/meta/ - Ruthless criticism of all that exists (in leftypol.org)

Why was the climate change thread deleted on /leftypol/? >>/leftypol/2522458

Created a new 4-week ban on all boards for xxxx (# 96237 ) with reason: AI Text slop

I gave evidence that the Americans believe that the Chinese are capable of winning an attritional war with the US. It was labeled, and AI content isn't against the rules, unless you want to ban the NAFOid bots.

>>43318
You are unbanned. Don't do it again.

>>43319
What, you want me to screenshot the AI slop next time? The entire point is that the US is behaving as though the Chinese have the utter hand.

Hey…. So I was the tor poster using the name "BeriaCunnyRapist1917" I wasn't the reason the whole tor node is blocked right now, was I? If so I don't understand why, I didn't post anything rule-breaking or unusual. Just to be clear.

FIX THE TOR NODE, NEW REPLY BUTTON BECOMES WHITE, UNABLE TO REPLY, TOR IS BLOCKED FOR NO REASON ON SIBERIA.

>>43326
YOU ASSHOLE

MODS UNBLOCK THE TOR NODE

>>43328
Bro, I did not do anything ISTG. If you go to the banned.php page on the tor node it says "Pedophile abusing the TOR node"

I noticed a couple of my post were disapeared, and then suddenly the reply button went white…

Mods, can you please unban the tor. node. I'm scared of being arrested for using a communist website……………..

Are you serious? Auto banning VPN/Tor nodes for 2 years?

Why does the moderation work so hard on trying to kill this imageboard?

>>43330
Get a proper VPN you doof. Tor is commonly suspected to be a government honeytraps.

Petition to ban any mention of Hasan dog shock collar

>>43335
I don't have the moneyyyyy
>>43326
I'm gonna assume that was the reason because the mods have been radio silent as usual, note for anyone reading this thread: Don't use joke names. You will get banned or the entire tor node blocked apparently.
Anyways I'm going to ontineu posting as I always have, and none will be the wiser, just without using the name field, because it triggers jannies so badly..

Instead of deleting threads about climate change and moving threads mentioning "gender" to LGBT - Why not create a /geopol/ board and move all the country cyclicals and "happening" threads there?

None of you have answered btw why the climate change thread was deleted even though there was an interesting discussion going on.

>>43356
>why the climate change thread was deleted even though there was an interesting discussion going on.
if I had to guess, the OP got banned for something else and it just purged all his posts

>>43359
The answer to that question about the climate thread since you want to know. I originally bumplocked it and saged, because the conversation was allowing for idiotic climate deniers, shitflinging, and breaking of the ordence rule about climate denial. I originally going to keep it that way but was given the get go from the OP on the Matrix chat to nuke the thread so I did.

As for the TOR node, we have range bans for now and unfortunately is getting some of the other users. It was to catch a bunch of the spamming users whom abuse the TOR node.

>>43369
nice try, felix

so, what's up with those ai looking spam threads? >>43374

our least favorite retard in britpol is back. please moderate.
also they are probably samefagging to continue the conversation ad infinitum, because nobody here actually wants to talk to them.

>>43395
You probably posted that yourself lol. But if not then ok go ahead and report it. It's not we are able to look at every single post on the website automatically

T. mod

the funny thing about their love of this compilation is that the last post is entirely accurate, completely ill at ease with the posts it's grouped with. look at any photo of an anti-trans rally in britain and it's immediately obvious that it is made up of older women. it's not written in a particularly nice tone, but it's ironically a sympathetic post: it identifies the source of the issue as society undervaluing older women. it implies the solution is to value them more highly, give them a positive source of valorisation, not for them to 'do better' or 'educate themselves' or some other cliche.
in our long-suffering thread, our long-resident wall-of-text weirdo has never engaged with the salient detail that is the way the trans issue cuts across age groups. (because they'd then have to engage with the material causes of both trans and anti-trans activism, rather than going "trans activism is because of neoliberalism and perverts and idpol, anti-trans activism is because of facts and logic")

this, incidentally, is also why they deserve to be banned again and again. they have posted, word-for-word, this post with this image repeatedly >>43392 to the extent that filtering it would be an economical way to have them self-ban. they have absolutely nothing new to say. even when you feed them novel points, you get the same babble again and again, zero engagement with your salient points but a laundry list of bile against AGPs and xenogenders and trans activists and 'the left'
like the empty nested older women, this person is clearly chasing some kind of validation, seeking status as a truth teller by repeating something so tediously that even if it were correct (which it ain't) it would still constitute mental illness.

