[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1785575713701-6.png (204.52 KB, 295x475, ClipboardImage.png)

 

This was a frustrating book to read and not in the ways a lot of people accuse it of being (I don't think it's valid to criticise a sci-fi book for using technical terms). Each of its nine chapters was originally written as a short story, meaning the pacing is unfortunately completely wack and sometimes you go from a really interesting story to something completely unrelated. I also have some problems with the way the story itself is told, and the future being envisioned, but despite my complaints I devoured the book in only a few days and enjoyed reading.

Accelerando is an unending deluge of interesting and amazing ideas about the future of technological progress. It is about the singularity from its beginning to its end, and it is fascinating and really fun reading about how it progresses. The civilisation comes out of the other end is unexpected and kind of frightening. Every decade or so in the story there are asides which tell you about the state of the solar system. The speculative civilisation simulation is the main draw here and it is genuinely engaging, though there is also a human story. I do have criticisms of the future imagined in this book, which I'll talk about later. It also is a little bit dated in a few places, especially at the beginning.

The human story has highs and lows. It's frustrated very badly by the disjointed chapters, and is usually less interesting than the civilisation progression. It's especially bad in the last third, where I think the characters become less engaged with the technological progression and things kind of of become a bit more conservative. I actually don't think the characters are all that bad. I really liked Manfred and I related to Amber, though I didn't really care for Sirhan. Maybe it's because I'm coming off of other sci-fi novels with ridiculously flat characters, but I think the ones in this book are pretty good and engaging.

The problem comes from how they turn the plot into family drama. I was not looking for family drama when I started this book, and it massively overstays its welcome (I thought Amber's relationship with her mum, who's the most annoying cuckservative ever, was engaging, but everything to do with Sirhan is just frustrating). My favourite parts of the story were the beginning with Manfred, and the part where Amber is on the spaceship (I liked this part a lot, it was fun), because these are the parts in which the plot is allowed to be about actually interestPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>810522
>The problem comes from how they turn the plot into family drama. I was not looking for family drama when I started this book, and it massively overstays its welcome (I thought Amber's relationship with her mum, who's the most annoying cuckservative ever, was engaging, but everything to do with Sirhan is just frustrating). My favourite parts of the story were the beginning with Manfred, and the part where Amber is on the spaceship (I liked this part a lot, it was fun), because these are the parts in which the plot is allowed to be about actually interesting things. Oh and there's a cat which helps them out.


I don’t like family drama much in stories. It’s always long and drawn out.
The parents are never given much flak for their incompetence and the kids are always looked down upon as brats even if they’re rightfully angry.

Or it’s all forced bonding.

> Accelerando is constrained by its liberalism. It is fundamentally a conservative liberal silicon-valley techbro story, though it pretends it isn't. At one point it says "Capitalism and Communism have both become obsolete", but the new system is still a class society with scarcity and EVERYTHING is based on the market, corporations or legal systems. So, it says Communism has become obsolete, but it obviously isn't (even if the proletariat no longer existed, if class society does that just means that it has developed in a way we didn't expect, but the contradiction of class still has to be resolved so communism is still necessary).


Can you clarify a bit on this? Using real world examples, though

>>810526
TBH, you would probably would like a bit where loads of children including the MC at that point escape into space from their parents and set up an Empire in Jupiter.


>Can you clarify a bit on this? Using real world examples, though

Sorry what do you want me to clarify?



File: 1785580557332-6.jpeg (10.4 KB, 764x401, d11.799.jpeg)

 

now that the dust has settled

who was in the right here?

The bowl



File: 1785239420693-5.jpeg (99.8 KB, 850x850, IMG_1354.jpeg)

 

It’s my dream to fuck a femcels brain out. But where can I even find them?
40 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

>>810235
<45% are going extinct

>>810249
Wdymby

>>810235
That doesn’t make them a femcel by your definition

>>809700
Elon Musk is a billionaire and no one likes him.

