>>719923>have you ever seen what redditor are like,Only through screenshots, it seems like a standard issue 4chan clone: a handful of ivermectinites egged on by a swarm of bots.
>my takes aren't from twitter or redditThe reason I assume you got these assumptions from twitter is because they were boilerplate stances people used to have back when i used to use twitter.
>criticizing something as immature and childish is a coherent criticismIt's abstract nonsense that teens make up to separate themselves from the indignity they've associated with their own childhoods due to the way the adults treated them growing up. No, throwing away your toys and school year books doesn't make you an adult. Adulthood and maturity are not consumer identities you wear as a hat.
>it's the marvel fans, the dinsey fans, the star wars fans, the harry potter fans,Actual fanatics of these are not abundant enough to be statistically significant, despite what marketing campaigns would lead you to believe. The reason these properties do well is because television users are anti-intellectual reactionaries and thus voluntarily larp as mindless cattle to convince themselves they're normal, because that's how they conceive "normal people" in their head. It's like a reverse solipsism. I don't know why they do that. My mom used to be an engineer and yet she does this, weirdly self aware about it.
<and the YA book readersContent ratings aren't genres. A book doesn't magically become an affirmation of your adulthood because the author sprinkled some sex scenes and swear words in it.