/siberia/ - Off-topic

Argentina is by far the most racist and xenophobic country in Latin America. They are the Israel of the New World.

I thought I was on /latam/ for a second. I don't know much about argentina other than about the fact that they went "ancap" (fascist) and that their economy and quality of life are rapidly deteriorating as a result. Also that Maradona was a communist in addition to being a very talented player. Oh yeah, also that Argentinian alfajor tastes great

>>801999
>They are the Israel of the New World.
that would be the US however

>>801995
This is how every AnCap sees Javier Milei

cape verdesian detected

>>801919
The Deprogram fell off. Hakim had never been wrong ever before the China episode. Sad state of affairs. That being said, even this stereotype you paint usually despises Hasan, dude fell off even harder (though he was already a libshit to begin with). They also despise the ACP for obvious reasons.

>>802031 (me)
Like it feels like you're just trying to bait and piss off the most amount of people possible instead of building a coherent caricature. Do better

>>802024
There is no "Dengism"
Deng was Marxist. He shed blood fighting Japanese fascists in the Communist army. You will never do such a thing.

>>801997
Gem

>>801997
Holy larp son

Starlight was right about cutie marks restricting freedoms. Without the bubble cutie mark Derpy would be a nuclear physicist.

>>801543
no Starlight was a retard. division of labour is good. Twilight and the girls were right to do cultural genocide on her town, dragging it kicking and screaming into the future

>>801546
Socialism is supposed to work on overcoming the division of labor. And Equestria has been doing cutie marks for 1000 years and their productive forces SUCK. In the movie they almost got conquered by some blimps and a hornless unicorn.

>>801676
cutie marks are part of pony species being, retard. you will not get rid of them any more than you will get away from the distinction between earth pony, pegasus and unicorn

new Tamers12345

This is how we pirated back in 1975 before tor renting was invented or something

>>801978
Are you writing this in the convalescent home?

Am I right in thinking that this is just sadism, which is justified by "wel, xe murdurz bad goys xD xD (end vey r also migrands)"?

>>802079
Nah, you’d be right considering how the movie is basically the cinematographic version of William Luther Pearce’s “The Turner Diaries” in terms of having little to no artistic merit and for being nothing more than pro-murder agitprop that will likely inspire acts of right-wing terrorism in the coming years.

And of course, the establishment won’t ban it the way they ban ISIS propaganda even doe the only difference is in length. I don’t think that CIA asset ever made a feature-length movie though

>>801580
>How long until euROPE cannibalizes itself?
>starring Armie Hammer
lol

>>802088
Most feature-lengths got CIA asset involvement

true.

Normies have only two opinions: "there is no God" and "there is a God and he is good."
For some reason, it's impossible to think that "there is a God and he is bad."

>>802056
They are calling God™ good because they fear that their God™ would smite them if it gets criticized even just a little bit.

>>802056
>For some reason, it's impossible to think that "there is a God and he is bad."
because that shit is even dumber than the first two options

The trvke that shook the 'beria

>alienated
this gon be the new buzzword for the year and we will ALL be using it wrong

>>802025
where do you think we are?

unsubscribe me from your blog posts, pls

>>801861
Externally apparent personality is quite easy to manage. For example, I used to be the average /leftypol/ anti-idpol moron and now I'm some kind of pro-Woke type once I looked at some charts and realised it's shibboleths and fandom all the way down. All it takes is a small amount of tact for this to go from being an insufferable contrarian little man to a very tolerable progressive, despite clearly still holding a lot of views that would rightly have me executed if I said them in the wrong context. I actually used to be much worse than I describe. I know personality is malleable because I have manipulated my own.

I take no view on what people are attracted to (social desirability bias is such that they'll always lie) but judging people by personality is essential. 15 minutes with any opinion survey will tell you that politics today mostly functions as a personality test.
are you a pseudointellectual elitist virtue signaller, or an actually mentally retarded vice-signaller? are you high openness, mid-low conscientiousness, high agreeableness, or are you low openness, mid-high conscientiousness, and low agreeableness?

