Would the balkanisation of the united states be a good thing and actually help bring about world communism or would it just lead to there being multiple little fascist states that cause lots of trouble?
4 posts and 1 image reply omitted.If the US balkanizes the remaining nations will probably be a mix of authoritarian neo-liberal states, think a democrat controlled state but even more authoritarian to quell dissent and protect their nations "democracy"/bourgeois interests while the other nations will be extremely authoritarian far-right, hyper militant, fascist states, think the average board on 4chan like /pol/, /v/ or a country like Saudi Arabia but even more retarded and sociopathic. I don't see them causing trouble beyond themselves because they will always have a convenient enemy bordering them giving an air of legitimacy to their own rule. Maybe they will make alliances with outside countries to empower their own rule in the former US region but I don't see them being a major problem beyond maybe funding some terrorist groups abroad.
>>748555Rent lowering anime girls keep pseuds out
>>748496From a purely selfish perspective I support balkanization because I'm on the west coast and if it was left to its own devices it would be highly successful. At a bare minimum a very wealthy social democracy. The US federal government is unquestionably holding it back and at this point provides zero benefit.
feel like the oklahoma purchase territories would be de jure land back with reclaimed territories but de facto indigenous and yt supremacist gangs competing for territory. bit of a wild west situa there. thered be an unofficial truce just bc the settlers outnumber them. midwest/chicago could be self sufficient if it could get fertilizer for its massive fields and assuming monoculture farming is still the meta. if u overthrow the farmers you could get a good chance at whatever communist ideology is in season at the time but itd undoubtedly be a shithole bc its cut off from the rest of the world, although i dont know enough about its soil quality to say. could be self sufficient? has california industrialized? i feel like since its marketed as this final vacation spot for all aspiring landowners and bougs it prolly hasnt. Might project soft power all over the world but it'll have extreme beef with texas to get access to the gulf dont know too much about the east to say but im going this far so whatever. northeast prolly some weird mix of constitutionalists and might nostalgiapill themselves to conquer the original area of the 13 colonies. But itll have a progressive bend to it. imagine(haha) an imperialist social democracy. might also want to re-engage in canada just bc of lost territory there. might push to institutionalize the indigenous AGAIN to be official "citizens" to try to make some claim at canada's territories an twisted version of land back. The south dunno, thats a real wild card. black communities are definitely impoverished and theyll get all of the heel and be the scapegoat for all problems if they dont rise up. theyve strategically been starved of whatever official aid but the chaos of balkanization might get them to make some real gains for their communities. As the waters rise bc of global warming itll be a refugee hotspot. However itll be de jure a confederacy apologist statist revisionist of some kind and be the upturned nose of all the balkan areas bc of some well reasoned disgust at the confederacy but also conveniently turning a blind eye to all of the minorities there. i think im underestimating the indigenous here in all territories but damn the amerikkkans genocided them pretty badly in the past. theyll probably be another faction but like afghanistan itll be heavily tribal out of respect. maybe they wont have to do incest to keep their people alive.