[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1776972002947.png (2.16 MB, 1000x1500, MazdakCreatesUtopia[1].png)

 

LOL

>Mazdak was an ancient Iranian Philosopher, who believed the scriptures (Zoroastrianism scriptures, this was pre-Islam) dictated radical social equality. He thought all property should belong to everyone, and wealth shared equally. He was so convincing that he even convinced the king to go along with it, and was able to successfully implement many of his social reforms. He also believed in getting rid of clerics, because they held religious authority over the population, which he thought was illegitimate. Eventually other rich and powerful Zoroastrian and Christian kings got wind of it, and challenged Mazdak to "debate" their clerics. These other kings were the judges, so naturally their guys won, and they brutally executed Mazdak and thousands of his followers. If Mazdak was a prototype for socialism, or even communism, I suppose you could say their reaction to it was a prototype for how to defeat socialism in the good old "marketplace of ideas". As with most ages and societies, those with huge amounts of power and property have never been too keen on philosophers that want to take it away.

>>776244
*loud wrong buzzer*
anachronisms aside, the key difference is that he didn't represent a model that could overcome the system of his time. getting killed for being a nuisance to the kings was, in the long term, his only objective and achievement. this has nothing to do with modern (marxist) socialism

he was an adventurist , rightfully killed

>>776248
>his only objective and achievement
achievement maybe, but objective, what? you believe he wanted to get killed without achieving the change he wished for?

>this has nothing to do with modern (marxist) socialism

thats like saying utopian socialist have nothing to with marxist socialist. They share a similar goal, even if they dont share an analysis that didnt exist yet and the means to reach their goal according to more modern theories



 

By the invitation of EQG chads
>no hooves
<War of all against all edition
<Gunpowder Treason Day
King James VI & I movie:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PPRUFSGdI22n/
596 posts and 1331 image replies omitted.

Kings power alone can only do so much.
Perhaps it would be suitable if we could make genetic clones of monarchs to serve as eyes and ears of national welfare

>>776242
Like it or not, yes, that's what monarchy is.
Some constitutional monarchists will tout that a king does not rule alone—I personally deny that, even if there are assemblies or council… the chief definition of monarchy is one alone rules, and that fundamental law of monarchy is expressed through sovereignty in which form or constitution of a state or republic is defined primarily by one person's majesty or preeminence and some family alone stands out–and if not, then it's another form of state/republic such as a democracy or oligarchy where some other kind of government has the primacy… but we don't accept a mixed constitutional or the concordant notion of political pluralism like Aristotle's. As Hobbes says, the chief difference between the mixed constitutionalist and absolutist view is that rather it isn't the concord of many men, but the union–and the integrity of the republic is its sovereignty as the fundamental law, pertaining to three forms–and while there might be a confluence of members / elements of democracy or aristocracy, the purity of the primary form of state is maintained, be it a monarchy, oligarchy, or democracy, like Bodin defends and traces back to Herodotus (*and denies Plato acknowledged it in the Aristotle or Polybius established mixed constitutionalist ideals). That is the nuance–and while it seems anachronistic, I cannot really take monarchy any other way because mixed constitutionalism dilutes and renders monarchy irrelevant to begin with… so I personally still maintain the opinion of Bodin or Hobbes in the year 2026 tbh. I wouldn't have it any other way, even if it is not very fashionable, lol

I personally do not accept the mixed constitutionalist view when it comes to monarchy for numerous reasons. Like Jean Bodin says it makes a monarch into no more than a mean magistrate and overall tends to favor elective monarchy since it stresses concord and rule by turns/rotational government since monarchy is but one lesser estate among other heads… to have it as one part monarchy, one part oligarchy, one part democracy considers monarchy merely as a mere part in relation to the state and not the majesty or sovereignty of the whole state… like Jean Bodin says the outcome usually is plain democracy like mixing paint together… and I hate t it because then there is no definitive form of state and no pretense to say the state no longer is a monarchy… which is important to me because Mixed constitutionalists just don't care about the 3 forms of the herodotus debate and that particular quality… same I'd say even for Plato who might say in Laws that it's merely the rule of a faction to maintain a particular form of state… but rather appeal to good policy/law or aristocracy/good government in general… but I am not really content with what some traditionalists or integralists or conservatives have in mind with just any vague notion of good government– so like Bodin I'm not for confounding the forms… and I don't take it for the partiality of a faction, but as Hobbes says the civil soul. So I definitely maintain a definite kind of sovereignty as is customary for absolute monarchists and dates back to Herodotus…
Mixed constitutionalism is a declaration of war against all notions of monarchical preeminence and majesty to me.
That is all I have to say there and why I am the way I am.

