/meta/ - Ruthless criticism of all that exists (in leftypol.org)

Why was the climate change thread deleted on /leftypol/? >>/leftypol/2522458

Created a new 4-week ban on all boards for xxxx (# 96237 ) with reason: AI Text slop

I gave evidence that the Americans believe that the Chinese are capable of winning an attritional war with the US. It was labeled, and AI content isn't against the rules, unless you want to ban the NAFOid bots.

>>43318
You are unbanned. Don't do it again.

>>43319
What, you want me to screenshot the AI slop next time? The entire point is that the US is behaving as though the Chinese have the utter hand.

Hey…. So I was the tor poster using the name "BeriaCunnyRapist1917" I wasn't the reason the whole tor node is blocked right now, was I? If so I don't understand why, I didn't post anything rule-breaking or unusual. Just to be clear.

FIX THE TOR NODE, NEW REPLY BUTTON BECOMES WHITE, UNABLE TO REPLY, TOR IS BLOCKED FOR NO REASON ON SIBERIA.

>>43326
YOU ASSHOLE

MODS UNBLOCK THE TOR NODE

>>43328
Bro, I did not do anything ISTG. If you go to the banned.php page on the tor node it says "Pedophile abusing the TOR node"

I noticed a couple of my post were disapeared, and then suddenly the reply button went white…

Mods, can you please unban the tor. node. I'm scared of being arrested for using a communist website……………..

Are you serious? Auto banning VPN/Tor nodes for 2 years?

Why does the moderation work so hard on trying to kill this imageboard?

>>43330
Get a proper VPN you doof. Tor is commonly suspected to be a government honeytraps.

Petition to ban any mention of Hasan dog shock collar

>>43335
I don't have the moneyyyyy
>>43326
I'm gonna assume that was the reason because the mods have been radio silent as usual, note for anyone reading this thread: Don't use joke names. You will get banned or the entire tor node blocked apparently.
Anyways I'm going to ontineu posting as I always have, and none will be the wiser, just without using the name field, because it triggers jannies so badly..

Instead of deleting threads about climate change and moving threads mentioning "gender" to LGBT - Why not create a /geopol/ board and move all the country cyclicals and "happening" threads there?

None of you have answered btw why the climate change thread was deleted even though there was an interesting discussion going on.

>>43356
>why the climate change thread was deleted even though there was an interesting discussion going on.
if I had to guess, the OP got banned for something else and it just purged all his posts

>>43359
The answer to that question about the climate thread since you want to know. I originally bumplocked it and saged, because the conversation was allowing for idiotic climate deniers, shitflinging, and breaking of the ordence rule about climate denial. I originally going to keep it that way but was given the get go from the OP on the Matrix chat to nuke the thread so I did.

As for the TOR node, we have range bans for now and unfortunately is getting some of the other users. It was to catch a bunch of the spamming users whom abuse the TOR node.

>>43369
nice try, felix

so, what's up with those ai looking spam threads? >>43374

our least favorite retard in britpol is back. please moderate.
also they are probably samefagging to continue the conversation ad infinitum, because nobody here actually wants to talk to them.

>>43388
"WAAAAH WE CAN'T WIN A DEBATE WE STARTED, WAAAAAAH PLEASE DELETE HIS POSTS SO YOU CAN'T SEE US NOT BEING ABLE TO ADDRESS A SINGLE FUCKING POINT WITHOUT DIVERTING TO COMPLETELY RETARDED SEMANTICS POINTS THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING BECAUSE WE CAN'T ACTUALLY DEBATE ANYTHING ON THEORETICAL GROUNDS, MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODS PLEASE SAVE US"
Every single fucking time.
It's is genuinely fucking wild how fucking pathetic you lot are.
Again, it's you retards that keep attacking the rest of the left, and feminists for being "Terfs" or for leftists not bowing down to your fucking delusional positions where you want TRA to literally be the core position of the British Left. (literally what you retards were arguing btw) then you have a fucking cry when I bring up the obvious fucking fact that most Neoliberals support TRA positions and Socialist Economics is the basis of the left. Nooo can't have that! Got to have a massive fucking cry fest, get fucking owned then run to the mods!
YOU
ARE
FUCKING
LOSERS.

