/siberia/ - Off-topic

>0 posts
fuck you, si/b/eria

>>735279
Sorry I was too busy whining about not having a girlfriend. I should've just talking about monkeys. What's your guys's favorite primate? I don't really have one. Maybe a gorilla

>>735290
>What's your guys's favorite primate?
Jacque Fresco

>>735283
Theirs a couple anons that have kids here. I'm surprised too but most people do seem to fuck even if I can't believe it.

>>735275
As are more than 90% of hetero men in the world by your definition.


>>735276
I'm not OP if that's what youre inferring

>>735293
Wrong.
Most hetero men are not creeps

>>735296
Show me a man not intrigued by a more nubile female body and I show you a liar and the kind of man you should be on the watch for

>>735303
How does this fit into the definition of creep? Is this gay misandrist? Or a female misandrist whom is out of her prime or something?

>>735053
Nah, I used this flag cause its funny, I am not connected with the poster in the /ukr/ thread

The only way artificial wombs can work is with stem cells

>>734928
>my sister introduced me to it.
wow

>>734803
They are completely irrelevant outside the internet, they're the definition of a meme.

Big emancipation for women and archivement for same-sex attracted men :)

Foucault was a Nietzschean and he saw his work as a tool for others to use in their own projects. He looked at what happened to Marx, with Marxists turning to stuff he wrote as some authoritative guide for every question in life, and didn't want to end up imposing positions on his readers. Foucault drew a line between morality and ethics, and in the latter he was effectively a Nietzschean obsessed with self-creation, the body as a work of art, creativity etc. When questions of right and wrong come up, his strategy was to question the distinction. Why are these things considered right and wrong? Whose interests does that sense of morality serve? How does it obstruct an ethics of self-creation?

Foucault wasn't amoral (that he believed in nothing) otherwise he wouldn't have spent half his time on picket lines. In his interviews, he would say stuff like "rape should clearly be wrong" etc. but doesn't properly justify those claims. His smarter critics accused his ethics of being incoherent and narcissistic. There's a contradiction in Foucault between his obsession with caring for the self, creating new ways of being, pleasure etc. and the darker side where he's all about how a person's sense of self is always shaped by power and people are worse than puppets.

>>734832
Chomskly was an MIT professor and like all celebrity professors he has to get funding to keep his university department afloat and fund the research. Its not uncommon for people like that to go beg rich people for money in exchange for a library or building named after them or some vanity project like that. Its what all universities do.

>>734828
Foucault was too based for this shit world. Chomsky was a bleeding heart lib but I will always hold respect for him for defending Pol Pot.

>ummmmm what if the proletariat does something le bad tho???
Peak burger anarchism. Can't believe Chomsky got me to support Foucault.

Who cares about two pedophiles fighting?

B–Based Foucault? wtf.

>>735060
Doesn‘t need to be. Money signifies a universal resource, and women desire a man with a lot of resources.

>>735032
There are many players out there who don‘t care about feminism and are as misogynistic or even more so than the average man, therefore your claim is false. That‘s not to say that is what makes them successful, but that plenty of cases like that exist shows feminism isn‘t critical in getting women. And that‘s actually women‘s own fault. Women say they care about feminism but still care more about a guy being attractive, confident and successful and will not bother to make it a criteria if he read Bell Hooks or whatever. It‘s also not difficult to be misogynistic and still talk to women as people thereby giving the illusion that everything is fine.

>>735029
Communism won't do that. There are multiple huge industries built on telling us what women want, what they want at this point in time is being the hottest bitch that will seduce the highest-up man possible in the feudal hierarchy while also being humble and relatable. This does not differ between cultural contexts, media and it didn't change all that much since the ancient times. Even today, in modern contexts, the stories that women like most are about old money or direct continuation from the aristocracy of old.
I quite despise the gaslighting from people like >>735032, that hasn't been my experience in real life or culturally, science also doesn't say that feminist or nice men have it any easier. It's just offensive how brazen the lie "left-wing" people push is. It's probably a big reason why some young men get pushed in the direction of those absolutely moronic right-wingers at first, and that is likely the intention.
China apparently banned these kinds of stories recently? Could be just fake news, but that would make sense for a communist party. What women want is just part of the currently existing superstructure to be demolished. Not even bourgeois superstructure since this was a thing since forever and bourgeois simply inherited it. This applies to men too, but I don't think anyone here would have a problem with that. What men want is also far more unstable, so that likely won't be nearly as big of an issue.

>>735029
Thoughts?

money buys u looks, it buys u confidence (buys u a therapist if consooming isnt enough), AND it buys u the spare time to get into dumb trad shit as a hobby

Defect to hamas

>>735223
>Low quality 144p

But the merkava unboxing vids are all full 4k

>>735160
For the love of God they are both awesome
Teheheeeee

i'm trying to understand what op is asking

>>735086
whats that? some online game?

