>>723658I've checked out the video, and honestly there is no need to 'refute' anything if any of these claims may bring us to a definite conclusion ( ie, racial differences presuppose the necessity of segretation ) which ultimately turns out to be independent from the claim itself.
There claim is tried to be justified in a sense, but the relation: claim -> conclusion is widely assumed. We simply don't genocide cats just because they are intuitively 'inferior to us' or smth.
( And it is interesting that looking at stuff like crime rates, we may see black crime is way higher, but in the end it will be like 99.990 white innocents & 99.900 black innocents per 100k white & black ppl, those who do not commit crime will be the majority no matter the 'race'. )
Basically, racial determinism in biological sense affirms that the constant cycle of evolution may develop certain traits or properties in individuals, even if our 'knowledge' about the human conscinousness and central neural system is largely unknown, it is alike to imagining a blind man is limited from the nature because of his properties, and within this immediate knowledge of a particular situation we could propose an universal truth/law which will always govern as such, this is alike to how we propose that F = m*a formula we derived from particularity of situations will uphold universally, but upon an another particular situation, like if we see/feel like a blind man is way more wise- we may develop some ideas that blindless is not a curse. Now our conclusion for the truth is changed! ( some tribal societies might have thought like so, dunno. ) After all, this is our third party view regarding the nature of the knowledge, and it is seemingly molded / influenced by our capturing consciousness / feelings.
Ahem, now getting back to our main case, we have a 'theory of evolution' which proposes that the general composition of molecular state of any being is subjected to constant cycle of change, oftenly minor changes over wide amount of time resulting with major changes. And the molecular state of a being may 'decide' their actions-abilities-etc in nature, this is indeed interesting, but, in an another particular assumption, can't we say that when our thoughts about something change ( like feeling attachment to someone you've never had that attachment before , thus the ne
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.