/siberia/ - Off-topic

Anyone else wishes they had incestuous leftcom sister?

I had been fantasizing about this for quite some time. Just imagine having a person in real life not only with whom you can share all online leftoid stuff, but also have passionate inbreeding sex. We would have one of those big armchairs and lay there for days. I need this so bad like my life would be perfect with her.

Did anyone else had similar fantasies?

Don't let the door hit you on the way out. Finally, they're going.

Your appearance leftypol

He was gay, the Glownymous thread spammer?

I’ll be upfront about my ideological priors: I’m broadly aligned with the American right and sympathetic to MAGA (woopiedoo, a dime a dozen, even in this site) politics. That said, my view of international order is explicitly multipolar, not universalist. I don’t think one model of governance, economics, or social organization should dominate the entire world.

A useful analogy is multiplayer videogames. When servers were community-run, you had diverse rule sets, norms, and cultures. Once everything moved to centralized, corporate-run servers, that diversity collapsed into a bland, lowest-common-denominator experience. I think something similar has happened at the global level: increasing centralization around a single liberal-capitalist model has produced ideological homogenization rather than genuine pluralism.

I understand the need for a Yugoslavia and USSR and North Korea and Cuba and so and so on the world.

Leftists and libs approach is kinda silly and retarded where everywhere at any point should be the same. The peak of humanity was when there was a space race and different communities tried to out-do each other for a single objective and the current stagnation of humanity is black-pilling.

My proposed solution is straightforward: real diversity, not cosmetic diversity. That means genuinely different systems of governance, economic organization, and social policy coexisting and competing. Capitalism versus alternatives. Liberal democracy versus other models. Let outcomes, not moral universalism, do the sorting.

I like the US just fine as a place where you spawn by default and then build your way to something else, but not actually as the rule of the world.

Autocratic or semi-autocratic states complicate the usual narrative by demonstrating that a country can remain internally functional and socially livable while explicitly rejecting U.S. ideological leadership. Russia, for example, illustrates that alignment with the American-led order is not a prerequisite for state capacity, social continuity, or geopolitical agency.

TL;DR: Multipolarity and systemic competition are essential for human progress. A unipolar, ideologically uniform world is a monopoly and monopolies stagnate. If we want real global competition, we need competing systems, not enforced convergence.

You read the title,



kulak

NEETs online tell me all the time that they spend their days doing nothing, but then you find them playing some Co-op multiyplayer games the entire day and they have plenty of friends on Discord whom they game with daily for hours or watch Anime with Them or that they spend their days reading Books, I feel like a total N.P.C compared to them, at least they have hobbies and online friends, on the other hand I got no hobbies or online friends, I just talk long walks daily and lay in my bed at most I listen to Music or masturbate for 5 minutes (sorry for mentioning this) or browse Pinterest or this site not to count basics such as eating and going to toilet

I browse internet and youtube the whole day. 99% of the time

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/food/2026/02/04/pizza-hut-closing-locations/88515586007/
<Pizza Hut is set to close 250 “underperforming” locations in the United States in the first half of 2026 as its parent company, Yum! Brands Inc. continues a strategic review of the struggling brand.
Gorbachevbros…

The Sopranos finale is the only one of those shows that isn't a total cop-out because the writers liked the character too much so tried to give them a totally unearned catharsis. Mad Men and Breaking Bad have incredibly cowardly finales. The problem with the "ermm you missed the point by idolising them" meme is that in almost all those cases it's undeniable from the way in which the scenes are famed that you ARE intended to like them. I mean, you don't end a show with this ←- shot if you want people to hate the character.

The usual defense of course is "oh it's just realism because in real life such people often get away with such things" (with optional accusations of supporting the "Hayes" Code because nobody on here can spell "Hays Code" correctly), as if that's what people are objecting to, as if mise en scene doesn't exist, as if all the metatextual framing choices don't make it clear that the protagonist is still intended to be liked. So, really, no, I don't think anyone "missed to point by idolising" Walter White, Don Draper, or BoJack Horseman. I think people are just too uncomfortable to admit how much the show kinda DOES want you to like them.

The Sopranos really is the only exception. David Chase pulls no punches with Tony Soprano in the finale and it's why it's the only time the ending works because it completely avoids any catharsis for a character who does not deserve it.