[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/AKM/ - Guns, weapons and the art of war.

"War can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun." - Chairman Mao
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1739145690948.png (736.36 KB, 1600x1600, ClipboardImage.png)

 

This guide will be purely talking about equipment. There are many other resources for training and organizing. I will leave out anything that requires further knowledge, this guide is meant to be accessible NOT in depth. This guide is meant to be shared to people who do not own a gun or are otherwise ignorant. If you have any suggestions or corrections I will edit it. Once the final product is complete I will turn it into a pdf and a simple image guide to be shared. This is a collaborative project so if you think something I said is stupid, let me know.

You need a semi-auto rifle, specifically an ar15.
They're accurate, lightweight, high capacity, and can shoot quickly.
An ar15 is recommended due to their customization and versatility. Parts and ammo for an ar are also very easy to get (at least in the US). The 556 round has proven time and time again to be effective. Sure an ak might look cooler but they are often more expensive and not as reliable as an ar. This guide will be US centric so a lot of the advice maybe won't apply to you if you live elsewhere.

Ar15 Basic Guide:
You can save money by getting a separate lower and upper. They're easy to put together. The upper matters a lot, the lower much less so. Oftentimes complete ars will have an overpriced lower so buying just the upper and the lower separate can save you quite a bit.

Handguard style: I always recommend M-Lok. It's lighter and better than keymod and allows easy attachments. I honestly don't see any reason to choose anything else unless if you just don't like the feeling of m-lok for whatever reason in which case you can research alternatives.

Length: The length you'll likely end up using is 16", this is as short as you get without dealing with any annoying laws. For whatever reason anything below this is much more of a hassle to get. 16 is a fine length anyway. A 20" will shoot the round faster and a bit further, but the military decided to move away from it in favor of a shorter length. I don't think the extra speed makes enough of a difference to justify the extra length. As for going shorter the rifle will get less accurate but for close quarters combat (such as inside buildings) this is preferred. Specifically an 11.5" is a great option. Remember though the military used 20" barrels inside for years. If they can do it so can you.
Tldr: Buy a 16"

Brands: Now this part depends heavily on your budget. If you're well off I woulPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
6 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

File: 1742690746932.jpeg (34.05 KB, 1032x269, 55582.jpeg)

I put in my loicense application for an AR-10 variant the other day, specifically the Savage MSR 10 Hunter. hopefully it doesn't take the popo too long to process it

>>5665
No AR-15's in the Democratic People's Republic of Illinois. Sigh.

I would rather use an AK or SKS if I could.

>You need a semi-auto rifle, specifically an ar15.

what exactly are your military credentials, anon?

direct conventional warfare against us military and paramilitary personnel is suicide. a leftist counter-insurgency coalition is outnumbered and outgunned on every front and therefore must resort to guerilla warfare tactics. if you want to know what kind of weapon is most effective in this type of scenario, all you need to do is look back to the vietnam war, look at what caused the most injuries and deaths of u.s. military personnel.

first of all, the majority of u.s. casualities in vietnam were not from bullets, but from explosives, namely mortar shells and mines. explosive fragmentation was responsible for about 60-70% of all us casualities in vietnam, and many of them were improvised explosive devices, often repurposed unexploded ordinance.

as for small arms casualties, the vast majority were not from snipers firing from long distances, contrary to popular belief, but from ambushes at very short range, 50 meters or less, with 7.62x39mm rounds, i.e. ak-47 and sks rifles. the viet cong would hide in the bushes and wait until the enemy was right on top of them and mow them down with close range rapid fire. the large heavy bullets caused much more grievous injuries than the more modern 5.56mm round.

snipers also played a vital role, but their role was more about psychological warfare than anything else; viet cong snipers often did not even aim to hit any target, they would do things like rig up a mosin-nagant rifle in a tree or in a tunnel and fire it remotely by pulling a string to terrorize and confuse the enemy. the psychological impact was devastating, us soldiers would surrounded on all sides by untraceable sniper fire and explosive booby traps, being herded like cattle into the aforementioned deadly close-range ambushes.

with all this in mind, i would say that the best rifle to carry in a hypothetical modern civil war type scenario would be a lightweight large caliber carbine. unlike vietnam, modern day enemy combatants will often be wearing soft body armor which protects against pistol and shotgun rounds, and even small-calibre rifle rounds to a lesser degree, but is useless against something as powerful as a 7.62 or the various deer hunting rounds such as the .308, .30-30, .30-06, .270, etc.

personally my choice of weapon would be a lever-action brush gun chambered in .30-30, such as the pictured marlin 336. at first glance it seems like an absurd choice, this old-timey lever-action rifle, but there is a Post too long. Click here to view the full text.