>Also tonnes of TERFs are young women, go read any terf forum and it's hugely made up of young women who "peaked" when Trans people started acting like degenerate weirdos in their circles and social spaces.
this is the only line in the entire post that comes within the same star system as the point i made, and even then it's a weak one (the biggest TERF forum is mumsnet [old], and even if you go for something else their userbase is still peanuts compared to even - say - bluesky, and the idea we should compare forums rather than real-life turnout is in itself silly, particularly for someone purportedly interested in "what is actually happening in the real world".)
that's 36 words out of 291, a relatively high ratio by this poster's standards.

i apologize for no doubt baiting a second reply, but i want to highlight for third party observers what we're dealing with here. this is an insane ratio of noise to signal. even before you get on to the general tediousness of the idpol discussion in question, there's the fact that 90% of any post will be irrelevant to that discussion. it's like trying to argue with a drinky bird ctrl+v'ing The Eye of Argon.

Why are you deleting my posts appealing my obvious nonsense ban?

>>43408
Bc youre unbanned. Congratulations.

>>43409
Will you absurdly ban me again if i make the same joke? Or was i right, this is just pretense?

>>43410
The janny responsible apologizes for their butthurt behavior, asks if we could just forgive and forget.

https://leftypol.org/leftypol/res/2538934.html (Family)
Why are you banned this thread? There is nothing wrong with it

thread >>2539323 on the leftypol board is thinly veiled race baiting pol shit. delete it.

Disabled TORposting on /latam/ again, haven't you? Unbelivable how one (1) lusophone monkey bends you out of shape this bad, and makes you do more work (for free).

Is /usapol/ banned?

>>43422
Based mods tbh thank u guys

pin and lock the 420chan thread in /siberia/ please, it's got a lot of good posts and screencaps dating back to 2006. they were on fox news after all…

Is there any way to automatically detect this image? There's clearly a bot that posts the same bait periodically to keep the board activity stewing in boilerplate and harden consensus, a cointelpro tactic.

Mods stop deleting my posts just because radlib gangster widow doesn't like trvth nvkes

>>43422
You could put more effort in not looking absolutely assblasted over this

WTF is up with the front few pages today?
probably being raided by an unfunny autist.
do job plz.

>>43304
Please remove this loli spam shit from the drive general https://leftypol.org/leftypol/res/2545865.html#q2547776 its completely unrelated to the thread

overboard seems to be broken

Is there a way I can search all boards at once?

the search function means I have to select a board to search and this site suffers from way too many separate boards.

can our beautiful mods comr up witg a plan to get rid of the fuentes shill in usapol? whether by restricting it to isg or whatever. i am so god damn tired of hearing about the musings of laura loomer and spic fuentes

>>43464
imagine being this butthurt over a cartoon drawing of a child, and not even of a sexual nature to boot, lmao

test

They really did remove Alunya from the favicon, and anons called me crazy when I said they were going to remove her.

Please ban the weird incel who keeps shitting up the venezuela thread. it's a thread about potential war and he's only here to shit it up and make it unusable for it's purpose by endlessly crying about Maduro/splitting hairs about who in the world gets to be a real anti-imperialist.
Yes, it is just as autistic as it sounds.
It's just wrecker/glowie shit, and he knows that well.
https://leftypol.org/leftypol/res/2539692.html

>>43518 (me)
sincerely thank you.

Lol what? It's against the rules to call out LARPing now? Did Iron Felix become a mod?

How is this incel or sexism? Is calling out the exploitative nature of Western streamer culture and their use of 3rd world poverty porn wrong?

