[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/lgbt/ - LGBT

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender +
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 3?
Not reporting is bourgeois
| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1744012683699.jpg (72.63 KB, 736x736, 7dbdd6d19981fdf6fe1e85e860….jpg)

 

MadoHomu Exedra edition
Previous Thread:
>>618934
250 posts and 42 image replies omitted.

>>1932
Or? 😈

>>1933
Hmm nah. Im normal again

>>1905
Idk why this reply when the first image explains that proletariat women are unequal to proletariat men.

Also your second post ( >>1906 ), is just highlighting liberals in the movement and the sway/leading it has.

The problem I had was simplifying the contradictions of the struggle to just purely proletariat vs bourgeois, when it's clear that, even if they're extensions of the first dialect, they still exist.

You're misunderstanding me in thinking that I'm arguing for the solution to be derived from that liberal-feminist framework, or that a communist movement should work part within in it to satisfy those liberals.

And confused when I'm using the modern (water down) definition of feminism of being:
> When you're for the liberation of women and men from the patriachy
And saying that communism, a movement that logically incorporates it but to those less read in theory would not realize this (hence le "maga-communism"), would aim to liberate proletariat women more than just their status as a worker.

>>1931
>>1932
>>1933
>>1934
Get a room you two
you two would be cute together

File: 1748722269845.jpg (97.52 KB, 1020x582, samalander.jpg)

I think I might be mostly gay or like only able to be satisfied in a monogamous relationship with a woman. But I'm in a relationship with a guy again and thinking of moving in together. I don't feel worthy of dating women and feel like a total creep in general, so ig I am somehow more comfortable dating men even if I feel unsatisfied. Also it's really shitty of me if I mislead my bf or see men as less desirable or precious or hurt his feelings by being crazy like this. I am pretty insane in general tho and kinda cope sometimes by being inappropriately flirtatious. Should I just become a monk and live in the forest and let myself become busted and alone or something?
Ok my actual question is wat do relationship wise? Should I break up with him? Give it time and maybe I will chill tf out and sort some baggage or get dumped but it's worth trying?


File: 1748490408484.jpg (5.89 KB, 300x168, wow.jpg)

 

"erm hrt should be prescribed through the proper channels"-girls when they realize that trans girls in the year 2240 BC didn't get a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria before drinking the horse piss


File: 1748001985652.png (129.76 KB, 973x829, rider1.png)

 

Has anyone else noticed when some people call for the abolition of gender (which is a position I sympathise with even though it is ultra-leftist to expect society to do away with it right now) just seem to be asking for all femininity to be erased? Like when people, and I'm assuming its mostly men trans or cis, say that we need to stop having gender, they also say long hair and pretty clothes need to be banned, and everyone should just be strong and masculine. It feels not many people are expecting gender abolition to cause everyone to become feminine. Idk its interesting hearing about this. I'm reminded of the anime Simoune where the baddies are all transmasc industrialists (I did support them when I watched it because they were historically progressive industrialists). That's basically a vision of gender abolition actually being women abolition. When you talk to lots of people you will hear this. Just ask King Lear what he thinks.
24 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

>>2070
>having a job used to be a man thing
Not exactly, proletarian women just aren't as much of an underpaid labor force as they used to be, at least in the imperial core. Gender remains alive and well in other forms though, because the more intense economic exploitation constitutes only the most readily apparent part. Thus the abolition of gender doesn't logically follow from the dissolution of difference in the labor market, it doesn't stem from the inherent bourgeois need for an underclass, rather the place in the family structure women are groomed into, with all of the reproductive and emotional labor it entails.

I don't see gender abolition as asking everyone to be male. For example I'm a cishet male father and to me gender abolition involves me taking on more work that was seen as traditionally "female" like domestic labor. In my house I do the laundry, I cook the dinners, I wash the dishes, and I change the diapers. To me that's gender abolition.

>>1968
Capitalism will restrict personal expression (including as it relates to gender and sex) if that is optimal for the production of capital. Even if it is a detriment to the individual.
Corporations restrict female expression more in full time employment, but educational institutions restrict male expression more during k-12 & arguably in higher education.
The restriction is done in different dimensions, i.e. long hair, clothing primarily for women. For men, it looks like lower educational attainment across the board, worse grades, worse attendance, and worse life outcomes.
It's hard for you to fully understand the other side of the aisle here and how men are repressed. It's not quite as obvious as a hair style or skirt length.

