/siberia/ - Off-topic

hahaha funny pooooooooooop
POop FUNNNYYYYYYYYYY :) xD
LELELELELLE KEKEKEKEKEK FUNNNY POOOOOOOOOOOOPPPPPPPPPPP

it takes a deeply diseased mind to care about this

>nationalism? militarism?
Also cultural conservativism in general. The most common kind of leftist chud is a /pol/ack who got into Soviet aesthetics.

>>780441
It depends on how much you go outside

I am a leftist chud because i hate how much white leftoids talk about harm reduction and mental health

to be honest u gotta be a little chuddy to be a revolutionary

>>780396
the video title might be true but so what? trump is well below the average male, that's the point

>>780388
Anyone on here who says that shitting on conservatives makes you "lib" is a /pol/ tourist.

They're probably factoring in parasociality.

• A conservative would have mixed feelings and thus not be operating at full power.
  
• A normal person wouldn't give a shit and could easily to flatten him, perhaps with higher than usual strength depending how aware they are of Trump's negative impact on their life.

Conservatoids don't want to beat Trump in a fight because they worship him like a fucking god. Even I can hold him over my head and dump him in a dumpster, waiting for when the rubbish truck arrives…

holy shit rightoids are actually cucked

Wow, this is an interesting thread I just found.

First off, hardly anyone wants to really hear what I have to say probably, but…

For one, I think it's a bit ridiculous that humanity has been around for as long as it has, and yet we've hardly ever had any societies that resemble Marxism. Wherein, there is no extreme classism, or inequality and human beings aren't controlled through the threat of force or sophisticated types of what is virtually mind-control and manipulation. Taking this into consideration then, it is highly likely that the problem perceived by Marx is a lot more complicated and nuanced then we are led to believe. It is just more deeply entrenched you could say I guess. What they call "cooperation" and "compassion" can just as easily be guises for more subtle and less overt forms of sublimation and control.


bad things could happen to me for saying some of the things I do, I guess partially it's because you're supposed to pretend you can't see too clearly, hence the blind seer. But really the book of revelations beast system as it is often referred to as does seem to be on the horizon. I am not saying it's going to happen for sure, but it still is something to be aware of. There is another ancient race that used to exist, the reptilians. There used to be a race of bi-pedal upright human sized lizard people, and at some point reptilian DNA got into the human race. And than, when you look at ancient civilizations like Egypt, it is very clear that they worshiped snakes and everything. It is very possible some of the ruling bloodlines in Egypt had reptilian DNA. (it wasn't all of Egypt) and when you study ancient Egypt, it seems like it is very possible there whole society was formed around ancient mechanisms of various types of control.

It is very likely that the end times beast system will be very similar to ancient Egypt from what I have studied. And probably has ancient ties to it or something. It's also likely that ancient bloodlines rule the world. We're always facing off against attempts to assimilate us into some type of Babylonian, ancient Egyptian or Roman type of rule or societal organization and structure.

Like, ugh.

This is another issue with ancient Egypt. They worshiped the sun essentially, but also the sun represented different things in Egypt. The reason a snake is often in front of the representation of the sun is because many lizards have types of pineal glands on their foreheads and thus the sun roughly stands for or signifies the ancient Egyptians spirituality. Well, I guess you're not supposed to explain it because it's hard to do, but there's lots of different ancient artifacts from different parts of the world, many of whom have some type of focus or significance with the forehead and some type of third eye. There's lots of different beliefs all surrounding the third eye that can even be found in new ageism, but it all originates from ancient Egypt.

I think the sun represented some type of energy, you were like considered spiritually enlightened if you had a third eye and the energy from it is shown as the sun. But from my own experiences, what I really think the whole thing with the sun and the snake and pineal gland is that basically it makes some people prone to almost seeming like they have a bug type of antennas. Basically for sure, when you're getting along with people and you're sharing happiness or joy with one another, it's not your brain for sure. But with these people, it probably is something to do with their brains.

