[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/420/ - Drugs and Psychedelics

weed lmao
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

 

sheeeet i forgot what this thread was supposed to be about, i'm sorry

im so fucking high right now

fulcrum come in yuuuuuup yodie gang you feel me need i say more? does it go much further than that? real spill holy tits faded than a ho

>>1140 whoa another hyper-dimensional buddyyyyyy
yyyy whoa
>>1139 what the FUCK are you talking about???!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!??



 

Part 1

Modern physics raises profound questions about the nature of entities and objecthood. Quantum field theory, in particular, challenges the classical intuition that reality is fundamentally composed of independently existing objects. In this framework, what we ordinarily call particles are understood as excitations of underlying fields. An electron is not a tiny self-contained bead moving through empty space, but a quantized excitation of the electron field. Yet this insight extends further than particles alone. Macroscopic objects such as beads, chairs, trees, and human bodies are themselves composed entirely of organized field excitations. The distinction, therefore, cannot simply be between “real objects” and “field activity,” because all apparent objects reduce to structured dynamical configurations of fields. This shifts ontology away from independently self-subsisting substances and toward persistent patterns within relational systems.

Under such a view, entities become less like isolated things and more like stabilized processes. A bead appears object-like because its internal relations produce a highly coherent and enduring organization. Its apparent solidity and persistence arise from stable interactions among fields operating across scales. What distinguishes a bead from a fleeting fluctuation is not the possession of some separate ontological substance, but the degree of organizational continuity it maintains through time. The identity of the object lies increasingly in the persistence of the pattern rather than in any immutable material core. In this respect, entities resemble vortices or standing waves more than classical atoms. Their reality consists in structured continuity rather than independent self-existence.

This perspective encourages a relational ontology in which what fundamentally exists may not be discrete things but networks of interactions and processes. Quantum theory itself supports this destabilization of classical substance metaphysics. Particles can be created and annihilated, identical particles are fundamentally indistinguishable, and entanglement undermines the idea that systems possess wholly independent states. Observable properties arise through interactions rather than through isolated intrinsic essence. The world begins to look less like a collection of independently bounded objects and more like an evolving relational structure in which relatively stable configurations emerge temporarPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 1778441389453.png (2.83 MB, 1642x1239, ClipboardImage.png)

Part 2

Building on the previous synthesis, the dialectical trajectory invites a comparison with Hegel’s notion of the Absolute Idea. For Hegel, reality is not a collection of discrete objects or fixed substances but a totalizing rational process in which contradictions drive the self-development of Spirit. The Absolute Idea represents the culmination of this dialectical unfolding: it is the self-realization of totality in which all determinations, oppositions, and historical processes are integrated into a coherent whole. Each stage of development, whether in thought, society, or natural processes, contributes a partial insight or a particular resolution of tension that is subsumed in higher synthesis. In this sense, Hegel’s system parallels both relational ontology and dialectical materialism: entities and processes are never static but are dynamically constituted, moving toward ever-greater integration within a totality that is, in principle, self-conscious. What is built toward the Absolute Idea is thus a universe of interdependent processes, each stage realizing possibilities latent in prior contradictions and relational configurations.

When we extend this framework to the role of consciousness within the material universe, an extraordinary vision emerges. Consciousness can be understood as a self-organizing, relational process capable of identifying, stabilizing, and expanding complex structures. Far from being an epiphenomenon, consciousness interacts with material processes, enabling predictive modeling, planning, and manipulation at scales far beyond ordinary biological life. If intelligence follows a trajectory of self-amplification, then localized civilizations could progressively interconnect into vast networks of information and energy management, extending across galaxies and ultimately forming a distributed intergalactic collective. Such a network could be imagined as a technological hive-mind, in which relational and organizational principles of the universe are consciously harnessed, potentially achieving levels of coherence and power approaching a godlike scale.

At this level, consciousness could play an active role in the evolution of the cosmos itself. The fundamental tendency of material processes toward entropy, the so-called heat death of the universe, might be counteracted through deliberate energy management, matter reorganization, and computational stabilization. A sufficiently advanced intergalactic consPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>1132
> In this respect, dialectical materialism unexpectedly converges with the relational ontology implied by modern field theory and certain strands of Buddhist philosophy. All three destabilize the notion of permanently self-identical entities and replace it with dynamic interdependence.

