>>773493>What are your thoughts on it?There's nothing interesting in this document (ironically). All of it is stuff that has already been discussed to death everywhere, and some of it isn't even exclusively related to AI (meaning it's been discussed for even longer).
Technological advancement is good, more productivity is good. In a decent world the drawbacks would be mitigated through societal cooperation probably mediated by the state. UBI is kind of the sophomoric version of this, but as a normal human being I would love to be reliably paid to do nothing.
The only detail worth nothing regarding AI specifically is that there is zero guarantee so far that it's actually going to be the new industrial revolution that is constantly being promised.
>What things can/should OpenAI and other large AI companies say/do when it comes to compensating for eventual inevitable job loss from AI?Nothing. Companies are completely unfit for this task, it doesn't matter if they're nonprofits or whatever else. Also, OpenAI "saying" things truly does not matter even in the artificial world of this discussion, sorry. They can lobby for better policy, but that's ultimately the government doing something, not the companies.