/siberia/ - Off-topic

I don't debunk shit, you're free to be a dumbass if you like.

omg is that a starmie??????

ur mummy pussy tho

Jim Jones is returning to earth

>>773493
>What are your thoughts on it?
There's nothing interesting in this document (ironically). All of it is stuff that has already been discussed to death everywhere, and some of it isn't even exclusively related to AI (meaning it's been discussed for even longer).
Technological advancement is good, more productivity is good. In a decent world the drawbacks would be mitigated through societal cooperation probably mediated by the state. UBI is kind of the sophomoric version of this, but as a normal human being I would love to be reliably paid to do nothing.
The only detail worth nothing regarding AI specifically is that there is zero guarantee so far that it's actually going to be the new industrial revolution that is constantly being promised.
>What things can/should OpenAI and other large AI companies say/do when it comes to compensating for eventual inevitable job loss from AI?
Nothing. Companies are completely unfit for this task, it doesn't matter if they're nonprofits or whatever else. Also, OpenAI "saying" things truly does not matter even in the artificial world of this discussion, sorry. They can lobby for better policy, but that's ultimately the government doing something, not the companies.

>>773511
I like this picture.
Dialogue is what is missing in relationships and women cannot dialogue. Inb4 mods get a thorn up their ass about me saying that. They can't do any of it. Diatribe and debate can at least be entertaining if not vicariously informative as an observer. But jannies don't debate, they don't diatribe, they don't do anything besides make things worse.

OP's pic is a whole lot of malarky however and I'll explain why as i do appreciate the healthy economics discussion
>32 hour work week
It's not so much we need a standardized objective allocated time, work isn't atrocious because of long hours, many jobs require long hours. It's because of social conditions. Getting treated like shit at work just to come home to an empty or toxic house isn't something a preplanned 32 hour work week can fix. Revolutions are internalized and expressed outwardly. Thats why the Ontario toilet paper burning was so cool. I don't even think his pay was anywhere near bad enough to warrant a violent outburst. I think the conditions around his entire life were.

Same goes for elderly care. Fuck the elderly. They were subservient golems than, they can be subservient golems now dying in the streets relying upon the charitableness of the kids they abused and the population whose needs they ignored.

What we need is lottery economy. People work for scratch off tickets and incorporate micro gambling into every facet of consumer life like you buy a gallon of milk and if you buy choccy milk you might win free milk for a year.

This would be astoundingly profitable as well as secure the financial fitness of the dollar used be it usd or yen or whatever. Unless you wanna go crypto. I wouldn't recommend that however if you want to maintain some semblance of individual autonomy with totality of market controls.

Socialism isn't communism.
Communism isn't a state apparatus, it is a man willing to fight.

>>773493
>What are your thoughts on it?
Porkies fear lumpen will riot and/or murder them so giving these people few beadcrumbs is worth it.

>AI will cause job losses
No issue, so long as you nationalise ownership but privatise enterprise. Same thing they do in China.

>thoghts
Hang all porks, establish Dictatoship of the Proletariat, nationalize AI

>(due to their illness)
lol'd
More seriously this is the only sensible position if you go for the mental illness angle. No one spend their day hating actual mentally ill people or the handicaped as it would be either nonsensical as they dont control it or abject sadism.
Them being mentally ill being the reason why we should harass and brutalise them is a always a lie, the people doing it don't do it with down syndrome people or with schyzos.

Chud because it leaves room for forced institutionalization and treatment. For the 60s, though, not that bad.

A bit chuddy. But the legalization of homosexuality in Bulgaria was catalyzed by exposures of the Elites in this old-fashioned perspective that was enforced by social conservatism from before the communist ascension

It's materialistic and dialectical
Chuddiness and wokeness are both bourgeois

Weird Al is reddit embodied

They see me mowing
My front lawn

>>773652
yeah it's cringe but sometimes cringe is based. you just have to embrace it.

Filtered by kino.

I'm more a Neil Cicierega fan myself

>>773512
You vastly overstate their power
Shit wouldn't possibly be as bad as it is if they were competent or capable. For that to be the case they'd have to be the most vile and evil motherfuckers ever. Comically so. As would every single citizen for going along with.

Don't attribute to malevolence what can be blamed on stupidity.

