>>725368pol pot could pull no /pol/s out of pol pot's /pol/ pot because once a /pol/ is in pol pot's /pol/ pot it has been potboiled beyond recognition. however, pol pot could have some sort of pull pot to put /pol/s in and pull /pol/s out of in case pol pot doesn't want to put /pol/s in pol pot's /pol/ pot. i'm not sure what the purpose of pol pot's pull pot would be but since pol pot is the owner of pol pot's /pol/ pot i guess it's up to pol pot if pol pot wants to have a pull pot to use in place of pol pot's /pol/ pot. if pol pot does have a pull pot and not just a /pol/ pot then we can start talking about how many /pol/s pol pot could pull out of pol pot's pull pot (after pol pot puts them in pol pot's pull pot, of course), but it's an open question whether pol pot could really put all of /pol/ in pol pot's pull pot to then pull /pol/ out of pol pot's pull pot.