[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1780135823082.jpeg (158.89 KB, 1280x800, IMG_3699.jpeg)

 

Come molti di voi sapranno il Giappone ha un grosso problema in comune con l’Occidente, che è la denatalità.


I giapponesi non fanno più figli e in molti si stanno interrogando sulle cause di questo fenomeno. In questo articolo (https://archive.ph/BEcaT) ad esempio la ragione principale viene individuata nella difficoltà chehanno i più giovani di trovare un lavoro stabile e remunerativo.
Qualcuno però la pensa diversamente e sono i redpillati che vivono in Giappone, come quello che ha scritto questa risposta (ubermann su reddit) che mi è capitata sott’occhio e che ho deciso di tradurre (non dal giapponese, era scritto in inglese lol) perché penso sia molto interessante:

>Vivo in Giappone. Questo articolo è una stronzata ed è completamente fuori luogo. Ennesima prova che questi professori universitari non sanno di che parlano.


>Per capire come mai qui non si facciano più figli, esaminiamo alcuni punti riguardo al Giappone:


>Il Giappone è una società incredibilmente ginocentrica che mette le donne sul piedistallo in ogni aspetto della vita. Entrate

gratis nei locali (dove i fessi pagano anche 40$), sconti ovunque dai teatri ai bar, diverse serate per donne durante la settimana ecc.
Nessuno qui letteralmente si aspetta che le donne paghino per qualcosa, anche se hanno un buon lavoro e fanno un sacco di soldi. Sono andato ad appuntamenti con donne con una buona carriera e si aspettavano ugualmente che pagassi io il conto. Ci si aspetta semplicemente che le donne non paghino, punto. Indipendentemente da quanti soldi abbiano (nota: alcune pagano per loro stesse ma è raro, ed è inversamente proporzionale al loro aspetto)

>Il sesso avviene ovunque e non c’è nessuna stigmatizzazione sociale. Ci sono perfino hotel speciali (“hotel dell’amore”) che le coppie affittano per poche ore solo per scopare. Questa libertà comporta che le donne ignorino il 90% degli uomini e si scambino fra di loro il restante 10%. I Chad giapponesi stanno beccando più figa che mai, mentre i beta Taro sono relegati alla sezione porno dei negozi di DVD. Le donne giapponesi cavalcano il *cazzosello più a lungo delle occidentali, e non è raro trovare ventenni di Tokyo che hanno avuto un numero di uomini a 3 cifre.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
62 posts omitted.

>>788764
>Or because they're disgusted by it, due to how they're treated in porn.

Mainly they’re disgusted by male reaction. Women still watch porn and make it for their own satisfaction

>This is still a minority amongst women.


A “minority” that isn’t as small as you think.
Especially within the past fifteen years.

>I think there are other issues due to this (mostly impossible expectations really), but this bothers me a lot less then porn addictions.


How?
If anything it’s not “impossible expectations “ but rather that society patronizes male youth sexuality as bad, condemning them for daring to show any ounce of libidinal energy for meatspace females.
So it’s safer to express psychosexual energy with fictional characters
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>788764
>I'm also opposed to most pet ownership, it often feels that for a lot of people, a dog has replaced the need for a child, and can't understand that dogs are mere animals.

Humans are mere animals too.
The problem is that humans expect dogs to be humans in quadrupedal form.
A lot of dogs suffer from behavioral and developmental disorders due to excessive artificial selection and premature and forced obedience training. And lack of autonomy.

Also the funny thing about dog worship is that the same people who fish over dogs hate children. Yet, dogs behave more messy and stinky than actual children do.

The worst part about domestication of dogs and cats though is spaying and neutering.
I can understand if it’s for hormonal or pathogenic issues, but it’s mainly done out of moral convenience as soon as the dog or cat comes of age


> More generally dog ownership is associated with very selfish, hence the whole "dogs are better then humans" or the "dogs can sense bad people" (Except Blondi apparently)


Funny enough a lot of serial killers were fond of dogs. Charlie Manson, Adolf Hitler, Son Of Sam, etc.

>>788767
>Mainly they’re disgusted by male reaction. Women still watch porn and make it for their own satisfaction

Most dont, I think the stat is 13% could be some underepresentation.

>A “minority” that isn’t as small as you think.

>Especially within the past fifteen years.
It's inscreased lately, but it's still a minority, in any case, some women like viewing themselves as objects, it doesn't really change my point.

>How?