File: 1746888572844-0.webp (406.35 KB, 600x401, bay1.webp)

File: 1746888572844-1.webp (1.44 MB, 1956x1304, bay2.webp)

 

Bayonets on rifles appreciation thread -

The first one is the type 56
The second one was the type 56

different guns btw the PLA was on sumthing else
6 posts omitted.

File: 1755186181858-0.png (206.21 KB, 768x575, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1755186181858-1.png (43.94 KB, 720x396, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1755186181858-2.png (1.03 MB, 640x460, ClipboardImage.png)

The only way to break a 90 degree ambush is the afix your bayonet and rush the enemy.

I remember reading All Quiet On The Western Front and the author mentioned something about how bayonets are not a great weapon because they tend to get lodged in the enemy's torso and that WW1 soldiers preferred to use a shovel for hand-to-hand combat.

>>5864
>the only way to survive an ambush is to just kill them

>>5864
This is probably solid advice given the situation but you're still probably dead

>>5974
Given that its already over at that point, go out with a bang



File: 1730866892598.jpg (1.7 MB, 3205x1772, CF340.259.jpg)

 

What's the tackiest handgun I could buy?
23 posts and 16 image replies omitted.

>>6018
I question whether there's enough material between those outer cartridges for the cylinder to handle the pressure

>>6015
this is awesome, anyone got $1499 to spare?

>>6012

just got out of the russian 9mm ammo rabbithole and i'm wondering if you could shoot 7N21 out of a 38 super handgun in an emergency…

>>6019
it's probably fine the way the .22s are staggered toward the outside, but I still wouldn't wanna run shit hot buffalo bore or anything like that

File: 1768058779859.jpg (34.24 KB, 600x419, Arsenal_AR2011-A1[1].jpg)




File: 1758376511546.jpeg (293.29 KB, 1700x1130, IMG_5537.jpeg)

 

Many advanced systems (such as the F-35, HIMARS, Patriot) have software and hardware that is controlled, updated, or encrypted by the US. This can indirectly act as a "switch," because allies cannot freely reprogram or modify the systems without approval from the US. They could shut down the entire Western defense capability if they wanted to. Most often, Washington limits capacity through policy or hardware configuration prior to transfer (e.g., by limiting the range of HIMARS in Ukraine). It's not a "remote control," but it achieves the same effect. Communications and networks (Link 16, GPS, etc.) are also under US control and can be shut down or restricted in certain areas, giving Washington leverage.

Buy Swedish.

in the swede club, straight up gripen it. and by 'it' i mean my peanus.

gripen meme plane. buy battle tested J-10 and long range PL-15E



File: 1767866379059.webm (6.21 MB, 856x480, 1764491055882.webm)

 

how much of an impact does one guy who has thousand hours of target training but nothing else make in war? just an average joe with an ar 15 who is good at hitting a target, no survival or military training besides that.

zero

Dead guys can't hit targets

Zero, one drone strike to the noggin and your thousands of hours of training are now gone



 

Literature and others sources for reading on the history, manufacture, and use of improvised weapons. The TM 31-210 Improvised Munitions Handbook is usually recommended as the most comprehensive and practical but was curious about other sources people have read.

I've also read Fighting In The Streets, a few groups communiques e.g. BOAK, and some history of the IRA, especially their mortar campaign.

I've also seen a few guides for police bomb technicians and Hollywood special effects teams.

>>6003
>BOAK
AZOV*


>>6003
I have a bunch of pdfs/epubs about ammunition/fighting/whatever but the quality of a lot of them is dubious and some I still haven't got to reading



File: 1764643577034-0.png (84.44 KB, 225x159, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1764643577034-1.png (2.04 MB, 1024x1119, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1764643577034-2.png (2 MB, 1024x1094, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1764643577034-3.png (10.4 MB, 2741x2741, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Taiwanese DCCU looks so good, it looks like everything the american UCP tried to be but failed at. I really wanna get my hands on a full taiwanese DCCU uniform but its very difficult for two reasons - lack of avaibility and production is largely if not almost entirely made for smaller sizes. Last pic seems darker for some reason. I think I might buy a replica off of aliexpress or some other obscure site some day.
6 posts and 10 image replies omitted.