>>2076
Hmm, many questions occur in the vast mind

For you:
Are women also unable to establish a deep bond with you due to their inherent limitations?
Would only a male with his medium could touch the deepest tides of your being?
Would you dedicate your life to your male friend in a grim situation ( such as war )? Holding his hand, until death.
Are yuo attracted to males?

File: 1748415282365.png (24.64 KB, 128x128, meh.png)

>>1968
If “biological sex” is dismissed as meaningless or inherently contradictory, and “gender” is fully detached from material embodiment or social function, then what exactly is being transitioned? You can’t cross into a concept you refuse to stabilize.

Fellow transhumanists should stop reading so much philosophy garbo. Rather than addressing social organization of labor and capital, pseuds end up outsourcing liberation to technology or voting with your wallet or what have you.


File: 1748361951001.jpg (114.36 KB, 684x960, RDT_20250524_1931456370861….jpg)

 

The problem is not desire but desire production.

We see the seducer manipulating us but we do not see capital maniputing the seducer. The advertiser only sells the production of desires which sell. The salesman identifies with the market, and disidentifies with his own desires, so the salesman comes to believe that outside of work he is possessed by an alien force when exactly the opposite true.

Patriarchy is a product both of the family control of reproductive labor, and the media control of desire production. So we have seen since the 15th century a weakening of the family, and a strengthening of the media. So we have seen a shift in patriarchy from aphobia to gayphobia, and the construction of the pervert.

The solution to queerphobia is not just to abolish the capitalist family, but also to abolish the capitalist media. We must stop fetishizing independent art and start unionizing advertisers, writers, journalists and other pornographers. If it does not print then we walk out.

funny pb parasite memes


File: 1748353335785.png (2.19 MB, 1038x1286, isdq.png)

 

If far-leftism can’t give me this, then count me out
https://youtu.be/K6uEwpCdV3U?si=58gPR67Nr80uiPgT
https://youtu.be/9j-FPwSuomM?si=z4mAXER8LNnd_I8N


File: 1746246168443.png (48.29 KB, 960x576, djqvyw9lgt531-4171767031.png)

 

Trying to put together a reading list for Queer Socialist Theory/ Trans Liberation.
While we agree that LGBTQ people should be free to live their lives under socialism, unfortunately this hasn't been the case for all socialist govs.
Past reactionary behaviours/ policies have also emerged in certain so-called Socialist orgs like the ACP who use the USSRs past homophobia to justify their bigotry.
As a result, I think it's important that we assemble resources to ensure that future/ existing parties, platforms and orgs don't repeat the same mistakes.

Any recs?

Quotes and examples of pro-LGBTQ policies in Socialist Govs are also welcome.
15 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

lmfao theres only one communism, stop adding retarded adjectives to it that only pertain to interclass activism

>>1163
lol using shit ass larpy bourgeois nation-states and parties as examples of literally anything

>>1167
>what parts can be re-framed with a Marxist lens
college student moment

>>1350
>>1358
>>1351
nothing but philosophy and sociology shit god damn

>>1166
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>1358
>>1165
>>1350
>feminist marxism
>queer marxism
>materialist feminism (??)
proletarian women and proletarian queers will be liberated along with all other proletarians as a matter of course in a revolution, and non-proletarian women and non-proletarian queers are not our concern

>>1357
of course being trans is not an ideology, doesnt mean this garbage thread isnt just peddling a bunch of unrelated ideology shit to communism lol. being trans and posting here is infuriating because everyone here is so fucking retarded and infuriatingly middle class

File: 1748346078705.png (101.65 KB, 1893x921, lgbtq.png)

I haven't read any of them and there are some questionable things on the reading list that we don't support (anarchists, Parenti) but this looks good

>>1163
There's no analytical tool feminism or "queer theory" can give you that science and materialism can't do on their own.

>>1167
>-The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State by Engels.
Feminism is a mythological project built around an essentialized subject (“woman”) that has never existed as a coherent class. Engels wasn’t doing a heccin feminism. He was dismantling the family as a unit of private property and inheritance.


File: 1748284496436.jpeg (61.88 KB, 500x752, Abimael-Guzman-Reynoso-1.jpeg)

 

what's the perfect way to have an ID-type photo\ portrait taken of me? One of those shops wherein you lie with an all-blue wall on the back and a guy takes your picture from the same established distance. Shoulders lying back? chin "tucked in"? Strongly pursed lips and looking front PAST the camera?


