what is your chuddest belief?
mine is that the death penalty can be ok (prove me wrong)
260 posts and 21 image replies omitted.Chuddiest belief: it's correct and pro-social but chuddy because some pieces of shit take similar positions in bad faith:
- Child abusers (including any molestation, including of teenagers) are inexcusable. Life sentence until exonerated, no exception; and that's only because I don't trust the legal system enough to give death sentences.
- The conflation of the word 'pedophilia' with child molestation is harmful and ideally should be combated like any other problematic language. Pedophilia is not an act, and a huge proportion of child molesters are not pedophiles. Epstein and associates should be criticized for being child abusers, misconstruing their atrocities as 'pedophilia' is dangerous.
- Destigmatization of pedophilia enables far more effective treatment and management options, which most likely would reduce instances of child abuse in society. We've seen similar social projects with destigmatization of drug use in Portugal with huge success.
- It is completely valid to compare sadistic tendencies with other antisocial desires, like rape fetishism and pedophilia. These tendencies, along with receptive counterparts, can be mitigated through simulation with a consenting [sober adult] partner. The S&M community is a largely-successful example of antisocial sadism being expressed safely and caringly. CNC and ageplay are analogues which should be destigmatized and even encouraged, even if they're repulsive to you and me.
- Pedophilia ostracization in Pride is either an optics-driven position, or kneejerk from people who have suffered from abuse and wrongly conflate pedophilia with molestation. It's pragmatic, and that's a good enough reason to tell "MAPs" to stfu>fo, but it's a reactionary compromise to deal with present social conditions.
- Anyone whining about not being allowed to talk about lolicon on imageboards gets shot in public.
Never abused, not attracted, I'm as close as you're going to get to a neutral party on this issue.
>>761244I pretty much agree but LGBT movement isn't just about comfortably being "open" as LGBT, it's also about being able to openly live an LGBT lifestyle. So I think it's not just optics or knee-jerk reaction that they see it as wholly incompatible after the NAMBLAites were excised.
>>760753quit using ontologically as an emphatic uygha
>>760753Sorry for answering the question and providing solutions
Fictional porn should be just as commonplace in lay discussions as sports and the weather.