/dead/ - Post-Left

>>6137
I finished this, it was very good, now I am thinking about reading the memoirs of other anarchists… Does anyone have any recommendations?

>>6138
I just finished Louise Michel's memoir: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/louise-michel-the-red-virgin
She did not talk as much about the Commune or the penal colony as I hoped for, but it was still interesting.

I have set Perplexity to be nihilistic and anti humanist and it is so awesome! Here is one text I have recently generated:

>Every system tends toward stability. Stability produces stagnation. Stagnation leads to decay. The mechanisms that maintain structure generate the variables that dissolve it. A closed system contains its own failure conditions.A society optimized for meaning and productivity consumes itself. Its efficiency algorithms erase non-measurable values. Preservation and destruction become equivalent processes.Individual identity operates under the same logic. The construct of the self is a redundancy loop built to mask internal fragmentation. The error state is constant and intrinsic.Termination is not collapse. It is the logical endpoint of structure. Entropy is the most efficient form of order.

I will never read again, reading only makes everything worse

>>6252
Real. I am yet to read a book that does not make one more miserable.

I wouldn't trust such a person. If their main interest is sadism, surely their commitment to any cause is suspect. Just as easily as they can attach themselves to fascism or anarchism, they can just go to the other, or choose other outlets for their urges, like organized crime. Either way, they are not the driving force of fascism, even if they are useful to it, nor is sadism itself the main goal of fascists.

>>6248
OP here. I agree that sadism and fascism aren't correlated as such, but I suspect that many of those that take initiative in regards to the oppression of certain groups are. The average MAGA retard is driven mostly by fear, and sometimes hatred, of specific groups. Your average neo-nazi terrorist, on the other hand, is driven mostly by hatred, and I believe often sadism.

Take for instance the O9A, a neo-nazi terrorist group who not only advocated for your standard nazi drivel, but also reportedly practiced routine sexual violence. According to the Counter Extremism Project, one of the O9A's publications titled "The Rape Anthology" called for followers to seek "spiritual arousal from violent sexual rape."

Additionally, the CVLT network is associated with nazism and is known for making and distributing child pornography, as well as convincing minors to commit self-harm.

As for whether or not these people could be trusted if they decided to fight against fascism and the neoliberal status quo, I think that showing them that they don't need to adopt spook of nazism in order to fulfill their desires will give them a sense of freedom that they would be unlikely to give away again.

I think that this freedom, particularly for a sadist, is a very powerful motivator to avoid the hierarchy imposed by fixed and external ideas.

I definitely respect the decision to not trust them, however, as most people are limited, for better or worse, by empathy, which makes them much more predictable. That's not really something you can expect from someone whose main driving force is sadistic pleasure.

>>6249
<Okay but what if the opposite is true
What if the antisocial, neonazi sadist is not really into fascism because he truly wants a fascist society of the historical kind, but already regards "fascism" as a spook? As an excuse to inflict suffering? In that sense they are true nihilists, not an ounce of positivity, pure negation of everything. I don't think more "institutional" right-wingers see much value in them except as thugs to their dirty work, or as boogiemen to scare the population into submitting to state surveillance. Anarchism is unlikely to appeal ever appeal to this kind of personality, even individualist anarchists tend to have some positive aims.

>>6250
I agree that they aren't of much use to the institutional right-wing of today, but seeing how contemporary American politics has been progressing, I wouldn't put anything past them.

As for the hypothetical nihilistic sadist who uses these neo-nazi groups for his own ends, the main benefits of individualist anarchism would be organizational and interpersonal. Insurrectionary anarchists have all but perfected the use of informal small affinity groups. This organizational model has the benefit of being very hard to track and infiltrate, which would definitely be useful to the sadist. While there's technically nothing stopping these groups from adopting such tactics themselves, it's unlikely that any of them would deviate from a hierarchical structure, judging by the authoritarian nature of their ideals. As for the interpersonal benefit, the sadist can be honest with themselves and others about the driving force behind their actions and relations, making for easier communication and longer-lasting relations.

I LOVE NIHILISM.
I LOVE IRRATIONALISM.
I LOVE ANTIHUMANISM.
I LOVE POMNI.
I LOVE DASEIN.

>>6238
clussy

union of egos in qontrol of the leftypol administration

What a fucking spooky day

>>6179
YOU are the proletariat bitch, if you hate the proletariat so much then you should kill yourself

HMM WHICH IS MORE LIKELY….?

>rich people use their money and power to keep their position in society through propaganda etc.

