/dead/ - Post-Left

>>3077
https://www.principiadiscordia.com/holynonsense/HolyNonsense2017-Letter_Print_02.pdf
I was here, >THOUGH< not on time. Read Firestone (but not the incest stuff). 情熱的に性交 pillows and robohusbands. Read Solanas. Don't treat your BPD. Burn bras. Stream Loona. Smoke ARGs. Wear those stickers they put on bananas on your nose. 녀성은 꽃이라네. Something is occurring in Chicago …

huh just learned /dead/ still exists

Fact is, “Nix” is a dumb angry little beast that has overstayed her time in the internet limelight and will chase it down with white noise uwu posts on “Pleroma” in lieu of her totally realistic internal fantasies of genocide. Pathetic even by the standards of a cult leader. Smh

pseud

>>3055
you mean you do that and now just make up another baseless accusation to divert the discussion away from what you can no justify.

>>3056
It's so funny that a so-called nihilist thinks human beings are actually able of rational thinking. What's next, upholding science and objectivity?

>>3057
of course rationality exists. it just as no absolute or essential meaning.
like you dont know shit about nihilism. fuck off already you uber spooked cuck.

>>3058
You don't even know about the values you yourself spouse. Sad! Keep thinking your beliefs are correct and the product of your rational mind and not something that clicked with your brain just because.

>>3059
such things surely also exist.
but what are not talking about your favourite color or music, but a belief in a set of political or philosophical systems.
like yeah, subcounscious decisions are a thing. but political decisions come about through counscious evaluation. unless of course, you are chasing a phantsam, like you are.
how hard can you cope btw? what are you gonna come up with next? epistemological arguments? just stop anon, you sound like a retard.

i feel terrible
like everyday

Imagine enjoying drinking, i only like a couple of beers now. Only bottles I'll buy is gin. Cheap vodka is literal poison and I'd rather be sober.

I got 2 months before I become an alcoholic I imagine

>>1972
>imagine not being on substances every waking minute
couldnt be me

too much of a poorfag, can't relate lol

I wonder if OP is still alive…

>>2899
Now. Listening to some good tunes with a joint and warm soup in my belly. :

>>2899
i just reinstalled battlefield 1942 and enjoyed finding out ppl are still playing it online

whenever i steal smth successfully
so a few days ago

>>2929
This. Illegalism feels so rewarding. I don't really steal much but I feel great after finding a nice spot and doing some graffiti.

3 seconds ago when I thought of making a dumb post here

>>2593
They have a nihilist faction, anon. If they were all nihilists they wouldn't need one.

>>2592
>>2593
>>2596
Imagine giving a shit about labels

>>2598
I'm not the one who started sperging out because Desert doesn't fit your little nihilist canon.

>>2596
>They have a nihilist faction, anon. If they were all nihilists they wouldn't need one.
Very strange line of argument, I'm not sure I buy it. Have this though. Related.
<CCF, Spyros Mandylas and Cell of Chaotic Strike>>

Could some of you nihilist friends drop by >>>/siberia/ every once in a while to BTFO the cancerous growth of spooked bullshit, social chauvinism, lib idiocy and the like? I'm seeing more and more /pol/ and radlib talkingpoints on there and it would be nice to share the massacre of them with some of you people.
That is all
In best regards, an alleged ultra-leftist

>>2931
this is all a spook in your head

>>2930
thats all i know basically :P

Tbf Op you shouldn't base your view on any kind of ideology or idea on how people people on the internet behave. Anarchists and marxists online are retards like everyone else on the web. And this even ignoring e-celebs and grifters. Read theory and remember that those retards still want a better world like you do, so be nice to them. (except for the aformentioned e-celebs, they only deserve beatings).

>>2922
post-leftists are just as bad as leftists
point is, everything is shite

>>2957
Well, the important thing is that you've found a way to feel superior to both.

>>2946
but if it was, my team would totally beat yours

>>2947
Yes, if he wants that he should read the collected works of the great Stalin

>>2948
>but if it was, my team would totally beat yours
Nah actually we would win because as anarchs we reject your 'rules'. BTFO.

>>2953
but… i'm an anarchist too…

>>2955
>but… i'm an anarchist too…
Hmf! Probably the wrong kind!

Self-annihilation alone will leave you a helpless slave to your impulses. Why? Because you cannot escape the purpose of an identity: to give you coordinates, to help you navigate the world. There is no such thing as abandoning your identity; you either paint your own mask and wear it, or you wear the mask that others will paint for you - to merely destroy your mask is to identify with the mask of madness.
The irony is that a life of complete rejection is precisely what capitalism results in. It's a system that encourages us to reject our desires so that we may identify with our impulses. It is a system that pushes us to throw away our identities in favor of the carefully crafted identities that we are sold. The nihilistic goal of abandoning the ego without replacement is a mirror of such self-cannibalization.
You should neither reject capitalism nor should you accept it, because in both instances the result is the same: wear the mask that the other paints. No, the only solution is to see this dialectic through to the end and start anew. You have to abandon your identity in order to create a new one. You have to give up your dreams in order to dream differently. Either way, your only free choice is to accept responsibility for your desires and the pain that comes with being free. There is no easy way out.

>>2925
identities are mostly just a habit of thought, it is learned behavior. You can choose to think about stuff unrelated to an identity, at first it will require a little concentration and deliberate attention, once that becomes your new habit, you're free.

>>2936
who are you, this comment feels like something i'd write but i dont remember writing it

wait fuck nvm your conclution isnt dialectical enough. good try comr8

to fix my post make these edits: The new identity you take on cant just be another particular identity, but one which rises above all identities by explicitly embracing progress/negation/surpassing. Without that you fall into a stupid loop, where you have a solid identity, you can negate it if you want, but only to take on another identity. This is true in some ways but it's not so futile - while yes in order to function you need some positive identity (or values, coordinates, etc. to identify with), this identity doesnt have to resemble the old one, or any unexamined identity. It can and should be fundamentally different, so that rather than staying fixed and tribal, it's expansive and universal, self-overcoming without having to accept some outside identity over and over, or being stuck (as you said) in the madness of pure negation.

Also interestingly, it seems like many schizophrenics probably don't even go all the way to self-negation, but hold on to both - the progressive and regressive directions, and make themselves really crazy by not just progressing the thought and accepting negation wholesale. (just from my reading of R. D. Laing and other shit :P)

>>2925
Read Plato and the Upanishads.

>>2937
This. You can't just make a clean break from your identity. You have to break it as you break a habit. It's difficult because habits are comfortable and lure you into them. It's like a desire path or pleasure path (picrel). Once the habit is well-trod it becomes more easy and appealing, while an alternative route is less appealing and might be a little rougher. But you have to carve out the new path over time through repeated use while you let the other path disappear through disuse. You may even be able to speed up the disappearance in some way by deliberately provoking the stimuli that would prompt the habit and then choosing to do something different and new instead, sort of analogous to aerating the soil and putting down grass seed or something. Don't think of the process as one of creating or building, but as one of growing. You are an organism and you will get a lot farther if you treat yourself like a soft squishy thing that has to be molded over time and induced to adaptation.