upon.
>1.
Since always, frequent ban evaders and trolls depend on their posts staying up to try and shift board culture. A scorched earth policy against them is ensuring they have no say. But also, generally speaking, low-worth posts that advocate reactionary positions or are just generally low-quality and take up space are cleaned up to improve the site as a whole. You were doing some NAFO-tier posting about the superiority of the West, I don't think anyone misses it.
>2.
On the contrary, you have an appeal - on the ban appeal. You can even appeal on the grounds of wanting to make an appeal on /meta/ - we allow that, in all but the most obvious and prolific ban evaders. Plus, the matrix chat is always open for appeals as well - we have redundancy built into the system.
>3.
Lolno. Rule 7 is our domain to decide, 16 and 17 are about our internal structure and direction being our own discretion.
>>43629
Don't make me tap the sign.
>"No chin, no right to speak."
While we are relaxed about the general content of /siberia/, that is far different from being relaxed with the form of such content. The prevalence of incels and soyjaks required culling because of their reactionary elements - /siberia/ after all is a leftist off-topic board, not a free-for-all for whoever saying whatever.

>>43630
>Your post is fine. It's not the reason you're banned.
Good to know that WVobbly gets to do unlimited 5 week bans on anyone he doesn't like, simply for not being pro-Russia enough, and for no other reason. Reign in this fucking retard or at least prohibit him from adjudicating over anything to do with me because he clearly has a personal vendetta against me and no one else.
>It's not best practice to feed trolls with a big, red, attention-grabbing stamp. We also don't like to allow ban-evaders to keep posting. If you're already been banned, expect your future posts to be deleted aswell. Just take a break and don't do it again next time.
Except I'm not a troll OR a ban evader. The only reason I'm even sitting on a fucking VPN is because WVobbly broke Rule 17
<Rule 17: Users have the right to question and challenge any bans or post removals, or other moderator actions, which they feel are unfair or do not live up to the spirit of the rules. This may be done…on the /meta/ board…
and by deliberately banning for all boards was trying to prevent me from even being able to launch an appeal on /meta/.

>>43631
>Browsing through your post history, you had some stinkers and a prior ban history I decided to act upon.
The "prior ban history" was literally YOU you disingenuous fuck. You handed me TWO back to back 5 week bans. Those are my only bans in recent history. The first one I let go because I felt like I needed a temporary break from the board anyways to focus on other things. When I came back, you realized I came back and IMMEDIATELY sought to find any possible pretext to try to ban me again and the post you selected wasn't even in violation, as agreed by the other moderator. Not only that, but you deleted my ENTIRE post history afterwards, not just the banned post, in order to try to cover your tracks. I know you you fucking scumbag. You say you read my post history? Then you would know I didn't use VPNs until now. You were hoping I wouldn't go to the effort of buying a VPN to lodge an appeal and wanted to permanently silence me by preventing me from appealing. If I didn't raise a fuss over your latest bullshit you would have gotten away with it too. Also, this is again YOUR attitude. You say that they were "stinkers" but no one mass reported over them. No one was provoked, trolled, or moved to extreme anger over my posts. YOU were the one who tried to dig through my post history for weeks or months or years-long ago posts that no one bothered to scream for moderation over simply because you don't like me. I have brought book screenshots, telegram screenshots, and even created OC for this board and specifically that thread. There is no justification for your claim of low quality posting when I can find
off topic spam: >>2581824
trolling: >>2581829
blatant racism: >>2581999
random death threats: >>2581997
that goes untouched in virtually every single one of those threads. You hand me 5 weeks for making a normal post while everyone else gets to rule break. This is again just ultimate proof of your biased moderation.
You accuse me of:
>NAFO-tier posting about the superiority of the West
No, if you read my post history like you claimed you'd know that I was PRO-RUSSIAN in the war. This is you making up ad-hoc justifications AFTER you banned me to try to look more reasonable to the rest of the mods who don't know that this is you on a campaign trying to silence me. Other mods like Moffin' have complained before about me being a bloodthirsty campist Zigger. You're accusing me of NAFO simply because I displayed some skepticism over Russian military performance and political leadership.
>On the contrary, you have an appeal - on the ban appeal.
Yeah one that would be insta-rejected by you since you're monitoring me like a hawk trying to find any possible way to ban me you disingenuous FUCK. You have NO JUSTIFICATION for banning people from /meta/. There are people in this community who never bothered to set up matrix chat. Furthermore, you've already admitted that I'm not a ban evader since before deleting my entire post history you were able to check all records of my posting meaning that you had my activity stretching back YEARS.
>Rule 7 is our domain to decide, 16 and 17 are about our internal structure and direction being our own discretion.
Again if Cyberbarbarian had been paying attention you'd have been fucking KILLED. I'm an oldfag. I remember how we used to have our site a single click away from /pol/ on 8chan and we had to deal with their constant race and lQ bullshit spam. That sharpened us and made us smarter since we had to engage constantly against our ideological opponents. People had to think carefully about how to respond and how to argue against that sort of stuff. They had to read, analyze, and use critical thinking skills.
Shay, one of our resident e-celebs, used to be a neo-nazi. He was CONVERTED due to my and other people's efforts arguing against race pseudo-science. He got BTFO so badly that he realized that the communists were smarter and flipped to our side. This sort of thing would be IMPOSSIBLE under governance by idiots like yourself who ban all dissenting opinions to try to force a hugbox. You accused me of being NAFO but I'm actually pro-Russian, so what you really meant was that despite supporting the same side you support in the Ukraine war, you were angry that I didn't drink the kool-aid and glaze Russia's military ENOUGH for your liking. This is an example of how retarded and biased your moderation was in that I didn't even break any rules but you simply didn't want to argue against me and sought to resolve a regular discussion through arbitrary moderation instead. TORpost spamming gets a 3 hour ban. Posting porn without spoilers gets a 1 day ban. I get handed FIVE WEEKS because you couldn't handle a real dissenting opinion. All you are doing is teaching everyone to switch to VPNs rather than being honest regular users because you literally can't be trusted with power. I found ACTUAL spam and low quality posts in the thread you banned me in that went unmoderated. Back the fuck off you slimy bitch.

>>43633
I forgot that /leftypol/ can't crosslink to /meta/. Whatever. Here is the random selection of posts I found in 10 seconds in that same thread that I was banned in that went untouched. Somehow my post was more "low quality" "reactionary" than blatant off topic posts, racism, and death threats. Note that I'm not saying that these people should be banned. I'm not. I'm happy that they have the freedom to joke around. But VWobbly is fucking gunning for me so hard that I refuse to accept any more of his moderation activity since it's blatantly clear that he's making up excuses just to try to get me out.

>>43633

>ban all dissenting opinions to try to force a hugbox
>"low quality" "reactionary"

Welcome to r/leftypol; similar issue is ongoing under /brg/.

She's. Sq dark. All staneire

Can you ban the guy spamming emojis in the thread >>>/leftypol/2547894 if he does it again, thnx.

>>43641
just perma smith anon for his disingenuous bullshit already