[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / wiki / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]

/dead/ - Post-Left

Password (For file deletion.)
Required: 2 + 2 =

Join our Matrix Chat <=> IRC: #leftypol on Rizon

| Catalog | Home


9 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


Unlikely. Stirner didnt really mention marx in the unique. he talked about communism, but it reads more like a saint-simon-type conception of communism rather than a marxist one. Like we have to keep in mind that in the times Stirner wrote the Unique Marx was not a well known theorist. If at all, he was known as a journalist. Proudhon, Feuerbach and Bauer were just much more relevant before the 1848 revolution, which is why they are mentioned directly.
Of course I agree that Stirner definetly used irony or provocation in the Unique, but even then the goal wasn't to mess with Marx specificly. Imo Stirner probably didn't know Marx or only as part of the rheinische, his journal.


I was referring to the meme above, not to the book. Like, imagine Stirner saying that to a pissed-off Marx. I mean, in Philosophical Reactionaries we had this paragraph of Stirner making fun of his contemporaries:
>Do you philosophers actually have an inkling that you have been beaten with your own weapons? Nothing but an inkling. What retort can you hearty fellows make against it, when I again dialectically demolish what you have just dialectically put up? You have shown me with what “eloquence” one can make all into nothing and nothing into all, black into white and white into black. What do you have against it, when I turn your neat trick back on you? But with the dialectical trick of a philosophy of nature, neither you nor I will cancel the great facts of modern natural research, no more than Schelling and Hegel did. Precisely here the philosopher has revealed himself as the “clumsy” subject; because he is as ignorant in a “clumsified” sphere in which he has no power, as a witless Gulliver among the giants.

I would imagine that if he read The German Ideology he would mock the hell out of Marx's ass.


this is the stupidest thing. If marx really had that in mind it only would serve to prove his total intellectual ineffectiveness against stirner's ideas.


I would kill for a time machine so I could go back, hand Stirner a copy of "The German Ideology", and get a snap shot of his massive forhead. I've always wondered how he would respond to his critique of his use of lumpenproletariat. Something tells me it would be a bit more nuanced than Marx anticipated.


File: 1659426585840.png (973.23 KB, 1280x720, Engels Stirner.png)

File: 1658516889709.jpg (26.7 KB, 474x378, th-1849496082.jpg)


How come that "green politics" two decades ago was much more radical than today even though the situation today is so much more obviously very dire? You would think that now that more people are interested in "green politics" there would be proportionally more direct action and whatnot but it seems that people's interest is limited to being scared shitless of the/no future.


because green politics got intergrated into the neoliberal status quo since then. same thing that happened to socdem and everything that tries to take part in parliamentarian politics.


because it was tied to the alter mondialisme movement and died with it


All political movements were much more radical a century ago. Nothing that good ol' political persecution, police violence, a couple of assassinations and decades of nonstop propaganda couldn't fix, though.


What's that

File: 1655969541361.png (1.22 MB, 1280x693, 1633316566588.png)


Stalin did nothing wrong
Except possibly being so kind and benevolent as he was he didn't kill enough people
5 posts omitted. Click reply to view.


Reminder that Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Castro were unironically history's best realization of Nietzsche€n übermensch.
Commies are life-affirmers, liberals are last men, fascoids promote slave morality, etc etc


life affirmation is when you kill everyone you don't like


Liberal detected


File: 1656342734639.jpg (54.15 KB, 535x462, 1654992616446.jpg)

>they think that that is somhow a positive thing


File: 1654936731929.png (1.12 MB, 1100x749, ui.png)


How to prepare for the end of the world as we know it so we can feel fine?


>Whatever result was obtained in Satya yuga by meditating on Visnu, in Treta yuga by performing sacrifices and in Dvapara yuga by seeing the Lord's lotus feet can also be obtained in Kali yuga simply by chanting the Hare Krsna maha−mantra. – Srimad Bhagavatam 12.3.52

File: 1653672349479.jpg (22.15 KB, 300x400, bey_small[1].jpg)


Wtf pedophile dead?
1 post omitted. Click reply to view.


good choice




Hakim Bey.


File: 1653733667391.png (104.91 KB, 500x403, memri beatings.png)

crakkker imperialist larping as arab


everyone was a pedo in the 70s, can't blame him
i liked Pirate Utopias

File: 1608528390291.jpg (61.1 KB, 640x453, somaliland.jpg)


Due to the techno-industrial city, doesn't matter the ideology, or society which possesses it; it will always need many people to keep it alive, and for this reason smaller languages cannot survive in this harsh environment. Let's assume a group of people who speak a minority language with around 300 speakers, they live in a poor small village, next to it is a city where a major language is spoken, if people want to have a industrial life, they will need to move to the city, commune, whatever is more convenient for your industrialist society, and there they will stay for better life conditions.