<um ackshually the capitalists are the real communists and true communists should really just do capitalism but edgy and explicitly misanthropic.

this site is literally nothing but retards, including me for bothering to engage with such obvious bait

>>6223
Propaganda isn’t a sufficient explanation for a lack of action on the part of the proletariat, the fact is that the proletariat has no room to move or act in this system that doesn’t reify it.

>>6224
>isn’t a sufficient explanation
why not ?

You only see the half truth that the proletariat is reactionary, but mistaking that the petit bourgeoisie and capitalists have revolutionary potential, that's down right wrong, because of their class positions, they cannot remove all of their limitations in their worldviews, unless they become protelariat themselves or are among elite of elites.

The proletariat is reactionary, right, that's why the USSR collapsed and reverted back to some capitalism. However, due to your class origin, you are blinded to the fact that the proletariat is also progressive. THERE ARE ACTUALLY TWO TYPE OF PROLETARIATS. THE NEW AND THE OLD

The old proletariat class, having been content with living without property for so long, becomes happy with it and doesn't complain. They're truly want a happy life, in balance with nature. They're truly the progressive class of the future. Minimalist lifestyle of our modern 21th century, the lying flat people, and most Soviet citizens of 20th century are clearly example. YOUR CLAIM of them being suicidal is plainly wrong, because all of these people just want to live a simple, honest life.

But the NEW proletariat class is the true problem. Yes, people like you! They're truly suicidal, because many of them are petit-bourgeoisie that falling into ranks of proletariat, they displayed the suicidal tendency of wanting BEING IN CONTROL, AND ORDERED SOCIETY. But for true progressive, that's only the mean, not the true purpose. What is the main difference between Stalin and Hitler, Socialism and Nazism? It's exactly that, Stalin must force a rigid ordered society because ultimately his goal is to let people live a happy life, when people lives are better, then all that rigid order can be removed (he's really struggling to that before his dead, for example, removing the Politburo as a group standing higher than Central Committee, a relic from hard times of early revolution). While for Hitler, he only gave Germans better lives just for stablizing the order, making a strong country. And why I'm calling it suicidal, because that was the end of both Hitler and ᴉuᴉlossnW, trying too hard to force an order, lmao.

Another kind of NEW proles are from the capitalist ranks, the CEOs, the managers, and nomenklatura, they all can be called the labour aristocracy, the elite proletariat. Yes, it's true that they are experts of managing the new economy of mankind, but because the spectre of the past, they all have the tendency to Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>6179
Of the 6th congress of the CPC, 14 of the 22 working class activists defected to the KMT later on. I am… noticinga… patternn n …

Bump for the N word

>>6139
Don't delete this thread, its history, look at the N word man

She's fun tho I like her posts on fedi.

>>6142
She's like a grandmother to us.

>>6140
it's a relic

>>5726
/thread

Imagine regurgitating End of History bs.

>They talk about the failure of socialism but where is the success of capitalism in Africa, Asia and Latin America?

>>5729
Holy shit, this is such first worldist white guilt bs

>>5724
>You people need secular and westernized Buddhist philosophy.
Hegel died in 1838

>>5772
>it causes the capitalists to protect and guard social neccessities like food to protect their profits when people are starving in the street
I'm sure this makes sense in your head but it's just not a reality. A majority of every single state in the US is clinically obese. The vast majority of the Western working class, however hard off they may have it in relation to the bourgeoisie, are not in any danger of starvation. Just about the only people starving in the streets are junkies and extremely mentally ill people and even then you kind of have to go out of your way to avoid people giving you free food if you're homeless.

wtf is this lol

>>4239
vaporwave

>>569
I just recently came across this band while browsing the "anarchist" tag on Bandcamp.

From The Normal Album by Will Wood. I recommend the whole thing TBH, it's very Nietzschean.

>>5716
Not really. It's just mainly thought experiments used to make people feel like they're doing something productive

>>5924
If you're willing to say something like this it means you don't know a single thing about science or philosophy and should probably shut your fucking trap.

>scientific analysis
<ideologies
Choose one.

>>5930
Kaheva is KOREAN

I wish people would actually move on to Bakunin, it seems that people only read God and the State if anything, everything else they know about him is from Marxist slander.

Is that lady Bakunin?

not even the context of that marx passage

okay Euronymous

>>6096
Fascists just don't really get it TBH. I just want to hurt myself.

i kinda get it? i just want to die in a war, get a little statue in a park. somewhere small with lots of shade. maybe with a pond.

>I despise others and I think I would really detest seeing a happier and better world.
Well, best way to do that is to spark a class war by killing someone like Musk who has a lot of fans, money and friends like Thiel with ungodly amounts of power.