[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!
[ Return / Go to bottom ]

File: 1780037220900.jpg (126.62 KB, 1024x1024, 537.jpg)

 

FATALITY Edition
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
91 posts and 17 image replies omitted.

>>789962
>The world litterally caters to short people in concrete material terms

In truth it caters to average height people and people who are abnormal in height wether that be being short or tall are at risk of infrastructure that isn’t are made for them. I.E. Tall people having to buy for expensive clothing, not being able to enter certain places, cars not being made for people with dwarfism etc.

You also have to take dating into account where taller men are considered more attractive and shorter women women are generally considered more attractive, but preferences for women’s height are less extreme.

>you never heard of the term "lanky" before

Lanky specifically imply tall AND skinny and it doesn’t always have a negative connotation.

File: 1780640003398.png (1.2 MB, 768x768, ClipboardImage.png)

>>789761
that birthed the bourgeois class
>like donald trump and jeffrey epstein
????
>just because you think so doesn't make it true
seeing's believing, dipshit

>>790047
Yes, but since the average height of the men is higher then women, this means that the average height of the population as a whole corresponds to the height of a smaller man.
I guess you could argue that its less likely to fit for smaller women tho.
Obviously people with dwarfism aren't in a good position either.
Bar dating apps choosing the most random of issues, there isn't that big of an importance for height in real life dating, plenty of short guys gets girlfriends and wives, and honestly, i'd rather be short then a redhead in dating (I'm neither)
Idk, Lanky is the anglophone term, but in france we use " grosse perche" (big rod) to insult tall people, it's never been a positive. you're right that it's mostly for skinny and tall people.

>>789992
Incels would probably like how chudded the country is, but they'd get fucking shanked.
t. work with pinoys

>>790126
By the men or the women?

>>789691
>I know that seggs wouldn't really do much to improve my material conditions
sexo is actually a little bit downstream from material conditions, i'd say

>>789883
monkeypaw moment where you enter a loving relationship with a nice girl and you grow fat together (which is usually the case for long term relationships), you lose the spark and you fantasize about fucking an arthoe you met years ago after a mutual friend introduced you, and she was obviously into you because you were a well-paid developer working on fintech but knew enough foucalt to have the obama gimmick work in your favor, but you were never brave enough to actually ask her out, that's your life now.

>>789772
>the hands are bigger than her head

>>789939
Looks more like she's very short tbh

>>789934
Are you on the rag today anon?

>>790153
girls love when your hand covers their entire face

>>790156
I think I set him off with my attempt at a joke about that chicks fetishes.

>>789962
Again, short men are viewed more negatively and often have to use stepladders or whatever to get to high places.

And that anon is right. Short men are patronized a lot.

The fact that you’re acting like this tells me that you’re not really looking at the problem.

But of course when women are mocked/patronized for aesthetic/physiognomic flaws there’s a lot of sympathy that’s given

>>789962
>The world litterally caters to short people in concrete material terms, how many tall people die in freak accidents every day ?
either you are freakishly tall or you are unable to comprehend than when anyone says "short" they mean "shorter than average". of course the world will "in concrete material terms" cater to the average. because it's the fucking average, this is so self-evident it's stupid to point this out.

>>790160
I'm not talking about people with dwarfism
No ones gives sympathy to women who are ugly, idk in what world you live.
>>790163
The average includes women, anon. ta short man is often average in terms of height of the whole population. I'm not even freakishly tall, just normal regular tall, (186cm) and I've always been uncomfortable everywhere, the worst being cars.

>>790057
>Bar dating apps

Why would you exclude dating apps? They are very important in modern dating, studies show that 10% of all partnered adults met their partner online, and 20% for those under 30, 39% of straight couples who met in 2017 met online. 27% of couples who married in 2024 met on dating apps.
so it’s only getting more important.


https://www.connectedcouples.app/blog/how-couples-meet-statistics

>>790419
More then I thought. Nonetheless, there is a difference between dating apps and meeting online.
But for dating apps, the issue with them is that they select for the most petty of traits, I wonder what are the stats for male redheads on them for exemple.
I just think they should be banned, it's a disgusting reflexion of the liberalisation of everything in society, including romance, since may 68. I think they're pretty much solely responsible for both the rise of "slut feminism" and incel ideology. They've only worked to make tensions between the sexes larger.
I don't think they reflect how people date in real life, people tend to be a lot less stingy with people in real compared to behind a screen.

