>>792476Retard, that paper only concerns with a single 40 yo brain cancer patient, and it wasn’t even about the question that guy was asking you, which was on whether intergen intimacy is inherently harmful. Hardly representative as a population sample. Bet you were too much of a dumbass to actually read it, uh?
I guess you tried to imply minor attraction is some disorder or caused by some disease. Tough luck buddy, your claims are a falsehood:
https://web.archive.org/web/20211004023954/https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1866/19870/Goudreault_Marc-Andre_2017_essai_doctoral.pdf?sequence=2>"Differences between pedophiles and controls reached statistical significance for psychopathic traits, with pedophiles displaying fewer psychopathic traits compared to controls. These results contradict the findings of the large majority of studies using forensic and clinical samples of pedophiles."https://www.b4uact.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/B4QR-Spring-2022-2-2.pdf>"Furthermore, there is an area of non-forensic sexological research suggesting some minors do seek sexual activity with adults. Without implying that such activity is acceptable, this research suggests that the 3 participants’ thinking that the children and young adolescents with whom they engaged as adults were wanting to engage in sexual activity with them might not be a “cognitive distortion.” Persons who feel attraction and affection for minors may, indeed, find themselves in a situation in which a minor is possibly seeking out sexual activity, so they need to develop techniques for responding in such situations and be prepared to effectively avoid acting on their thoughts and feelings."Also, as of 2026, there’s no evidence for intergen intimacy being inherently harmful or that it causes ever-lasting trauma, so your prejudice is completely and utterly unjustified:
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.