Same way you see the same shit with celebrities, people living in fictional worlds and can't handle humans relations but only relations with an idealised person, it's something most grow out off.
>If anything it’s not “impossible expectations “ but rather that society patronizes male youth sexuality as bad, condemning them for daring to show any ounce of libidinal energy for meatspace females.
This doesn't happen tho, hypersexual men are celebrated, it's well seen to have had a lot of sex as a man, if anything, it's sexual women that are shamed.

>Why are you using May 1968 as the reference point?

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>788772
>This doesn't happen tho, hypersexual men are celebrated, it's well seen to have had a lot of sex as a man, if anything, it's sexual women that are shamed.

Half true
Hypersexual men are celebrated if they have other machismo traits.
If an obsess nerd was hypersexual, society would call him a sexual offender waiting to strike. But if you’re a hip hop artist that plays football, being a hypersexual dude is seen as a natural given.
Also hypersexual women are only criticized out of pretense

>It's inscreased lately, but it's still a minority, in any case, some women like viewing themselves as objects, it doesn't really change my point


I think you’re coping that women don’t fit into your paternalistic view. Women do watch and enjoy porn especially more so nowadays and some some even make porn of their favorite fictional characters

>It's the point where society openly embraced the liberalisation of sexual relations, but it's more of a referance point over a large phenomenon, rather then a specific month where everything changed, it's been a longer phenomenon.


Society hasn’t really openly celebrated sexual liberalism. It was only a cute bohemian fad for boomers.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>788772
>Same way you see the same shit with celebrities,

Celebrity worship involves worshipping a meatspace person

>people living in fictional worlds and can't handle humans relations but only relations with an idealised person, it's something most grow out off.


Using fictional characters as an outlet for your psychosexual energy isn’t a bad thing and in fact ought to be encouraged

If anything, it’s people imposing their preferences onto meatspace characters that’s the problem. And most are vanilla anyways. That in itself ain’t a problem.
The problem is that people think themselves as open minded when they’re easily disgusted with anything remotely nuanced. Especially if it’s in meatspace format.



 

⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠤⠤⠤⠄⣀⠄⠄⠄⠱⡄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⠁⠂⢄⢘⡾⠤⠐⠒⠒⠄⠄⠄⠄⠐⠒⠠⢀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠄⠂⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠐⢄⠄⠐⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠄⠈⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠙⠝⣶⣄⠄⠄⠈⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠄⠈⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠤⠶⠶⠦⣼⣿⠃⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⡠⠂⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠒⠒⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⡠⠂⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⡀⠠⠄⠒⠒⠒⠏⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠞⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⡀⠄⠂⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠂⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⢀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣠⠃⢀⡴⠃⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⡠⠂⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣀⡀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠂⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⡼⢁⠔⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠠⠚⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⠉⠻⢦⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⠄⢀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⡄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⣾⡷⠃⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠑⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠑⢄⣀⡐⠄⢶⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⣾⡿⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⠢⡀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠄⠰⣝⢷⣀⡘⣃⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣾⣿⠇⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⡆⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠄⠈⠪⡄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢂⠄⠹⣯⡿⣿⣿⡄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
551 posts and 527 image replies omitted.


File: 1780077783250.jpeg (65.48 KB, 736x736, HHmdwtOXQAAAzdm.jpeg)


File: 1780176873335.jpeg (363.61 KB, 1536x2048, HI4pR5EaMAAiVOB.jpeg)


Rate her fit

File: 1780302000968.png (87.1 KB, 920x1280, Fixed this vulgarity.PNG)




File: 1780261651706.png (764.19 KB, 685x675, IMG_3717.png)

 

Janice Fiamengo is one of the go-to “researchers” among MRAs when it comes to citing an “expert” on feminism to the extent that one of her articles got hosted by kosher right outlet PJ Media and, despite MRAs circle-jerking over her, most feminists have barely heard of her. Indeed, I can only think of one feminist response to her, and it amounts to just an answer post at Quora: https://www.quora.com/What-arguments-do-you-have-for-or-against-Professor-Janice-Fiamengos-view-on-feminism/answer/Frederic-Christie?ch=17&oid=27190247&share=dd688188&srid=3gfRuZ&target_type=answer

I should also note that, in spite of her many interviews with various outlets across the Canadian and American right-o-sphere, she still remains an obscure figure and you’ll never see her ever debate her views on video. Hmm, wonder why? 🤔

I wouldn’t talk about her if it wasn’t for the fact that she is one of the most cited female apologists for the manosphere, and her audience is mostly made up of run-of-the-mill chuds and MAGApedes who circle jerk over her as shown by how almost every result shows her works whenever you type her name on search engines.