>>810274
He doesn't have to be liked…i still remember a time in 2017 when reddit science soy guys were mocked for loving elon musk…fast forward 2023 and now they're mocked for Not liking based elon musk….. and now everyone hates him

Guess what he only grew more influential no matter who loves or hates him.. still is….i mean he can cope better than us with being hated with his wealth

>>809247
Fair point.



File: 1785370503365-5.png (5.52 MB, 2000x2000, ClipboardImage.png)

 

The authors of this book were smarter than Marx
32 posts and 10 image replies omitted.

>>810176
>Pretty much no mainline Christian sect believes the Bible was directly authored by God and is infallible.

You’re joking, right?
A lot of mainline Christians believe the Bible was direct verbatim from Jehovah

>>810177
Which is why I don’t like the idea of “re-education” as some form of moral correction for reavtionaries

>>810073
Sex happened not not in the modernized Anglo American gestures that you think.
Stop imposing modern cultural impressions onto the past, especially sexual ones. It’s annoying.

>>810089
>You are saying that there's one word which is badly translated (and not even "mistranslated") and has been made better through Biblical scholars.
I already explained that I don't think it was deliberate. Mistranslated means badly translated, in terms of how I was using the word.
>One word out of a million is is not a sold defense for your apathy.
Apathy means indifference.
>The majority of Biblical scholars are atheists,
And they agree with me
>yet reddit atheism is of your own kind, since you languish in arrogant slogans.
If I were a reddit Atheist this conversation would have gone differently. For one thing I wouldn't have been nearly as patient or thoughtful in my replies, and I would have used phrases like "your sky daddy" to mock you. But like I said, the term "reddit Atheist" has been worn out to no longer just refer to that kind of insufferable liberal imperialist Atheism from the 2000s and 2010s.


>>810020
Is this Asherah the same one that’s referred to as Astarte or Ashorath or Ishtar?



 

Luke 7:37

37 A sinful woman in the town learned that Jesus was eating at the Pharisee’s house. So she brought an alabaster jar of perfume 38 and stood behind Jesus at his feet, crying. She began to wash his feet with her tears, and she dried them with her hair, kissing them many times and rubbing them with the perfume.



File: 1785530892859-5.jpg (413.01 KB, 1756x2048, 1781280352320.jpg)

 

Mooooooods ban the stupid incel that infests siberia every once in a while.
8 posts omitted.

>>810325
There isn't, and you're treading a dangerous line even considering that there might be.

fuck you, we are in a gender war and I'm the only man brave enough to say it loud in this place

>>810442
I love women and I’m man

>>810338
>single childless and pretty
Heh funny how you mix in that men shpuld be raising other men's children as a complaint against men. You guys can't help yourself but go over the top with your contempt.

>>810307
Let me guess:
<You are a "transbian" on hrt to replace your evil male hormones.
<You are into femdom and want to be castrated by a biological female just like in your anime comic.



File: 1744026167132.jpg (Spoiler Image,243.52 KB, 1561x2048, Gk37ERsWMAAbqvL.jpg)

 

a thread to post hot trans women
497 posts and 427 image replies omitted.

>>808871
This you? You dont look half bad. How many months on E?

>>808912
guess?

>>808756
>Why do people with gender dysphoria looks traumatized
This is one of the bad side effects of treating trans identity as wholesome chungus self affirmation. As if being trans is no different from being a goth girl or growing out your armpits.

>>809117
Id say a bit less than a year. 8-10 months maybe. Im not an expert though and im not trans so dont be mad if im wrong

File: 1785547055487-6.jpg (248.9 KB, 981x1024, HKN05xcXYAAWd6N.jpg)




File: 1785286043721-5.jpg (70.81 KB, 686x386, hq720 (2).jpg)

 

the fact that perpetual motion machines are physically impossible proves that we are living in one of the worst timelines
13 posts omitted.