>>43544
And of course you banned me because of these chan-culture tards spamming KYS. But of course you won't ban them for Rule 11.

11) Posts should, overall, be conductive to an informed and productive discussion. /leftypol/ is not an academic journal, but it also should not be a cesspit of back and forth bickering and pointless insults. Users should attempt to argue for the point they are presenting in an honest and open way and should be receptive to information or arguments that do, in fact, challenge their views.

No that's my fault for triggering them I suppose.

>>43544
you're comparing apples to oranges with the first pic & cases of western women being escorted for breaking local legislation on indecent exposure vs sexual assault and rape
this is still less incel brainrot than the reactionism that is allowed to stay up on /siberia/'s sex & relationships thread and the blatant pedo apologism of >>43526 and by certain namefags

>>43546
>you're comparing apples to oranges with the first pic & cases of western women being escorted for breaking local legislation on indecent exposure vs sexual assault and rape
I didn't once say I condoned sexual assault in any circumstance. But imagine one of these women walked around completely nude or wearing some fetish gear or whatever is the most provocative in their countries, in some backwater neighborhood. What would be the reaction if they got attacked? It would be "uhhh, what the fuck were they thinking?" Also "that's indecent." So these stupid streamers and vloggers try to go all over the world to places where people make less in their lifetime than they do in a year and act like it's supposed to be the cultural equivalent of their home country. But that's exactly why they make these fucking videos. The women are far from the only ones and the innapropriate attire is far from the only issue. I've mostly seen the men trying to make a big deal about the attention they receive and the hostility that people have for filming them without their permission.

These faggots seriously go like "Uhhh this is a public space! I can film you without your permission!" Like I doubt they even check if that is the law in the specific country they're visiting.

It's just the Logan Paul in Japan thing, but even worse if you ask me since these people are fucking destitute and you're trying to turn them into click-bait.

>>43547
>But imagine one of these women walked around completely nude or wearing some fetish gear or whatever is the most provocative in their countries, in some backwater neighborhood. What would be the reaction if they got attacked?
not denying that this in particular would be rather bizarre behavior with consequences that could be foreseen, but it does not excuse the attacker(s) nor should it have any effect on their sentence
also what kind of woman (outside of sex work) would actually do that in a "backwater neighborhood", given that it's the country/culture she's a part of? in my opinion, this raises some concerns about her mental health or overall situation, should that thing ever happen. for me, if i saw a nude woman in a crime-ridden neighborhood i would assume she's a runaway from someplace very dire and is in need of immediate help or is a hard drug addict if she demonstrates the typical movements and habit of such

>These faggots seriously go like "Uhhh this is a public space! I can film you without your permission!" Like I doubt they even check if that is the law in the specific country they're visiting.
honestly i completely agree with condemning this behavior, even more so in the age of ai deepfakes. the world would surely be a little more of a nice place if every country had enforceable legislation against filming people without their consent

Can I get a months ban to help with social media addiction?

I reported CP on the maim board 5 hours ago and it still is there, wtf man

Mods someone is doxxing me on /brg/, please act

>>43503
>They really did remove Alunya from the favicon, and anons called me crazy when I said they were going to remove her.
TBH, since Leftypol has became everything it was founded to oppose, I actually support them doing this. It doesn't deserve Alunya.
>>43559
Good luck. They thought it was a good idea to open up /latam/ when they apparently don't have Spanish or Portuguese-speaking mods.

>>43560
>when they apparently don't have Spanish or Portuguese-speaking mods.
Errou!

>>43567
>soymaxxed
Be for real lol

fix the N word filter. it's too overzealous. I can't even say chickeuygh or Arnold Schwarzeuyghur. including screenshot for proof.

>>43566
what was the joke?
who got doxxed?
context is important.

>>43571

>what was the joke?

There's this fag that spergs out from time to time on /brg/ spamming the same shit about "hetmoids" again and again, so i posted a picture of lamp saying i'm breaking it on his face. This is in reference to an occasion where a group of gays was attacked by some lunatic a decade or so ago with a lamp.

>who got doxxed?

