/siberia/ - Off-topic

what is your chuddest belief?
mine is that the death penalty can be ok (prove me wrong)

>2 April edition
Happy birthday, Atvara, hope you'll have a great one <3

By the invitation of EQG chads
>no hooves
<War of all against all edition
<Gunpowder Treason Day
King James VI & I movie:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PPRUFSGdI22n/

Cats are resilient revolutionary spirits who partake in the revolutionary struggle and champion bodily autonomy against the patriarchy (scratches you if you try to pet them). Meanwhile, dogs are subservient lumpenanimals who do everything to try to please their upper-class owners and do their bidding, such as in the case with KKKops dogs or the attack hounds of evil millionaires, while cats served in Stalingrad on the side of the Soviet Union during the Great Patriotic War (I'm not kidding; look up "Mourka Stalingrad"). German Shepherds were aiding German Wehrmacht and SS soldiers in hunting down Jews and partisans. Hitler himself was a dog lover who valued them over human life. You can also see this with the modern right and American idolization of the dog in such as in their settler colonial fantasies or elons obsession over doge and weaponizing them to attack Muslim minorities or liberals forbidding single mothers and their babies from resting at their restaurants but allowing these stupid small minded mutts to roam around shitting wherever they want, a pinnacle of toxic individualism, truly the bourgeoisie's best friend. Meanwhile, cats are social communal animals who you can generally allow your toddler to be at least near a hundred radius of a cat without losing a limb. while dogs gets into fights over the smallest pettiest differences and always view small children as competition of an adults affection. Anti cat sentiments strongly correlate with misogyny, such as sexist stereotypes about "cat ladies" (full uncritical support to grandmas and their hundred precious kittens) or how many dogs can be accurately described as "evil r*pe beasts" with them humping everything they see and certain breeds symbolising male violance and dominance. Why is it like this? we took the once noble wolf and corupted them using while torture and eugenics into these "things" meanwhile the noble african wild cat integrated itself into human society willingly and is a symbol of human-animal coexistance.

Because in my experience, as an extreme normie by this board's standards (e.g., had several gfs, regular sex, my own place, good money, etc.) this is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what 95% of women actually want.
Like, yeah, maybe they give lip service to the whole "emotionally open and vulnerable men in touch with their feelings" schtick because social media tells them to but in reality I think the opposite is true - women want a man that is more detached, stoic, unconcerned about internal feelings, etc. Because that: 1) makes them appear stronger and more confident, and therefore more masculine, and 2) makes them feel more safe and secure with them because even if they are having a meltdown and being over-dramatic over some shit (as women are apt to do) their man will be a reliable rock to lean on without him breaking down over shit too.
I've even had my current gf - who herself used to go to therapy a lot and is very lefty/soft in general - say that deep down, despite what she says sometimes, she likes that I am never being obsessed over my emotional problems and internal soul-searching shit, and that I just "move on" with things, unlike other guys she's dated (who she also identified as being some combination of mentally ill, bisexual/gay and/or emotionally immature).
Who created and pushed this agenda of "all men should regularly attend therapy and talk about feelings like women", and why? It didn't exist for thousands of years, only in the last decade or two.

is It was created by women for the purpose of sabotaging the relationships of other women because they are jealous of their success. Yes, it is as simple and as petty as that?

is It's a way of shifting blame onto men that women are no longer upholding the social contract and men are struggling to uphold society because of it?

is It the logical equivalent of men telling women not to wear makeup, simply making it easier for the other gender to filter you?

Sixty to eighty percent is political garbage, and the other chunk is straight-up incel fuel for virgins seething at the world.

Imma post these again because I'm bored (remember this guy is mixed race)

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎

> Communism killed millions of innocent people and it is literally slavery.
> t. Nazi
Why is that? How can anti-communists claim that the USSR killed innocent people when literally 90% of them are Nazis who love Pinochet?

What's the diagnosis for people who continue to post on 4chan as of April 2026 after everything that's happened? The hack, the Epstein reveal, the IP fingerprinting (spur.us)?