>>827643><posts a shit ton of text then complains about text>Piss off I replied to your 3-post Great Wall Text of China with one or two sentences for each claim. You're clearly gishgalloping by repeating the same points that have already been addressed. Moreover, you are still arguing a strawman by focusing on quantities.
>You have no proof of it.Plenty of proof has been provided. You are just in denial of it and would rather misdirect the conversation towards quantities.
>The tanks and aircraft were largely inconsequential.Actually, British heavy tanks were critical in the Battle of Moscow; Lend-Lease tanks were even used in Uranus (although Lend-Lease motorized was by far the stronger deciding factor). Aluminum was also critical for plane production. You had to cope about the Soviets using wood (which only proves how badly they needed aluminum), neglecting that the engines required aluminum alloy. Indeed, without the Lend-Lease aluminum, Soviet aircraft production would be half of what it was.
>The trucks came when the USSR had already put German forces on the retreat multiple times, the fuel arrived only then as well.False. The aid in 1942, while this isn't peak, it was still critical. Uranus relied on Lend-Lease's superior motorized.
>The food was inconsequential as I proved with actual statistics and primary sources from American and Soviet sides.Also, false. You continue to ignore the timing of it, how much the Red Army actually consumed of it, and its nutritional value.
>The "quality" of the items was not consistentAlso false. The trucks, explosives, types of food, fuel, etc. were all generally better quality than what the Soviets domestically produced.
><Gross National PRODUCT is not relevant to values of imports relative to said productPost too long. Click here to view the full text.