>>43395
You probably posted that yourself lol. But if not then ok go ahead and report it. It's not we are able to look at every single post on the website automatically

T. mod

>>43397
Again, mods don't want people to see what their little /tttt/ trans rights retards are posting.

the funny thing about their love of this compilation is that the last post is entirely accurate, completely ill at ease with the posts it's grouped with. look at any photo of an anti-trans rally in britain and it's immediately obvious that it is made up of older women. it's not written in a particularly nice tone, but it's ironically a sympathetic post: it identifies the source of the issue as society undervaluing older women. it implies the solution is to value them more highly, give them a positive source of valorisation, not for them to 'do better' or 'educate themselves' or some other cliche.
in our long-suffering thread, our long-resident wall-of-text weirdo has never engaged with the salient detail that is the way the trans issue cuts across age groups. (because they'd then have to engage with the material causes of both trans and anti-trans activism, rather than going "trans activism is because of neoliberalism and perverts and idpol, anti-trans activism is because of facts and logic")

this, incidentally, is also why they deserve to be banned again and again. they have posted, word-for-word, this post with this image repeatedly >>43392 to the extent that filtering it would be an economical way to have them self-ban. they have absolutely nothing new to say. even when you feed them novel points, you get the same babble again and again, zero engagement with your salient points but a laundry list of bile against AGPs and xenogenders and trans activists and 'the left'
like the empty nested older women, this person is clearly chasing some kind of validation, seeking status as a truth teller by repeating something so tediously that even if it were correct (which it ain't) it would still constitute mental illness.

>>43402
Lmao, like you retards have an argument beyond "Uhh biological women don't exist because they just don't okay, Transgenderism should be the core of all leftism because only true leftists believe men can instantly turn into women just because they do, also anything negative said about a Trans person ever is Transphobia and right wing propaganda".
Also if you think that Women are literally jealous of being mogged by Trans identified males lmao.
Also tonnes of TERFs are young women, go read any terf forum and it's hugely made up of young women who "peaked" when Trans people started acting like degenerate weirdos in their circles and social spaces.
Like I've always said, GreenandPleasant is right over there on Reddit for you lot. Why in fuck does every single British leftist discussion space have to revolve around reinforcing Trans crybullying while shitting on women?
Of course the mods have nothing to say because they know that if they wade into the debate and actually enforce a "no criticism of Gender ideology" rule, swaths of the community will oppose it because it makes no sense in relation to Marxist or Feminist conceptions of gender/sex relations or formation.
> zero engagement with your salient points
L M A O, I've addressed all you retards posts relentlessly time and time again, then you go running to the jannies and crying to get my posts deleted, meanwhile, you retards REFUSE to engage with any criticism of gender ideology or the reality of what is actually happening in the real world because it goes against your Tumblr Shibboleths and you know there isn't actually any argument against them.
Go ahead, explain why Diaracial or Pro-Ana are not legitimate identities and expressions of dysphora, I'm still waiting.

>Also tonnes of TERFs are young women, go read any terf forum and it's hugely made up of young women who "peaked" when Trans people started acting like degenerate weirdos in their circles and social spaces.
this is the only line in the entire post that comes within the same star system as the point i made, and even then it's a weak one (the biggest TERF forum is mumsnet [old], and even if you go for something else their userbase is still peanuts compared to even - say - bluesky, and the idea we should compare forums rather than real-life turnout is in itself silly, particularly for someone purportedly interested in "what is actually happening in the real world".)
that's 36 words out of 291, a relatively high ratio by this poster's standards.

i apologize for no doubt baiting a second reply, but i want to highlight for third party observers what we're dealing with here. this is an insane ratio of noise to signal. even before you get on to the general tediousness of the idpol discussion in question, there's the fact that 90% of any post will be irrelevant to that discussion. it's like trying to argue with a drinky bird ctrl+v'ing The Eye of Argon.

Why are you deleting my posts appealing my obvious nonsense ban?

>>43408
Bc youre unbanned. Congratulations.

>>43409
Will you absurdly ban me again if i make the same joke? Or was i right, this is just pretense?

>>43410
The janny responsible apologizes for their butthurt behavior, asks if we could just forgive and forget.

https://leftypol.org/leftypol/res/2538934.html (Family)
Why are you banned this thread? There is nothing wrong with it

thread >>2539323 on the leftypol board is thinly veiled race baiting pol shit. delete it.

Disabled TORposting on /latam/ again, haven't you? Unbelivable how one (1) lusophone monkey bends you out of shape this bad, and makes you do more work (for free).

Is /usapol/ banned?

>>43422
Based mods tbh thank u guys

pin and lock the 420chan thread in /siberia/ please, it's got a lot of good posts and screencaps dating back to 2006. they were on fox news after all…

Is there any way to automatically detect this image? There's clearly a bot that posts the same bait periodically to keep the board activity stewing in boilerplate and harden consensus, a cointelpro tactic.