File: 1780758050723.jpg (457.03 KB, 2048x1371, 1713391569821.jpg)

>>788076
>>788408
>>789066
>poor
>masculine
>hairy
>last years of my 20s
its so fucking over bruh

>>790409
> No ones gives sympathy to women who are ugly, idk in what world you live.

They do.
Society is more defensive of womens self image than mens

>>790487
>listing masculine as a negative trait

Ngmi

Being hairy and broke I can sympathize with though

>>790487
It is what it is. Hair can be cut, age is just a number, and not being poor should be your main goal in life anyways. Focus on sorting your cash out first.

>>790420
> I don't think they reflect how people date in real life, people tend to be a lot less stingy with people in real compared to behind a screen.

My sweet summer child

People are just as stingy in meatspace as they are in cyberspace but they’re not gonna be outright about it because they don’t wanna be accused of discrimination.

Also I remember as a kid watching talk shows or listening to radio shows about women talking about immediate turn-offs for them in dating, a lot of which seems more petty.
Or even overhearing female convos about dating preferences.

> I just think they should be banned, it's a disgusting reflexion of the liberalisation of everything in society, including romance, since may 68. I think they're pretty much solely responsible for both the rise of "slut feminism" and incel ideology. They've only worked to make tensions between the sexes larger.

Romantic love was alot more discriminatory before May 1968
Men were rejected for not being in a prestigious families/universities

Women were divorced so that men could find a sugar baby.

If anything, love nowadays being de-liberalized with the “puriteen” epidemic and whatnot


Besides, the “liberalization “ of love you’re referring to was a boomer fad. It went out of fashion by the Reagan era

>>789772
I wish fujoshis would draw their pretty men having their feet and/or pecs worshipped

>>790497
>Romantic love was alot more discriminatory before May 1968 Men were rejected for not being in a prestigious families/universities Women were divorced so that men could find a sugar baby.
This wasn't true in working class families. Families and traditional communities tended to operate as a system of support outside capitalism, may 68 put an end to this, marking the advance of capitalism in the last remnant of the previous order.

>Besides, the “liberalization “ of love you’re referring to was a boomer fad. It went out of fashion by the Reagan era


Not really, just look at how widely avaible and popular porn, casual sex, dating apps are. The "puriteen" stuff is overstated, never has the youth watch so much pornography, the decline in sexual relationships is because of the decline in relations in general. If anything, this is another step in the liberalisations of relationships as now tech compagnies even controls the way people meet each other.
I'm not arguing that people weren't vain before, but dating apps has institutionalised it, they've promoted it, and they've made it the sole criteria in those apps.
I've met plenty of people who were ugly, short, and still managed to get a similarly wealthy girlfriend or boyfriend. But this can't happen online.
I don't think traditional values were perfect, but we live in a era where individualism, selfishness and capitalism is promoted as moral, by both the cultural right and left. they just appeal to women and men differently.

File: 1780764817333.jpg (144.85 KB, 1080x602, Screenshot_20260606_105224….jpg)

>>790409
I guess you can't be, statistically speaking, freakishly tall and not retarded at the same time

>>790522
Why do you use May 1968 as demarcation?
Also, “puriteen” is overstated but it’s a real thing. Although most of these puriteens are beyond pubertal age
There’s been hostility towards porn, especially cartoon porn.

Young people have less sexual relationships due to stranger danger and me too.

Also:
>I've met plenty of people who were ugly, short, and still managed to get a similarly wealthy girlfriend or boyfriend. But this can't happen online.

Those people you listed are outliers.

The “free love” movement was a farce. It needed in the Reagan era
Half the shit that happened back then would be considered grooming in the post-2012 cultural climate

>I don't think traditional values were perfect, but we live in a era where individualism, selfishness and capitalism is promoted as moral, by both the cultural right and left. they just appeal to women and men differently.

Traditional values were just the village elders being the executive branch of aesthetics
Nowadays it’s the commoner who is the executive branch of aesthetics

>>790527
I'm French and French people are generally taller then average
In any case
7-9% isn't that small of a minority, when people see me they see that i'm tall, but they aren't shocked about it either. You've seen plenty of people that tall in your life, I assure you.

