/siberia/ - Off-topic

the megaphone
just kidding, it's the ak47

The AK47 sticks to the intended purpose: wiping out imperialists

AI trebuchet

My balls got wrinkles because I vaxmaxxed

my fucking food went cold because of the vaccine

the vaccine made me shit and piss my pants just now

Mandatory vaccinations for anti-vaxxers. If they evade vaccination, charge them with attempted murder.

how the fuck is this thread still up
people like OP belong in gulags

>>776084
no

>>775958
well we're both mixed, but in a different way, and linked through the white side of our family, so that's actually the common variable here

At a classmate's birthday party. I was already 17. Met there a girl from my English class, got drunk and that way found a way to have the guts to approach her. It was not amazing but getting to approach her made me believe I was not unkissable and that made wonders in my self esteem.
My most significant "first" was not that one, though. it was not the first time i had sex either. My most memorable "first" was the first time I got a handjob from a girl.

>>776119
>My most memorable "first" was the first time I got a handjob from a girl
ah an old fashioned

>>776027
I wouldn't know, unrequited feelings do not count.

Guys will murder other dudes for looking at their women funny. And many women will celebrate this.

>Tyson said that Roy Bryant had been abusive toward Carolyn, and "it was clear she was frightened of her husband." Tyson believed Bryant embellished her testimony under coercive circumstances. Bryant described Milam as "domineering and brutal and not a kind man".
Moid behind it all once again.

>>776267
Behind every violent woman is a violent man

>>776267
>domineering and brutal and not a kind man
He tortured a kid to death, yeah no shit he wasn't a kind man.

>>776115
you reuploaded it, you fricking frick!!!

>>776122
Train train, I love my station

>>776208
what a throwback, i haven't heard that song in like 10 years

>>776139
6head

>>776244
*loud wrong buzzer*
anachronisms aside, the key difference is that he didn't represent a model that could overcome the system of his time. getting killed for being a nuisance to the kings was, in the long term, his only objective and achievement. this has nothing to do with modern (marxist) socialism

he was an adventurist , rightfully killed

>>776248
>his only objective and achievement
achievement maybe, but objective, what? you believe he wanted to get killed without achieving the change he wished for?

>this has nothing to do with modern (marxist) socialism
thats like saying utopian socialist have nothing to with marxist socialist. They share a similar goal, even if they dont share an analysis that didnt exist yet and the means to reach their goal according to more modern theories

>>776238
Even a sovereign absolutist like you knows that counsel makes or breaks a nation.
How many civil wars have been provoked by greedy counselors looking to get their slice of the pie?

Kings power alone can only do so much.
Perhaps it would be suitable if we could make genetic clones of monarchs to serve as eyes and ears of national welfare

>>776242
Like it or not, yes, that's what monarchy is.
Some constitutional monarchists will tout that a king does not rule alone—I personally deny that, even if there are assemblies or council… the chief definition of monarchy is one alone rules, and that fundamental law of monarchy is expressed through sovereignty in which form or constitution of a state or republic is defined primarily by one person's majesty or preeminence and some family alone stands out–and if not, then it's another form of state/republic such as a democracy or oligarchy where some other kind of government has the primacy… but we don't accept a mixed constitutional or the concordant notion of political pluralism like Aristotle's. As Hobbes says, the chief difference between the mixed constitutionalist and absolutist view is that rather it isn't the concord of many men, but the union–and the integrity of the republic is its sovereignty as the fundamental law, pertaining to three forms–and while there might be a confluence of members / elements of democracy or aristocracy, the purity of the primary form of state is maintained, be it a monarchy, oligarchy, or democracy, like Bodin defends and traces back to Herodotus (*and denies Plato acknowledged it in the Aristotle or Polybius established mixed constitutionalist ideals). That is the nuance–and while it seems anachronistic, I cannot really take monarchy any other way because mixed constitutionalism dilutes and renders monarchy irrelevant to begin with… so I personally still maintain the opinion of Bodin or Hobbes in the year 2026 tbh. I wouldn't have it any other way, even if it is not very fashionable, lol

I personally do not accept the mixed constitutionalist view when it comes to monarchy for numerous reasons. Like Jean Bodin says it makes a monarch into no more than a mean magistrate and overall tends to favor elective monarchy since it stresses concord and rule by turns/rotational government since monarchy is but one lesser estate among other heads… to have it as one part monarchy, one part oligarchy, one part democracy considers monarchy merely as a mere part in relation to the state and not the majesty or sovereignty of the whole state… like Jean Bodin says the outcome usually is plain democracy like mixing paint together… and I hate t it because then there is no definitive form of state and no pretense to say the state no longer is a monarchy… which is important to me because Mixed constitutionalists just don't care about the 3 forms of the herodotus debate and that particular quality… same I'd say even for Plato who might say in Laws that it's merely the rule of a faction to maintain a particular form of state… but rather appeal to good policy/law or aristocracy/good government in general… but I am not really content with what some traditionalists or integralists or conservatives have in mind with just any vague notion of good government– so like Bodin I'm not for confounding the forms… and I don't take it for the partiality of a faction, but as Hobbes says the civil soul. So I definitely maintain a definite kind of sovereignty as is customary for absolute monarchists and dates back to Herodotus…
Mixed constitutionalism is a declaration of war against all notions of monarchical preeminence and majesty to me.
That is all I have to say there and why I am the way I am.

The general policy I have in mind is particularly like I outlined with Corgism, lol, a cult of personality–with the customs of absolute monarchists–I can't vibe with esotericists/metaphysicians/integralists/mixed constitutionalists because they aspire to just any vague idea of good government/aristocracy, what I have in mind is a unique form of familialism/cult of personality, very specific, and it feels droll/lifeless to me to not stress this quality.

>>776235
I wont avoid younger people because of it, ive just noticed its more common throughout dating and its a huge turn off for me, ive always been annoyed by it though even like 20 years ago.

>>776237
Have you considered that younger people are using phones in dating to cope with nervousness especially with this moral obsession with youth sexuality?
Nowadays, getting sex in youth is like trying to get water in a desert, especially if you’re a cishet male youth
You see the neopuritanism towards young adult sexuality these days, courtesy of stranger danger

>>776237
Usually people like To act like any current year problem is the first of its kind
IMO, playing on your phone during a date is a far more tolerable faux pas than being loud and obnoxious or fronting

Can you people stop yapping and post some tits please?

>>776254
Here's a couple that caught my attention on a search

>>775314
>twins are ass
i keep telling my uncle in mn this and he gets mad at me everytime

Toronto

Wemby flopped so hard he knocked himself out.
Jesus Christ the new NBA buzzword of "ethical basketball" is fucking ridiculous

Sports are fascist.

>>775964
explain

>>775718
>you should regrow your foreskin
not him but it's not the same.

>>776109
it's really fucking depressing btw. i've gone into my circumcision on here before, and how i was fucking old enough to remember it and it wasn't my choice

but i've never bothered to get it restored because a restored foreskin looks fucking hideous unlike an actual naturally uncircumcized penis. no beef to anyone who has restored theirs. good for you if you have but i really don't want to fight for fore years just to end up with this.

pic 1: a normal uncut dick

pic 2: a "fixed" cut dick after YEARS of fighting

posted again because i forgot to spoil

that pen0r looks distressed, try using a moisturizer

More of the foot
>>776108

>>776111
I want to suck that first dick, uncut cocks are so hot, thanks god I don't live in the USA (I am still circumcised due to phimosis)
Mmm yeah I haven't started restoring mine yet but I was also worried about the end being too wide