Mods stop deleting my posts just because radlib gangster widow doesn't like trvth nvkes

>>43422
You could put more effort in not looking absolutely assblasted over this

WTF is up with the front few pages today?
probably being raided by an unfunny autist.
do job plz.

>>43304
Please remove this loli spam shit from the drive general https://leftypol.org/leftypol/res/2545865.html#q2547776 its completely unrelated to the thread

overboard seems to be broken

Is there a way I can search all boards at once?

the search function means I have to select a board to search and this site suffers from way too many separate boards.

can our beautiful mods comr up witg a plan to get rid of the fuentes shill in usapol? whether by restricting it to isg or whatever. i am so god damn tired of hearing about the musings of laura loomer and spic fuentes

>>43464
imagine being this butthurt over a cartoon drawing of a child, and not even of a sexual nature to boot, lmao

test

They really did remove Alunya from the favicon, and anons called me crazy when I said they were going to remove her.

Please ban the weird incel who keeps shitting up the venezuela thread. it's a thread about potential war and he's only here to shit it up and make it unusable for it's purpose by endlessly crying about Maduro/splitting hairs about who in the world gets to be a real anti-imperialist.
Yes, it is just as autistic as it sounds.
It's just wrecker/glowie shit, and he knows that well.
https://leftypol.org/leftypol/res/2539692.html

>>43518 (me)
sincerely thank you.

Lol what? It's against the rules to call out LARPing now? Did Iron Felix become a mod?

How is this incel or sexism? Is calling out the exploitative nature of Western streamer culture and their use of 3rd world poverty porn wrong?

>>43544
And of course you banned me because of these chan-culture tards spamming KYS. But of course you won't ban them for Rule 11.

11) Posts should, overall, be conductive to an informed and productive discussion. /leftypol/ is not an academic journal, but it also should not be a cesspit of back and forth bickering and pointless insults. Users should attempt to argue for the point they are presenting in an honest and open way and should be receptive to information or arguments that do, in fact, challenge their views.

No that's my fault for triggering them I suppose.

>>43544
you're comparing apples to oranges with the first pic & cases of western women being escorted for breaking local legislation on indecent exposure vs sexual assault and rape
this is still less incel brainrot than the reactionism that is allowed to stay up on /siberia/'s sex & relationships thread and the blatant pedo apologism of >>43526 and by certain namefags

>>43546
>you're comparing apples to oranges with the first pic & cases of western women being escorted for breaking local legislation on indecent exposure vs sexual assault and rape
I didn't once say I condoned sexual assault in any circumstance. But imagine one of these women walked around completely nude or wearing some fetish gear or whatever is the most provocative in their countries, in some backwater neighborhood. What would be the reaction if they got attacked? It would be "uhhh, what the fuck were they thinking?" Also "that's indecent." So these stupid streamers and vloggers try to go all over the world to places where people make less in their lifetime than they do in a year and act like it's supposed to be the cultural equivalent of their home country. But that's exactly why they make these fucking videos. The women are far from the only ones and the innapropriate attire is far from the only issue. I've mostly seen the men trying to make a big deal about the attention they receive and the hostility that people have for filming them without their permission.

These faggots seriously go like "Uhhh this is a public space! I can film you without your permission!" Like I doubt they even check if that is the law in the specific country they're visiting.

It's just the Logan Paul in Japan thing, but even worse if you ask me since these people are fucking destitute and you're trying to turn them into click-bait.

>>43547
>But imagine one of these women walked around completely nude or wearing some fetish gear or whatever is the most provocative in their countries, in some backwater neighborhood. What would be the reaction if they got attacked?
not denying that this in particular would be rather bizarre behavior with consequences that could be foreseen, but it does not excuse the attacker(s) nor should it have any effect on their sentence
also what kind of woman (outside of sex work) would actually do that in a "backwater neighborhood", given that it's the country/culture she's a part of? in my opinion, this raises some concerns about her mental health or overall situation, should that thing ever happen. for me, if i saw a nude woman in a crime-ridden neighborhood i would assume she's a runaway from someplace very dire and is in need of immediate help or is a hard drug addict if she demonstrates the typical movements and habit of such

>These faggots seriously go like "Uhhh this is a public space! I can film you without your permission!" Like I doubt they even check if that is the law in the specific country they're visiting.
honestly i completely agree with condemning this behavior, even more so in the age of ai deepfakes. the world would surely be a little more of a nice place if every country had enforceable legislation against filming people without their consent