the most recent Epstein file drop potentially implicating the creation of /pol/ with moot meeting with Epstein feels like it needs to have its own thread. it's pretty much an accepted fact at this point that Epstein played a key role in what seems to be a massive secret human trafficking ring that exists as a form of Mutually Assured Destruction to for the elites to maintain power, but what is currently a lesser-known and recent revelation is that circumstantial evidence indicating that the entire formation of the far-right was an astroturfing psyop by pedophile billionaires and the intelligence community.
in particular, this thread
>>>/lgbt/3094 links even more damning evidence that the astroturfing of far-right politics has been intentionally perpetrated as a psyop to ensure that the Molochian demons in power have access to as many children to rape as possible. pedocon theory is not a meme at this point or even merely an own on the hypocrisy of the far-right; it arguably is a significant factor behind the existence of the far-right today.
https://dump.li/a/29c72d#xhttps://archive.org/details/dark-web-playground-child-abuse-forum-leak-censored-posted-endchan-03.18.2025while it's bordering on LARP to act like anything serious happens on this site, broadly speaking "the left" and especially leftists familiar with imageboard culture & history should be investigating and agitating more specifically on this matter. the purpose of this thread is to consolidate information on this and to crowdsource more investigative work in the Epstein files specifically on the issue of astroturfing the creation of the alt-right. if you are involved in any real life organizing of any kind you should be spreading this information far and wide for agitprop purposes.
the masses needs to know that there is no civil debate to be had with the right, nor is there even any particularly sophisticated leap in theory and critique one needs to make; the far-right is simply ontologically evil and we should be agitating on them all being controlled by human traffickers as hard as possible.
>>2678992>It really wasn't any more reactionary than South Parkwhat kind of metric is that supposed to be?
>>2674800Where did I say this was the only way rightoids come about?
What is clear is that, the specific brand of internet rightoidism that permeated the internet around the time of the Donald Trump presidency was engineered by Israel
obvious you're a gimpy little 4chan pedophile and mad about
>uuuh middle classyou've literally no idea who I am. Nonce.
and I just want to state again
I SAID ALL OF THIS 6 YEARS AGO.
I AM SO AHEAD OF THE CURVE, ALWAYS HAVE BEEN
HATERS WERE ALWAYS BEHIND.
Funny I was arguing with my missus that "Pizza" being a paedophile codeword is retarded "what if I literally just want a Pizza? They accidentally deliver me a fucking girl?"
Yet.. it turns out she was right, it really does seem like Pizza, Lemonade and a other food based words are used as code words a lot in these emails.
Am i the only person who doesn't think Epstein meeting with moot one time means that an entire political movement was astroturfed? Pol was most likely already in the works and had nothing to do with anything Epstein said. Epstein liked to talk a lot, that doesn't mean all these emails reveal the genius machinations of the elite, it's mostly him spitting out random ideas that may or may not be taken seriously at all.
>>2679624South Park is a liberal (in the pre-"woke" sense) show
aka it is literally not radical in any way
>>2678878No, Judaism is a religion. A "Secular Jew" is not Jewish in any real sense beyond maybe a vague cultural tie, they are Ashkenazi, Mizrahi etc. It's just we keep using Jew incorrectly and it's pushed by Jewish people to run defence by conflating Religion and Ethnicity.
Are you telling me, that pic related, is literally the same ethnicity as Netanyahu?
I mean, lets be fucking real, not even Jews think of of themselves as all the same ethnicty, ask an Ashkenazi Israeli if he's the same ethnicity as a Ethiopian Jew and see how many of your teeth you will be picking up off the ground.
If we hold this "Jew is a ethnicity because of vague cultural traditions" does that mean everyone who celebrates Christmas is Ethnically Christian?
>>2681499>Am i the only person who doesn't think Epstein meeting with moot one time means that an entire political movement was astroturfed?No. There's so many similarities between "pizzagate" and this that it makes me tired just thinking about it lol. And I don't mean the pedo stuff I mean people making connections where there aren't any really besides some tangentially related stuff but saying this means I'm a shill working for epstein or was it soros this week can't remember.
>>2681499So what do you think the manipulation part relating to 4chan in the very first picture of OP relates to?
>>2682020No, you are not a shill working for Soros. Just a useful idiot suffering from misguided nostalgia for a website that is basically a fed honeypot for at least a decade, or as RapeApe has put it: 'I am talking to the feds all the time.'