Me

>>43571
"doxxed" guy found leftypol from god knows where and has been spamming and ragebaiting /latam/ for the past year. none of his posts have any quality whatsoever, his "effort"posts are obvious run-of-the-mill stuff like "the left shouldn't support criminals!!!" or ISG drama but 90% of the time he is just sperging out at everyone with 15-year-old 4chin vocabulary, such as telling trans people to cut themselves, posting images of gay people dying from aids, seething about him being banned from reddit that no one cares about, calling women "femoid", hating on average workers with right-wing jargon, etc. anons have asked him to stop and mods have banned him several times.
he gets really frustrated when he's banned and says that we can't take a joke. thing is, nobody has ever laughed at his posts. it's not like he posts elaborated dark humor or something, he simply says shit like "kill yourself transhumanist" and then angrily posts that it was just a joke when he's banned.
he wasn't really doxxed since it was just some ordinary pics being posted, no full names, addresses or whatever. but now that the joke's on him he's really butthurt.

>>43574
Seems about right.

>>43574

>telling trans people to cut themselves

Never happened btw

>>43574

Also this

>15-year-old 4chin vocabulary

Is such a weird thing to bitch and moan about, considering this is an imageboard, and you'll find that lingo spreads through most of it. People on the english speaking boards say shit like "trvth nvke"; writing like that started with reactionaries calling Europe "Evropa" on their silly boards and websites, AFAIK. Other shit that people use like jannies, something-pilled, something-maxxed, etc., is used outside of IBs.

This shit is just cultural lag: the brazillian online left still associates things like "pilled" to the manosphere, even if other people use it ironically or in jest, so they assume that anyone saying it must be an Andrew Tate simp. In essence, they are trapped in 2019 and didn't have the 5th head of Marxism, Nick Mullen to explain to them that saying "fag" and "retard" is okay now.

>>43580
It was only a 3 hour ban, don't be a melt. I would have done the same if you said that to a guy for no reason.

>>43577
You should probably lurk more.
>>>/leftypol/
>>>/siberia/

>>43574
What a king

>>43586
Based mod

>>43588
Then why are you complaining about what you should be allowed to post or not if you're a newfag

reactionary incel nonsense spam on /siberia/ particularly in >>>/siberia/729387
btw muh wall/egg carton discourse is incel delusion created to cope with male pattern baldness and age-related sperm quality decline

>>43593
t. autism sperm fan
>But a large 2014 study based on Swedish medical records hinted that the odds of autism among children born to fathers older than 45 are about 75 percent higher than for children born to fathers in their early 20s. And a 2010 analysis of Swedish data found that men over 55 are four times as likely to have a child with autism as men under 30.
>The most prominent hypothesis is that the sperm of older men has accumulated many spontaneous mutations that the men pass along to their children.

>>43595
>I date a lot of young women
cool story bro, much believe
>I would exterminate every single psychiatrist if it was up to me.
agreed tbh

>>43589

>newfag

Omg that's 4chan vocabulary, mods quick do something!!!!

>>43304
mods, nonce shit on front page

MODS!!!!

>>43604

Hey man can you please be patient, the mod team is busy working hard to remove people using 4chan vocabulary like "newfag"' and "jannie"

clean up the usa thread

what the fuck are you doing. clean up the usa thread

Why the fuck did you delete my thread? Was it because I put a funny image on it?

>>43610
yeah basically

>>43611
Why am I not allowed to put funny images on my thread opener?

>>43612
it just kinda seemed like a typical /pol/ spam thing

>Your ban was filed on Wednesday 19 November, 2025 and expires 4 days from now, which is on Wednesday 3 December, 2025
>You appealed this ban onThursday 27 November, 2025and it was denied. You may not appeal this ban again.
<ID 96734

Welp, looks like the nodes out on /siberia/ for another week :/

just a heads up i dunno. there is some drama involving BE and some breadtuber being discussed in the isg thread and that's fine or whatever. but people on this site and in the isg thread are incapable of discussing the arguments of said breadtuber and are attacking her identity and aesthetics. idk if you care or whatever but that's gonna make the site look bad whatever

>>43616 (me)
examples of said posts (in the /isg/ thread):
>>2579158
>>2579159
>>2579160
>>2579165
>>2579145
>>2579150
>>2579141

btw a question should be added to the faq page about how to link posts across boards

Why is the homosexual jannie banning people for "low quality posting" on siberia?