>>801868
Insofar as that's genetic, people with that burden should not reproduce. Insofar as it isn't, society should be structured in a way that alleviates this.

>>801871
Autism has a huge spread within it and is a useful illustrative case: Autism should theoretically kneecap your openness and agreeableness while hiking your conscientiousness (which is in practice mostly "rule following") but extremely online autists are at worst split down the middle between woke transsexuals and 4chan nazis. there is nothing anti-human in loving the former and hating the latter! the latter are themselves anti-human!!

"Judging people for not conforming to societal norms is vaugeposting." it is one thing to judge people for not conforming to a societal norms in a high-openness way (e.g. LGBTQetc) and another to judge them for not conforming in a low-openness way (e.g. open racism).

>Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

it was a good vid, already watched it
>TL;DR babies arent born with religious beliefs but by 3.5 they develop a theory of mind, including a theory of mind for dead things
>they have to be socialized into believing specific religious ideas
>non-religiosity is surprisingly "sticky" and persists across generations in the same family through socialization even if the person themselves wasn't raised to be explicitly nonreligious. This is because modern 1st world societies subconsciously indoctrinates new generations into secular humanism.

it's a bit more nuanced than that but i'm going off memory here. watched it like 4 hours ago

>>801380
theres a part where he talks about superstitious beliefs and their link to childrens brains having difficulty to discern objects from agents, and that this is actually an evolutionary hiccup we have from prehistoric times, that made me think, if scared superstitious people are more likely to survive in nature, could it be that humans naturally evolved to be more religious? it mustve had at least some impact on our society right?

>>801429
superstitions are really just pattern recognition making false associations because of not having enough information, pretty much. other animals can be pretty readily develop similar "superstitious" behavior, not specifically a human thing. religion is though, because it entails having a narrative passed down through language which no other known animals have.

>>801429
that's probably just one of many reasons

>coping with death
>keeping the community together through shared belief
>ritually burying the dead instead of just letting their corpse lay around prevents disease
>ritual prayer and meditation reminds you to stop think about your actions and the impact they will have, and to consider the other people in your life and what they are going through
>you are more motivated to do complex social things like build temples and record the history of your society and ancestors if you believe the gods want you to do it
>if you think the gods are watching you and judging you morally then you can't really hide your bad actions even when you are by yourself and nobody is really watching. so you act as if the gods are watching at all times, and hold back your more cutthroat animalistic instincts to crush others for quick gain
>if humanity has some kind of ultimate purpose then you have a reason to care about future generations after you are gone, and to "plant trees whose fruit you won't be around to taste" so to speak
>the origin of the universe, matter and energy are genuinely confusing and so hypothesizing that matter came from the ultimate mind is actually pretty intuitive and it's unsurprising materialism is less intuitive at that pre-scientific stage of history
>religion enables you to abstract and symbolize things beyond the literal, leading to the invention of numbers and writing.

Where's the RWBY posting OP

Legitimately kill yourself subhuman filth

>>802022
No, you.

Isn't burning down your house, for insurance, fraud? Were those landlords killed?

>>801946
It's only fraud if you get caught and they can prove it. If landlords were killed it was probably by organized crime for getting to greedy and not paying the arsonists properly.

>>801940
wtf ben this an anti semitic stereotype? in the 70s it used to be called 'jewish lightning'

>>801950
Lol I'll remember this

>>801946
>Isn't burning down your house, for insurance, fraud? Were those landlords killed?
Those landlords was innocent. This is blood libel. They were victims of antisemitism.

>The first true "headline" of landlords committing arson would likely be the arrest of 8 landlords, detailed in the New York Times in 1975.[31] Among these were the highly-publicized case of Imre Oberlander and Yishai Webber, two Brooklyn-based landlords who were caught driving to one of their buildings whilst wearing blackface, explosives in tow.[32] Critically, none of these landlords were black or Latino but were Jewish. The landlords profited greatly off their insurance policies; Oberlander, for example, had collected $125,000 (over $750,000 in 2026) in payouts from twenty-one separate fires between 1970 and 1975.[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1970s_South_Bronx_building_fires#The_fires