/lgbt/ - LGBT

>>10433
>it follows that homosexuality can be defined as capitalist decadence
That doesn't follow at all, like not even a little bit. There has never been any society where gay people were so numerous as to crash the birth rate, and I fail to see how homosexuality or acceptance of it follows naturally from capitalism.

>>10403
Cockshott's materialism is anything but vulgar. Let us know when you have some material evidence or scientific laws regarding psychic phenomenon. Otherwise it will be rightfully regarded as just another method of intelligence fencing.

>>10407
He advocates a bachelor tax for anyone who doesn't have kids, including heterosexual married couples. Why? Because the future labor of children sustains those childless when they retire. They don't contribute labor to social reproduction, so they cobtribute through more taxation to support social services: schools, hospitals, day cares, etc.

Homosexuality isn't decadent, but living off of other people's kids' labor without contribution is.

>>10574
>scientific laws
scientific laws do not exist as substantial entities. to regard them otherwise is vulgar materialism - there is absolutely no reason to posit fixed universal laws just because they would to conform then to some idea. we have just made that assumption. laws are simply regularities in the current forms of matter which we have observed. there is evidence that these regularities actually do change over time - notice how scientists have hitherto just played with the data under the unfounded assumption that various universal constants should stay fixed which is an a priori assumption that has no actual material basis
https://www.sheldrake.org/essays/how-the-universal-gravitational-constant-varies
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364123244_Strong_evidence_for_composition-dependent_gravity_from_Cavendish_experiments
let us think about the problem philosophically. hume pointed out that there is no reason to assume that our categories of causality and such were actually substantive entities rather than regularities and associations we have built up about the world. the only person to give a real answer to hume's problematic was kant, who explained the regularity of the cosmos by means of the transcendental unity of apperception - but of course if we are not to become correlationists or idealists, we must accept the possibility that this unity of apperception has a natural history, and so the categories of the judgement including those of causality are contingent entities that themselves could have evolved. you have to give a rational explanation that answer's hume otherwise you are making unnecessary assumptions about the fixity of the physical world. note also that my position is also more parsimonious. why? think about it this way. a good argument for evolution is that we make far less presuppositions starting with a simpler thing which eventually evolves into a more complex thing. in contrast, intelligence design would have all of that complexity already given from the very beginningPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>10584
>idealist word salad
scienfic laws are algorithms shorter than the results they describe. where are the laws about panpsychism?

>self-important faggotry
it's about the reproduction of labor power and having kids not about "what to do with the homosexuals."

>>10636
>scienfic laws are algorithms shorter than the results they describe
why assume such algorithms should be permanently applicable?
>where are the laws about panpsychism?
where did i mention panpsychism at all? i didnt even need any use for that hypothesis
>>self-important
i dont care about homosexuality much so i do not feel particularly targeted
>it's about the reproduction of labor power and having kids
if it is just about that why talk about homosexuals at all? and why should we care about this topic when we are not living in socialism?

why everyone must be nice when i feel real mean?

>>10151

i also plan on coming back for SRS since they have a technique here with tilapia skin graft that allows you to get wet like a cis girl

Anons, the mod team has been compromised by ZOG.

They are instant banning people in /latam/'s /brg/ who talk about a leftist party in Brasil that is being persecuted for their anti-israel, pro-resistence activities. They have range banned me, and are monotoring the thread like hawks.

Please call the jannies gay there and in /meta/, or post sneed.

FREE PALESTINE

>>10151
Brazil

How do I find a rich chaser to pay for FFS? I would literally be his sex s;ave for 6 months if it means I get ffs

>>10415
I fucking hate my huge nose and my brow bone. They make me want to rope so bad

>>10343
>Imperialist sex trafficking networks and intelligence agency cutouts want us dead.
85% of queer people know this already.

did you really expect anything from the place where the Yakarta method was born?

>>10347
yeah but it's the most banal bougie fundie conservative sex cult Moonie kind of shit
just some fat guy with a cult and CP on his work laptop and a bored wife who hates transhumanists because her husband rapes trans prostitutes
some Andrew Tate kind of twit who thinks he's a genius supervillain when he blames everything wrong on queer people
idk it's some really stupid and faggy fratboy hazing ritual power network kind of shit
it's kind of like starting a war because you stuck a bottle up your ass kind of bullshit
some kind of Humbert Humbert kind of stupid rich idiot nonsense

What do you mean by "reconsidering being a feminist"? What would that look like, materially? Cuz if it's just a label, it doesn't matter. If you're a radical Leftist you're already a feminist in practice.

I want to mention that I am not the same person spamming antifeminism slop on the beria, I have no qualms with actually real feminists…
>>10353
By ‘feminist’ I mean someone who’s really into women’s rights. I guess it’s true that all radical leftists are feminists by default, in the same way that they’re all anti-racist, but some people specialize in certain areas… and I think it’s good that it’s that way as long as everyone can share a baseline understanding of intersectionality, but they usually don’t. Hope that makes sense

There are two options:

1. Try to prove that TERFs are Nazi degenerates who have nothing to do with feminism.
   
2. Accept that TERFs are feminists and reject feminism as a label.
   

I would do both, depending on the situation. Among feminists 1; among MRAs 2.

there's plenty of feminism that's not bioessentialist sex negative terfism but this type of feminism is also typically sex positive which is why it's not talked about in leftist spaces

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Barr_Snitow

Probably not, but surely served as one.

>>10259
>>10260
I mean those leftists who call for the family to be abolished and for the whole community to raise the kids. They never actually try doing that.

>>10283
>I mean those leftists who call for the family to be abolished
so like 5 people on twitter

from where i sit in america it seems to me like the family already was abolished a long time ago. this whole thing we got going on where it's just two self-centered parents trying to groom their kids for conformity and success like they're show dogs and pushing them out the door at age 18 and leaving their own parents to die alone in some dirty derelict house or a nursing home, people value money and status and ideology more than their own flesh and blood, that's not a family. and it's not good, not having strong family ties makes people weaker, more helpless and isolated and easier to control, there's a reason why america's ruling class systematically destroyed the white family after the great depression, why they destroyed the black family after the civil rights movement, family is the most fundamental unit of social organization, you break up the family and people have nothing.

Cant afford abolishing the family in this economy

>>3346
That and trans people are pretty autistic

>>10264
Not a form but there's an overlap definitely

Trans people are the jews of the 21st century. Which is why btw we must oppose trans separatism because that is zionism.

>>10262
Please explain further I find this interesting but there isn't really any good information on it.

>>10300
Rare S W