/siberia/ - Off-topic

we use ytdl here, sir.

>>744298
What exactly does he think they were doing with that agricultural produce? They were exporting it to fund industrialization that dramatically improved the lives of ordinary Russians (and protected them from extermination by the Nazis). Does he think da joos were just eating it all themselves?

>>761787
Poland at that time was/is responsible for heinous crimes but they were certainly victims during the war period

>>761787
>fascist
Not really. It was a broad-tent dictatorship backed by the military.

>>760070
>Sanitsiya
>botched anglo-russian pronunciation
>contemporary russian propaganda talking points about the nonexistent Polish-German alliance
I wonder who is behind that post hmmmm

>>761834
Here I thought that Nazi Germany was backed by the military. I guess Walther von Seydlitz-Kurzbach had no relation to Friedrich Wilhelm von Seydlitz.

>>761188
>Opposition to porn is one of the classic backdoors for reactionary politics
woke socialists: "We must SMASH THE STALINIST AUTHORITARIAN STATE that oppresses the libidinal desires of individual consumer freedom. What if our liberated Ukrainian slaves consent to doing free association between free producers in the global free market at Jeffrey Epstein's island?"

>>761194
>Obviously porn is usually produced with the intention of being pornographic,
https://www.nplusonemag.com/online-only/online-only/thinking-mans-guide-perverts-guide-cinema/
<A few years ago, Zizek asserted that “we should not oppose something just because it was appropriated by the wrong guys; rather, we should think about how to re-appropriate it.” This accurately describes the mission of The Pervert’s Guide: to take back post-code Hollywood’s unwritten codes for cultural criticism—even for the left—while turning various independent and international films on their heads in the bargain. “Cinema,” Zizek explains in the opening moments of the film, “is the ultimate pervert art. It doesn’t give you what you desire; it tells you what to desire.”
<Perversion at the movies, then, doesn’t mean that you cleave to the content of a given desire, but rather that you try to elude the cinematic injunction to desire x, y, or z. It makes for a rather intricate game, and as it happens the perils of the cinema apply to imaginative engagements of all kinds. This is nicely encapsulated by Zizek’s reading of Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo (1958), a film in which an intrigue that begins as something known to be fake, inauthentic, and artificial becomes so interesting that one gets caught up in the game, until such point that appearances finally overtake reality

aw geez ric, it's not the 1970s anymore, it's just called porn

>>761421
How does porn affect interpersonal relations compared to TV and video games?
And why do people pathologize porn in relation to sex, especially when sex is already pathologized?

Porn is ironically more ethical than sex.
Society has more respect for breeders who irresponsibly pop out babies or perverts who constantly hit on women at wrong times than gooners who just keep their libido exclusively on their desktop.

In the future, procreation shall be glass tubes instead

Nah, I'm actually Porno-Communist.

>>761838
fellas can we radicalize AI?

>>761839
musk fiddled with his cringey ai until it became a nazi, so probably

>>760897
NEVER FORGET THAT PIECE OF SHIT DELIBERATELY ALLOWED CSAM TO BE SPREAD ON 8CHAN DUE TO HIS "ABSOLUTE FREE SPEECH" LOLBERT POLICY

NEVER FORGET THAT PIECE OF SHIT BECAME A MASSIVE CONTRIBUTOR TO THE SPREAD OF NEONAZISM ONLINE

>>760898
Patch still spams cp from time to time.

>>760897
Damn dude he's dead. Have at least a modicum of respect for that.
Yeah he fucked up bad, but from what I saw, he hated the monster he made and tried to undo some damage.

I hated the guy but I have laid my hate to rest.

Daily reminder to our 420comrades that Thuoc Lao are free all over Viet Nam.

kirts SA ban :D

>>761263
have sex wiht her NOW NOW NOW NOW

>>761605
Won't women be entitled to have sex with me under leftism?

>>761605
>but it won't end suffering
No one said it would end suffering, but if you're going to claim "even though I don't know you or your circumstances I know for sure you will still be miserable" you'd have to believe it wouldn't significantly reduce suffering at all.

what are we going to do about it

>>761605
>Communism can't prevent you getting a broken heart.
Broken hearts are almost always at least in part due to the extreme atomization and alienation of capitalism. I venture that communism can, in fact, do exactly that. Among many other more important things.

>>761160
thats a really tempting thought i wont lie

>>761160
i cant possibly be the only one whos fantasized about having sex with their mother right?

>>761803
tell me more.
anyone else around you?
what made you decide /siberia/ was where you were gonna admit this?

>>761808
where the fuck else would i admit it? idk i just find my mom hot

i want to play an XCOM game where the Aliens are the good guys against pedophile elites on earth

>>761571
what would we call them? galactists? cosmoists? universalists?

>>761591
A.I.

>>761591

glorps

“ET” creatures are really crypto terrestrials

It's over

Have you tried brave?

Just restart your router and clean your cookies

proton and riseup vpns are free. 4cuck bans you for vpn doe, don't use that shit

>>761291
how do I use reddit then?

Shah was such a virgin he couldn't keep his money from spilling out of his bags.

It's actually remarkable how backwards Iran is. And I blame the US for that. No coup against Mossadegh in 1953 = No Shah. No Shah = no 1979 revolution. The clerical reactionaries would never have come to power. The Ayatollah was the Lenin of reactionaries. He made reaction look badass… I mean just look at that poster.

>>761713
>And I blame the US for that.
That is geopolitics.
Soviets and the British also invaded Iran and made Reza Shah abdicate for pro-German influence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Soviet_invasion_of_Iran
Which was the same with Mossadegh – to also secure economic and political interests.
…
TBH, when it comes to the Shah of Iran and criticism there, at least this isn't Lavader sperging out about price controls and the bazaaris–(He was always a bit of a lolbert tier constitutional monarchist… but Shah regime was basically actually existing corporatism, one party state and everything–for what it really is, not the Aristotelian misconception of corporatism/guild system they like to praise–grumble, corporatism was always state corporatism to begin with, not a partnership of clans).
It's the divine right of the free market with monarchists like Lavader, Aristotle's food argument and marketplace of ideas appeal to democratic input, muh decentralization and muh partnership of clans (which they make a guise of "guild corporatism"), muh middle class, it's all Aristotle's Politics.
A bit of a off-topic tangent, but monarchists these days… we're totally swamped with right libertarian sentiment… It's dumb too because the Shah of Iran's White Revolution distributed land and property to begin with and was fairly Liberal enough… but Lavader calls it Communism… "Monarcho-Communism" –and there's some truth to it being a one-party state, but monarchy was always aligned with a unitary mode of politics, that is what they don't understand.
Honestly, Lavader… I never quite liked him as an absolute monarchist because early on before he was popular I remember Lavader being a staunch constitutional monarchist and opposing my politics…
…But his Medieval video also irked me because he brought up Aquinas to greenlight tyrannicide theory and left it to private judgement to determine this… in spite of Aquinas' warning against private judgement in De Regno…
I hate being on the rightwing sometimes… all of them glaze Aristotle… this is why I sympathize with Hobbes so hard… it's as if I were alive in his era, people never really changed and stopped doing that…
Me and Lavader represent two sides of the Post too long. Click here to view the full text.