>>2682037Never said anything about it not being a fed honeypot or denied that it was. Subject here is Epstein. But you're exactly what I meant. Disagree with the herd and you're instantly insulted by a bunch of emotional fags like you, lol.
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/02/the-epstein-files-as-a-weapon-in-the-conflict-over-currency-and-the-central-domain.htmlThe Epstein Files as a Weapon in the Conflict Over Currency and the “Central Domain”
<Posted on February 5, 2026 by Curro Jimenez
>The Epstein files have shown, once again, that elites from the worlds of politics, finance, technology, and media form an interconnected network. At points, their interests and connections collide into a single vortex—in this case, most probably a deliberately created one. This begs the question: why was it exposed?
>I don’t think there is much doubt that Jeffrey Epstein was an intelligence asset. He was most probably working for Mossad, but with ties to others—for example, MI6, as his extensive relationship with Lord Mandelson indicates. His life and “career” were a typical example of this. He was virtually unknown, with no significant traceable family connections; yet, after working in a finance firm, he launched his own financial company and did extremely well.
>Epstein ran a financial advisory firm that charged “fees” to his clients. Fees are virtually unlimited, unlike the sale of goods, which is much more complicated to justify. If an agency wants to channel money to an individual, it’s a great cover. Some argue that those fees were, in effect, blackmail, but that is a flimsy argument.
>When Epstein died in 2019, he was a wealthy man. He was worth $578 million, including two private Caribbean islands, several lavish homes, and about $380 million in cash and investments. But $578 million is a relatively small number for the world’s billionaires, sovereign funds, and politicians with state budgets—and a manageable investment to control them.
>The Epstein files have exposed the debauchery of elites. They operate in a separate order, both physical and moral. Through their corporate offices, private villas, jets, and exclusive hotels, they inhabit a different world. In that world, the amorality of the current cultural form is expressed through perversions. However, many of those who so loudly criticize them might fall into the same pattern if only they were assured immunity.
>Which is what Epstein seemed to provide: a safe environment in which to let loose all kinds of fantasies. Whether they were legal or illegal was of no consequence. The correspondence of many with him shows a tacit understanding that whatever happened when they were together was not to be spoken about too directly—only by reference, and never in public.
>For about 30 years, since he bought Little St. James Island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, it worked. The man must have been smart, no doubt. He managed to infiltrate elite circles, gain their trust, and make them feel safe enough to engage in illegal activities, all while keeping records and probably reporting to his bosses.
>Until it was no longer private. In 2008, when he was first tried and convicted, few in the public suspected the reach of his network and the scale of the operation. It might be more than mere coincidence that it was the year of the big financial crisis. In 2019, he was arrested, and less than a month later, he supposedly killed himself while in jail. But I don’t think many people really accept that.
>The question, assuming one does not buy into the mainstream media narrative of Epstein being a perverted, self-made millionaire who happened to have many elite friends, is why he was exposed. Having the wealth, connections, and compromising evidence, why did he not use it? Perhaps he tried after he was arrested, and that’s why he “died.”
>But the question remains: if we accept the hypothesis that he was not working alone but for someone, why did they allow him to be caught and exposed? I will attempt a circumstantial answer, not a particular one, as I don’t think many people are in a position to answer it definitively.
>We are in the midst of a change in the “central domain”—to use the Carl Schmitt framework—of our current technological paradigm. For Schmitt, a central domain is the subject that gives an age its structure, language, and battles. A central domain is the core of an age in relation to which all other subjects and challenges are defined. Each era has one dominant domain that organizes how people understand reality.
>Schmitt offers the example of European technical progress during the nineteenth century. Progress in this field was the central domain of that age’s paradigm. The massive upsurge of “technical progress” affected all “moral, political, social, and economic situations,” he writes in the essay “The Age of Neutralization.” Its overpowering effect gave it the status of a “religion of technical progress, which promised that all other problems would be solved by technological progress.”
>After the age of “technical progress,” for Schmitt, came the age of economic technique, which lasted, I would say, until 2007–2008, coinciding with the release of the first iPhone and the financial crisis. In an economic age, “one needs only to solve adequately the problem of the production and distribution of goods in order to make superfluous all moral and social questions.”
>“God, freedom, progress, anthropological conceptions of human nature, public domain, rationality and rationalization, and finally the concept of nature and culture itself derive their concrete historical content from the situation of the central domains and can only be grasped therefrom,” Schmitt writes.
