My notion of monarchy is not really traditional medievalist Christian royal monarchy, but more like Alexandrian model, Absolutism, State Shinto/North Korea/hereditary dictatorship–a hereditary monarchy with a kind of familialism/dynastic patriotism like North Korea somewhat has (but not completely).
Corgism:>Politics as a colony of an absolute monarchy and people form a great family; a cult of personality for a community of pleasures & pains.…
My notion of monarchy is like a singer on the stage, sings a life into people–if I had to sum up the way I think, and why I demand one singer, one teacher–is because I want the most direct attention drawn to a cult of personality to breathe a soul into people.
Adding more singers–like the saying "Too many cooks spoil the broth" is exactly the undertone of how I see it and why I want one monarch alone to sing.
Too many cooks risks replicating the condition of a people that a singer is there to resolve – the masses without a singer are like an amorphous blob, with no identity, no culture, no frame of mind, etc.
A singer on a stage makes a community of pleasures and pains that Plato lauds.
When it comes to too many cooks, like too many lords and masters, like Homer discounts, "Too many masters is a bad thing, let there be one ruler, one king", I stress monarchy over notables/decentralization/tocquevillism much like Hobbes sentiment.
And the problem with the notables is the same problem with multi-party democracy for me, that's why we need the preeminence of monarchy, some kind of majesty or state of awe on all the people (notables included). But that people don't see the need for a cult of personality / monarchical preeminence to begin with… that pill is not something most normalfag monarchists would understand because they're mostly taught to loathe a cult of personality as a communist trope / one-party leninism
Hobbes sentiment is how I mostly feel there–for me, it has all the faults of multi-party democracy, but with noble estates:
>"And because an oligarchy consists of men, if the passions of many men be more violent when they are assembled together, than the passions of one man alone, it will follow, that the inconvenience arising from passion will be greater in an oligarchy than a monarchy."Post too long. Click here to view the full text.