>>753676if you want to play the game of "we can easily judge fascism from its fruits", then im sorry to inform you that modern communism failed badly in that test also since most communists today are libs and not even of working class origin
>Why waste time making a "coherent critique" of fascist """ideology""" when its a bunch of schizoslop they make up and change as they see fit? do you think Lenin and Mao basically changing Marx's views to suit their local conditions proof that communism is "schizoslop that they make up and change as they see fit"? or is it theoretical development?
> If you want to le stop fascism you need to change the material base from which it grows out again and again in all of its different forms and shades from Hitler to Pinochet to Trump: capitalism.you think fascists dont know this? Most of the og fascists had read Marx dumbass, ᴉuᴉlossnW was a former socialist
>I'm intersted in material analysis not neohegelian idealismyou are fundamentally unserious. Hegel and those on the idealist factions did not consider material analysis to be useless or that there is no value in tracing historical development of economic systems as Marx did. Hegel mentioned ideas in the same sense of Spinoza, not in the spiritual sense