It honestly feels like they have some type of light or beam of energy emanating from their foreheads and they expect or want (it almost seems like they crave it) for you to do it back. Well, due to mass immigration, globalism, and tourism, it started to become this weird thing in my country. It started to feel like I was encountering these 'forehead' people on a regular basis, they would get angry at me all the time and stare at my forehead, and the back of my head (but like the top of my skull where my brain was) because for all intensive purposes, I don't think I have a pineal gland or I'm not a sun whatever it is. I even asked one of them about it and they confirmed, that's what it was pretty much. Now this is often what ends up being what collectivism is. There's different types of collectivism I think, but for some reason more than not often times this ends up being the dominant form of collectivism. A lot of people won't believe me and they'll call me "schizo" and get super pissed (I'm certifiably sane) but whatever, there's tons of evidence that exists which more or less prove this. Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

oh and here's the sun again but with a bug this time, just to prove that it is almost like having some type of antennae or something *shivers*

>>779261
Things have already improved a lot. Human life was so much worse in all previous times. Advances in medicine really are magical if you remember that for so many, like Karl Marx's family, life was simply defined by sickness, pain and death. Even for people who weren't particularly sickly, half of their children died before adulthood, almost all for no reason other than "fuck you". This is the number one reason why I never get people who whine about nature. It's a status quo of eternal pain and suffering, even worse for other species. We invented nursing runt of the litter puppies and kittens. They are abandoned to die by their parents in nature.
And then there is the social aspect. While there is still so much barbarism and sadism, especially from americans, zionists and their allies, things did get better in everyday life. I personally witnessed how working class people basically stopped using their fists on each other over stupid disagreements. The powerful also used to be a lot more unrestrained before the october revolution, even if that part got worse since the 70s.

>>780337
The stuff you’re saying is typical conspiracy theory crap.
Also, the reptilian conspiracy makes no sense because where are the genetic markers to prove it?

And why have we not seen any actual reptilians?

>>780346
This. I keep saying that the past has a lot more problems but people wanna act like the past was automatically better/virtuous.

The problem we have is more a lack of economic/industrial autonomy and rampant idealism

Last one looks like she’s fucking karl marx lol

>>779749
What is the materialist reason why sub-saharan Africa is the only place where women are giving birth more than the rest of the world?

>>779775
Poverty and religion.

>>779775
Women's education and access to contraceptives. Rest is irrelevant bullshit. Not even Islam can save birthrates in Middle East.

bump for moar

>>779781
Correct. Women have more reasonable birthrates in Iran where women are educated.

>>779445
Would you let her drum on your ass?

@eminegerezz

>>779660
gonna go rizz her up, wish me luck bros

>>780404
Won't work unless you're a 9/11 azen

do cates enjoy total fage yogurt

and every year we go on hunting vacations to europe and kill wh*Teoids to bring their skull as prizes back home 🥹

>>780366
What an awkward federation region-wise. I wonder on which basis the federative regions are set up there.

>>780400
Just a random map I found on this subject. Probably a USSR not collapsing cold war fantasy map. Especially with Europe and East Asia under Moscow.

>>780366
the third world war will be completely communist on both sides mark my words

>>779978
>That dominating others either by being their natural better or by outsmarting them is bad. Women tend to teach boys these kind of things no matter their professed politics.
You just have to look at men raised by single mothers to see that is not so at all.

Most boys are raised by women generally. Women or rather mothers tend to do the bulk of child rearing whether they're single parents or not. Most men don't really want to do that and they generally don't need to or rather don't have to. I wouldn't if I was a father.

>>779983
I didnt say all women do this, but it is tendency especially in an atomised culture. The boys "raised by a single mother" were more often than not raised by their male friends and the medias, their mother merely being a provider.

American women unironically think boys screaming in pain and shitting themselves is cute.

>>780349
Weird how culture works, since I'm from a country that doesn't do circumcision, I think circumcised dicks are the ugly ones, it even turns me off from some porn.

