/siberia/ - Off-topic

Cats are resilient revolutionary spirits who partake in the revolutionary struggle and champion bodily autonomy against the patriarchy (scratches you if you try to pet them). Meanwhile, dogs are subservient lumpenanimals who do everything to try to please their upper-class owners and do their bidding, such as in the case with KKKops dogs or the attack hounds of evil millionaires, while cats served in Stalingrad on the side of the Soviet Union during the Great Patriotic War (I'm not kidding; look up "Mourka Stalingrad"). German Shepherds were aiding German Wehrmacht and SS soldiers in hunting down Jews and partisans. Hitler himself was a dog lover who valued them over human life. You can also see this with the modern right and American idolization of the dog in such as in their settler colonial fantasies or elons obsession over doge and weaponizing them to attack Muslim minorities or liberals forbidding single mothers and their babies from resting at their restaurants but allowing these stupid small minded mutts to roam around shitting wherever they want, a pinnacle of toxic individualism, truly the bourgeoisie's best friend. Meanwhile, cats are social communal animals who you can generally allow your toddler to be at least near a hundred radius of a cat without losing a limb. while dogs gets into fights over the smallest pettiest differences and always view small children as competition of an adults affection. Anti cat sentiments strongly correlate with misogyny, such as sexist stereotypes about "cat ladies" (full uncritical support to grandmas and their hundred precious kittens) or how many dogs can be accurately described as "evil r*pe beasts" with them humping everything they see and certain breeds symbolising male violance and dominance. Why is it like this? we took the once noble wolf and corupted them using while torture and eugenics into these "things" meanwhile the noble african wild cat integrated itself into human society willingly and is a symbol of human-animal coexistance.

sometimes i feel naïve and unequipped to handle a world that’s becoming ever more complex then i remember there are zoomers who are unironically saving for retirement

Your appearance leftypol

Sixty to eighty percent is political garbage, and the other chunk is straight-up incel fuel for virgins seething at the world.

New cat thread, post cats and kitties

Both big and small welcome

no furry shit though

Has anyone noticed that chatgpt will spontaneously use a word in hindi script.

Anything beyond basic etiquette, which increasingly more people are disregarding or will probably think you’re a pussy for, seems like a scam and a waste of time. People decide if they like you in 5 seconds or 15 minutes if you’re lucky.

After that, it’s more a matter of whether entropy or determinism is at play. So is there really a point?

I’d have stayed home and neeted.

mreoh

You know the feeling when you think about something and an ad pops up about it?

>Google's core business has always been the same: understand you better than anyone else so they can serve you ads and keep you inside their ecosystem. AI doesn't change that goal, it supercharges it. The more Gemini is woven invisibly into Search, Gmail, Maps, YouTube, and Android, the more Google knows about your thoughts, intentions, decisions, and daily patterns in real time. That data makes their advertising engine dramatically more precise.

>There's a second layer. Google's explicit ambition is to drive the cost of expertise toward zero, making knowledge work like legal review and financial planning something AI handles automatically. That sounds democratizing, but it also means Google becomes the middleman for an enormous slice of human decision-making. When you ask an AI built by Google whether to take a job, buy a house, or choose a doctor, and that AI is integrated with your search history, emails, location data, and calendar, Google gains something more valuable than ad targeting. They gain influence over decisions.