When this happens, there are two possible outcomes:
> 1 - They won't teach their native to their children preferring them to only speak the major language, because their native language is "useless"
> 2 - They will teach their language to their children, let's assume the best case scenario and let's say they taught the most traditional form with no loanwords, only native words, and the children speaks the minority language perfectly; here is a more case by case thing, but probably this kid will only speak this language with his family, and with no one else, so many things could happen here, loanwords enter his language when talking to their parents, they start speaking more and more of the majority language with their parents, and in the future they will spread a more majority languicized version of the original language, and with each generation the language is slowly(or maybe even faster in worse scenarios) disappearing until it is finally gone. This being the best case scenario for the language.

This is the natural process for smaller languages, which are the majority of our world's languages today on the techno-industrial system by its pure nature. But now let's make a case, how could we revive this language? A fake idea of national identity could bring up many nationalists puppets who would only speak the original language in its pure version, and would force their children and relatives to only speak it; this is a similar case to Ukrainian which is a language that I know fairly well, but it also brings all the nationalist spooks, fights, racism, class division and way more stuff(evidence for this is the state of the Ukrainian language today) that all of us know so I don't think anyone here would agree in doing this as a long term solution.

So as we can see, language Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
21 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


you could translate that anytime you want, maybe keep the loanwords. as people move over time and the language spreads it will take over if people have no reason to learn english anymore. also have you noticed the latin/french loanwords in scientific disciplines? it sounds so ugly and out of place.


The CPC at one point was seriously proposing to change the national language of China to Esperanto, as relatively neutral intermediaty between commonly spoken languagea that was adopted by many inernationalist socialists. This was before the national chauvinism shit though.


>We need languages that are artifically manufactured in a lab and enforce it upon everyone in robotic fashion.


>also have you noticed the latin/french loanwords in scientific disciplines? it sounds so ugly and out of place
True, they should have used Swahili instead. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)


Everyone will speak chinese, accept your new masters

File: 1651255036567.png (217.78 KB, 511x761, Ted_K.png)


>A revolutionary movement offers to solve all problems at one stroke and create a whole new world; it provides the kind of ideal for which people will take great risks and make great sacrifices.
Have truer words ever been spoken?
4 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.


>A revolutionary movement offers to solve all problems at one stroke and create a whole new world
It aint. Revolutions don't really offer anything aside from a change of personnel at the top of any given hierarchy.
Insurrection on the other hand…


Lenin said something similar
I wanna love ted, if only he were class pilled


if u dont know where his ideas are based ur the retard objectively


fucking inusrrectos


I can really sympathize even with his primitivist spooks
idk if he was actually an ecologist but I also care deeply about nature regardless of it's impact on humanity


i just checked /lit/ and half the threads and posts are off topic nazi stuff
16 posts omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 1651098703730.jpg (157.08 KB, 992x880, 1493154955622.jpg)

>Mah tradition.
Nice spooks, nerd.


i dont mean it in a spooky way at all though, i mean the material, lived tradition embodied in the particularities of daily life. This is what we can never run from, and thankfully too, since it's the only thing which can reach beyond cynical nihilism to enliven us in our non-belief.


Why do you people always need some kind of a spiritual uplifting to just not cry over the meaninglessness of existence? Such a Christian mindset. Read the spook book.


Why would I be invested in the future of a politics when My main concern is My Own future?


>the politics that was liquidated in 1945, if not even before, is relevant in this century

File: 1640724522830.gif (1.45 MB, 292x493, yakui.gif)


Are there any drugs that are actually good for you? Like psychedelics and stuff like that, is any really therapeutic or is that just a meme?
24 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


Is it the same deal with high cbd weed? I wouldn't mind smoking weed but THC dominant weed puts me in a paranoid schizo bad trip type of deal every single time. Way harder for me to handle than psychedelics.


different bodies react to cannabinoids differently
i’ve had schizo trips on balanced edibles


as in equal ratio of cbd and thc


File: 1650907967328.png (818.45 KB, 565x850, ClipboardImage.png)

<Very large amounts of caffeine have been known to destabilize bipolars and schizophrenics inducing mania or psychotic episodes. This isn’t terribly prevalent but is known to occur.

<Caffeine is also known to interfere with some antipsychotic medication, generally first generation antipsychotics, specifically clozapine. Antipsychotic dosage generally has to be increased to account for this interference.


File: 1651039380062.png (2 MB, 1300x1818, coffee.png)

wtf I love coffee now?

File: 1649587559099.jpg (154.28 KB, 500x1406, spookargument.jpg)


"Spook," spectre" or "phantasm?" Mine is "spook" because it's pretty specific and unique to dialectical egoism. And you can also play with it by adding prefixes and postfixes (i.e. spooked, despooked, unspooked, spooky, reverse-spooked, anti-spook, spookprejudiced). I also like to say "sacred idea" or "ghost in the mind" sometimes.
4 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


Well, I mean, Stirner did use the dialectical method. That's why I said "dialectical." But Stirner used that to pwn Hegel epic style so I don't see why that's a problem. You can also call it Stirnerian egoism, nihilist egoism or whatever the fuck. Rational egoism works too, I think. Though there are other "egoisms" that are called "rational." Like Rand's brand of egoism.


>I like calling people imbeciles.


my favourite word is dick sauce





Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / wiki / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 ]
| Catalog | Home