/siberia/ - Off-topic

young uneducated african american democrat women from the west winning again

its a thing since thomas robinson in the uk had a elon musk funded campagin to raise the flags

>>776227
This is because america is the only nation statd that really does serve its people: reactionary settler petty bourgeoisie

>>776327
Or maybe you can stop the "settler" spookery, you fed.

Sakai was FBI and third-worldists are feds.

>>776227
>So are there other countries that do this?
Yeah a lot, like most of the world starting east of Europe.

>>776313
why are people so scared of fin or w/e its called. the """nasty""" side effects are like under 1% chance and you can just stop taking them if they happen

>>776316
I bet lack of hair isn't the only thing wrong with him. He probably has other issues and the lack of hair is just the tip of the iceberg.

>>776316
I don't want to try and bring back something that I know will go eventually anyways. My dad is straight bald as well, and it's clear I have his genetics. I look just like him when he was my age.
>>776318
yeah I've gotten a lot fatter since my hot days too

>>776319
>I don't want to try and bring back something that I know will go eventually anyways
what a retarded excuse. trans people are gonna have to take hormones forever, doesnt stop them bc the alternative is even worse

>>776320
I'm happier looking a little scary at night than tending to a dying garden. Im pretty much hemmingway maxxing at the moment
twink death is real

Obsessing about pedophilia isnt healthy. It could be even a symptom.

>>776187
I'm not, doe. This is a little bit of a problem I have been seeing in political spaces

>>776296
I mean I hate to say it but anti pedo hysterica is another way the ruling class stay in charge, don't hate the system that kills millions of kids every year, hate the people that touch themselves to cartoon porn

the megaphone
just kidding, it's the ak47

The AK47 sticks to the intended purpose: wiping out imperialists

AI trebuchet

>>776084
no

>>775958
well we're both mixed, but in a different way, and linked through the white side of our family, so that's actually the common variable here

At a classmate's birthday party. I was already 17. Met there a girl from my English class, got drunk and that way found a way to have the guts to approach her. It was not amazing but getting to approach her made me believe I was not unkissable and that made wonders in my self esteem.
My most significant "first" was not that one, though. it was not the first time i had sex either. My most memorable "first" was the first time I got a handjob from a girl.

>>776119
>My most memorable "first" was the first time I got a handjob from a girl
ah an old fashioned

>>776027
I wouldn't know, unrequited feelings do not count.

>>776244
*loud wrong buzzer*
anachronisms aside, the key difference is that he didn't represent a model that could overcome the system of his time. getting killed for being a nuisance to the kings was, in the long term, his only objective and achievement. this has nothing to do with modern (marxist) socialism

he was an adventurist , rightfully killed

>>776248
>his only objective and achievement
achievement maybe, but objective, what? you believe he wanted to get killed without achieving the change he wished for?

>this has nothing to do with modern (marxist) socialism
thats like saying utopian socialist have nothing to with marxist socialist. They share a similar goal, even if they dont share an analysis that didnt exist yet and the means to reach their goal according to more modern theories

Kings power alone can only do so much.
Perhaps it would be suitable if we could make genetic clones of monarchs to serve as eyes and ears of national welfare

>>776242
Like it or not, yes, that's what monarchy is.
Some constitutional monarchists will tout that a king does not rule alone—I personally deny that, even if there are assemblies or council… the chief definition of monarchy is one alone rules, and that fundamental law of monarchy is expressed through sovereignty in which form or constitution of a state or republic is defined primarily by one person's majesty or preeminence and some family alone stands out–and if not, then it's another form of state/republic such as a democracy or oligarchy where some other kind of government has the primacy… but we don't accept a mixed constitutional or the concordant notion of political pluralism like Aristotle's. As Hobbes says, the chief difference between the mixed constitutionalist and absolutist view is that rather it isn't the concord of many men, but the union–and the integrity of the republic is its sovereignty as the fundamental law, pertaining to three forms–and while there might be a confluence of members / elements of democracy or aristocracy, the purity of the primary form of state is maintained, be it a monarchy, oligarchy, or democracy, like Bodin defends and traces back to Herodotus (*and denies Plato acknowledged it in the Aristotle or Polybius established mixed constitutionalist ideals). That is the nuance–and while it seems anachronistic, I cannot really take monarchy any other way because mixed constitutionalism dilutes and renders monarchy irrelevant to begin with… so I personally still maintain the opinion of Bodin or Hobbes in the year 2026 tbh. I wouldn't have it any other way, even if it is not very fashionable, lol

