[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/dead/ - Post-Left

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 3?

Not reporting is bourgeois

| Catalog | Home
|

 

you may have my notes on Either Kierkegaard/Or Nietzsche
https://ghostbin.me/641b939d57ebc
2 posts omitted.

>>3965
hes not anarchist hes weird

>>3965
no hes a filthy christcuck

>>3965
he was a complicated guy but i guess he was anti-political or a neo-reactionary of some kind

junko please

>>3968
Those fucking neo-reactionaries from the 19th century!



 

Hello, I've just finished Stirner's Critics and am planning on going through the rest of his articles, but I'm curious if there are any more contemporary writers/thinkers that have engaged in 'egoistic critique' the same way Stirner describes it. They don't necessarily need to be egoists, but people that have engaged with his work and seem to be smart would be nice to have a little read into. Debord has been interesting, as has Landstreicher (not that the former is an egoist by any means), but I'm looking for particularly younger writers ie ones that have grown up with contemporary capitalism, cyberspace etc.

or just any and all egoist writers is fine too i guess

As far as "egoist critique" goes, there is of course always the output of politically active egoists like Benjamin Tucker and Renzo Novatore, both self described egoists who published articles.
However Tucker is a libertarian basically and Novatore his hard to find in English aside from his work Towards the creative nothing. https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/renzo-novatore-toward-the-creative-nothing
Tucker: http://fair-use.org/benjamin-tucker/
There is also Emma Goldman who didn't label herself an egoist but did read and like stirner and her critique often involves spook busting. Also everybody should read some Goldman in their life.
http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/goldman/GoldmanCW.html
As far as contemporary stuff goes, you can just type egoist into the anarchist library search and read hundreds of articles of bad quality by lazy authors. Because thing is - I don't think there is much more to add to egoist critique beyond what Stirner already wrote. There is only so many times you can show something to be abstract essence divided from it's concrete being without repeating yourself.



 

How I’m tryna be
6 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

>>3876
who



cares?

>>3886
I do

>>3880
look at em go

Use it on yourself, weeb

File: 1686488229728.gif (903.5 KB, 1174x844, zpage044.gif)

How I'm tryna be



File: 1685837728206.gif (3.77 MB, 498x498, pepe-clown.gif)

 

I engage in no spooks, and I gotta say lulz is vital to space travel.
I try to be a retard consistently, dab on solipsists, and so on but
I found myself unable retard
retard not work
does not function correctly
I fucked up
I searched for leftism in my life
and I found nothing
I am sad. but, well not happy but yeah, I can handle it.(not politics)
1 post and 1 image reply omitted.

File: 1685839174919.jpg (599.36 KB, 1920x1080, 1684261644705.jpg)

>>3950
Powell needs to raise rates faster. The NEETS must be driven to the streets.


>>3951
AY YO WTF HOW

elaborate and so on

is philosophy related to science

hmm what do I with this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_philosophy

have gay sex with it?



File: 1652581810058.png (673.96 KB, 740x416, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Please provide me one illegalism starter pack tyvm.
2 posts omitted.

>>3559
We never stop This music makes your eyes pop
It helps you dodge a cop, whether you believe or not

File: 1676560926616.png (858.41 KB, 726x536, 1644468659975.png)

does anybody have resources on lock picking?

>>3781
there are a ton of hobbyists on youtube who give detailed deconstructions of locks and how to pick them, lockpickinglawyer showed up on my recommended the other day

>>3781
It's not hard. Buy a transparent lock and a pick/tension wrench set for 15 USD off amazon or alibaba etc so you can learn how pins work. Some you can do with just a bit of aluminum can around a lock handle or rake the pins chaotically until they all pop into place. Some locks are harder than others to pick. Another option is if you get literally 1 photo of the key used for the lock, you can take that and trace it then import it into a CAD design software and place that over a key template. Then you just upload that to a cnc router and you can cut out a nearly exact copy of the original.

>>3538
download tor
engage in black market activities



File: 1632330798164.png (1.15 MB, 1920x1080, 1631908685893.png)

 

> I can’t resist mentioning once again the moronic theory that depicts productive forces “ripening” until they “give rise to” or “make possible” the “transition to a new social form.” Such “productive forces” do not exist apart from the “social form.” The artifices are integral parts of the artificial worm, they are nothing but its attributes. The technologies are the claws and fangs of the Leviathan. Silver mines and later water wheels do not give rise to the Islamic Leviathan; It gives rise to them. The types of technologies developed by a Leviathan depend primarily on the type of Leviathan in question, not on the “state of developmednt of global productive forces” cited by artifice fetishists. The Phoenicians developed, near the very dawn of Civilization, a maritime technology that would be unmatched until the appearance of a Leviathan with similarly extended tentacles.
Is Fredy right about this? It seems evident, that the social form does influence technology, and its progress. But is he right about it not happening the other way around? New technology cannot change the social form?
10 posts omitted.

of course it's true. take a look at science today. science has moved away from being 'natural philosophy' into a realm of non-reflexivity. it's excellent at producing weapons of war, but sucks at most other things.

fredy was only half-right. Technology on its own does not create social production. the social body , the socius , is defined by the technology of its time. this was proven by d&g thought a la primitive, asiatic, moderno-capital. perlman was right in respect to this aspect. what perlman misses however is as the socius expands and contracts its tensions create new social relations and greases the techno-productive gears. large jumps in Technolyzation can force social relations further too, when they are lacking. it is a laxadayzical process, jolting, jilting etc. too the two are simultaneous but also concurrent. they can happen in big jumps.
Perlman missed as such then that Civilization thus produced Capital who became its own Being in its own right.
>fangs and nails
these are tools, and thus remain the same throughout, but evolving as so too we do.

