/AKM/ - Guns, weapons and the art of war.

Don't get your house searched, if you have a secret stash you shouldn't be keeping them there anyway

>Is it possible to actually completely eliminate illegal guns and ammo in private ownership?
No
>How many firearms are secretly owned in places with extreme gun control and penalties like China and Singapore?
Probably less than countries where it is easy and legal to own one
>Today with metal detectors and sniffer dogs it seems almost impossible if they search your house.
Guns can be printed in high temperature filament as strong as aluminum that will not show up with a metal detector and/or embedded in a solid mass with the same density. Dogs to my knowledge sniff mainly gunpowder and explosives ingredients of these. I don't think they can smell the actual firearm itself but they may be able to be trained to smell lubricant used for the firearm. You can avoid all of these threats I think. The cops will strip down everything in pursuit of the contraband if they think it is there but you can avoid that to to varying degrees based on threat model. There is this old rule of thumb for hiding drug stashes about like 15 minutes of hiding for 1 hour of searching ro something. Anyways figure out how hard the cops will go to find such contraband and prepare your model accordingly.
>>3100
This. Bury underground in some preservative in some remote location on a property you own or somewhere else no one will dig through incidentally. Don't be caught travelling through such an area. Ammunition and small items can be buried in small waterproof plastic containers etc. There is even a lot of designs online for easily accesible buried waterproof containers. The prepper community etc has tons of good tutorials online. Don't just scoff at good ideas. Learn.

>>3099
they will put them in a drum of oil and bury it in a location only they know until it's time to use it
>>3101
this guy basically gets it

Even the paddle itself is good by itself
You can brain someone with it
Start by carving one

>>3348
You sound one step away from unironically saying "the founding fathers were talking about muskets"

>>3327
LOL
typical anarkiddies, always having their priorities straight

>>3324
>this a thing that happens when people substitute belief in the masses or organizing within the masses for their small group, and they compensate for the lack of effectiveness by ramping up the radical aesthetics and "militant" posture
this is everyone in leftypol who cant shut up about muh guns

>>3377
Its better than nothing
I suppose some would prefer if we were all castrated liberals engaging in the public discourse, but we dont have a place there, because we are threats

>>3377
>every burger in leftypol
ftfy

>>1972
Looks like they're all back, rejoice

cant wait until wearing ballistic helmets in public becomes normalized

>>2021
Short bros… it's not over?

>>2022
Could build yourself a pillbox with steel and bricks if it's in your home. Or something funnier like this one guy who had renovated his house with a reinforced door so he could lock himself upstairs and shoot trough holes in the floor.

>>1849
>Watching the latest NY shooter video got me thinking, how if at all possible could one survive a mass shooting?

Just pull out your gun and shoot back at them. If you have nothing, then charge them. Running is for pussies. You'll only be shot in the back. Hiding is for pussies. You'll only be doubletapped.

This tbh

>>3083
This is nonsense.

the Tu-4; It is obviously based on the B-29, that is not denied by anyone, however there are major differences in their construction.

Soviet engineers were tasked with reverse-engineering the several B-29s the USSR had in it’s possession; impounded USAF bombers (under the terms of the 1941 Soviet-Japanese Neutrality treaty) which were forced to land in Soviet territory after flying bombing missions against Japan.
The B-29’s fuselage was made of an 1/16 inch thick plates, or 1.5875 mm. The Soviets used a metric system, so there was no way or logic to produce/use such plates, only 1.5 or 1.6mm. This meant that it could not be applied directly to the original B-29 plans because of mass, length and rigidity changes in the air-frame. So Tu-4 air-frame was redesigned, (increasing and redefining size and dimensions) with the plating being made of 1.8 and 0.8mm plates.
Other differences also existed. The Tu 4 used 20mm guns in its defensive mounts, and later mounted 23mm guns, (both of which were far more effective at defense, having a longer range, able to contend in distance with the 30 and 25 millimeter guns of fighters of the time), and with a heavy enough hit to seriously damage attackers with explosive force, rather than the cleanly punched holes the .50 M2 left. Or the engines; the Tu-4’s ASh-73 radial engines were not copies of the B-29’s Wright R-3350 “Duplex Cyclone” radial engines as is often (falsely) claimed. The two engines were in fact separately developed from the same “grandparent”: the R-3350 was an evolutionary development of the Wright R-1820 Cyclone engine, whereas the ASh-73TK was an evolutionary development of the Shvetsov M-25 which was a licensed copy of that same engine. This common ancestry meant that many parts were similar or even interchangeable between the two engines, but the only component of the Duplex Cyclone engine which the Soviets actually copied was the turbo-supercharger unit. The Tu-4s engines did not include the R-3350’s lightweight magnesium-alloy crankcase, which increased weight but also eliminated the Duplex Cyclone’s infamous tendency towards engine fires so catastrophically hot that they could melt the wing spars in literal seconds. The differences are seen in capability as well. The Tu-4 was about 750kg heavier, 10 mph slower (big difference that is) and carried only 6000kg (Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Use it as a blunderbuss and praise Stalin?
I dunno what do you want us to say?

is that a PCP gun? you can get some joules out of those, sometimes enough to kill a man if you get a good hit

>>2773
Isn't wagner giving people literal sticks?

I heard Wagner give their recruits wet noodles instead of guns. Is this true?

>>2768
More like 100 to 1

>>2758
>NaOH and aluminium
doesn't sound as bad as
>HCl and zinc
both should explode due to buildup of H2 gas. hot HCl is almost surely worse than hot NaOH. however:
>KOH and aluminium
potassium lye is quite aggressive. neither of these are deadly. if you want be really dangerous you should do
>HCl and TCCA
this will build up Cl2 gas which, apart from exploding, will be in deadly concentrations within around a meter of the blast radius, depending on the mass of ingredients. in a confined space this will be far worse

Ingredients:
-A moderately thick glass bottle that will shatter on impact but won't break in your hands
-A rag made of flammable fabric cut into strips
-Some sort of fuel with a syrup-y consistency if you want it to stick well (a good formula is dissolving styrofoam in acetone and mixing the resulting solution with an equal amount of gasoline; the Finns that coined the term Molotov cocktail thickened their gasoline with roofing tar)
1. Fill the bottle with the fuel in an open air or ventilated space
2. Tape a strip of rag around the neck to protect your hands from the heat
3. Shortly before you plan on throwing it, dip one half of a long rag strip into the fuel while the stuffing the other half in the neck of the bottle, plugging it while leaving about 5 cm hanging out
4. Light the rag and throw

>>2758
This only works if you expect the invaders to occupy instead of just killing you. The US pissed around for two decades making opium, if they wanted to kill every single Afghan man, woman, and child the war would have been over in a year.

>>2812
You do realize almost all wars are fought to occupy a country, not commit total genocide

>>2678
>Flags like, it's a flag, but attached to a relatively thick wooden stick
like the ones our Greek comrades like to carry in the front rears of their demonstrations
as you can see they're also big into motorcycling

fashoids will never attack an org meeting cause they are opportunistic druggies ,they will either muster forces and attack an antifascist rally in hopes of coming out of it as the victims or a random girl handing out leaflets putting up posters , you will very rarely get into a pre planned fight with a fasch

Security:put up a large guy or two in the door ,same thing in a public meeting make sure you have enough guys to defend yourself and lookouts

>>2643
My first thought will be to evaluate the risks, and prepare defense against the most plausible ones.
Why would fascists be the first one to attack?
I would think the government would be, that's how it rolls here anyway.

>>2678
Flag is too large

No trespassing sign on the barn. My neighbors may be reactionary hicks but they respect property rights, by god.