Now, while I’m unfamiliar with her academic work in English literature back when she was professor of English at Ottawa university, I am familiar with her anti-feminist polemics and overall right-liberal takes on other matters.

So, first let’s get out of the way and say that she does point out many flaws in the history of feminism such as the disdain towards men shown by even some of the first-wave feminist figures, the elite-driven nature of feminism that runs contrary to the rugged individual image common in the mainstream, as well as the anti-social behaviour they display since the second wave.

But with that said, that’s where my praises for her ends, since I’m really critical of her since despite her facade she is merely an ideologue that uses factoids to spin a narrative that fits into the chudintern’s incessant culture war paradigm.

A key example would be her take on Emmeline Pankhurst and her mail bombing campaign that led to her arrest, as well as her securing female suffrage in exchange for promoting the BriPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
1 post omitted.

effortpost that should be on the main board tbh

>>788624
Done: https://leftypol.org/leftypol/res/2828514.html#q2828514

Hope that the mods delete this thread whilst keeping the copy on the main board.

>Janice has to ignore both how historically then and now feminism has often been a tool for western imperialism that only ends up with disempowering global south women who weren’t already part of the upper and middle classes

Therefore we should never criticize misogynist cultures and countries? Or the criticism should only come from women inside those countries? (Who will be called CIA or Mossad anyway)

Also can you actually give an example of feminism being used to "disempower global south women"? Not in a vibes based way, but an actual example of feminism causing the disempowerment of global south women.

>>788687
The point is clearly one of obfuscation on Janice’s part since she engages in idpol to discredit the Axis of resistance overall as part of a broader support for US imperialism. Indeed, at no point has she or other “Progressives but not for Palestine” types Janice might be at home with ever criticise the IDF’s rape and killings of Palestinian female civilians, nor the US bombings of Iranian, Iraqi and Afghan civilian women.

Indeed, even during the GWOT, you’d be hard pressed to find any of the feminists supporting the GWOT ever condemning war rape committed by US and other western armies.
As for feminism itself, its status as part of the imperial power process and its use by global capital to divide worker’s uprisings is well-known, so feminism is complicit in the capitalist exploitation of global south women.

I’m not even sure why I have to argue such an obvious point. Are you a liberal by any chance? Because I need to know if I’m arguing with an actual leftist or just a liberal.

>>788687
I don’t think you understood OP’s point which isn’t really about the merits of feminism per se as much as that Janice Fiamengo grasping at straws to paint an ideological narrative of feminism as anti-western (whilst ignoring evidence and counter-examples to the contrary) makes Janice less of an impartial scholar and more of a partisan hack who acts as an apologist for the western right, especially given her penchant for idpol and playing on white male grievances (legitimate or not) to keep white men from escaping the right wing plantation.



File: 1780289704313.jpeg (9.69 KB, 275x183, rights.jpeg)

 

are "rights" real? Do they exist?
8 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

not physically. but they are as real as ideas are real. as real as any other social construct is. as real as communism, justice, mathematics etc.

>>788751
Some social constructs are real. Others aren’t
Also what you mean is abstraction.

>>788754
can you provide examples of what a fake vs real social construct would be?

Obviously. Saying otherwise is pedantry.

>>788755
The racial categorization we have used since the seventeenth century especially in the US

“White” in America is ethnic elsewhere

Or how about phrenology?
It uses a lot of abstractions that aren’t real.



File: 1780237341562-0.jpeg (18.81 KB, 384x384, IMG_7298.jpeg)

File: 1780237341562-1.jpeg (211.77 KB, 690x1500, IMG_7299.jpeg)

File: 1780237341562-2.jpeg (139.63 KB, 1242x923, IMG_7300.jpeg)

 

What do you guys think of General William Tecumseh Sherman?
8 posts and 3 image replies omitted.

it would've been better if the Union had lost. two weaker burger states at odds with each other would've been better for the world.

File: 1780292163772.png (279.97 KB, 2518x1083, chadwillich.png)

>>788511
I'm more of an August Willich guy

File: 1780293882140.png (1.5 MB, 1617x1249, August Willich.png)

>>788700
Willich my beloved

>>788689
As a general rule, fuck alternate history, but I don't see the Confederacy surviving to the modern age. One scenario I think sounds fun is that they're secession actually ends up leading to a Haiti style slave revolt and Haiti ends up with a powerful ally in the American south. But there's no way to know.

