Come dispute bans, complain, get jannified, and other such things related to /leftypol/ here. Please try not to spam this thread or make multiple posts on the same issue, as this makes it harder for us to respond to issues.
IF YOUR IP IS BANNED ON META USE THE MATRIX WAITING ROOM
https://matrix.to/#/#leftypolantechamber:matrix.orgLogs:
https://leftypol.org/log.php?board=leftypolFree onions:
http://kacdyre2mccory3jccpzu36ybzr6tpteuic6a7uhhya4dleek4xeuiid.onion/Previous thread
>>39778 106 posts and 21 image replies omitted.>>43642Yeah fair enough. Smith Anon responded to this Marx quote:
"Taken together, the commodities are sold at 2 + 7 + 17 = 26 above, and 8 + 18 = 26 below their value, so that the deviations of price from value balance out one another through the uniform distribution of surplus-value, or through addition of the average profit of 22 per 100 units of advanced capital to the respective cost-prices of the commodities I to V. One portion of the commodities is sold above its value in the same proportion in which the other is sold below it. And it is only the sale of the commodities at such prices that enables the rate of profit for capitals I to V to be uniformly 22%"
…by claiming that according to Marx, values and prices are the same.
That guy has to be a far-right troll who is spreading disinfo on purpose and not just an idiot.
>>43652>spreading disinfo on purpose and not just an idiotits exceedingly clear and hes ruined polecon general for its entire existence. at first it was a good exercise and opportunity to teach lurkers but hes just been repeating himself after being proven wrong for over a year. not to mention he was banned before and just kept dodging. it wouldnt be so bad if he was just presenting liberal or keynesian ideas as an alternative but he always says "according to marx" and then blatantly lies about things hes been corrected on a hundred times.
>>43655rainer shea is ACP now and was always a tankie ML before that. most tankoid mloid already hate KKE for being revisionist electoralist opportunist labor aristocrats that shit talk china and most people here who support and spread KKE propaganda about everyone being imperialist are maoists and leftcoms. its always been known KKE are conservatards because theyre anti-lgbt which curiously the ultras never mention while condemning russia and sometimes china for the same. principled stalinist dengoids around here dont like KKE or ACP and never really did
/siberia/ infested by incel id/pol/ threads
>>>/siberia/732581>>>/siberia/732967>>>/siberia/732972>>>/siberia/733066>>43657First thread is fine.
Second thread has been merged to another.
Third thread has been locked.
I don't get the fourth thread tbh.
>>43633>Good to know that WVobbly gets to do unlimited 5 week bans on anyone he doesn't like, simply for not being pro-Russia enough, and for no other reasonGuys been at it this specifically for years at this point, if you get banned just check the logs and refuse to see it as legitimate if its from the king retard.
>>43663Mods, ban this doxxer NOW!
Caught a 5 weeks ban that i can't contest here because some retarded moderator has a vendetta against me, and just writes "pol" as the reason why i'm banned.
Ban number 103209
>>43692I'm still banned, and no reason was given. I'm just going to post with VPN/TOR since hammering a 5 week ban for "pol" and not allowing me to contest here is not only unreasonable, it's a joke.
Oh that's cute, you're also deleting my posts on latam while ignoring the appeals. What a turbo faggot you are.
Just ban Smith anon ffs
So is rule 14f and g just whatever the fuck the mods decide it to be? What exactly constitutes "low effort sectarianism" and "pointless idpol disscussion". I have no idea what I am actually banned for because whichever fuckwit banned me just labelled me a troll and cited those two rules, I don't even have a post screenshot or ban log. Or is the rule just there so you aren't allowed to criticize positions the mods agree with? What is the point of a place to discuss shit in leftism if I can't even insult and critque other leftists? Tf? Looking at the ban logs it seems the mods love to use rule 14 as a sledgehammer whenever they ban someone they don't like for some dumbshit reason. Like if I was suggesting that people should be wreckers and sabotage other communist groups because I don't like them, then it would be an understandable ban for sectarianism. Otherwise fuck off with this nonsensical retardation.
Did the entire mod team left for (((holidays))) and put a retard in charge?
>>43706Let me guess, you made the thread seething about anarchists?
>>43708No I have no fucking idea why I got banned as they didn't even send a screenshot.
>>43707Maybe it seems like for the past couple weeks the mod team has become completely braindead. (Far more than usual)
Too much tolerance of euro chauvinists. But I do not expect much since atleast one mod him/herself is a euro chauvinist.
