Normie turned into a term, that describes a mainstream man, instead of a man that does anything a normal man would do (Such as studying, getting family, good job, etc). People argue over accusing each other of being a normie.
2 posts omitted.normie is a social relation. dont think its really changed much in the past centuries bc crapitalism but it definitely has diversified in fulfilling said social relation, assuming that we can even say that the normie described nominally was not in of itself a specialization of whatever dominant social relation was existing at the time of the prescription of the normie label. for example, 4chan is normie-centric despite being anti-normie. normie as a myth could be described as racist, hierarchical centric, spectacle focused etc etc. they love the myth of their normie and seek to replicate this myth in their daily interactions under the guise of being anonymous. leftypol despite being anonymous and chuddy itself still has different relation dynamics that leads to a "relaxed" atmosphere less focused on upholding normie-centric culture. theyll bully you for different things but the normie myth, like all social relations eventually, is broken and shattered. i like leftypol more than twitter bc even the radicals there have this "normie-centric" way of socializing w each other that i, a midwit fat fucking chud, cant describe in words but is visceral. does that mean leftypol is not normie like? I dunno, maybe its just another social relation that I cant grasp into words until years later after having finally understood the scene but at this moment, to me, it doesnt feel normie pilled. whatever, maybe it'll change when i get the words to describe it, but bc leftypol does have a distinct feeling, it could be said to have an underlying dominant social relation.
"Normie" is just an inverted slur.
It says more about the plaintiff than the defendant
"The normie" is just another word for the eternal philistine
To this day the revolutionary principle has gone no farther than to assail only one or another particular establishment, to be reformatory. Much as may be improved, strongly as “discreet progress” may be adhered to, always there is only a new master set in the old one’s place, and the overturning is a – building up. We are still at the distinction of the young Philistine from the old one. The Revolution began in bourgeois fashion with the uprising of the third estate, the middle class; in bourgeois fashion it dries away. It was not the individual man – and he alone is Man – that became free, but the citizen, the citoyen, the political man, who for that very reason is not Man but a specimen of the human species, and more particularly a specimen of the species Citizen, a free citizen.
>>749868You have posted this before