/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>774273
I'm a tankie who is into femdom and likes vore. How do I fit in?

>>775201
>all correlations were very small
>the graph has been stretched diagonally
dont worry

>>774973
>futa

maybe musk bezos rothbard and hoppe have a point

reddit science is Jeffrey Epstein class ideology

>>775509
Welcome to the new political spectrum

>>775509
>reactionaryism
They're trying to build a prison
They're trying to build a prison
Following the rights movements, you clamped on with your iron fist
Drugs became conveniently available for all the kids
(I buy my crack I smack my bitch right here in Hollywood)
Nearly 2 million Americans are incarcerated in the prison system of the U.S.

They're trying to build a prison
They're trying to build a prison
They're trying to build a prison
For you and me to live in

Another prison system
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Because Ultraclericalism is opposed not only to the nations, but also the preeminence of their kings and their kingdoms (as opposed to Christ's kingdom)–I condemn Ultraclericalism over Nationalism, and find Ultraclericalism a far greater, more subtle, closer dagger to the jugular vein of monarchist ambition.
–That all other monarchists who think otherwise… have been deceived… in the way Abraham deceived Pharaoh by taking his wife into his harem… and if knowing that, still insist, then the only monarch they are monarchists for is for King Jesus, tbh, which is fine for a Christian, but from the very beginning it was opposed to the Alexandrian model and dynastic patriotism like the Kims have in North Korea.

h*z upholding monarcho-socialist thought. gracesisters our response?

The only one recorded to celebrate his birthday in the Old Testament–The Pharaoh.
>"The celebration of the birthdays of Kings, and Princes, was of ancient custom, and venerable antiquity, among the Medes, Persians, and Romans."
>"For though Job, and Jeremy, cursed the day wherein they were born, and only Pharaoh, Jeroboam, and Herod, are remembered in Scripture, to have made great feasts on their birthday, as some have observed, yet that is not recorded of them as their sin."

My notion of monarchy is not really traditional medievalist Christian royal monarchy, but more like Alexandrian model, Absolutism, State Shinto/North Korea/hereditary dictatorship–a hereditary monarchy with a kind of familialism/dynastic patriotism like North Korea somewhat has (but not completely).
Corgism:
>Politics as a colony of an absolute monarchy and people form a great family; a cult of personality for a community of pleasures & pains.
…
My notion of monarchy is like a singer on the stage, sings a life into people–if I had to sum up the way I think, and why I demand one singer, one teacher–is because I want the most direct attention drawn to a cult of personality to breathe a soul into people.
Adding more singers–like the saying "Too many cooks spoil the broth" is exactly the undertone of how I see it and why I want one monarch alone to sing.
Too many cooks risks replicating the condition of a people that a singer is there to resolve – the masses without a singer are like an amorphous blob, with no identity, no culture, no frame of mind, etc.
A singer on a stage makes a community of pleasures and pains that Plato lauds.
When it comes to too many cooks, like too many lords and masters, like Homer discounts, "Too many masters is a bad thing, let there be one ruler, one king", I stress monarchy over notables/decentralization/tocquevillism much like Hobbes sentiment.
And the problem with the notables is the same problem with multi-party democracy for me, that's why we need the preeminence of monarchy, some kind of majesty or state of awe on all the people (notables included). But that people don't see the need for a cult of personality / monarchical preeminence to begin with… that pill is not something most normalfag monarchists would understand because they're mostly taught to loathe a cult of personality as a communist trope / one-party leninism
Hobbes sentiment is how I mostly feel there–for me, it has all the faults of multi-party democracy, but with noble estates:
>"And because an oligarchy consists of men, if the passions of many men be more violent when they are assembled together, than the passions of one man alone, it will follow, that the inconvenience arising from passion will be greater in an oligarchy than a monarchy."

• Thomas Hobbes

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>775331
>>775321
the kid had ice in his shirt, jordan was trying to loosen it and help get it out.
mimicking slapping his ass doesnt help

>>775331
Is it as weird as the time Putin was filmed giving a kid a raspberry on the stomach?

>>775334
Probably the same, both are still less fucked up than the Dalai Lama outright sucking a child’s tongue

>>775314
>twins are ass
i keep telling my uncle in mn this and he gets mad at me everytime

Toronto

>>775341
>Washing these things is such a fucking chore its not worth it, after awhile it just becomes too filthy to use. Dust and other trash get stuck.
this is how chuds think real vaginas work so it should be seen as a bonus by them

>>775483
wait there's a 420 board?