>>780256
Blaming SJWism for the rise of anti-SJWism is naive in all but a tautological sense. Absent SJWism, they'd just latch on to something else. You can put a band-aid on a wound, but you can't stop the top level trends that lead to the same effects.
You must understand that these groups select for personality. This is why New Atheism cleanly split 50/50 between them: half of them were in it for social justice (became SJWs) and half were in it because they had a pathological need to "win" "arguments" (became SJWs OWNED slop producers)
there are also rationalists, who really really liked longform analysis blogposts, who find themselves wavering between SJWs and Nazis depending on how big a retard Trump is being that day.

The people crying about straight white men were open-minded, generally agreeable neurotics desperately clutching at reasons they felt bad. first they settled on ~50% of the population, which was subpar, but then - eureka! - they hit upon the economic system. The people crying about SJWs were closed-minded, generally disagreeable neurotics desperately looking for people to get into fights with. they've bounced between the jews, welfare queens, the SJWs, socialists, the SJeWs, communists, cultural marxism, and finally settled on becoming a global Trump cult of one flavor or another, often ironically engaged in "reverse-SJWism" where they argue minorities are oppressing white losers, where twitter users posting bad things about the president is violence, etc.


What you must understand is that the thing underpinning it all is personality. /leftypol/ is the only place on the left that is conflicted about this because it is under two selection effects: selecting both for SJW/leftist "types" (as a left-wing site) and for anti-SJW/rightoid "types" (as it's an imageboard), usually in some kind of incoherent mix. (myself obviously included)

>>780334
You can't just say that anti SJW would have happened anyway because of material conditions but then say all politics is about personality. You're massively oversimplifying.

Now yes, sure, the wider global trends quite likely would have pushed us to a similar situation to now, but the SJWs clearly didn't help things. It's conceivable that we may not have got a Trump presidency, or at least not a second one, without them.

I really don't think it's just leftypol that has a problem with manhating on the left either. I get the distinct impression that most men are not comfortable with this kind of rhetoric but are too afraid to say anything about it. I will never understand the kind of men who listen to the misandric shit and be like "you're so right milady, men are truly trash 🥲", have some self respect god. And yes there's still plenty of people out there like this, they definitely haven't all become egalitarian communists.

>>780336
Personalities are material conditions, or at the least are formed by underlying material conditions. If I simplify, it is because the details aren't as relevant as the thrust of the argument.

You overestimate loud but irrelevant factors and underestimate boring ones. SJWs had less than nothing to do with Trump winning in 2016 (He did terribly with young people! The clinton campaign actively helped him get the nomination! Brexit shows that some other underlying cultural force polarization of voting by age and education was at play, since nobody cares about the social justice implications of a trade bloc!) and very little to do with him winning in 2024*
For all the hype on "Kamala's for they/them", the actual determining factor was overwhelmingly the economy being bad, the same reason almost every incumbent government outside Canada has eaten shit in the last 5 years. "Vote for me and I'll bring back the economy circa 2019" isn't a bad pitch!
(this economic explanation for voting behavior doesn't clash with "politics is about personality" either: a lot of personalities are "apolitical"/swing voters, and don't neatly fit into the leftist/rightist archetypes of the SJW/Nazi dichotomy. What the dichotomy explains is why rightoids in every country love Trump despite him being a lecherous foreigner.)

*I think they were a factor in business leaders going over to backing Trump, but this speaks to the desirability of SJWism/wokeness as a phenomenon: it was a genuine-bottom up set of demands from workers which firms first tried to buy off with token concessions (not a corporate conjuring trick to distract from class war), then flipped over to endorsing reaction when that failed and when all the various disparate identity struggles realized that since they all felt broadly the same way, there must be something wider at work… like capitalism.

Manhating is its own separate thing. I'll tell you a weird trick, but I doubt it helps: recognize when you aren't being talked about. When someone says "kill all men" because a certain man annoyed them, it's very unlikely they're thinking of you, odds are they've no idea you exist and i all but guarantee they've got no ability to impose harm on you, so why feel it has anything to do with you?
This phenomenon is at its clearest whePost too long. Click here to view the full text.

she will be forever vindicated. every thing that came out of her mouth was a certified trvthnvke that shook treatlerites to their very core