It never worked for me

this animal peeing like that is probably someone's fetish

>>735090
what happens when you try?

>>735093
i think it's what theyre calling a "sable"

>>735103
>Blah blah blah everything that i'm unfamiliar with is le icky and gross and immature
Very fascinating insight
>>735073
Age gap can be a serious problem tho, i've known women who said that they are damaged from dating 30 year olds when they're 18, or maybe it's just selection bias. People who have good relationships with older partners usuall don't rant about it to strangers.
The problem i have i think is when people tried to imply that every single age gap relationship is toxic, and that every single power difference in a relationship makes it unsalvageable. You're basically implying that falling in love with someone poorer than you is akin to paying for prostitutes

>>735182
>The problem i have i think is when people tried to imply that every single age gap relationship is toxic, and that every single power difference in a relationship makes it unsalvageable.

It's just post-prime age people projecting their hurt and immaturity onto younger people. It's also fear of aging.

>>735128
>Most anime is absolute trash. Nothing but fucking filler. Fucking painfully slow. I pretty much don't watch any anime that's not original. I just read mangas.

Thank you. I keep telling people to read the manga whenever they complain about lore inconsistencies between an anime and it's manga.
However, despite the fact that anime is mostly filler, I prefer it over western animation in terms of character designs and personalities.
Western animation uses too much snark and intentional mediocrity for the sake of "relatability". The characters aren't all good looking either and their skillsets are questionable.

>>735182
>Age gap can be a serious problem tho, i've known women who said that they are damaged from dating 30 year olds when they're 18, or maybe it's just selection bias. People who have good relationships with older partners usuall don't rant about it to strangers.
in these current trends of social media especially with social issues, it's rather "narrative first, reality later". this sort of thing is spread foremost by women who like to engage heavily with culture therapy on tiktok etc. and tend to overemphasize narratives they find attractive and advantageous to their sex. men may not be aware of this but women treat relationships like men treat football or war, and all women are on the same side, that's why they build intelligence networks with each other to sip tea. much of what gains traction is based on fear, women's fear drives them much more and women (often rightly so) believe that they're more at risk of harm from the average man. this combined with the infantilization of society is the real origin of the age gap meme. it's also advantageous to older women that younger women remove themselves from their age bracket of the dating market. in a funny way these women are using their unfair power dynamics as trusted older women to do this.

>The problem i have i think is when people tried to imply that every single age gap relationship is toxic, and that every single power difference in a relationship makes it unsalvageable. You're basically implying that falling in love with someone poorer than you is akin to paying for prostitutes
that's the result of the hysteria (is that a bad word?) being pushed above. women and men are very attracted to power differences in relationships. in fact, it is one of the main factors that drives attraction. women love feeling small and weak and men love feeling like a strong protective man. how many women refuse to date a short man because she doesn't make her feel safe for example? in the same way men like younger women because they're cute. all of this is just women seeking to strengthen their own power as a sex in the dating market and to destroy men's ability to find partners so that they can be more tightly controlled.

Stop being a weeb and 80% if the cringe leaves your body

>>735216
This is why I think cisheterosexual relationships should be strictly procreational only. The natural inclination to power imbalance that's in cisheterosexual relationships mean nothing outside of making babies.
People can preach all they want about equality and progress but until women stop overlooking short/broke/babyfaced men and men stop overlooking older/butch/tall women I don't see why the traditional way of relationships was any worse

>>733696
see: reddit inceltears meetup vs incel forum meetup
>>733329
Not really, the struggle and hardship was always supposed to be for a promised better future where labor time was drastically reduced via automation and people were as socially liberated as they could realistically be. Not sure if youre an anti communist doing the on paper vs in practice bit or another retarded stakhanovite-fetishist

>>735127
>Not really, the struggle and hardship was always supposed to be for a promised better future where labor time was drastically reduced via automation and people were as socially liberated as they could realistically be.
Not them but this doesn't mean the conditions under communism will mean someone will inherently get a GF if they want one.

Just that social conditions will be one where it wont matter if someone has a GF or not. Wanting a GF inherently is just entitlement and part of the patriarchal system that communism is trying to do away with and for good reason.

>>735132
Oh yeah I don't disagree, if anything it will make it worse because there is no way for someone who lost the genetic lottery to compensate.

>Wanting a GF inherently is just entitlement and part of the patriarchal system that communism is trying to do away with and for good reason.
This is stupid though.

>>735137
>This is stupid though.
Why? having a significant other shouldn't be a factor into someone being happy or not and the only reason it's even a big issue in society is because of patriarchal norms pushing the idea that if you want to be a true man or successful human being then you should "have" a partner. Its a patriarchal power structure that not only harms women but makes men miserable by proxy if they can't "compensate".

>>735187
This.
Romantic relationships are treated like buying a new car