>>796368> When the child can go to nursery you go back to work, return to 50/50 but also do more of the school pick ups I don't think this is actually that common. If it takes a hit to career then 50/50 usually stops happening, maybe goes to 60/40 or less.
> This is precisely why 50/50 is a trap for women and why there is a rise in women choosing to be singleBecause they would rather be single than be with someone who isn't making good money. That's the subtext. It isn't about the person, money is the fundamental subtext of everything.
There is no true reciprocal because generally the way these relationships play out, it follows a leech/victim pattern where the first one always overstates the nature of their contribution (could be a man or a woman, but the latter is more encouraged by the hivemind).
The benefit of true 50/50 financially (or close to it) is that there's no bullshitting around it, it's purely quantitative. This whole "reciprocal contribution" thing is just one giant psyop/negotiation to extract more out of the opposing party. "Reciprocal" can always be distorted. The thing is with finances there's no bullshitting around it. It's an irrefutable number.
Say there's some wannabe SAHM that wants to bullshit their way into marrying a rich guy. This 50/50 requirement instantly filters out this type. Maybe it's not a true 50/50, maybe it's 60/40, but this type will be instantly infuriated by this type of boundary because it now means that they're being held to a standard. So it limits the kind of bullshit they can get away with