The general policy I have in mind is particularly like I outlined with Corgism, lol, a cult of personality–with the customs of absolute monarchists–I can't vibe with esotericists/metaphysicians/integralists/mixed constitutionalists because they aspire to just any vague idea of good government/aristocracy, what I have in mind is a unique form of familialism/cult of personality, very specific, and it feels droll/lifeless to me to not stress this quality.

We need a new thread.



File: 1774818752063.webp (Spoiler Image,124.77 KB, 1179x1572, IMG_5077.webp)

 

Since you f@gs let the last thread die i’m making a new one

Post tits: big, small, natural, fake, saggy, flat, milfs; any woman with breasts, post ‘em

(Preferably not ai, unless they’re good quality)
122 posts and 167 image replies omitted.

>>776235
I wont avoid younger people because of it, ive just noticed its more common throughout dating and its a huge turn off for me, ive always been annoyed by it though even like 20 years ago.



>>776237
Have you considered that younger people are using phones in dating to cope with nervousness especially with this moral obsession with youth sexuality?
Nowadays, getting sex in youth is like trying to get water in a desert, especially if you’re a cishet male youth
You see the neopuritanism towards young adult sexuality these days, courtesy of stranger danger

>>776237
Usually people like To act like any current year problem is the first of its kind
IMO, playing on your phone during a date is a far more tolerable faux pas than being loud and obnoxious or fronting

Can you people stop yapping and post some tits please?

File: 1776974798793-0.png (Spoiler Image,132.5 KB, 1200x1256, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1776974798793-1.png (Spoiler Image,216.65 KB, 1536x2048, ClipboardImage.png)

>>776254
Here's a couple that caught my attention on a search



File: 1776803606145.png (3.28 MB, 2556x1179, IMG_0659.png)

 

There are infinite natural numbers. You can take any of those natural numbers and multiply them by 2 and get another infinity of natural numbers. You could do the same thing with 3, 4, 5, etcetera. That must mean that there are infinitely infinite infinities, ad infinitum, ad infinitum, ad infinitum, etc, etc, etc,…(…)…
4 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

I swear this is like the fifth time someone's posted this same thought on here and no, you don't get "another infinity", it's the same infinity. Look up countably vs uncountably infinite.

>>775703
>>775727
DICKBLAST SAYS CANTOR WAS A PSEUD AND A THEOCRAT TRYING TO DEBOONK MATERIALISM WITH MIND GAMES AND PARLOR TRICKS

>>775922
You don't even actually need Cantor for this though, like if you multiply a natural number by two you just get another natural number, that's already included in the original set of natural numbers.

dont forget negative infinities either

I don't believe in infinity. It's imaginary, nothing is infinite.



 

Can normies be socialist?
15 posts and 3 image replies omitted.

File: 1776896825227.webm (1.33 MB, 1080x1920, tomato.webm)

>>775991
nta but normies do exist just not in the way 4channers conceptualize them. Normalcy does not exist, but society tells us it does so whenever we're in public we pretend to be whatever is commonly considered to be normal. In other words, normalcy is a LARP.

Isn't it weird that everyone seems boring and bland as fuck but when you get to know people you realize they have a ton of niche interests and interesting observations that you'd never thought they could possibly have? its because once people trust you a bit more they slowly start dropping the normie NPC larp.
The things that make us unique are also the things that make us feel vulnerable because they feel like a failure at being normal.

>>776004
>when you get to know people you realize they have a ton of niche interests and interesting observations that you'd never thought they could possibly have?
ivenever met an interesting person irl like that

>>776006
No one's ever felt comfortable opening up around you.

>>776069
its probably just that the average person is fucking boring man.