>>809762
cause its not a machine. a perpetual motion machine is supposed to be a man made machine that is capable of generating energy infinitely with little force applied to it, like vid related but not fake. the sun isnt a machine and grabbing its energy is too hard to actually change anything about our society, whereas if these machines could work irl theyd probably make energy so cheap we'd be swimming in it

>>809782
You meant to say a machine is a man made object that uses energy to do work.

I view the sun as a machine, but naturally made. But then again, that may be my anthropocentrism acting up

Also are you saying the perpetual motion machine in the vid is fake?

Also, I don’t think perpetual motion machines may be an actuality because nothing lasts forever. Mass and energy are limited

In order to generate perpetual power, it requires something else to change its physical/chemical state. Unless you have a way of capturing byproduct material that can be instantly reverted back into fuel.

>>809302
>it's true in the abstract therefore it's true in the actual
no man

Bump for more interesting discussion

Are perpetual motion machines actually a thing?

It sounds like alchemy



File: 1785392798447-4.jpg (33.2 KB, 620x404, 1785358153251653.jpg)

 

Why do capitalists so often risk everything for short-term profits even if it costs them everything in the long run?
37 posts and 8 image replies omitted.

>>810131
>How is the system managed 'irrationally'? What are the 'incentives'? How do they lead to 'irrationality'?
i mean these are all pretty basic marxist stances though, arent they? thats one of marxs main points in capital

Tbh it doesn't matter the "style" of capitalist managemebt and how rational or irrational the capitalists are, the irrationality is in the "necessity" of an accumulation based economy and the way everything is set up to facilitate that.

Also tbh marx didn't deny the possibility of a peaceful transition to socialism in some countries if the capitalists wisen up

>>809839
Bourgeoisie are not in control capital itself is. Its the only entity with agency.

>>809865
not a meme, izza poast

>>810131
you expect things from a post that it was obviously never intended to deliver. e.g.
>There are 'incentives' for every fucking living being on this planet. Hot tip: it might have to do with material conditions
yes: but "material conditions" is familiar to every poster here, while i am quite possibly the only leftypol user who will tell you to look at incentives. part of my purpose is to invite people to look at the problem in a new way.
>Then you proceed to shift the topic entirely.
because that's a reply to an entirely different post! someone said Keynesianism was a better way of managing capitalism, so there was an extended digression about why this isn't the case.

i may return and do a fuller response, but i am not convinced it is a good use of time. first of all, you've replied "line by line" in a bad faith way which makes a well structured response impossible, second of all you're clearly not very good at it. there are "no concrete examples" of "overregulation" you say, right before getting mad at a concrete example about airline deregulation which - and i know this requires you to draw a very obvious inference - must have been overregulated if deregulating it was a good thing. "what are the incentives, how do they lead to irrationality" - this is answered at length if you keep reading! the incentives are for legislators to focus on tax cuts that benefit incumbent firms over deregulation which benefits new firms! this is like you reading an essay that goes "this paper will demonstrate x" and immediately going
>This paper will demonstrate x
<HOW? HOW WILL IT DO THAT?
read on! read for the year! read on! read a little! i'll read on!

given this, trying to address any of the complex points (like the distinction between an evolutionary and a planned process) would be a doomed endeavour. so the only points that feel worth addressing (because they are quite brief and easy) are:
  • fuel efficiency: in a marketplace where the government sets ticket prices and restricts competition so that airlines are always profitable, the relative advantage of buying more expensive, more fuel efficient planes is lower than in one where airlin
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.



File: 1785527951047-1.jpeg (42.02 KB, 845x856, yz3nxwj57f9h1.jpeg)

 

>tfw the porn/non-porn subreddit you haven't visited in 3 years has grown 10 times in size

>>810286
>porn/non-porn
???

>>810297
First I wanted to post about porn subs but I realized SFW subs have suffered the phenomenon too



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home