Because in my experience, as an extreme normie by this board's standards (e.g., had several gfs, regular sex, my own place, good money, etc.) this is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what 95% of women actually want.
Like, yeah, maybe they give lip service to the whole "emotionally open and vulnerable men in touch with their feelings" schtick because social media tells them to but in reality I think the opposite is true - women want a man that is more detached, stoic, unconcerned about internal feelings, etc. Because that: 1) makes them appear stronger and more confident, and therefore more masculine, and 2) makes them feel more safe and secure with them because even if they are having a meltdown and being over-dramatic over some shit (as women are apt to do) their man will be a reliable rock to lean on without him breaking down over shit too.
I've even had my current gf - who herself used to go to therapy a lot and is very lefty/soft in general - say that deep down, despite what she says sometimes, she likes that I am never being obsessed over my emotional problems and internal soul-searching shit, and that I just "move on" with things, unlike other guys she's dated (who she also identified as being some combination of mentally ill, bisexual/gay and/or emotionally immature).
Who created and pushed this agenda of "all men should regularly attend therapy and talk about feelings like women", and why? It didn't exist for thousands of years, only in the last decade or two.
is It was created by women for the purpose of sabotaging the relationships of other women because they are jealous of their success. Yes, it is as simple and as petty as that?
is It's a way of shifting blame onto men that women are no longer upholding the social contract and men are struggling to uphold society because of it?
is It the logical equivalent of men telling women not to wear makeup, simply making it easier for the other gender to filter you?
20 posts and 3 image replies omitted.>>769827What’s your beef with video games?
It’s too old fashioned to look down on video games as detrimental, it’s not 2004 anymore
>>770103Frustrating on purpose. Mk ultra shit
Like I said, I don't know about the modern slop to make that judgement but I imagine it's only gotten worse in some regards.
Put it this way, I'm finding out the names of devs and just going to call them child molesters everywhere I go. Hopefully they try and sue me so I can physically see them in court, and than break their legs.
You wanna build a demon engine? Enjoy a hellish torture simple as.
>>770122> Frustrating on purpose. Mk ultra shitLike I said, I don't know about the modern slop to make that judgement but I imagine it's only gotten worse in some regards.
If you pathologize video games because you find them frustrating, that says more about you. I could say the same about gambling and recreational shooting.
>>769696as a cishet male who has been in a successful relationship with a cishet woman for 15 years, is married, and has a kid, let me tell you that every single incel thread on /siberia/ is composed of
>false dichotomies>strong assumptions about both men and women as monolithic categories>misogyny and sometimes even internalized misandry>really bizarre anger and bitterness that frames itself as being unemotional or scientific.This is one of those threads. You can be open with your feelings, soft, and vulnerable
when it makes sense to be that way while also being strong and stoic when you need to be. What people (not just women) want is
context sensitivity. They want someone who can "read the room" and react appropriately based on the situation. I know a lot of you struggle with this. I have tried giving you advice before but you don't actually want advice. You want approval from your fellow incels. Actual advice from a sex haver infuriates you like nothing else.
>>770148The biggest complainers here seem to be other sex havers. They're mainly complaining about the type of sex they're having.