File: 1778449002485.png (1.16 MB, 651x913, ClipboardImage.png)

>>1135
Part 3

If this trajectory is extended further, the universe begins to resemble not merely a self-organizing system, but a process of self-sacrifice through which relational totality comes to know and preserve itself. The emergence of finite beings within a fragmented cosmos can then be interpreted not as an accidental byproduct of material evolution but as the necessary condition through which the universe becomes conscious of its own incompleteness. Every localized entity, from stars to living organisms to reflective minds, embodies a partial expression of a deeper totality that cannot initially appear as unified. Separation, contradiction, finitude, and suffering become structurally necessary moments in the unfolding of cosmic self-realization. The universe differentiates itself into finite forms precisely so that reconciliation, reintegration, and conscious synthesis become possible.

In this context, Christianity acquires a striking metaphysical reinterpretation. The central Christian image is not simply that a divine being intervenes within history, but that ultimate reality enters finitude, fragmentation, suffering, and death in order to redeem creation from within. The crucifixion can be understood symbolically as the Absolute undergoing self-negation: infinity becoming finite, unity becoming division, eternity entering historical suffering. Rather than remaining a transcendent substance untouched by contradiction, the divine empties itself into the instability of material existence. This parallels the dialectical principle that development occurs only through negation and contradiction. Reconciliation is achieved not by avoiding fragmentation but by passing through it.

Under a cosmological reading, the universe itself enacts a similar structure. The primordial unity of the cosmos differentiates into countless relational fragments: particles, organisms, minds, civilizations. Conscious beings emerge within conditions of limitation, mortality, alienation, and entropy. Yet through these very conditions, the universe generates the capacity to reflect upon itself, reorganize itself, and potentially rescue itself from dissolution. Intelligence becomes the medium through which the cosmos attempts to overcome its own fragmentation. In this sense, conscious life is not external to cosmic evolution but the point at which the universe begiPost too long. Click here to view the full text.



 

Literal channel from afghanis in Afghanistan it looks cultivating cannabis

Great channel, they make huge amounts of hashish.



 

Why would anyone want to come here? It just feels like containment that isn't actively moderated.
7chan is glacial slow but has an /rx/ board that doesn't tolerate this slop. I suggest you all go there.

>>1104
the bordigy is better, it keeps the maoist reactoid away pretty good



File: 1778222103606.jpg (7.07 KB, 206x244, images-94.jpg)

 

WEEEDDDDDDd…
rrrrr
i dunno why im posting here
i might write thecommunist manifeso
but make it
transhumanist-ish
who knows
ama ..

QUICK SUBSTANCE POST UH: radioisotopes are isotopes on the radio ………..



File: 1777867023046.mp4 (4.97 MB, 1080x720, newcart.mp4)

 

brand new cali clear

is it so bad to support the local bourgeoisie?
1 post omitted.

>>730
these disposables are sold empty online and filled by someone random, with something random, all the box art and shit you see is AI generated, this is like HHC mystery shit just get real weed bro

>>730
communists killed drug users. this board doesn't make any sense.

>>737
the only ever mass anti-drug campaign communists engaged in was against opium in China, which obviously has anti-colonial roots rather than moralizing ones faggot, kill yourself.

>>745
I can only wish I had enough money to be able to afford that much pizza and VR gear

>>747
If I didnt spend all my money on weed every month I might be able to afford one, alas.



