/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>806966
This is true and backed by for example by research that for example looked at and compared the reactions of African fauna to human sounds. African fauna exhibits a hypersensitivity to human-made noises.

>>806966
yup. humans are literally an invasive species in every other continent and an extremely dominant one at that. sadly non-anthropocentric perspectives are not welcome on this site so the users have to come up with various nonsensical explanations as a cope to detract from basic ecology

>>807027
This

>>806947
>africans are the only race that did not kill off all their local megafauna
>material explanation?
they're the only ones who understood how to live sustainably and the world has never stopped hating them for it. everyone else lives in an unsustainable and wasteful way and calls it "civilization". If you live sustainably you're a "savage"

>>807309
Is this the biggest libshit take on this website?

>>807238
Leftists have done worse, OP is valid.

>>807231
Why would we care about an inter-imperialist conflict?

>>807238
He was an anti-monarchist emperor

>>807238
Anti-Monarchism is a child's political position. Monarchs can be objectively revolutionary, such as the British monarchy's support of Soviet communism against the German onslaught.

>>807263
Can you provide evidence of this?
The British were gripped with Germanophobia around the World Wars.

Also never forget that monarchs are head representatives of imperialism.

If anti monarchy is a child position, it’s a pretty precocious one at that.

i'm struggling to call this clickbait because it seems so counter-productive. "i found something" as title, meaningless thumb that describes nothing and it's like 1 hour in length? will people really click this? it's not doing big numbers. will i click it to find what that something is

>>807248
Let me guess: the author of these videos is Orthocuck

>>807253
No, I think he's an occultist of some sort.
He has also criticised Orthodoxy as a LARP.
https://m.youtube.com/@praiseoffolly4235

>>807247
Those type of titles are becoming common and they go into the same existential angst ramblings about how society is fucked up, people are fake, much social media, the usual shit

>>807255
Only in very broad aggregates, but also not really. The zeal of the Stalinist LARPer about executing Romanov children, while sometimes vice signalling, takes place in a basically virtue signalling framework (look how far I'll go to build a better society for everyone / cruelty as a means) while the zeal of the average Trump-type or Nazi for deportations or arbitrary detention or whatever takes place in a basically vice-signalling framework (cruelty as an end, even if you were to demonstrate that this was not an effective means of building their ideal society they would just laugh about how it's based anyway.)

The skeleton key to this is the right's underlying love of "owning the libs", leftists do not really have an "Owning the libs" tendency. Insofar as a Stalinist tries to own the libs, he posts industrial production figures or "who put what in space first" charts. When a rightist tries to own the libs, he winds up somewhere between rolling coal, 'jakposting about transgender suicide, and the whitehouse posting crying families being deported on Twitter.
(Rolling coal perhaps being the archetypal example. You make your truck waste more of your money to annoy environmentalists that live in your head rent free?)

There is no leftist "based ritual" ( https://www.richardhanania.com/p/the-based-ritual ) and psychologically speaking: The left would be plenty viable in a world without the right (consider that the average left-wing website slop is an article about some dead martyr'd leftist and how nice they were. Take away the martyr-makers and you're still left with the article!), while the right would sincerely struggle in a world without the left and hated-minorities. (consider that the average right-wing website slop is an article about ethnic minority criminals, transgender people, immigrants, seething that countries trade, etc. Take away the outgroup and you've got nothing!)

>>807267
>Only in very broad aggregates, but also not really. The zeal of the Stalinist LARPer about executing Romanov children, while sometimes vice signalling, takes place in a basically virtue signalling framework (look how far I'll go to build a better society for everyone / cruelty as a means) while the zeal of the average Trump-type or Nazi for deportations or arbitrary detention or whatever takes place in a basically vice-signalling framework (cruelty as an end, even if you were to demonstrate that this was not an effective means of building their ideal society they would just laugh about how it's based anyway.)

Now this is major copium.
The Stalinist LARPer who rationalizes killing children for heir parents sin is vice-signaling. He’s just using “for the proletariat” as a convenient cover.

That’s the same rationale that the right uses. Punishing children because of what the adults did.

Virtue signaling would at the least have those kids being re-educated.

