>>6693>you can't just jump in and change the doctrinei have my own doctrine that i am trying to develop and follow which i developed after years of reading and thinking about philosophy. the occult stuff is me trying to make that philosophy spiritually practical. like even if im somehow interpreting all of these doctrines incorrectly, i am really not inclined to mourn such an event (hell, at times ill intentionally pervert certain notions in the same way deleuze would to various philosophers) because im not trying to be a buddhist, a christian, a vedantist, a niner, etc. my practice has its own centre of gravity. also btw my birth faith is christianity and i never just rejected it because christians hate gay and trans people or whatever. on the contrary, ive read about various forms of christian theology, gnosticism, hegel, tolstoy's gospel in brief, the process church etc. christianity has also been incorporated into the project in different ways. for instance, the double cross. there is also the fact that i see hidweh as a non-antinomian inversion of christ's essence. while jesus was the logos made flesh, she is the flesh made logos. actually ive referenced christinity and judaism explicitly in more mythological/esoteric writings than any other religion. there are others who worship the same goddess that i do who, in isolation, have a very different far less abrahamic language for approaching these things ..
i will admit that i do get a little too cautious when looking into certain traditions like the golden dawn because i dont want to install too much abrahamoid influence or whatever. maybe that is something i can work on
>and not every doctrine is or has to be compatible with each otherive never claimed such a thing. i am not a new ager saying that every faith is all pointing to the same truth. certainly i dont believe the hidweh project is just pointing to the same thing everyone else is. there are a few people i might be inclined to see as "fellow travelers" (to an extent) but that is about it. i mean needless to say if i believed stuff was all really compatible there would be no reason to look into satanism at all beyond edginess
>>6694this true and you do make a good point
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.