>>776126
The average person is an entire person, I'm willing to bet my entire next paycheck you're not any more fascinating than and them.



File: 1776925122316.jpeg (4.2 KB, 196x163, download (26).jpeg)

 

Had to copy/pasta my own response as of course fucking jannies just delete thread instead of helping. They don't help anyone, ever.
>>776047
Imma be real with you chief. As an actual minister, you're not the first person I've talked too about suicide.

I'm not gonna sit here and tell you things aren't so bad, they are. Shit sucks. You can't even do basic things. Like right now X and Youtube just aren't working for me, not sure why, obviously this crap hole is…but after a hard day I can't even shit post or watch videos really?

And it might hurt your family, but fuckem. They're neurotypicals, they'll get over it. I'd be shocked if it actually did traumatize someone. I'm not saying that to make you feel worse, you know this already. Your friends and family aren't horrible to you, but they're not actively contributing to a better life either. Harmless isn't innocence.

And it might hurt your family, but fuckem. They're neurotypicals, they'll get over it. I'd be shocked if it actually did traumatize someone. I'm not saying that to make you feel worse, you know this already. Your friends and family aren't horrible to you, but they're not actively contributing to a better life either. Harmless isn't innocence.
But the main reason you shouldn't kill yourself isn't even because "it's sinful", its not. I mean it is but it's not the end of the world. That's your life, only you can judge it's potential.

However you should know you take it all with you. Now you might be a strict atheist and think nothingness awaits you and is preferable. If that's the case well i disagree but i could see why you'd do it.

However you should know you take it all with you. Now you might be a strict atheist and think nothingness awaits you and is preferable. If that's the case well i disagree but i could see why you'd do it.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>776118
H should definitely be last resort. Better idea would be starting with something softer and moving to harder drugs only if doesnt help.



 

Whole world's gone to shit.

Every corner of every city in every country in every goddamn crack and corner of this god-forsaken planet is caked in filth:

the filth of the trash, the filth of the forgotten, the shit smears and the fuckin' wastewater warlords of the street.

The type of cat who commands you to share that cigarette "let me hit that shit"—the one from the pack you dared to think "I should just fucking quit" before buying, because the cash flow is light.

About as fuckin' light as the rivers and the creeks flowing right now in the pre-summer heat.

Ain't no more spring. Just heat. Just hot. Just concrete. Just a motherfucker who might get got.

That's the time of day now.

The type of heat that soaks into the scalp and massages the anger muscles so deeply, you have to wonder who will die in the dead of summer—which is still months away.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
2 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

Ever thought about visiting the countryside and reconnecting with nature?

20 years in the can… not one fucking peep

the most underappreciated poster on this site

Ive been rewatching spongebob recently. The show is a lot funnier as an adult.

>>775981
Really?
I’ve been rewatching childhood shows and they have the same level of sentiment to me.
No more or less funny



File: 1774122708625.jpg (287.45 KB, 900x851, gooner bingo.jpg)

 

posting this banger bingo again
23 posts and 15 image replies omitted.

>>771063
Like the 3rd time. It was all dry after that

>>771070
i dont get it
please explain this joke


Kill me

I think I have masturbated too hard/rush and besides my blue/big veins I can see some micro res veins wherw I isually place my hand
Help



File: 1774737372132.jpeg (84.5 KB, 1200x675, 1752025956810.jpeg)

 

Please post more of these
13 posts and 18 image replies omitted.

File: 1776408977507.jpg (41.57 KB, 415x434, chud.jpg)



File: 1776428049439.png (563.5 KB, 1000x1102, Nazi pig.PNG)

>flood or sum

File: 1776429427553.png (649.94 KB, 720x720, ClipboardImage.png)


File: 1776894286016.png (590.89 KB, 532x395, 1627323861619.png)




File: 1776893302351.png (15.12 KB, 500x250, Oekaki.png)

 

>Suspicious edition
Someone please provide a material explanation for why only one or two Eurovision songs briefly go viral every year before becoming completely irrelevant and why safe pop music is preferred by viewers over an atmospheric ballad about the singer's dead father's alcoholism.

Mods. Delete this imperialist thread.

Alcohol is just expensive and over-commercialised methinks

hanging…..



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home