>Some might argue with the use of Carl Schmitt’s theoretical framework because of his political choices; however, Schmitt was right in foreseeing two big changes well ahead of time. First, that the relationship between power and the subject in the twentieth century could no longer be thought of through the classical concepts of national sovereignty and the nation-state—an idea that many others, from Foucault to Agamben, developed later.
>Secondly, as Nathan Gardels writes for Noema: “It appears Schmitt’s second possibility of America as a balancer did in fact take place during the post–Cold War period. That brief era, which built the exoskeleton of a singular planet, is now splintering. Deglobalization, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and the mounting hostility between the West and China—which is seeking to become a maritime global power unshackled from its continental constraints—are morphing into the differentiated Grossraum that Schmitt predicted.”
>Schmitt anchored these insights in his concept of paradigms with central domains dominated by his notion of the political. He argued that the central domain is where the definition of friend and enemy—his primary category for the birth of the political field—takes place, and that where this happens is where the political truly resides.
>I would argue that we are living through a transitional period between central domains, which Schmitt also considered to be a distinctive phase. We are moving from a central domain defined by economic and analog technique to one dominated by the digital. The digital domain is the age of cloud infrastructure, data, and algorithms, where virtually all spheres of life are reflected and stored—and increasingly, what shapes our very subjectivity.
>This new central domain is where the struggle for power happens, and nowhere is that more clearly visible than in the control and definition of money. We are in the midst of a struggle among elites for dominance over the central domain, the power nexus. The money that is coming, which will determine this central domain, is digital; the issue is who will control it.
>At its core, digital money is not about currency in the traditional sense, because it is not currency as we are used to defining it; it is a control mechanism. Control mechanisms have “rails.” Whoever owns the rails controls visibility, access, enforcement, and ultimately sovereignty. A central bank digital currency (CBDC) places those rails formally in the hands of the state. A stablecoin, by contrast, places them in private hands—regulated and compliant, but governed through contracts, platforms, and market incentives rather than public law.
>This distinction matters because it maps directly onto a deeper conflict inside American power. On one side stands what Simon Dixon and others call the Financial-Industrial Complex (FIC): large banks, asset managers, payment networks, exchanges, and financial infrastructure firms whose profits depend on scale, liquidity, and predictable flows. On the other side are the Military-Industrial Complexes (MIC): the security agencies, defense contractors, and intelligence services whose power rests on threat management, surveillance, and enforcement. Somewhere in between, with Trump closer to the MIC than to the FIC, is the Technological Industrial Complex (TIC).
>This is where the tension lies. The FIC wants the rails because they monetize them. The MIC wants the rails because they police them. The TIC has understood that, while they may claim strength on their own to impose order in the previous two complexes, for now they are better off close to the MIC. Stablecoin regulation—who may issue, how reserves are held, and what programmability is allowed—becomes the battlefield where this conflict is negotiated.
>Epstein was a tool, and that tool has been used—and is being used at this very precise moment—as a weapon in this conflict. If we continue the hypothesis that he was an Israeli intelligence asset, then trying to understand where Israel fits into this conflict could be clarifying.
>For decades, the Middle East functioned as a U.S. security theater. Israel was a central node in that system: a military ally, intelligence partner, and testing ground for surveillance, targeting, and population-control technologies that would face legal or political resistance elsewhere. Continuous instability justified defense budgets, arms sales, and a permanent security posture. The Military-Industrial Complex thrived on this arrangement.
>But finance has a different calculus. War is volatile. It disrupts energy markets, trade routes, and investment timelines. It creates risk. As the global system moves toward a multipolar order—driven in part by China’s rise and the erosion of sanctions effectiveness—the Financial-Industrial Complex increasingly favors managed stability over “forever wars” in the Middle East.
>If Epstein was a Mossad intelligence asset, then it could be argued that he is being used in order for Israel to gain leverage and to favor those who favor it—and perhaps that he was allowed to be exposed because, in this elite conflict, he was losing leverage and had become too expensive an asset to let go to waste. >>2682038>disagree with the herdThere are at least 5 separate instances of 4chan tourists like you trying to inject their shitty talking point into the discussion (and failing) trying to control the narrative and 2 other OPs in the catalog.
>>2682042You're getting upset because you strawmanned and I didn't bite. Lmao.