>>43617
>>>/leftypol/2579158
>>>/leftypol/2579159
>>>/leftypol/2579160
>>>/leftypol/2579165
>>>/leftypol/2579145
>>>/leftypol/2579150
>>>/leftypol/2579141
>>43618
We only accept the highest-quality posting on /siberia/. What is and is not worthy of it is ultimately to our discretion.

1) This was very obviously a joke, parodying the "100 million members of the CPC" line that keeps getting thrown around.
2) This is objectively not what spam is.

This is a shame to see, as moderation had improved significantly in the past months until recently. Now we're lapsing back towards pointless deletions and bans. No /leftypol/ allowed.

I demand accountability from the retarded mod issuing a 5 week ban as a personal vendetta.

My post was not "reactionary" you dipshit. The only person who replied to my post immediately understood the point I was trying to make about NATO deliberately dragging out the conflict and how it's all kabuki theater. I've attached a second screenshot with the only person who replied to me showing that the average thread member in that thread understood my point unlike the dumbass mod who insta banned.

Furthermore:

1. Since when do Mods DELETE the posts they ban? I'm a veteran from the fucking 8chan days and as far as I can recall, whether it was under Space, old BO, Bunkerchan, and even here on /leftypol/ until recently, unless the post is literal porn/illegal content or soyjack spam, banned posts are supposed to STAY UP with the ban message inscribed in red underneath so that other members receive some transparency on what the fuck the mods are doing.

2. Banning for ALL SECTIONS, not just the forum that was "violated", is deliberate censorship. This is why I am accusing the mod of a personal vendetta because besides the ridiculous ban time, banning from ALL boards also prevents people without VPNs from being able to lodge appeals in the Meta forum. I have never bothered with VPNs on /leftypol/ stretching back to the 8chan days, but if this abhorrent behavior is not reigned in by the mod in question or anyone else, I will switch over to forced VPN posting for the rest of my time because clearly a certain someone cannot be trusted to avoid abusing the moderator position they were granted.

3. I demand that regardless of everything else, that this moderator be forced out immediately from his position because he has clearly not read the rules of the board and is not abiding by them. Specifically, he has violated Rule 7, 16, and 17.

>>43625
Once Cyberbarbarian does his once a year check in you're fucking done you power tripping retard. Imagine being entrusted with mod privileges and then not even fucking following your own rules. Siberia has always been a joke/offtopic board and you're trying to moderate it as strictly as /leftypol/. Not even old BO on 8chan was so retarded as to try to censor videogame or meme threads. You're either a fed trying to undermine the site by forcing ultra serious discussion at all times on all forums, or legitimately so stupid that you need to be immediately removed for the safety of the rest of the community.

>>43626
I just lifted the ban but it had already expired so you should be good. Sorry for the inconvenience.

>>43628
Your post is fine. It's not the reason you're banned.
>Since when do Mods DELETE the posts they ban?
It's not best practice to feed trolls with a big, red, attention-grabbing stamp. We also don't like to allow ban-evaders to keep posting. If you're already been banned, expect your future posts to be deleted aswell. Just take a break and don't do it again next time.

>>43629
/siberia/ is more loosely moderated but it's not an all-allowed board.