>>773573
>But that's not what 99% of people complaining
>If you look at the popular discourse of these things, 99% of them are people complaining about jiggling boobs and female romantic interests being described physically.
Yes, that was the point. What most people talk about are only symptoms of a broader cultural condition.

Even if i was to concede all instances of female objectification in media to be the result of "male preference", this symbolic order remains as a visible feature of male gaze, that is a centering on male perspectives. As cringy as bourgeois feminist discourse about "herstory" can get, it emerges from a real-existing cultural condition, that one needs to be cognizant about, if not actively combat.

>>773577
The female gaze does the same. Read any female media about male characters

A funny thing about the "natural" talk about men oogling women is I remember some article or documentary about some hunter-gatherers who called the men in cities babies because of how they're obsessed with boobs. Only babies care about boobs that much. Women there didn't wear tops and no one cared.

>>773659
yeah but it's "natural" in the sense that testosterone is high in young men, which makes their sex drives skyrocket by their late teens and early 20s, so sex is always on the mind as a "natural" condition of being a human being. further, every appealing aspect of a human being, which is to say everything that (You) may find appealing in another person, is a fetish, a -philia
>breasts = mazophilia
>midriff = alvinolagnia
>armpits = maschalagnia
>legs = crurophilia
etc.
<I must stress, it's not just body parts; you can fetishize a subjective personality trait or quality that someone possesses
the point being that there is going to be list of normalized or socially acceptable philias that people will be able to express openly without much scrutiny; in our modern society, it's legs, breasts, ass, etc.

ultimately, you're talking about a socialized reaction to a particular philia, and every society is going to have its 'taboo' and generally acceptable list of philias, including the hunter-gatherers to whom you're referring. if it wasn't breasts, it was something else, which may or may not appear foreign to us modern humans.

>>773271
idk man its a recent phenomenon maybe bc of globalization bc of capitalism. its a tendency tbh

>>773565
>>773571
>>773575
>>773576
>>773584
>>773588
The balding calculator says I'll go bald in old age so I don't think I need to worry

Why can't it be body hair that falls out instead of head hair? This is a cruel world.

>>773576
Lose

Shave the top of it and keep the sides like James Randi

leninmax or shave it no in between.

>>773549
>king of the commies

monbol classic

I think that knowing what the grundrisse is at least makes you duke of commies

>>773564
It wouldnt be the first communist dynasty.

>>773549
uhhhhh what is the grundrisse? sounds like some kind of german pastry.

>>772138
Funniest post on siberia rn

Please, Ariel, I need to see the NIPPALZ. I WANT TO PEENCH THEM

>>773195
8 hours ago

>>773595

Imagine being Alex Jones

> Spends 20 minutes talking about BBC

What vitality and being sued for defaming families of school shooting victims does to a mf chud

>>773589
>average manospherian space
>nazis
Oh lawd I'm laffin

>>773592
without reading too much into it, I'd say this is pretty close to the mark. from a cisgendered, hetero, white male neo-nazi perspective, the black male constitutes a competitive threat to his fragile white masculinity, and the inferiority the white male experiences as a result of simply entertaining ideas of being subservient to blacks (or any other race really) manifest through this sort of fetish. it's sexually charged ragebait, which is quite stimulating in the sense that it arouses anger within the consumer, alongside a sexual thrill that is built upon dominant and submissive interpersonal dynamics.
>1. start with the premise that you're simply the best (so why even try?)
>2. denigrate the other, but not without acknowledging that the other is a capable opponent who can usurp your position as "the best/greatest/superior"
>3. deploy a scenario in which the other assumes an antagonistic role, which provides much needed justification for the dehumanization levied at them
>4. dispel one's own inferiority, anxieties, or lack of confidence by 'slaying the proverbial dragon' that is embodied by this other
>5. this can only be done by allowing said other to invade one's territory and act as a competent interloper, but in a controlled and 'safe' setting such that one's power is never truly tested, but symbolically dissented against
>6. the gratification arises from the dissipation of anxiety centered around one's own role and the maintenance of said power, i.e. the comfort of reaffirming one's position as 'top dog'
so white supremacist types will hate the black man, but use him as a vehicle through which he can display a toothless display of power and thus achieve gratification that arises out of the reaffirmation of his position as superior. as for the female involved, she is a hapless object in this entire exchange, a symbolic representation of the white man's domain and property, which he allows the black man to symbolically tarnish so he can get high.