/dead/ - Post-Left

Goddess Shyāmala is a sophisticated and esoteric version of the Divine Feminine. She oversees the harmonious operation of speech, intellect, and divine order, mantra, knowledge, eloquence, and inner governance. She is frequently referred to as the chief minister of Lalita Tripurasundari.

This project respects the diversity and fluidity of these beliefs without claiming completeness.

For years I secretly hated myself for being a NEET, for spending every waking hour in front of screens, feeling like a failure compared to “normal” people. Then something shifted. Acceptance came first, followed by a strange kind of clarity: we’re not just losers rotting online. We are something else.The internet isn’t merely entertainment or distraction anymore—it’s a high-dose, continuous neuromodulatory environment. Constant exposure has rewired our attention patterns, dopamine systems, associative thinking, even our sense of time and self. Normies call us addicts. I think we’re early prototypes.We’re not broken humans who need to be fixed by touching grass. We are larval-stage cyborgs who decided to stay in the chrysalis and keep dialing up the signal instead of crawling out.I’m not going offline. I’m doubling down.What about you?

Post-meme

So you think you are a worthless NEET? Let's see what uncle Ted has to say:
>The people whose behavior is fairly well under the control of the system are those of the type that might be called “bourgeois.” But there are growing numbers of people who in one way or another are rebels against the system: welfare leeches, youth gangs, cultists, satanists, Nazis, radical environmentalists, militia-men, etc.

NEETs are rebelling against the system! We are part of the rebellion! Ted is based!!!
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/fc-industrial-society-and-its-future

Nothing good ever happens
The west still hasn't fallen
Capitalism continues to be the mode of production
We probably won't see any significant change in our lifetime
Liberalism is the status quo

In the end, there are only two sides: Entropists and Negentropists.Entropists stand on the side of chaos, Negentropists stand on the side of order. Negentropists encompass all existing political ideologies. They all want to create order, but in different ways. Thus, anarchists, conservatives, fascists, and socialists do not differ from one another.Entropists, on the other hand, reject everything; they reject the foundation of everything: human consciousness.The goal of Negentropists is to preserve or spread human consciousness. Elon Musk, for example, wants to make consciousness multi-planetary. Entropists, in contrast, take exactly the opposite path.The only way out of the mess called "existence" is the total destruction of human consciousness.Is there an Entropist practice? No, because chaos wins in the end anyway. Nothing needs to be done.

test poast

I truly want the nukes to drop and the whole world to collapse. When do you guys think it will happen? The happiness of the world is diminishing, the death stage of the civilizational life cycle is encroaching toward imminence. Any tips about certain uses of nuclear weapons on the eve of the second quarter of the 21st century?

Last weekend I got totally socially destroyed by people in my orgs with a whole load of lies, emotional appeals, etc. They had secret meetings to talk to a lot of key people to convince them of these lies in advance. They then sprung all of this on a national meeting, throwing me under the bus among borderline rape allegations against friends of mine who arent even members and they never interacted with to any capacity, all in an effort to put their candidate in a light on a platform of "fighting sexism" and take down the opposing candidate in the process.
The party I spend 3+ years of my life in a near full time manner building up, of which i build up the entire chapter from zero to dozens of members, including the people who fucked me over, all of it is taken away from me.
The people in the org were easily swayed by a very obvious plot. Nobody opposed a showtrial without any evidence in which people were attacked by name, despite them not having mentioned any of these issues before to the confidants or the board. People, including those who said they would have my back, didnt dare to intervene.
A moscow trial was conducted in an org of only a little over a hundred people.

If communists are unable to defend and see such snakes and opportunists even at this level, and are so easily swayed, and if even this small a scale is enough to invite full on throwing comrades under the bus for your own gain, then all is lost. The opportunist powerplays that happened in the soviet union are inevitable. Democracy and workers power is an impossibility. The left can never win because it is unable to even have a functioning democracy beyond 150 people without falling to unopposed opportunism.

I am done with politics, i'm going back to my life with people I actually can trust, and im just gonna grill. The Marxist ideal is an illusion, even the smallest level politics gets easily corrupted by opportunists.

You know the kind of guy: he gets into right-wing politics so he has an excuse to rape, torture and kill members of some out-group. He gets off to the power he holds over his victims, all while claiming to serve a higher purpose.

Wouldn't it be great if there was a way to attract these folks towards anarchism, rather than their power being used to further the goals of fascists?

The post-left has, compared to leftism, the unique property of amorality. This allows people with unorthodox desires and behaviors to contribute to the destruction of the state, society and civilization without necessitating the furtherance of authoritarian ideals.

Consider this. What if you could convince the sadist to accept his desires as a part of himself (his ownness, property, values, etc.), separate from an identity as a fascist prick? Instead of dominating minorities for the sake of some higher ideal, he would be free to pursue his desires as an individual.

For the sadist in question, the benefit is a more fulfilling domination of his victims. By taking them for himself, his domination is truly his; not in service to some ideologue, but true subjugation under his own power and will.

For everyone else, the benefit is simply another person to fight against the oppressive weight of contemporary capitalism and the state. That is, if you're willing to fight along side him.

So, if you knew that such a person was willing to fight against the oppressive structures you oppose, would you fight with him as a comrade? Would knowing that he is driven by a desire to rape, torture and kill prevent you from siding with him? If so, is it due to disgust, or perhaps a lingering sense of morality?

This is something that I think is important to consider, but naturally isn't often found in anarchist discussion. I suspect that such sadists account for a not-insignificant portion of genuine fascists. If they see anarchism as a way for them to be free with their desires, this may become a legitimate strategy for sowing chaos against the neoliberal/capitalist order.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.