>>43627
A 3-hour ban? Come now, I am much more generous than that. Not my ban.
>>43628
Browsing through your post history, you had some stinkers and a prior ban history I decided to act upon.
>1.
Since always, frequent ban evaders and trolls depend on their posts staying up to try and shift board culture. A scorched earth policy against them is ensuring they have no say. But also, generally speaking, low-worth posts that advocate reactionary positions or are just generally low-quality and take up space are cleaned up to improve the site as a whole. You were doing some NAFO-tier posting about the superiority of the West, I don't think anyone misses it.
>2.
On the contrary, you have an appeal - on the ban appeal. You can even appeal on the grounds of wanting to make an appeal on /meta/ - we allow that, in all but the most obvious and prolific ban evaders. Plus, the matrix chat is always open for appeals as well - we have redundancy built into the system.
>3.
Lolno. Rule 7 is our domain to decide, 16 and 17 are about our internal structure and direction being our own discretion.
>>43629
Don't make me tap the sign.
>"No chin, no right to speak."
While we are relaxed about the general content of /siberia/, that is far different from being relaxed with the form of such content. The prevalence of incels and soyjaks required culling because of their reactionary elements - /siberia/ after all is a leftist off-topic board, not a free-for-all for whoever saying whatever.

>>43630
>Your post is fine. It's not the reason you're banned.
Good to know that WVobbly gets to do unlimited 5 week bans on anyone he doesn't like, simply for not being pro-Russia enough, and for no other reason. Reign in this fucking retard or at least prohibit him from adjudicating over anything to do with me because he clearly has a personal vendetta against me and no one else.
>It's not best practice to feed trolls with a big, red, attention-grabbing stamp. We also don't like to allow ban-evaders to keep posting. If you're already been banned, expect your future posts to be deleted aswell. Just take a break and don't do it again next time.
Except I'm not a troll OR a ban evader. The only reason I'm even sitting on a fucking VPN is because WVobbly broke Rule 17
<Rule 17: Users have the right to question and challenge any bans or post removals, or other moderator actions, which they feel are unfair or do not live up to the spirit of the rules. This may be done…on the /meta/ board…
and by deliberately banning for all boards was trying to prevent me from even being able to launch an appeal on /meta/.

>>43631
>Browsing through your post history, you had some stinkers and a prior ban history I decided to act upon.
The "prior ban history" was literally YOU you disingenuous fuck. You handed me TWO back to back 5 week bans. Those are my only bans in recent history. The first one I let go because I felt like I needed a temporary break from the board anyways to focus on other things. When I came back, you realized I came back and IMMEDIATELY sought to find any possible pretext to try to ban me again and the post you selected wasn't even in violation, as agreed by the other moderator. Not only that, but you deleted my ENTIRE post history afterwards, not just the banned post, in order to try to cover your tracks. I know you you fucking scumbag. You say you read my post history? Then you would know I didn't use VPNs until now. You were hoping I wouldn't go to the effort of buying a VPN to lodge an appeal and wanted to permanently silence me by preventing me from appealing. If I didn't raise a fuss over your latest bullshit you would have gotten away with it too. Also, this is again YOUR attitude. You say that they were "stinkers" but no one mass reported over them. No one was provoked, trolled, or moved to extreme anger over my posts. YOU were the one who tried to dig through my post history for weeks or months or years-long ago posts that no one bothered to scream for moderation over simply because you don't like me. I have brought book screenshots, telegram screenshots, and even created OC for this board and specifically that thread. There is no justification for your claim of low quality posting when I can find
off topic spam: >>2581824
trolling: >>2581829
blatant racism: >>2581999
random death threats: >>2581997
that goes untouched in virtually every single one of those threads. You hand me 5 weeks for making a normal post while everyone else gets to rule break. This is again just ultimate proof of your biased moderation.
You accuse me of:
>NAFO-tier posting about the superiority of the West
No, if you read my post history like you claimed you'd know that I was PRO-RUSSIAN in the war. This is you making up ad-hoc justifications AFTER you banned me to try to look more reasonable to the rest of the mods who don't know that this is you on a campaign trying to silence me. Other mods like Moffin' have complained before about me being a bloodthirsty campist Zigger. You're accusing me of NAFO simply because I displayed some skepticism over Russian military performance and political leadership.
>On the contrary, you have an appeal - on the ban appeal.
Yeah one that would be insta-rejected by you since you're monitoring me like a hawk trying to find any possible way to ban me you disingenuous FUCK. You have NO JUSTIFICATION for banning people from /meta/. There are people in this community who never bothered to set up matrix chat. Furthermore, you've already admitted that I'm not a ban evader since before deleting my entire post history you were able to check all records of my posting meaning that you had my activity stretching back YEARS.
>Rule 7 is our domain to decide, 16 and 17 are about our internal structure and direction being our own discretion.
Again if Cyberbarbarian had been paying attention you'd have been fucking KILLED. I'm an oldfag. I remember how we used to have our site a single click away from /pol/ on 8chan and we had to deal with their constant race and lQ bullshit spam. That sharpened us and made us smarter since we had to engage constantly against our ideological opponents. People had to think carefully about how to respond and how to argue against that sort of stuff. They had to read, analyze, and use critical thinking skills.
Shay, one of our resident e-celebs, used to be a neo-nazi. He was CONVERTED due to my and other people's efforts arguing against race pseudo-science. He got BTFO so badly that he realized that the communists were smarter and flipped to our side. This sort of thing would be IMPOSSIBLE under governance by idiots like yourself who ban all dissenting opinions to try to force a hugbox. You accused me of being NAFO but I'm actually pro-Russian, so what you really meant was that despite supporting the same side you support in the Ukraine war, you were angry that I didn't drink the kool-aid and glaze Russia's military ENOUGH for your liking. This is an example of how retarded and biased your moderation was in that I didn't even break any rules but you simply didn't want to argue against me and sought to resolve a regular discussion through arbitrary moderation instead. TORpost spamming gets a 3 hour ban. Posting porn without spoilers gets a 1 day ban. I get handed FIVE WEEKS because you couldn't handle a real dissenting opinion. All you are doing is teaching everyone to switch to VPNs rather than being honest regular users because you literally can't be trusted with power. I found ACTUAL spam and low quality posts in the thread you banned me in that went unmoderated. Back the fuck off you slimy bitch.