>The skeleton key to this is the right's underlying love of "owning the libs", leftists do not really have an "Owning the libs" tendency. Insofar as a Stalinist tries to own the libs, he posts industrial production figures or "who put what in space first" charts. When a rightist tries to own the libs, he winds up somewhere between rolling coal, 'jakposting about transgender suicide, and the whitehouse posting crying families being deported on Twitter.
(Rolling coal perhaps being the archetypal example. You make your truck waste more of your money to annoy environmentalists that live in your head rent free?)


You keep using the Stalinist larper as a leftist analogue for right wing inclinations.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>807286
you dropped this

>>807286
If you're exclusively talking about the romanovs, it was a quick decision made on the fly to stop the white army from having something to rally around, it was not made to punish them, there is no time for re-education in the middle of a civil war, and it's still killing their parents in front of them, not the best childhood memory.

>>807291
Is that a fan blade for a “special Ed cap”? If so, I take it that you’re triggered?

>>807292
That’s funny because that’s the same kind of rationale that the right uses against troubled youths or ethnic petit offenders

>>803797
Yeah? What?

Bump, you guys need to post in this thread more

>>807265
you can literally find better shit on an image search engine or even fucking 4chan/reddit and not have to unclick spoilers. this site isnt for porn anyway. it's retarded to use it that way.

>>803794
came for the tits, stayed for the mental health session

>>807271
Sure but i want it here too

>>806914
Hopefully in the future, the Internet will be telepathic projections activated only during REM sleep.
During waking hours, no Internet access.

>>807090
enjoy your beef brain BWL

>>807081
the recluse path was too OP so the devs nerfed it by adding a brain damage debuff. basically youre forced to get the social DLC now

>>806560
Get to a bathroom immediately, discard your soiled underwear, and take a quick shower to clean up. Use soap and warm water to prevent any skin irritation. If you're out in public, you can clean up as best as you can with wet wipes and tie your contaminated clothing in a plastic bag to deal with later.

>>807168
I guess they’re only looking at isolation as an undesired effect.
There’s a lot of humans and non-anthropological animals who live in solitude with little to no problems

Isolation is only a problem because alot of people aren’t equipped with autonomous technical skills or any hobbies.

Socialization is overestimated as a virtue.
People always complain about how in the past “everyone knew everyone” compared to nowadays but forget about gossiping and peer pressure that’s common in collective spaces

>>806483
That would be awesome!!

>>806569
It wasn’t mere slander. He really did do that. He used kids and women for sex magic rituals.
Abused them.

Also, how is he “anti-capitalist”?


And he’s put on a pedestal like a saint.
Meanwhile, people wanna crucify artists for making incest fanfiction of childhood TV show characters

>>806600
he didnt use kids bruh there is no source for that but women who consented to be naked on an altar? yeah so what?

and heres how he is
https://sacred-texts.com/oto/lib77.htm
library.oto-usa.org/crowley/essays/duty.html

Alunya x Rodina OTP

you cant because theyll always have the best clapback, after all they know all about the cringe shit you did when you was a teenager

If only more women were brave enough to flick their bean in public. But I guess women are huge cowards.

this generation is genuinely the worst one in centuries

bruh

>>807072
women wank in public all the time, they have the decency to be subtle about it

>>806949
Most people dont think thirty is old to the point of saying silly things.
People look forward to being thirty as accomplished adults

The reason why some people fear being thirty is because a lot of people aren’t accomplished.

>>806951
And I can show you a lot of people who don’t look so good in their forties compared to their twenties.

It goes both ways

>>806875
Thirties is late prime-age.

>>806949
I find it funny how it’s considered acceptable to make fun of youth for being ugly and awkward but it’s considered disrespectful to do the same to elders.

We see the common teenage stereotypes about “zitfaces” becoming beauties in their thirties or middle school klutzes becoming finesse master's.

But when it’s the reverse? It’s always portrayed in a serious somber tone.

>>806464
Millennials pioneered trolling and cyberbullying. Their political organizations are full of backbiting, gossip, and ladder climbing, just like their forebears. They also invented "irony bros" so I dunno what you mean about them being earnest.

>Millennials re-introduced empathy and social progress
Where? All I've seen is a steady decline. People were nicer back in the 90s. Probably because of the better economy, but still.

>>807096
>Where? All I've seen is a steady decline. People were nicer back in the 90s. Probably because of the better economy, but still.

I’m gonna have to somewhat disagree with this. People weren’t necessarily nicer back in the 1990s. It’s just that a lot of our vitriol wasn’t as easily exposed as nowadays.

We had doomsday cults and Beckies out the wazoo.