/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>733942
>after 91.
YEAH!
Before 1991 they were socialist.

>>733805
>>733791
t. Ustase

Slavic people have the ability to fly

>>733800
I see Tomdatinker in /siberia/ and /draw/ but never in /leftypol/
Why is that?

>>734615
Idk

>>731683
>>731684
>>731686
Steve graffiti IRL

https://www.online-stopwatch.com/makeyourown/0023010001.460012319.10292039:113600/Weed-Legalization-Bulgaria-AI-Estimate/
The timer for recreational weed legalization in Bulgaria estimate from the now dead StonedSiberians TV room

Bump

>>731687
Thanks, I was looking for these images for a long time. Do you also have the jigglypuff ones?

I urgently need feedback. Please answer comrades.

>>734606
My chigga this is an image board we're ALL perma virgins.

Bump

It don't matter, you ain't gettin none.

>>733292
what if ants are the actual chosen people but humans, in their unending arrogance, spent 2,000 years arguing theology and killing each other over a book that was never written for them in the first place.

>>732737
You're missing the point.

If we're being generous, we can interprete Genesis 6:19 to mean that Noah was to bring two of every general type of animal that's worth giving a colloquial name onto the ark, and keep the species going for the duration of the flood. So for example, Tigers and lions would be counted separately, but eastern gray squirrels and red squirrels would both be covered under "squirrel". This task would've been theoretically possible, but realistically highly improbable. Noah, a random Jew from millennia ago, would have needed to not only travel the entire world, from the Galapagos to the South Pole, finding animals that the rest of humanity wasn't able to discover until roughly 6000 years later, but was also capable of getting all of them to come onto the ark itself without issue.

Of course, the Bible does not specify that they need to be land vertebrates. Certain prominent translations specify flesh, which implies vertebrates, but that's it. If we expand it to include non-land vertebrates, we've gone from highly improbable to outright impossible. Noah would needed to have needed to be capable of 1. deep sea travel, 2. bringing deep-sea fish to the surface unharmed, and 3. creating an environment that these fish are able to live in on the ark.

>>733487
God could just teleport all these animals to the ark with his special 'tism powers but he left dinosaurs out for some reason.
>Noah would needed to have needed to be capable of 1. deep sea travel, 2. bringing deep-sea fish to the surface unharmed, and 3. creating an environment that these fish are able to live in on the ark.
Dont be silly. These creatures would need a deep sea high pressure aquarium to survive on land + they can already swim so a flood isnt an issue.

>>733133
No

>>733326
yep

Bump

Why would badlands chugs do this?

>>734524
ok
where are the fptoilets 🤤🤤🤤🤤🤤🤤🤤🤤

>>734250
why do pigs sound like pigs?

>>734250
These blastpoints… too accurate for Marx-people.

I have a video of your mom giving me Kirk

>>734163
geg

>>734605
Probably more artsy stuff instead of hollywood blockbuster cashgrabs.

Bollywood is communism but crackkers do not want to face this reality

Only pornography will be available. But it'll be free

>>734605
no

>>734620
For me it’s the opposite. The worst part is that here they ban you for a MONTH for just about anything, and sometimes they even delete all posts from a single IP address.

>>734634
>pic
>Second post
Literally obsessed

>>734646
It's literally fictional bro.

>>734693
IIf it is strictly about raping mouse children in a mouse world, it is lessened.

>>734694
It would count as bestiality then

>>734475
I don't like touching snow. It's too cold also it doesn't snow where I live

>>734458
Radlib contrarian

>>734475
There is no snow this winter

>>734552
yes there is for me

CHAIRMAN MAUPIN'S CINEMA CLUB

CPI Department of Information

Film: Avatar (2009)
Director: James Cameron
Rating: 3/10 - A Vaginic Fantasy in Phallic Clothing

James Cameron’s Avatar is a masterpiece of ideological deception. It presents itself as a radical, anti-imperialist, pro-environmental fable, but beneath its stunning visual spectacle lies a profoundly Malthusian, anti-human, and reactionary core. It is a film that hijacks righteous anti-capitalist sentiment to preach a gospel of sterile primitivism and biological determinism.

The Na'vi are presented as the ideal: tall, strong, connected to nature, and fighting a defensive war against extractive imperialism. This seems to align with a certain rugged, sovereign ideal. Their connection to their land (Eywa) via a biological neural network (the "Tree of Souls") mimics a kind of collective consciousness.


The film's moral universe is clear: technology is evil, primitive existence is holy. The Na'vi win not by developing superior technology or strategy, but by summoning a literal deus ex machina, the planet's fauna, through mystical communion. This is not a Phallic narrative of overcoming through will and innovation; it is a Vaginic fantasy of regression, a longing to return to a pre-conscious, pre-technological state of animalistic unity with the Earth Mother. It is a bizarre Malthusian wet dream: humanity must renounce its tools and become passive parts of an ecosystem, rather than its conscious shapers.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>734505
If you take out relating everything to dicks and pussy that is a good review.

>>733501
The Na'avi are literally the Palestinians btw
The human KKKolonizers are the Eastern European jews

>>734505
>Vaginic

You mean yonic?
Also primitivism isn't "yonic" neither is it "phallic"

the invasion of venezuela