/AKM/ - Guns, weapons and the art of war.

>>1631
I'm actually thinking of researching mental illness in relation to gun violence as a med student just to show people that it's not the damn gun. fuck, I plan on marrying a burger just so I can get that citizenship and that sweet tax stamp for a can.

>>1680
Based lol. you can just make your own can illegally tho and use it as a flower vase or whatever if you need to hide it. I have seen some that are just as quiet as commercial cans so you can have a literally silent rifle with a bolt action 22 with susonics and ur can and it will hit and kill (your animals) within 200 yards iirc.

>>1680
i have a family member that brings up "gun facts" they learned in poly-sci back in thcci e 80s, like "households with guns are more likely to have gun deaths" like yeah and houses with bathtubs are more likely to have people die of drownings. they are terminally fukuyama brained and unable to imagine any reason to weigh the short term benefits of saving an exrta hundred or so people a year with the long term implications of consolidating power in a governing body that changes hands every couple years.

>>1683
i have found that with a 26" barrel cci quiet .22 are noticeably quieter than my pellet gun, great for small game hunting in places where you don't want to upset the neighbors, but i wouldn't try using it at 200 yards as it drops of hard after 50y like 1 foot at 80 and 2 feet at 100

>>1688
>terminally fukuyama brained
kek
stealing that one

Glock cleaning

>>419
why does this cartridge even exist? you’d think recoil that heavy would be a dealbreaker for a handgun

>>1668
you need thick manly wrists to wield guns made for shooting elephants

>>1670
i don't wanna shoot elephants that's fucking barbaric

>>1678
hello Agent Kochinski
>>1676
I've bought parts separately before. The part kits referred to in the bill are ones that include the 80% lower, not just miscellaneous parts kits. For example, I bought an 80% lower and a jig, then the upper receiver and barrel, then a small parts kit, then a buffer tube and spring. It was actually cheaper than buying a complete build kit, and would still, to my knowledge, be legal with the proposed reforms.

Guys on fosscad don't seem worried so I'm not worried. They'd be shitting and farting if it was worth worrying about.

>>1681
I don't even watch him or follow anything about him so fuck off with your non arguments.

>>1709
you too

haaa

https://www.lostarmour.info/armour/
There's another site like this that has a map. it's on sturgeon somewhere

The thing about nukes is you destroy everything in one indirect rough area hit. Fuck you don't even need to hit a target just airbust it. Think of how much work goes into the hyper-sonic cruise missiles to fire, control, directly precisely hit a single building.
The cities that are "ruined" have taken thousands of artillery shells, rockets, drones, jet airstrikes, chopper attacks, cruise missiles, mortars, shoulder fired rockets, tanks, grenades, MLRS strikes to just turn some buildings into rubble.

With a nuke, you just land a hit roughly around the area and everything is destroyed. Water, sanitation, food, farming, houses, apartments, energy, government buildings, television, hospitols, stores, pretty much everything is absolutely fucking burned to shit, and then covered with lots of nuclear fallout continuing to burn everything for years. the air is unbreathable, water undrinkable.
There is no winning for any nation that gets into a nuclear war. All heavily armed nuclear superpowers have emergency doomsday contingency plans so even if a first strike is effective against them, they have enough firepower hidden to launch retaliatory strikes from submarines, even nuclear torpedoes, possibly shipping containers smuggled into ports with nukes inside of them. Even without the nukes they have enough radiological materials to wage a horrific dirty bomb war with radioactive materials in conventional weapons.

There is no winning with nuclear war. It would destroy all nations involved, and in the case with Israel, they vow to use a Sampson option to destroy every city they can in the entire middle east and take them all down with them.

Mutually Assured Destruction was supposed to be a deterrent, not a scenario to enact.

>>1592
>low effort lounge
>posts this
also nukes aren't real

any other milsurp and historical re-enactment enthusiasts here?

>>280
>>281
>>282
>>326
>>327
>>478 (different kind of action)
>>479
>>483
>>517
>>499
>>519
>>709
>>733
>>748

>tfw will probably never own and AK
Unironically the 2nd amendment is probably the only thing I'm jealous about the US. Americans of /AKM/, cherish it. It genuinely has so much value and it bothers me so much that almost no other country on Earth is even close to the US when it comes to lax gun laws.

Related from old leftyk https://archive.ph/CShxA

Teetering rotors are a cheap design and a bad choice for military helicopters. Only American military helicopters like the UH-1 used it. This is because military helicopters fly low and when climbing over the top of ridges (like in this video) they enter low G and can have mast bumping. This problem is solved with fully articulated rotors.

>>1620
Jazz Fusion was popular during 70s and was progressively being refined in the 80s til smooth Jazz would develop in the 90s.

not great, not terrible

>>1586
this. I wouldn't encourage it

>>1587
This post made by liberal-gang

>>1585
I have a P365XL for everyday carry. It's basically a straight upgrade to the Glock 19 in terms of size and concealability without getting into literal pocket pistol territory.

>>1617
I was thinking about edc but I've seen too many webms of Glock leg. Should I try carrying with an empty chamber until I get over it?

>>127
>Well if your going to fighting a modern 1st world military state the most important thing you'd want to do is knock out their air force so you can run military operations in the open and cut off the opponents main advantages.
I had a dream where the American government was couped by a militarist faction and I had to help some dudes attack the local airbase and what I did was make a shit ton of rc planes that carried explosives to swarm the air base and knock out the fighters and bombers there. Idunno could work irl, I'm sure that some military force has tried that in the past somewhere.

>>131
Errors:
1. Get lots of drone parts in bulk identical to ones used in attack.
2. Recovery results in being tracked. No recovery results in delay.
3. RC planes can't carry much.

Iron dome missiles are expensive, so all you need to do is fire lots of cheap decoys until they run out of missiles. Then fire your rockets with real warheads.

Can someone redpill me ,are Gaza rockets any useful?

There's not much to hypothesize about, more rockets is the best advice one can give.

>>1285
what about these things https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodar

>>1285
This makes a lot of sense, thanks for the explanation.

>>1284
Uuugggggh here’s the simplest explanation

Microphones are gadgets that take in sound from a sound absorptive surface called a diaphragm that moves based off the vibration it receives that hits a coil triggering a vibration a circuit uses to produce sound whose volume is based off the amount of energy used up and the intensity of the vibration

Radars work a lot like microphones but they produce light or sound and take whatever object that signal hits back towards their diaphragm

Radar missiles are well missiles with radars equipped by them, these missiles are coated with light reflective material to ensure that any radar trying to detect their presence will have ejected light sent knocked off course which REDUCES not prevent the chances of a missile being detected. As a missile finds its target based off scans it comes closer into contact with potential radars increasing chances for detection and hence there’s your answer OP

>>1285
They also use inertial guidance so the RWR doesn't go off.

>>1285
>No amount of stealth technology can hide the target from active radar at close range.
True, but DFRM can fuck up the tracking

>fascist Siam taking over Laos
But why though?

>>1181
Monarcho-Schizoidism with Kaiserreich Characteristics

>>1451
Historical strategy games and their consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

kid playing dress-up, so like a lot of leftypol

reactionary mongolism with pre-adolescent characteristics