>>3889
Perlman lacked vision and presight. the fore and the for. He fell into the pseudo-reactionary trap as much as he attempted to go further - there can be no RETVRN. there can only be forward momentum, through progress and through collapse. ultimately we are not in control of the process, but the sentient We of which no one is in awareness of. Perlman idealizes a truly idyllic life insofar as he maintained some belief that it could be returned to. His realization that it could not be so sent him insane, alone, and he secluded himself.
cyberspace has truly proven the worst fears of Perlman, Situationists, and all others who grasped at It but couldnt quite get it.

>>>>3890
There is nothing more to do my friends. We will all enter oblivion together. I shall try and do so contented

>>3878
>>3879
you cant not have a civilization



File: 1683117929160.jpg (134.4 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg)

 

come by the fire, friends

File: 1683120618698.jpg (37.27 KB, 724x483, marhsmallow2.jpg)

>>3855
Anyone wants a marshmallow?

File: 1683971896502.mp4 (1.89 MB, 448x336, greece_molotov_burn.mp4)




 

Hi dead. Particularly the anarcho-nihilists. I generally consider myself a post-modernist and want to know more about your ideology. I have read the basics and understand the gist of the ideology. But I’m interested in learning more, especially would like to read or watch anything that can practically aid of the destruction of society or that can help with at least clearing my own local space and voiding it of meta-narratives. Love u, thanks.
7 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

File: 1679506629352-0.png (219.7 KB, 1000x2000, anarchy readings.png)


>>3811
"but the ideological supermarket — like any supermarket — is fit only for looting"

This is a classic leftypol quote

File: 1679508642795-0.png (182.33 KB, 442x334, 1.png)

File: 1679508642795-1.png (228.65 KB, 341x1056, 2.png)

File: 1679508642795-2.jpg (43.33 KB, 350x266, 3.jpg)


>>3813
nostalgic af

File: 1680190743751.webm (1.83 MB, 1280x720, 1448029758093-0.webm)




 

> Therefore we say that the central political fact of the last thirty years went unnoticed. Because it took place at such a deep level of reality that it cannot be called political without bringing about a revolution in the very notion of the political. Because this level of reality is also the one where the division is elaborated between what is taken for reality and what is not. This central fact is the triumph of Existential Liberalism. The fact that it is now considered natural for everyone to have a rapport with the world based on the idea that each person has her own life. That such a life consists in a series of choices, good or bad. That each person can define herself by an ensemble of qualities, of properties, that make her, through her continual balancing of those properties, a unique and irreplaceable being. That the contract adequately epitomizes relations between individuals, and that respect epitomizes all virtue. That language is nothing but a means of arriving at an agreement. That, in reality, the world is composed on one side of things to manage, and on the other of an ocean of self-absorbed individuals, who in turn have a regrettable tendency to turn themselves into things, letting themselves become managed.> [..]> We have been sold this lie: that what is most particular to us is what distinguishes us from the common. We experience the contrary: every singularity is felt in the manner and in the intensity with which a being brings into existence something common.> At root it is here that we begin, where we find each other. What is most singular in us calls to be shared. > [..]> So communism starts from the experience of sharing. First, from the sharing of our needs. Needs are not what capitalist rule has accustomed us to. Needs are never about needing things without at the same time needing worlds. Each of our needs links us, beyond all shame, to everyone who experiences that link. Need is just the name of the relationship through which a particular perceiving being gives meaning to such or such an element of its world. That is why those who have no worlds — metropolitan subjectivities for instance — have nothing but whims. And that is why capitalism, although it satisfies the need for things like nothing else, only spreads universal dissatisfaction: in order for it to do so it has to destroy worlds. > […]> In the final analysis, capitalism consists of nothing more than a reduction of all relaPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>402Yes.

>>402
Friendship is communism: my little comrade.

File: 1608528386050.jpg (38.64 KB, 610x610, no friends.jpg)

Real friendship has never been tried. At least by me ;~;

>>513
“My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic” is an anarcho-monarchist text



File: 1608528456748.jpg (23.77 KB, 332x400, o.jpg)

 

feeling bored, might kill some presidents later idk
1 post and 1 image reply omitted.

>>1797
THIS LIST OF THE TOP TEN THINGS YOU CAN SAY THAT WILL GET YOU ARRESTED WILL SURPRISE YOU!


>>1800
pussy

Nose

death of a president (DIY)



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 ]
| Catalog | Home