>>2682020>this that it makes me tired just thinking about it lol.This sentence is so reddit coded, jesus.
I think Jeffrey Epstein is still alive. His gaming login stats (fortnite) and that 4chan screencap from 2019 have convinced me so.
>>2682261bro couldnt miss the new fortnite season
>>2682271>>2682262>>2682261and who the fuck moves quickly to erase the fortnite wayback machine webshots? damn it.
holly fucking crap.
and there's no one that can come along and say,
yes, he's death. because no one trusts the people around.
>>2682035It's fairly obvious that an anonymous board anyone can post on can be used for manipulation. He's stating something obvious that many other people have pointed out
>>2682020I thought there might be something to pizzagate too but now I'm convinced it's all just schizo nonsense, all of it.
>>2679352> Why do we have to preface every criticism of Jewish billionaires with "Not All Jews" lol?Because there hasn't been a coherent political project or ideology that mobilizes people against some vague cabal of white elites, but the trope of Jewish finance controlling the world has been a common antisemitic trope. This isn't to deny that there are many rich Jews among the world financial elite.
>It should be obvious to anyone that criticism of the Jewish bourgeois is limited to the bourgeois members of that group.Going off the posts here and elsewhere the last week, it clearly is not "obvious to anyone". This is where you come off as very disingenuous.
>Neither are the Christian Zionists that promote Jewish supremacy as a means of terrorizing the middle east.There are many that are genuinely religious, why else would you believe Christian zionism lmao.
>That doesn't mean the racial supremacist element doesn't exist among the bourgeois as a means of inflaming ethnic conflict for their own economic benefit.Inflaming ethnic conflict against whom?
>>2682840Don't you think they might have had plans or even attempted to use 4chan as a platform for right-wing manipulation?
>>2682045Explains why he answered my letter as a child.
>>2678601For all the bad things to say about glowzek, he has a healthy sexuality.
re: China, not ruling class degeneracy but still relevant in terms of sex pests and potential blackmail
>We had sex in a Chinese hotel, then found we had been broadcast to thousandshttps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62rexy9y3noSo, found any way to make any use of all this info or what? GO AGITPROP
>>2683519whenever someone try to portray that the US government has some legitimacy, point out to epstein.
>>2685289I've heard a lot of pages related to people currently in power, especially Trump, are being removed.
Even the internet response to the Epstein files is blatantly psyoped, right? Seems like there's been a big uptick on social media in sentiments like
>the epstein files prove qanon and pizzagate were real and we should have listened to alex jones and /pol/…
misdirecting attention while also trying to rehabilitate bad actors.
>>2685593It's more like most of the stuff coming out doesn't implicate anyone who wasn't suspicious already and there is just so much material that everyone is able to pick and choose the facts that fit into their narrative.
>>2685593there are many psyops going on
1. nick fuentes trying to make epstein seem like some cool guy
2. centrist jewish journalists saying nothing ever happens and this is boring
3. people crashing out about demonic satanist cannibals
4. mainstream media trying to redirect blame towards russia instead of israel
>>2685593There definitely is a misdirection towards the deviancy and individual failings and not the financial crimes and the network.
>>2685593>Seems like there's been a big uptick on social media in sentiments like>>the epstein files prove qanon and pizzagate were real and we should have listened to alex jones and /pol/…>misdirecting attention while also trying to rehabilitate bad actors.There's been a lot of people who make fun of them for thinking Trump isn't involved.
more files.
shrimp caomplete talk with french diplomat:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01758926.pdfthe acid request was on the same day the FBI opened a child sex trafficking investigation against him
>>2673417can't stress enough how literally everything that is a revelation in these files is in this article, reddit, 4chan, bitcoin, microtransactions in gaming, israel, etc etc
>>2685607>people crashing out about demonic satanist cannibalsyeeeeeep
I already consider the plot lost, this isn't radicalizing the workers, this is radicalizing the lumpen rightoids and lib PMC types, no surprises that when you frame it as a moral panic that no revolutionary sentiment will be born from it, only reaction
Some clever people found out that PayPal will give you the name of email address holders if they have been connected to a PayPal account for payment. This way we now know that the gynocologist Epstein was talking to who had his name but not email redacted in some of the mails is Mark Epstein, his brother.
>>2686990the guy they talked about the gynocologist with'
not saying that he was the gyno, sorry
>>2685607Wondering how we can cancel out nick
Unique IPs: 32