/siberia/ - Off-topic

How is Teto related to leftypol?

>>778563
She has red hair.

they're filthy and disease ridden

>>778603
Ill mark that as a yes then.

So is your mother

>Chinese capitalist made automation illegal like every other capitalist since tge 19th century
Big

I don't care how much of a communist you claim to be, if you support AI slop you are my enemy.

>>778560
if true this would be dumb
not because the anti-AI principle is incorrect (on the whole current AI is dogshit and most studies show it reduces the effectiveness of the average white collar worker), but because it's basically just creating a license for shitheads with money to throw around to sue employers because they were made redundant for being redundant.
one thing neoliberals have right in theory (though never commit to in practice because they want their precious tax cuts) is that the purpose of social policy in a market economy is to protect workers, not jobs. you shouldn't keep typesetters around inefficiently doing nothing in the age of laser printing just because you want to hold down headline unemployment. if they're going to do nothing, give them their free time back, and if you really, really want make-work projects, the state should employ them building something useful.

>>778605
chinabros are we neolibs

>>778311

>17cm

Prove it with timestamp or else you're a fucking larper.

Y'all have big dihs. Fucking based.

is this real?
>iq
was at least 130
>height
5'10"
>dick size
above average
>body type
usually quite slender but am a little chubby but losing weight fast
>facial symmetry score
I have no fucking idea
>sexuality
completely straight
>body count
I don't know like 20 : (
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

having ffee'

yawn

thinking about sending Noam Chomsky letters again I feel like he is the only one who is good enough to answer my heckin questionserinos

: (

>>778596
hot

>>778598
tiny white chuddie pecker


LOOOOOOOL!!!!!!!

dihh in ahh

>>778555
I can't believe I was able to read this and I'm a millenioid.

>>778131
ngl fr, lil bro. Mf, touch grass bruh. Unc unalive aura. No cap mid. My brother in Christ be like "let's f*cking go." Cooked baddie. Oof rizz.
Vibe: kys.

>>778131
I, a zoomer, only managed to piece together the meaning on the third reading.
>>778449
Not the king james bible 🤣🤣🤣

>>777836
The Manifesto isn't toilet paper, come on, the first chapter outline their conception of history pretty well, and has some bangers, though it's not as good as the first chapter of the German Ideology, and Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. The other chapters of the Manifesto aren't as relevant today though.
Otherwise you are right, some knowledge of Capital is absolutely necessary (or at the very least Wage Labour and Capital) to really understand what Marx was getting at. I didn't read it in its entirety, but the first (value) and fourth chapters (M-C-M') are essential and completely changed the way I think about capitalism, so I think even only reading these two is fine.
The second chapter is good but somewhat outdated (money isn't a commodity anymore) and the third chapter…I honestly got filtered, it's a slog to go through and I didn't understand the point. I gave up somewhere during the next few chapters, one day I will pick it up again.

>>777854

• Abolished the Soviets (workers' councils) that formed during the February Revolution.
  
• Nipped in the bud the most ambitious avant-garde art movement worldwide and replaced it with kitsch "socialist realism" art after 1928.
  
• Stalin purging all the Old Bolsheviks and killing good thinkers like Isaak Ilyich Rubin, while sparing opportunists
  
• Brezhnev stopping the program of reduction of labour time (the goal was to reach a 32 hour workweek) started under Khrushchev, and making the economy stagnant, setting the stage for the future collapse
  
• And perhaps but I'm not too familiar with this period, the War in Afghanistan, which precipitated the terminal decline of the USSR.
  
  

The USSR did some good things, but they did plenty of mistakes. Defending it blindly won't bring it back and won't help us understand what a new 21th century socialist movement should do in order to change the world for the better.

>>777857
>We can tell
It's not a very good look for self-proclaimed Marxists when an anarchist know Marx's theory better than you.

>>777866
I thought the author of GMIL was a woman?
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

The ussr did absolutely nothing wrong, there where just a few unlucky purges

>>778474
>posts without reading the thread
based

>>778003
Ok this sounds more believable
Also I hate how society defines teenage transgressions as age related when adult transgressions are often far worse

>concerned about his academic performance

you are a cop trying to kill your little brothers soul to confom, that is why he runs to Andrew Tate for answers.

Give him estrogen every night to kill his toxic masculinity.

>>778387
Good, little shit deserves it

>>778387
No anon I think you made that up

>>778541
>If someone who masturbates to drawn depictions of children is a pedophile does that mean someone who plays violent video games is violent?
<Does being sexually attracted to simulated images of children make me a pedophile? Think about the artistic merit those images, aren't they similar to le fortnite?
I brought up Martyrs specifically because it's just thinly veiled misogyny disguised as an art house film. There is as much artistic merit in a 30 minute montage of beating and raping a woman as there is in pornography of a cartoon child. If you enjoyed Martyrs, I believe you're a misogynist and if you masturbate to underaged hentai you're a pedophile.
>Does the mere simulation of the act make you guilty of being a societal undesirable and therefore worthy of the gulag?
<Guilty
Being a pedophile is no crime, acting on it is. This is a clear distinction that pedophile apologists make. It doesn't make you any less of a pedophile.

>>778542
>I brought up Martyrs specifically because it's just thinly veiled misogyny disguised as an art house film. There is as much artistic merit in a 30 minute montage of beating and raping a woman as there is in pornography of a cartoon child. If you enjoyed Martyrs, I believe you're a misogynist and if you masturbate to underaged hentai you're a pedophile.
ngl you just sound like a chud. I've watched Martyrs twice and while the story is really stupid there are more layers to the film than just "horror porn go brrrr" and the audience's role in watching it with the expectation that it's horror porn out of morbid curiosity is literally part of its "message" so to speak.
I don't like the film, but you reducing a piece of art to "just violence against women" is just extremely reductive and chuddish.

>Being a pedophile is no crime, acting on it is. This is a clear distinction that pedophile apologists make. It doesn't make you any less of a pedophile.
What's the purpose of the label if not for social ostracization? What's the difference between a "pedophile" who consumes fictional media and someone like GRRM who writes explicit sex scenes involving children but with the consent of the entire media industry and pop culture? Is there literally any point to this distinction when I know you for a fact do not consider applying the same kind of judgement you hold for lolicons onto "professional mainstream pedophiles" like him? It just seems like a way to bully people for something you don't like, and then post "based, nothing of value was lost lolxd" when they're victimized by fascism.

I'm not advocating we support or normalize pedophilia, quite the contrary actually. I think pedophilia should be a label reserved for those who actually victimize children so we can properly ostracize them for their crime and not dilute the label in any way. I don't think fiction has any place in handing out these labels that do nothing but provide us an easy way to hate someone. Particularly when, as in the case in the OP, the person will now be branded a sex offender and put on the registry for the rest of their life with every potential employer now knowing what they get up to behind the privacy of their own home. Is that fair to them, merely for consuming a cartoon?

Like it seems cPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>778542
Oh no the thoughtcrime woe is me I deserve prison :^(

>>778540
>getajob gif spammer downplaying a communications crackdown
Of course he'd be a British flavored glowie. Burger glowies and krumpet glowies are the two least subtle kinds.

jackin it to hentai kids is suspicious af but this is excessive

>I know I have terrible taste in porn, i know it’s slop, I like it that way
Being overly apologetic is sometimes more rude than just being earnest. Shed that internalized cringe culture.

Source engine is really powerful, there's a reason so many 3D artists like it.