>>43633
I forgot that /leftypol/ can't crosslink to /meta/. Whatever. Here is the random selection of posts I found in 10 seconds in that same thread that I was banned in that went untouched. Somehow my post was more "low quality" "reactionary" than blatant off topic posts, racism, and death threats. Note that I'm not saying that these people should be banned. I'm not. I'm happy that they have the freedom to joke around. But VWobbly is fucking gunning for me so hard that I refuse to accept any more of his moderation activity since it's blatantly clear that he's making up excuses just to try to get me out.

>>43633

>ban all dissenting opinions to try to force a hugbox
>"low quality" "reactionary"

Welcome to r/leftypol; similar issue is ongoing under /brg/.

She's. Sq dark. All staneire

Can you ban the guy spamming emojis in the thread >>>/leftypol/2547894 if he does it again, thnx.

>>43641
just perma smith anon for his disingenuous bullshit already

Is spurdo anon saying back in time people could say trccn on leftypol?

CSAM in Siberia.
Again.

Petition to officially ban blanchardism from the lgbt board

It's the wojak pepe of the trans discourse

>>43646
Again, it's been up for hours.

>>43649
ok got it, sorry

>>43642
Yeah fair enough. Smith Anon responded to this Marx quote:
"Taken together, the commodities are sold at 2 + 7 + 17 = 26 above, and 8 + 18 = 26 below their value, so that the deviations of price from value balance out one another through the uniform distribution of surplus-value, or through addition of the average profit of 22 per 100 units of advanced capital to the respective cost-prices of the commodities I to V. One portion of the commodities is sold above its value in the same proportion in which the other is sold below it. And it is only the sale of the commodities at such prices that enables the rate of profit for capitals I to V to be uniformly 22%"
…by claiming that according to Marx, values and prices are the same.

That guy has to be a far-right troll who is spreading disinfo on purpose and not just an idiot.

>>43652
>spreading disinfo on purpose and not just an idiot
its exceedingly clear and hes ruined polecon general for its entire existence. at first it was a good exercise and opportunity to teach lurkers but hes just been repeating himself after being proven wrong for over a year. not to mention he was banned before and just kept dodging. it wouldnt be so bad if he was just presenting liberal or keynesian ideas as an alternative but he always says "according to marx" and then blatantly lies about things hes been corrected on a hundred times.