>>775369
At first, a little bit, but not really anymore. Bigger concern is that it's not very stimulating, which is what I was looking for but might not be for you

>>775484

it's just horrible for everyone, the porn threads get scattered among the siberian threads and the siberian threads get buried below the porn threads

Why not desire these traits without mentioning any particular race?

>>775102
> I wish I had straight Asian hair.
Same. I got blonde curls.

>>775105
good question

You will never be a real Asian. Your eyes are round, your stature is tall, the aldehyde dehydrogenase concentration in your blood is above-average. You are a weeaboo twisted by manga and anime into a crude mockery of humanity’s perfection.

Asians are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of evolution have allowed Asians to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even weebs who “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to an Asian. The length of your bones is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a drunk Asian home with you, they’ll turn tail and bolt the second he gets a whiff of your "Asian" cooking.

>>775469
anon………………………………………………………..

>>775374
There are ways to fraud that too. There are t-shirts in Worst Korea that have shoulder pads built in.

>>775383
Same reason why women don't feel like jackasses caking on a ton of makeup. It has an equalizing effect when it comes to looks, if done right that is.

>>775395
makeup is completely different from this. makeup is like wearing fancy new clothes while this is just pretending to have a different body

>>775397
Makeup can literally make your facial structure look different.

>>775395
>There are t-shirts in Worst Korea that have shoulder pads built in.
No I mean you are going to look visibly different with or without tshirt on. For height it doesnt matter, unless you severely overdo it with lifts, women arent going to notice 5 cm difference, and her shoes come off too, so it evens out.

Haven't you read the Odyssey? Witches don't usually give you a choice. It's not like in Sabrina.

I like peaches. Especially yellow peaches. White peaches are alright but yellows have more flavor and are juicier although messy because the juice gets all over you. They're good with Tajin chili powder.

i also have a peach tree, but i think its diseased.

>>775262
Thanks for reminding me about that song, how nostalgic.

But are there any communist parties in Alabama that i can donate to though

no

>>775083
Gigachad.

>>775293
Protestant, not orthodox.

Today's been the best day for my loop relapse. I'm not checking her socials every 10 minutes to see what they're feeling or thinking.
I'm not cured but I am healing, and I need to let myself accept it.

I hate spring, I got a semi just from looking in the eyes of a coworker for slightly longer than usual. Like wtf, I'm not even gay.

I was raped.

Now, onto the matter of the drug use. A while back, I made a post where I basically renounced my previous support of Polanski because of info given to me by a youth liberationist friend of mine from off the board who is supportive of mutually consensual relationships between adults and minors, and this info pointed out that Geimer's consent to Polanski's advances was in question because of the quaalude he gave her. Some people on the board agreed with my renouncement of support for Polanski for this reason and posted links to the court records where Geimer made statements that suggested she didn't really want the contact with Polanski. Others vehemently defended Polanski, so the board was a bit divided over this. However, I must concede that my source did not know about the fact that Geimer was apparently already familiar with quaaludes going back a few years, and hence she may have been willing to take the pill that Polanski gave her while knowing full well what effect it would have on her. This, along with the fact that Geimer insists in retrospect that she wasn't a "victim" of Polanski in any way, forces me to question my renouncement of my initial defense of him. It should be noted that Polanski has never been accused of displaying violent behavior of any kind, was never arrested for any crime not related to this one since it occurred (at least not that I know of), and there is effectively zero evidence that he ever threatened Geimer a few decades after the fact into stating that she thinks he should not be charged. There are definite shades of gray in this situation, and this should be considered. Though I do not agree with Polanski giving Geimer the drug, there is good evidence that she was no rookie at drug use and thus may have known how it would affect her.

Lyons:
> "The child also apparently had the Stage Mother from Hell, a film industry tradition. In short, there may have been excellent reasons why both sides wanted to avoid a highly publicized Hollywood trial, and no reason to treat the grand jury testimony of a 14-year-old girl pressed by her mother and the prosecutor as holy writ. She may have interpreted Polanski's pleading guilty to a reduced charge as a kindness."