>>790532
>Why do you use May 1968 as demarcation?
It's a symbolic event of the triumph of liberalism over traditions, of americanism over french nationalism, and of the free market over state controlled economies.
It's essentially the date that marked the final triumph of Liberalism in France, those mouvement then extended to the rest of the West. It's just a great representation of the changes in the world culturally in the afterwar era.

>Young people have less sexual relationships due to stranger danger and me too.
Both of those things (well less me too, but more so paranoia of women towards men) are a result of the weakening in social links with the end of traditional communities.


>Those people you listed are outliers.
doubt so, historically most people ended up being married and having children. You didn't have incels/femcels back then.

>Traditional values were just the village elders being the executive branch of aesthetics Nowadays it’s the commoner who is the executive branch of aesthetics
Not just that tho, the old system allowed for the creation of communities to work together with each other, where you met others and then eventually made a life with them. You didn't live isolated in a bubble, like many do nowadays. Communities are dead and the individual rule supreme, that was the promise of mau 68, thats the world we live in now.

File: 1780767002177-0.png (71.23 KB, 882x485, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1780767002177-1.png (276.17 KB, 498x426, ClipboardImage.png)

moid bros

how feasible is this female on male dating strategy?

>>790536
>>790527
Also older men tend to be shorter, so the percentage of tall men in young womens are dating pool is higher than that.

>>790547
Nitwit pop-science explanation aside, alternative between hot and cold does highlight the emotional experience. Hardly a novel observation.

>>790547
This sounds like post facto advice to justify shit a crazy bitch would already want to do

>>790545
>doubt so, historically most people ended up being married and having children. You didn't have incels/femcels back then.

Marriage back then was utilitarian

>Not just that tho, the old system allowed for the creation of communities to work together with each other, where you met others and then eventually made a life with them. You didn't live isolated in a bubble, like many do nowadays.


Most communities were small and tightknit.

>>790487
none of those things are stopping you from finding someone that likes you

>>790569
His (her?) mom probably likes them.

>>790487
At you age masculine starts being a plus, and hairy can be easily fixed. Poor on the other hand becomes a black mark on your soul, try to fix it asap.

>>789772
This but we're both guys and I'm on the right.

>>789772
built for bbc

beautiful lady😍🥰

File: 1780800906227.png (918.24 KB, 1920x1080, 7.png)

>>790573
The truth is
>The social contract is broken
>men are being actively excluded from employment AND dating
>Men are actively being excluded society
It's no secret that men are "dropping out" of the workforce and dating at record rates. Them "giving up" implies it's their choice. Nobody chooses to be loveless, jobless, and broke. Men want to work. They're just not letting us except at Taco Bell or Amazon for $17/hr, while being told "the future is female" and seeing "women encouraged to apply" on every job posting.

When women are homeless, society says they're "less fortunate". But when normal men struggle, suddenly it's a "skill issue" or "natural selection." Men are constantly gaslighted. Yet misogynistic men have no trouble dating.

The education system is gynocentric from pre-K to PhD. Women earn 40% more doctorates and nearly twice as many master's degrees. Med school, law school, vet school, all majority female. And despite male applicants having higher test scores, women are accepted at much higher rates. That's not "men opting out."

Most women won't date a man less successful than her. So as women's status rises and men's falls, fewer men meet their standards. Women don't have to lower them either they get validation from Tinder, emotional support from therapists, intimacy from any bar on any night. They don't need a real partner.

What problems in your life do you think women are to blame for?

>>790755
A woman gave birth to me.

>>790760
rest assured, I'll never forgive her for that.

>>790497
>“puriteen” epidemic
I wonder if I posted my opinions I'd be called a puriteen, even though I'm so old I remember when online dating was a thing everyone laughed at. What kind of pathetic nerd loser would get dates off the computer? LOL

>>790765
still true today…

>>790727
And? So?

>>790765
Most puriteens are usually above pubertal age anyway.
But your opinions about online dating wouldn't be labelled as such

>>790791
chudification is inevitable, retard

File: 1780819591193.png (2.04 MB, 1024x1536, ClipboardImage.png)

>>790808
this

>>790808
>>790817
"Chud" is just a slur to put down male cynicism nowadays.
It use to mean actual frivolous chauvinism

Now it's just used to put down men for not conforming to popular opinionz


Unique IPs: 24
[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ Return / Go to top /