>>43699NO. Ban all the interesting characters will kill the board.
>>43699I dont think hes broken any rules. Being stupid isnt against the rules
>>43722>Being stupidNo. See
>>43652 >>43723Sure but what rules are being broken there? Maybe he is, quite literally, retarded
chagosposter
>>43692>>43693>>43698My ban is still up and i demand to have it lifted; this is nonsense.
One of the posts the loser wagie deleted was me trying to correct a retard with a backwards understanding of marxism; and nobody else in the thread was trying to correct the stupid shit he was saying.
What's the point of deleting the only person trying to have educated and constructive discussions and let disruptive agents like the baitolanon up?
>>43732for "some" reason the gay ass antisectarian rule only applies to marxists lol
>>43733no it doesn't you're just whining
>>43738Dude was denying the historically progressive and revolutionary role the bourgeoisie played during the 18th century, that the american Bill of Rights was a result of this time period, and accused me of being a USA shill. He then proceeded to say Marx was wrong in praising Lincoln's role in ending slavery because that, as well as the other shit mentioned before, "didn't advance class struggle in the USA".
If a person fundamentally misunderstands marxism to this point, and nobody corrects them, what's the point of these forums to exist?
>>43739Hello. You are banned. While banned, you'll have your posts deleted, whatever their content may be. You'll have to wait for it to expire to post freely again.
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.
>>43731>My ban is still up and i demand to have it lifted; this is nonsense>>43732>What's the point of deleting the only person trying to have educated and constructive discussions and let disruptive agents like the baitolanon up?What a pathetic whining rat kek
Also
>posts homophobic content>surprised pikachu face it's banned >>43740No, fuck off you lazy bum. Why was i banned for 5 weeks for "pol"? Print that post and reply here, i wanna know what did i post that was "pol".
Go fetch it jannie 103209
I'll gladly take a 5 weeks ban IF it is a legit reason; otherwise, go fuck yourself, you don't own this imageboard.
(USER WAS BANNED FOR 5 MORE WEEKS IN THE CHEESE CAVES) >>43742I also know that the ban was bullshit because the retard that issued it also banned me from contesting it here, so go do your fucking job
for free >>43742>Go fetch it jannie 103209Wow the disprect, we are never unbanning you
>>43742I strongly oppose this.
We have worked long and hard for dignity in work down the cheese mines and we lost many hard working miners to this struggle. The forced labour of the bosses undermines not just those of us in the NUCM but all workers who put their lives in danger to bring you creemy cheddars, who have slaved away under the brie veins.
Solidarity beyween workers is a must. One should know this.
4 weeks ban for "ban evasion". How did i evade the ban? I'm using static IP wifi to post, and i contested my previous ban. The sodomite on /brg/ that brags about evading bans with a dynamic IP still has posts up. Why can he freely evade? Why does his shit stay up? Did the wagie jannie get upset that i made fun of him again? I thought he was a tough prolepilled working man with thick skin!
And once again: i know your ban reasoning is bullshit because you are making me use TOR to contest it. Ban id 113762
>>43759If i could reset my modem and get a new IP like the faggot that shits up /BRG/ and gets shilded by moderation, I'd do just that instead of coming here, via TOR, to contest a ban, because i can't use the website, because I CAN'T EVADE, RETARDS.
If i can post without resorting to TOR, i just assume my ban is lifted. If that's not the case, it's because your shitty system is broken and retarded, and that's hardly my fault.
Timeline of my ban:
1- It gets rescinded after a made a bunch of complaints because the moderation team was ignoring an unfair ban
>>43692 >>43693 >>43698 >>43707 >>43731 >>43732 >>43739 >>43742 >>43743 >>43744 ;
2- Start posting again;
3- Get banned again, this time for "ban evasion", even tho i didn't attempt to avoid my nan, because AFAIK i was unbanned;
4- Complain about it;
5- Retarded jannie says the reason is pic related.
Treating you like the lazy bums that you are is not a reason for banning people, you fucking pricks. I do not recognize this ban as valid, and nobody with a functioning brain would. Mocking you retarded petty tyrants is not only allowed, it's a duty any principled person should perform.
On top of that, you once again banned me from complaining about your unfair ban, which again just proves to me you know you are wrong.
>>43761My ban is still up, and i still haven't been given an explanation for the above mentioned issues. Anx again, making it so that i can't contest it without TOR illustrate my point for me: you are in the wrong, and don't want me complaining about it.
Unique IPs: 27