Of course, Lyons insists that we should ascribe ulterior motives on the part of Geimer and her mother for not pushing for charges against Polanski because the idea that she may not have considered her life "irretrievably ruinePost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Clark-Foley: "The truth, though, is that early on a significant share of 'the pack' was howling about Polanski's victimhood just like Levy [emphasis in original] – but sanity finally prevailed. Unfortunately, despite popular opinion turning against the world- renowned director, his letter sadly suggests that Levy is still far from alone."
Yup, it's a horrible shame that not everyone has turned on Polanski like Clark-Foley and the rest of "the pack" had hoped, though since enough have bowed down to media pressure to do so she sees that as a case of "sanity" prevailing. Let's all note the fact that Clark-Foley, like Lyons before her, didn't bother to put a shred of critical evaluation into any aspect of Polanski's situation, which is supposed to be the job of a progressive blogger to do. All they did was go along with the herd (or, as Levy calls them, "the pack") and express outrage that Polanski was treated by some in any way remotely to the contrary of what our conventional wisdom insists upon. And I must ask, is it really the matter that Polanski is given special treatment for breaking the law because of the value several people feel he has towards the world of cinematography, or can it possibly be the fact that when a renowned celebrity gets in trouble for breaking laws of dubious wisdom people are more likely to question the nature of the law and its supposed infallible absolutist wisdom than they are if Joe Schmoe gets arrested for the same type of crime? Progressives can accept shades of gray in almost anything, such as war, love, and most forms of crimes– except for the idea of sex between adults and those we today label 'minors.' When it comes to that, moral absolutism reigns.

Now we move onto the article by Kate Harding.

Harding: "The good news: California's 2nd District Court of Appeal rejected Roman Polanski's most recent request for dismissal of all that unpleasant business about his raping a kid and fleeing sentencing."
Yup, no gray area whatsoever when it comes to sex between adults and minors…it's always "rape." And let's all continue to ignore what Samantha Geimer has to say about this, okay? Nice to hear this from a progressive, but I won't belabor that point again since I already got into it up above. I will say here that it can be construed, as is likely the case by several of Polanski's supporters, that his fleeing the U.S. when faced with his conviction can be the equivalent of someone seekinPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

The URL to the page on Salon.com where all of the Polanski articles can be seen is here:

http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/roman_polanski

Here is the URL to my October 2nd, 2009 post on GirlChat entitled, "My Thoughts On the Polanski Situation Reconsidered," an opinion I repudiated in the above essay/analysis due to my further study of Samantha Geimer's grand jury testimony. This further study took into consideration all the evidence regarding its possible validity, including the fact that Geimer's subsequent actions, including her refusal to help indict Polanski in more recent years and her request that the charges be dropped even when she could have easily swayed public sentiment to her side if she did so–as well as statements she made on other occasions years after the incident–just didn't match up with that of someone who was actually forced to engage in sex without her consent. As a possible explanation as to why she made that testimony at the grand jury hearing if it wasn't actually true, one must consider the well acknowledged tendency of law enforcement officers and social workers to attempt to coax alleged victims of sexual abuse who had actually consented to the activity into fabricating details to make a better case against the accused, a tendency that became crystal clear to the public with the notorious McMartin pre-school incident. The URL to that post is here:

I like his movies

>>775347
>statutory rape isn't rape!
no, not technically, but a 13 year old girl is hardly in a position to decide for herself what she wants out of life, she's simply too young, and honestly the "magic age" of 18 isn't an indication of maturity, either. that is not to say that it should be considered a crime to be attracted to a young adolescent who is biologically sexually mature, but generally speaking, older males will have considerable ability to coerce any youth into doing their bidding, sexual or otherwise. the power dynamics are usually skewed in favor of the man, who will have more life experience and resources (capital as well as social status, to say nothing of raw physical strength) with which he can coerce younger parties into doing what he wants.
>she was already sexually experienced and familiar with mind-altering substances!
this is just slander. even if those things are true, it doesn't mean that the possibility of being manipulated by an older person with nefarious motives is out of the question, and polanski's supporters are suggesting that society ought to accept the notion that a drugged party is ever capable of granting consent.
>she says that she's actually fine so we should just believe her! there's no possible way that she's being advised and influenced on what to say by any given interested party!
okay, but you're just disregarding the possibility that she's being pressured into sweeping this whole debacle under the rug, and in fact she is not okay. the most damning evidence is her testimony, in which she says that:
>Roman Polanski instructed her to get into a jacuzzi naked, refused to take her home when she begged to go, began kissing her even though she said no and asked him to stop; performed cunnilingus on her as she said no and asked him to stop; put his penis in her vagina as she said no and asked him to stop; asked if he could penetrate her anally, to which she replied, 'No,' then went ahead and did it anyway, until he had an orgasm
that is pretty damning evidence and you'd really have to be beholden to some apologia for 'hebephiles' to try and contort it into anything less than a smoking gun.
>s-she was just being compelled to give this testimony!!! why Post too long. Click here to view the full text.