File: 1764645680398-0.png (411.96 KB, 2307x1543, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1764645680398-1.png (7.56 MB, 2560x2560, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1764645680398-2.png (1.7 MB, 1425x1425, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1764645680398-3.png (1.46 MB, 1080x1350, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1764645680398-4.png (1.03 MB, 819x1024, ClipboardImage.png)

>>6028
>Otherwise I haven't heard that about black b4.
That's one of the reasons they got rid of BDU. I still love my BDU. To me it's the OG. That's the one all fashion camos copy. I've been rocking my secondhand BDU jacket for 20 years. Thank you private Schubbe. I took off his name tag and the US Army patch too.

>>6030
>Plus black is a much needed color in jungle environments
The color doesn't exist in nature for the most part. A very dark brown is the most you get.

>>6031
To put it more simply, black at best replicates shadows to the naked eye. But that's irrelevant with NVG. You can see the true shade of colors, so you don't see any black-equivalent shadows, so things that are actually black stick out like a sore thumb.

>>6031
BDU jackets are higher quality than any jacket I've ever owned by the way. That fucking zipper is so high quality I'm sure it's never going to break. Stitching, material, everything. It's indestructible.

>>6032
Shadows are why black is in most woodland patterns



File: 1764440855982.png (25.35 MB, 7000x3700, ClipboardImage.png)

 

I remember there was this really good one I can't find anymore where the only flaw it had was calling chinese camo "chink camo", can't find it anymore, it was a good list though, if anyone has it saved pls repost.



File: 1754997345214.webp (181.74 KB, 1174x1474, IMG_2237.webp)

 

Are there any methods for defending your country from a nuclear strike? So far it seems that nuclear war would lead to everything on the planet being wiped out, but could there be a way to neutralise the threat of nukes altogether?

I’m not a scientist or weapons expert or anything but hypothetically, could it be possible to create some sort of defence wherein the nukes are disabled before impact by neutralising the warhead with some sort of force field?
8 posts omitted.

>>5859
patriot missile batteries have a 75% chance of intercepting an ICBM before reentry and separation, and all that scary stuff. the plan with the US missile shield in the event of a nuclear war, is to launch 4 of them per ICBM. 0.75*4= approximately 97.5% chance of getting a hit or some number close to that IIRC. basically enough to probably protect against a rouge nation like north korea. not sure about the remaining 2% odds. not sure what happens if they get unlucky.

>>5883

Patriot missiles can't stop an ICBM, they are designed to intercept short-range missiles. The US has some missile defense systems that can intercept an IBCM moving at hypersonic velocities but they are not very effective and a country like Russia with thousands of nuclear warheads could easily overwhelm any defense system that current technology can produce.

It's possible that in the future, with major breakthroughs in material engineering, the military could develop working railguns which could potentially be used for intercepting hypersonic missiles, but then the enemy could use that same technology for launching nuclear warheads at hypersonic velocities that even your defensive railguns cannot intercept. This is the fundamental problem - any technology that has the power to defend against a weapon of mass destruction could just as easily be repurposed into a weapon of mass destruction. Technology reaches the point where the weapons are simply too powerful for anything to possibly defend against them and there's no putting that genie back into the bottle.

>>5887
>but then the enemy could use that same technology for launching nuclear warheads at hypersonic velocities that even your defensive railguns cannot intercept
Metal Gear?!

File: 1763309445642.jpg (164.1 KB, 1024x576, 1760864598081433m.jpg)

>>5859
Not yet but AI+Radars could revolutionize missile defence if they develop the ability to detect even from the smallest signature that this is a nuclear warhead and not its decoy. More hypothetical would be swarms of drones to be formed into an aerial minefield that could counter multiple missiles launched at the target.

>>6007
>More hypothetical would be swarms of drones to be formed into an aerial minefield
https://www.businessinsider.com/ukraine-gets-drone-wall-to-fight-russian-threats-arms-maker-2025-11



 

This is the best book on guerrilla warfare I have ever read. It analyses Che Guevara, Mao Zedong and the Cuban revolutions guerrilla war experiences from someone who was involved with actual revolutionary guerrilla experiences. It’s called War of the Flea. The Classic Study of Guerrilla Warfare and it slaps. It focuses on Marxist, Marxist Leninist, liberation, anti colonial, anti imperialist, socialist, and communist guerrilla war strategies and gives a clear headed, non biased analysis. This video is NOT IN ANY WAY promoting violence, revolutionary or guerrilla war. So (I think) I took my meds and decided to review it. Enjoy!!!



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 ]
| Catalog | Home