File: 1746828072119-0.jpg (173.78 KB, 700x1072, heartstopper_1.jpg)

File: 1746828072119-1.jpg (253.83 KB, 1406x2108, 60h35db168.jpg)

 

This shit any good or more slop meant to be binged and quickly forgotten about? Normie gay friend keeps recommending it but he doesn't like any of the niche queer shit I show him so Idk.
2 posts omitted.

File: 1748182558766-0.jpg (46.97 KB, 322x475, MV5BMTMxMzY5MTMxN15BMl5Ban….jpg)

File: 1748182558766-1.jpg (253.83 KB, 1406x2108, 1746828072119-1.jpg)

>>1537
There are two types of queer people.

>>1537
Typical gay coming of age with much less tragedy than the pre-2010s stuff.
If you've seen "love, simon" or the likes, it's in the same vein. The story is peak high school lovy dovy shit.

I think it's OK plus there's twinks. Well produced. Kinda boring but there's not much good gay content out there AFAIK.

File: 1748223012688.jpg (46.41 KB, 658x658, Gruv1h7WoAAJbVq.jpg)

ill be honest, i am enjoying the hetslop more these days. i dont have any rationale for this other than "it Feels filthier"

>>2028
what does enjoying tetsuo the iron man make me

File: 1748628308366.webm (231.35 KB, 1276x720, WooKfonIuI0.webm)

>>2029
>plus there's twinks
>twinks
one of them is is a minor.


File: 1747190739308.jpg (71.43 KB, 736x941, d19e2bd0553c613ac9f15baa98….jpg)

 

Im a femboy, but my face is so masculine shaped and gross that it doesnt make me look feminine at all.
I hate looking masculine, I absolutely despise it.
Anyone have any advice on things I can do to look cuter and more feminine? Any help would be very much appreciated! :3
11 posts omitted.

>>1789
The walls of your city are pathetically low and vulnerable

>>1770
>>1763
But what if I dont want it to shrink my balls and other stuff

>>1863
Take T to make up for it

>>1864
Wouldnt that just cancel out the effects of the estrogen? Unless you are making a joke and im just too dumb to get it

>>1904
You can take estrogen but then apply topical testosterone cream to only affect a certain area
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGuvDlYDNzU


File: 1746038220353.png (Spoiler Image,118.97 KB, 413x402, Screenshot 2025-04-30 11.3….png)

 

i'm planning on starting hrt next year, but i don't know how to figure out whether or not i'm making a big mistake. i have trans thoughts or whatever and i am dysphoric, but most of my dysphoria is social and its more like a sense of grief and alienation than it is like a virulent hatred for my male body or whatever. im not attracted to men and i'm not super effeminate like in my personality. i genuinely have no idea why i want to transition or take hrt in like a tangible sense, but at the same time like i feel like i am not the gender i'm supposed to be and this life isn't mine like i feel a profound sense of grief when i think about what has been taken away from me if that makes any sense.
36 posts omitted.

>>1993
>MAPs/YAPs
discord users fedish

>MAPs/YAPs, AAMs/AAYs, zoosexuality, necrophilia
so a twitter users fedish

>>1999
>but where is conservativism ?, there is already incest and pedophilia so why not bring the rest in ?.
anon bait is biased
add conservativism pussy
it would be funny
and post on topic

>>1082
>>1085
>>1092
this is actually how most people actually feel like. Everyone especially imageboard patrons always want to conform the world to one flavor/style of living to eradicate "degeneracy"

>>1085
This isn't what communism is about. In communism the subjective differences between individuals are acknowledged. You literally can't make everyone the same without abolishing the individual, which was never a goal of communists. People are born with different abilities, different bodies, and a different base that they grow from basically, and you can't just flat that out with current technology. There has never been a push for absolute equality. This idea of communism making everyone 'the same' is just propaganda.

This part of Marxism is heavily rooted in liberalism and I wonder if we can surpas it. I don't think it would be a bad world where true equality has been established and the individual abolished. In fact this would likely be a further economic stage post-communism. But this vague goal of total equality is not something communism is set to achieve.

Just take the goddamn hormones and ask questions later

>>1085
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 ]
| Catalog | Home