>>788689
no it wouldn't, what would have been better, though was if the north was far more vitriolic to the confederates and decimated their troops, their cities, even executing every singular one of their generals



 

29 may is an amazing day, one of the best days on Earth, the day the disgusting boy fucking nailed jew worshipping reekoid despotate of Constantinople was rightfully destroyed by the forces of the Mujahideen and its vile vermonous memory erased from history forever

Today is the day the reek locust cuckstantine XI got his head served on a plate by our turkish brothers

Fuck byzanturds, fuck reeks, may their memory be eternally cursed.

My only lament is that the Abbassids were too lazy to destroy this loathsome pathetic excuse of a country earlier

>Flood

>>788724
How it feels to know that the Ottoman empire was the only real Roman empire…



File: 1780277576516.png (813.88 KB, 1024x1024, hr0pt7rev9031.png)

 

daily reminder that im a zettachad whose very presence mogs absolutely everyone in a 5.000 km radius and causes at least 3 suicides per week from jealousy and at least 15 different women and 18 different men are masturbating thinking of me at any given moment

me too

>>788651
This is also mostly true for me except for the suicides
I actually prevent suicides bc Im so cool

this is what a 5000km radius looks like btw

>>788665
This makes OP's numbers seem really low. Out of all that area there's ONLY 15 women and 18 men masturbating to OP rn? WTF?

>>788667
Yeah, there's like eight people jerking off to me in the bathroom at work right now and I called out tonight



File: 1780257082430.webp (92.51 KB, 744x418, IMG_1872.webp)

 

An Australian MP from the Nazi “One Nation” party came out as gay after his victory and helped his immigrant boyfriend.
https://youtu.be/Y4hWhQVcTb8?si=wlKSgPQd9yNWrOKE
3 posts omitted.

>>788591
The closest you’ll get is someone like Luna Oi! who is openly bisexual and a member of the Communist Party of Vietnam but is married to a man

hypocrisy is an integral part of rightoidism. its the same mentality where the judge snorts lines at the night club all weekend then goes to work monday to sentence people for a few specks of ganja

And many Nazis worshipped Christ, a Jew. This "hypocrisy" doesn't in any way make these people less dangerous.

>>788573
This is the endpoint of “morality is a spook”

When rightoids complain about “degenerates” they’re complaining about them as autonomous persons, not as humans in general.
They’d rather ethnocultural and gendersexual minorities to be pets for the noble whites.



File: 1780279131535.jpeg (37.39 KB, 941x530, ubzbdh0w0bse1.jpeg)

 

What the fuck is the point of reading books when you can just read summaries and basically get the gist of it, and then if you talk about it with people who have read the book they can't even clock that you haven't.
I've never read a full book on any of the shit I opine on and often wonder what might be in them to warrant ~300 pages of text like how do you fill an entire book with sentences for a simple concept that can be explained in a few paragraphs
12 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

a lot of books are full of dogshit and padded out and are not written as succinctly as possible to get the point across

>>788682
Yeah, entertainment books and technical writing are a good case for reading books

Most philosophy, though, is 300 pages of cope to ultimately arrive at an arbitrary position on questions such as "is there one thing or multiple things" or "should we kill ourselves or what"

I guess the gambit is that their "system" will become the new hegemonic language of reasoning, so they want to provide a toolbox or some shit

Worst case is kant, turgid writing + complete irrelevancy today (you're either a hegeloid or a nietzschcel)

I have read some books in the what is widely considered the worst genre: utopian novels. And so, with knowledge and conviction, I can say that OP is right at least in respect to those. Just write an essay, people!

It depends.
Science books shouldn’t be reduced to summaries.
A lot of basic fiction stories on the other hand

File: 1780295870487.jpg (354.59 KB, 2111x2416, 1753223831568.jpg)

You are basically telling on yourself. What you are saying is that a paragraph of an "executive summary" is enough to convince you that something is right or wrong. You don't need through literature surveys, detailed descriptions of the results, comparative analysis or anything else. It's sad.



File: 1779826472650-0.jpeg (10.7 KB, 168x300, IMG_7183.jpeg)

File: 1779826472650-1.webp (13.85 KB, 168x300, IMG_7184.webp)

File: 1779826472650-2.png (1.88 MB, 2388x1668, IMG_5914.png)

File: 1779826472650-3.jpeg (1.7 MB, 2388x1330, IMG_7186.jpeg)

 

Kim Jong Vroom, Mao Zehonk, Carl Skidmarx, or Joseph Stalling?
4 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

Josip Brakez Tito and Slavoj Skidek

>>786750
Not old enough to drink

>>786759
in US or Germany?

>>786762
France

Although he was not a Carmunist I will give an honorable mention to Cardafi, Liftya has been a failed state ever since Barack Granada ousted him.



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home