I personally do not accept the mixed constitutionalist view when it comes to monarchy for numerous reasons. Like Jean Bodin says it makes a monarch into no more than a mean magistrate and overall tends to favor elective monarchy since it stresses concord and rule by turns/rotational government since monarchy is but one lesser estate among other heads… to have it as one part monarchy, one part oligarchy, one part democracy considers monarchy merely as a mere part in relation to the state and not the majesty or sovereignty of the whole state… like Jean Bodin says the outcome usually is plain democracy like mixing paint together… and I hate t it because then there is no definitive form of state and no pretense to say the state no longer is a monarchy… which is important to me because Mixed constitutionalists just don't care about the 3 forms of the herodotus debate and that particular quality… same I'd say even for Plato who might say in Laws that it's merely the rule of a faction to maintain a particular form of state… but rather appeal to good policy/law or aristocracy/good government in general… but I am not really content with what some traditionalists or integralists or conservatives have in mind with just any vague notion of good government– so like Bodin I'm not for confounding the forms… and I don't take it for the partiality of a faction, but as Hobbes says the civil soul. So I definitely maintain a definite kind of sovereignty as is customary for absolute monarchists and dates back to Herodotus…
Mixed constitutionalism is a declaration of war against all notions of monarchical preeminence and majesty to me.
That is all I have to say there and why I am the way I am.

The general policy I have in mind is particularly like I outlined with Corgism, lol, a cult of personality–with the customs of absolute monarchists–I can't vibe with esotericists/metaphysicians/integralists/mixed constitutionalists because they aspire to just any vague idea of good government/aristocracy, what I have in mind is a unique form of familialism/cult of personality, very specific, and it feels droll/lifeless to me to not stress this quality.

We need a new thread.

>>776235
I wont avoid younger people because of it, ive just noticed its more common throughout dating and its a huge turn off for me, ive always been annoyed by it though even like 20 years ago.

>>776237
Have you considered that younger people are using phones in dating to cope with nervousness especially with this moral obsession with youth sexuality?
Nowadays, getting sex in youth is like trying to get water in a desert, especially if you’re a cishet male youth
You see the neopuritanism towards young adult sexuality these days, courtesy of stranger danger

>>776237
Usually people like To act like any current year problem is the first of its kind
IMO, playing on your phone during a date is a far more tolerable faux pas than being loud and obnoxious or fronting

Can you people stop yapping and post some tits please?

>>776254
Here's a couple that caught my attention on a search

>>775700
Yeah, between made up country east of baltics, Yugoslavia not existing, and central europe's completely mangled borders, this is definitely AI. Landmass geography is too good for him to draw it from memory, but there is no period when European borders looked like this so its not tracing either.

>>775665
>Dude is unironically repeating the German fakes about Illya Ehrenburg
Tatsuya HAS to be having stormfront infographics being sent directly into his brain lmao

>>775884
Why do fashies even cry about this anyway? Isn't the world supposed to belong to the strongest according to them
<baww it doesn't count if we lose though!

I’ve been thinking that, with the exception of the belief in the Judeo-Bolshevism thesis and the laser-eyed focus on “white European Christians”, the average alt-righter’s view of the USSR is identical to that of boomercons. I don’t think it’s a novel concept considering how the anti-communist propaganda force-fed to boomers that completely radiated into Gen X’s public consciousness eventually tricked down onto millennials, the generation that produced the alt-right. Later on this gets metastasised by zoomer chuds into an aesthetic where communism turns into a spook completely detached from any and all forms of communisms that historically existed if the boomer-ish “gay race communism” meme is any indication.

Take away the judeo-Bolshevism memes from them, and the current slew of chud anti-communism is just recycling of old and tired boomer memes.

>>776201
Mmm I think some chuds have a barely better understanding of communist than boomerlibs do
Also: Wow, this is truly character development, also, xer crad is hot. Sinfest really should draw gay porn. I wish I knew ML stuff so I could finetune a porn image model on his stuff

I swear this is like the fifth time someone's posted this same thought on here and no, you don't get "another infinity", it's the same infinity. Look up countably vs uncountably infinite.

>>775703
>>775727
DICKBLAST SAYS CANTOR WAS A PSEUD AND A THEOCRAT TRYING TO DEBOONK MATERIALISM WITH MIND GAMES AND PARLOR TRICKS

>>775922
You don't even actually need Cantor for this though, like if you multiply a natural number by two you just get another natural number, that's already included in the original set of natural numbers.

dont forget negative infinities either

I don't believe in infinity. It's imaginary, nothing is infinite.