/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>779749
What is the materialist reason why sub-saharan Africa is the only place where women are giving birth more than the rest of the world?

>>779775
Poverty and religion.

>>779775
Women's education and access to contraceptives. Rest is irrelevant bullshit. Not even Islam can save birthrates in Middle East.

bump for moar

>>779781
Correct. Women have more reasonable birthrates in Iran where women are educated.

>>780398
I have lots of degen fetishes but I don't feel I find him attractive because of a fetish, since I never masturbate specifically to fat men. It is just that he is cute, hairy and messy

>>780352
I'm bisexual does that count as hetmoid, or is there more to it than seeing women as potential sexual interest?

Men are the only group smart enough to know that being trans doesn't mean anything good or bad about a person, the rest need reeducation to stop being prejudiced.

>>780417
The neutral percentage is similar to women.

>>780417
>>780418
I think it's because of the trans 'ideology' like making it taboo to misgender someone, but then again only actual homophobes would really try define what an actual man or woman is for the sake of maintaining their hetero 'purity'

>>779445
Would you let her drum on your ass?

@eminegerezz

>>779660
gonna go rizz her up, wish me luck bros

>>780404
Won't work unless you're a 9/11 azen

do cates enjoy total fage yogurt

>>780366
What an awkward federation region-wise. I wonder on which basis the federative regions are set up there.

>>780400
Just a random map I found on this subject. Probably a USSR not collapsing cold war fantasy map. Especially with Europe and East Asia under Moscow.

>>780366
the third world war will be completely communist on both sides mark my words

>>780409
This is the best form of a world war.

>>780361
I dont know, ask OP.

Hasnt been my experience in Brazil. Tech jobs are scarcer by the day. Every job is, actually.

Where in South Asia are you from? I got an HJ and my bootyhole played with (upon her suggestion) by a Nepali hooker once

>>780381
same here in uruguay
I'm holding to my IT monke job for my dear life
imagine saying this 10 years prior

>>780384
How is life in Urgay? I have never met an Urgay before.

Rei

>>779978
>That dominating others either by being their natural better or by outsmarting them is bad. Women tend to teach boys these kind of things no matter their professed politics.
You just have to look at men raised by single mothers to see that is not so at all.

Most boys are raised by women generally. Women or rather mothers tend to do the bulk of child rearing whether they're single parents or not. Most men don't really want to do that and they generally don't need to or rather don't have to. I wouldn't if I was a father.

>>779983
I didnt say all women do this, but it is tendency especially in an atomised culture. The boys "raised by a single mother" were more often than not raised by their male friends and the medias, their mother merely being a provider.

American women unironically think boys screaming in pain and shitting themselves is cute.

>>780349
Weird how culture works, since I'm from a country that doesn't do circumcision, I think circumcised dicks are the ugly ones, it even turns me off from some porn.

>>780256
Blaming SJWism for the rise of anti-SJWism is naive in all but a tautological sense. Absent SJWism, they'd just latch on to something else. You can put a band-aid on a wound, but you can't stop the top level trends that lead to the same effects.
You must understand that these groups select for personality. This is why New Atheism cleanly split 50/50 between them: half of them were in it for social justice (became SJWs) and half were in it because they had a pathological need to "win" "arguments" (became SJWs OWNED slop producers)
there are also rationalists, who really really liked longform analysis blogposts, who find themselves wavering between SJWs and Nazis depending on how big a retard Trump is being that day.

The people crying about straight white men were open-minded, generally agreeable neurotics desperately clutching at reasons they felt bad. first they settled on ~50% of the population, which was subpar, but then - eureka! - they hit upon the economic system. The people crying about SJWs were closed-minded, generally disagreeable neurotics desperately looking for people to get into fights with. they've bounced between the jews, welfare queens, the SJWs, socialists, the SJeWs, communists, cultural marxism, and finally settled on becoming a global Trump cult of one flavor or another, often ironically engaged in "reverse-SJWism" where they argue minorities are oppressing white losers, where twitter users posting bad things about the president is violence, etc.


What you must understand is that the thing underpinning it all is personality. /leftypol/ is the only place on the left that is conflicted about this because it is under two selection effects: selecting both for SJW/leftist "types" (as a left-wing site) and for anti-SJW/rightoid "types" (as it's an imageboard), usually in some kind of incoherent mix. (myself obviously included)

>>780334
You can't just say that anti SJW would have happened anyway because of material conditions but then say all politics is about personality. You're massively oversimplifying.

Now yes, sure, the wider global trends quite likely would have pushed us to a similar situation to now, but the SJWs clearly didn't help things. It's conceivable that we may not have got a Trump presidency, or at least not a second one, without them.

I really don't think it's just leftypol that has a problem with manhating on the left either. I get the distinct impression that most men are not comfortable with this kind of rhetoric but are too afraid to say anything about it. I will never understand the kind of men who listen to the misandric shit and be like "you're so right milady, men are truly trash 🥲", have some self respect god. And yes there's still plenty of people out there like this, they definitely haven't all become egalitarian communists.

>>780336
Personalities are material conditions, or at the least are formed by underlying material conditions. If I simplify, it is because the details aren't as relevant as the thrust of the argument.

You overestimate loud but irrelevant factors and underestimate boring ones. SJWs had less than nothing to do with Trump winning in 2016 (He did terribly with young people! The clinton campaign actively helped him get the nomination! Brexit shows that some other underlying cultural force polarization of voting by age and education was at play, since nobody cares about the social justice implications of a trade bloc!) and very little to do with him winning in 2024*
For all the hype on "Kamala's for they/them", the actual determining factor was overwhelmingly the economy being bad, the same reason almost every incumbent government outside Canada has eaten shit in the last 5 years. "Vote for me and I'll bring back the economy circa 2019" isn't a bad pitch!
(this economic explanation for voting behavior doesn't clash with "politics is about personality" either: a lot of personalities are "apolitical"/swing voters, and don't neatly fit into the leftist/rightist archetypes of the SJW/Nazi dichotomy. What the dichotomy explains is why rightoids in every country love Trump despite him being a lecherous foreigner.)

*I think they were a factor in business leaders going over to backing Trump, but this speaks to the desirability of SJWism/wokeness as a phenomenon: it was a genuine-bottom up set of demands from workers which firms first tried to buy off with token concessions (not a corporate conjuring trick to distract from class war), then flipped over to endorsing reaction when that failed and when all the various disparate identity struggles realized that since they all felt broadly the same way, there must be something wider at work… like capitalism.

Manhating is its own separate thing. I'll tell you a weird trick, but I doubt it helps: recognize when you aren't being talked about. When someone says "kill all men" because a certain man annoyed them, it's very unlikely they're thinking of you, odds are they've no idea you exist and i all but guarantee they've got no ability to impose harm on you, so why feel it has anything to do with you?
This phenomenon is at its clearest whePost too long. Click here to view the full text.

she will be forever vindicated. every thing that came out of her mouth was a certified trvthnvke that shook treatlerites to their very core

Eurovision and legalisation of weed

GTA VI of course :3

>>780274
There's a new mega man game coming out soon. I think I'll be dead by then though

Obama, Clinton, Trump, Musk, Bezos, Zelensky, and more will die in our lifetimes. I want to be there to funpost when they finally pass.

>>780274
Because the victory of communism is inevitable!

It's fun how these guys were artificially boosted hard on social medias during the Biden and just vanished as soon as Trump won.