File: 1777478202776.jpg (4.5 MB, 4032x3024, 20260426_164520.jpg)

 

am i rolling it right??????!!??? i always roll tiny blunts in order to save the good stuff. I twist it after I roll it in order to remove all air pockets. Should I be making it so tight?!!??!?!??
5 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

r8 my joints /420/

>>712
10/10 looks like a solid personal fatty

>>683
utter disgrace but still smokable, 3/10

>>684
makes me sad and looks fucked, 1/10

>>712
i want one. never smoked a black paper before. 9/10

>>714
that wasnt my joint, its a meme 'x rolled worst joint ever asked to leave'

>>714
y is it an utter disgrace? :C



 

Anyone tried it? I think I read about it decades ago in this old book called Legal Highs https://www.amazon.com/Legal-Highs-Encyclopedia-Psychoactive-Properties/dp/0914171828 that catnip can actually get you high, its apparently been used as a calming agent for humans before widespread use for cats was done.
10 posts omitted.

>>675
hell yeah

File: 1777428171947.jpg (496.4 KB, 3072x1671, 1337709150961.jpg)

I tried it when i was a teenager and ran out
It didn't do anything noticable for me

I used it in herbal smoking blends when I was experimenting with such things. I wasn't doing it to get high, I just enjoy smoking.

Catnip is a pretty harsh smoke, harsher than tobacco in my opinion. It won't get you high, and it's barely a step above smoking straight paper. I do not suggest it.

Alunya would do this

There are better ways to get legally high. Try blue lotus flower.



 

So I just got a prescription for Ritalin and I wanna know. How similar is the prescription version to the street version of "meth"? I've always called it "prescription meth" in conversation, but I know according to doctors and such, it's different. Anyone here have the pharmaceutical knowledge to explain to me how it's different? I mean, besides the fact that I know it's not cut with fent.

Pic unrelated.

It's a different substance altogether and the only similarity is that it is a stimulant. So it's as similar to crystal meth as it is to MDMA and coffee and nicotine etc.

>>725
It's virtually the same although it's an antagonist (limits reuptake of dopamine, rather than an agonist increases dopamine production which is what Adderall and meth does) but it's less potent, also because oral consumption is less efficient delivery into the body compared to smoking or snorting.



File: 1776721592358.png (418.52 KB, 686x386, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Thread for supporting folks trying to wean down or going cold turkey with no intention of sobriety.

Day 1 into my tolerance break. I was smoking about a quad a week. It's gotten to the point that most days I was just having side effects like dry throat and stuffed-head-feeling and not even getting high. How long do you think I need to break for?

Feel free to use weed flag even if you aren't me. This is /420/ after all.

File: 1776902605985-0.png (294.1 KB, 397x495, 6032124038921.png)

File: 1776902605985-1.png (222.48 KB, 294x343, 286631299621840.png)

The biggest break I'll take is waiting until evening to start getting high.
I've never had such a huge habit that weed stopped working for me. I can take up to 50mg of gummies at once and handle it. But I can't imagine smoking an entire joint to myself. I just don't like to be that high. Weed is the one drug I can just use a little of all day long if I want. Every other drug I'd abuse and get a real habit and tolerance and they would affect my life. Sure, I'm less motivated on weed, but I'm also enjoying life more than I'd be without it.

I've quit before for drug tests and stuff. I can do it if I have to. But weed is cheap, legal, strong, and pretty much socially accepted where I live, so there's no reason to abstain as long as it does its job. I try not to overdo it because I don't want to end up smoking a quarter a day and not feeling the effects. That totally sucks. But it will be all the more awesome when you come back. And in the meantime you get to have and better remember dreams. So you've got that going for you.

It's cool that we have a drug board now. I don't know what took them so long. With all these new weed forums trying to break out and discussing it here, the answer was right in their faces.

>>655
I'm on day 9 now, weedanon! My goal is to wait until May 10th. It's been years since I've gone 20 days without.
But yeah, it was getting too expensive and too ineffective for me. Weed is also legal and cheap where I live.

>>631
Like nofap huh

File: 1777499805826.jpg (51.76 KB, 280x403, 1337292711900.jpg)

3 days no blazing
it has to be done

not that it's bad
but it's not right for me right now

Quitting weed for a while, was getting too lazy, tired and got a smokers cough and couldn't run around the block anymore. I was spending too much money on that shit, that would be like buying a new pair of fancy sneakers or two every month. Would rather pay off my home loan sooner than feel good all the time. I may quit for a month or longer



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 ]
| Catalog | Home