/dead/ - Post-Left

>>1844
I have a bad feeling that we're going to hemorrhage users in ways that other boards won't, since it's damn hard to get new users. Better slow than too fast, at least.

>>1844
Yeah but /dead/ is still a hidden board.
At least, it keeps tankies, socdems and redlibs away but it will be hard to get new posters that way.

>>1892
You guys appear on the overboard catalog, at least thats how I found this thread.
I assume most people are using the overboard catalog too, so you guys will have new posters coming in

>>1893
/dead/ posts did appear on overboard back in Flunkerchan too IIRC.

Personally I don't know if I support the creation of a new website, it is much comfier to lurk here. Any new developments from the matrix room?

>>1872
Seeth and cope bitch.

>>1881
you literally backed up this board when you had the choice you mongs, you're really desperate

>>1881
shut up fag
if they want to go let them go, although I wouldn't mind if they stayed, it'd be pretty cool too

finding posts from numbers, pls ignore
>>>/leftypol/163302
>>>/leftypol/161070
>>>/leftypol/162518
>>>/tech/7769
>>>/leftypol/153096
based wvobbly lmao

>>1901
>you barely have influence – if any at all – on things outside of you
False
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htm
Read this pamphlet to gain the superpower of commonsense

Preach. If you can function well in this society, you're fucked up.

>>1902
this but its not entirely this. if you are loveless for a long time then you turn into a depressed loser, so just get a gf

I legit blame capitalism for making me this way. Being psychopathic is the only way to get by in this world.

Are you an empath OP

God is dead and no one cares.

I am no one, and therefore I care.

But if I am God, and God is ded, then by a simple logical syllogism that must mean that I am ded.

&gt&gt8If you let logic kill you, you are spooked.A=!A until you can't breath anymore.

almost diededededed

his daddy was a priest

somebody hurt his horse or something idk

>RIGHT IS MIGHT
h-hey you're my best friend right, could you please ask my waifu on a date for me?

>WE RECOGNIZE THAT CRUELTY IS THE BASIS OF EVERY HIGH ART
n-nooo not my horsey

what do we think of post modernism from a /dead/ perspective?

chuds hate post-modernism cause they dont understand it and it's used in right-wing circles as a buzzword for 'bad thoughts. They think the whole deal with post-modernism is just rejecting modernist notions (like nation or economic structure) because 'it's ebil', but obviously thats a terrible interpretation.
I also don't like post-modernists, but I don't accuse them of trying to destroy the world because of that.

>>1713
pretty sure most /pol/aks lack the awareness that nation-states and capitalism are modernist notions

looks like it's just a website hosting a bunch of texts by these three people

also otto gross > wilhelm reich

>>1673
It's mostly this Laska's essays, but only a few are available in English:
http://www.lsr-projekt.de/poly/ennietzsche.html - Did Nietzsche know of Stirner?
http://www.lsr-projekt.de/poly/eninnuce.html - Why is everyone afraid of the big bad egoist?
http://www.lsr-projekt.de/poly/enmarsden.html - Was Dora Marsden an egoist?

The German has more essays, some that seem interesting, like Stirner as a teacher, Stirner and ancaps, there's even one about Otto Gross.

>>1672
Read some of their stuff on la Mettrie, and apparently it's a project with the goal of constituting a second enlightenment, or 'Enlightenment 2'.
Their premise is that although the enlightenment started as an european philosophical project in the 18th century and was developed through the 19th and the the first half of the 20th century, it was never completed due to not reaching it's goal (freeing the human from his self-sustained immaturity). But unlike the Frankfurt School, who thought the reason for this was the make-up of enlightenment theory itself, leading to it's own undoing (the relations created by the enlightenment were the grounds upon which it became impossible), LSR argues that enlightenment can be understood as going through different phases of development, with each phase seeing popular but wrong theorists overcoming one unpopular, but ultimately actually right theorist (18th century: Mettrie against Rouseau, 19th century: Stirner vs Marx, 20th century: Reich vs Freud).
According to LSR, studying Mettrie, Stirner and Reich and the controversies between them and their popular enemies will yield th philosophical grounds for a second enlightenment that actually fulfills it's mission.
How does that make any sense? I don't know yet but I'll keep reading some of that stuff since I got nothing better to do.

>>1689
Keep us posted fam

>>1773
Sure. I've read 5 of their articles on La Mettrie so far. They all were very similar in that all of the described the biography of Mettrie, talking about how he published 'the human machine', the book his is today most known for, very early in his philosophical career. The human machine is a very radical early materialist text, arguing that everything originates out of matter, including the psyché. Afterwards he had to flee several times from different countries, until he was invited to the philosophers court of Frederic II. LSR now argues that the works he has written here are his actually interesting material, because works like 'The art of lust' are different from other enlightenment philosophers of his time in that they were nihilistic instead of mormative.
I haven't read those books yet (they are currently already borrowed out at my local library) but from what the LSR author describes La Mettrie saw the main factor that was keeping people from truely enjoying themselves (specifically their lust) was their own conscience, which was forced into them by their sorroundings through the transmission of social norms. However La Mettrie apparently also differentiated between a healthy, satisfying desire and a desire that's also influenced by the conscience, only that the lust derived from this desire is not satisfying, because it only exists as the destruction of the conscience and is therefore still tied to it. From this point on La Mettrie was basically hated by the philosophers of his time, because they felt the whole moral nihilism thing was bad optics for the enlightenment, so he got cancelled.
I guess the parallels to Stirner are quite obvious, and I'm really interested to read the actual works by La Mettrie himself, so it might take my time to read the next texts of the website.
I also read 2 stirner articles,the one about nietzsche knowing stirner and 'Die Negation des irrationalen Über-Ichs bei Stirner', or 'Stirner's negation of the irrational super-ego', which tried to interpret Stirner as an 'anarchist' 'pedagogue'. The idea here is that Stirners concept of 'Der Eigner' or 'the owner/unique' could be used as the groundwork for an education that doesn't have the implementation of certain values and norms into a child as it's goal, but the support of the child in developing itself into a unique one. If there is interest, I can go deeper hPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>1684
>caring about prices
>paying for stuff
Toppest of Keks, just steal that shit u basic bishhhhh

>>1695
this but unironically

>>1699
I wasn't ironic either

>>1700
sorry :(

>>1695
honestly, a good idea i guess
i dont know why i never thought of stealing guns, i guess just because i've only looked into private sales so to me guns just come from random people, forgot there are stores with them

>/leftypol/: race isn't real, class reductionism is justified, fuck off with your idpol
&ltalso /leftypol/: umm don't post interracial.. mutt's law!! race mixing cringe because twitter libs like it.
the levels of spooks with these lads, not surprised considering a good chunk of them are ex /pol/tards anyways

>>1550
Have you considered that these posts are from two different groups?

>>1576
everyone who is not with the /dead/ is part of one monolithic group.
no, this is not ironic, i mean it.

this is a good containment board

>>1599
not very hard to repel posters if you keep banning them, what brings you here though?

>>1552
>kinda based kinda gey
spooks

>>1548
>satanic get
also, abolishing live kinda sucks when I do wanna exist tho

>>1575
it will all be okay anon, submit for the greater good

>>1583
but im no sub ;_;

>>1575
Just give it a try, I can promise you won't complain once you are dead.