/lgbt/ - LGBT

>>10664
Based

>>10666
I sense broken identity, rejection of modernity and the desire for the unshakable axis of "Tradition"…

>>10667
It is always better to have history and culture behind you than to be an upstart progressive.

MGTOW could have been gay, but they are too afraid

>>10669
Jack Donovan had something going about masculinist spirituality, but that splintered away from the main manosphere.

Sage post

OP here. I've posted this in a thread in siberia >>>/siberia/822915 and I will post a more serious thread in /leftypol/ soon. I think the Evola stuff should be have some attention. To SabinyAK >>10615 sex is something you're born with and so is your brain. Your gender lives in your brain and reacts to your experiences. Weininger, Evola and Mishima are showing positive indicators of madness and seem to have taken an anti-social outlet.

I wish we could catch madmen before they get power or shit up subcultures.

>>10654

>thinking /leftypol/ is some sort of ranked /siberia/

stick to Twitter, you're not built for the IBs

>>10655
>tuff
lolwut?

>>10654
>sex is something you're born with
Literally a modern transphobic definition. Sex is the sum of sexual characteristics.
>gender
A meaningless word.

>>10657
A transwoman once asked me about the difference between being male and being a man 7 years ago

>>10559
>>10560
So true, when the global revolution comes we will throw those backwards dobbyfuckers straight into the sea

>>10561
then we will bulldoze dobby's grave to make way for the undersea cable

It was actually over Palestine (which is just as bad)

>>10565
According to her it wasn't, it was primarily because she ran for a women's seat

>>10560
>them
Jews?

>>10158
Such a real experience though, me too. Now I want to go out like Comrade Norah tho.

>>10158
>>10165
You both need therapy and a warm hug from a partner.

>>10165
is this a trans cannon event? I did this too.

Wrong. Your gender belongs to me. Hear that leftytraners? You can borrow it from me if you ask nicely though.

>>10221
so he's lying and saying he doesn't care about pronouns while in real life obviously does use them? yeah that's kind of my point

>>10307

anyone who publicly announces that they care about something or don't care about something is most likely bullshitting. no normal person just goes around telling people what they do and do not genuinely care about, that would be like telling people your bank account password. this is why focus groups are such a huge waste of time and money, nobody ever tells people what they are honestly thinking, people don't even like to tell themselves what they are honestly thinking.

how embarrassed are you to be stirnerposting in 2026

you sound like the type of person who pledges allegiance to hitler after a trans person is mean to you.

>>2553
all enbies just call themselves that to steal resources from trans people, this is well known

>>2555
Actually trans people are a CIA psyop to deprive gay dudes of prime femboy material.

bump

>>2407
How many milliletres is 7mg? I would inject 0.1 mL a week and testosterone was obliterated

>>2584
femboys feinds are just a slightly more pathetic version of a chaser. go fuck yourself, its the only way it'll ever happen.

Bump

Op here, should I just debeautiful lady😍🥰? Like, if my sexual identity is broken and I feel alienated from society, won't transitioning make it worse? What will I get in return, other than a reduction in my internal dysphoria (and I already said I don't like breasts, so maybe I'm also trading one thing for another)?

>>10166

what will you do afterwards?

you'll be able to live in complete misery or will you fill the void with hate?

What do you think about SERMs?

>>9972
what is actually shameful and schizophrenic is thinking that identifying as an androgyne is based and trad because of ancient greece or something and that identifying as kind of a girl but not really is cringe and woke. you are a troglodyte larper and you need your brain rewired.

>>10428
You're running your fucking mouth a bit too much.

>>10419
Fascists believe in spiritual truth over material truth. The kingdom is organized according to a sacred dance rotating around the king. The material reality of gender and race are secondary to the spiritual reality. It goes back to the parable of the beds. The fascist believes God's bed, the bed of the bougie who commissioned a project to be superior to the bed that the artisan actually made and deplores the painting of the bed made by the social critic.

>>10448

the spirit in question:

>>10421
its about >>10351

>>10362
GO DIE, YOUR KING IS PROBABLY A ROTTENING CORPSE BY NOW, FOLLOW YOUR FUCKING LEADER.

>>10334
Post more animals with Marx heads

>putting your pee hole into someone elses pee hole
I applaud OP for upholding Two Holes Thought

>>10433
>it follows that homosexuality can be defined as capitalist decadence
That doesn't follow at all, like not even a little bit. There has never been any society where gay people were so numerous as to crash the birth rate, and I fail to see how homosexuality or acceptance of it follows naturally from capitalism.

>>10403
Cockshott's materialism is anything but vulgar. Let us know when you have some material evidence or scientific laws regarding psychic phenomenon. Otherwise it will be rightfully regarded as just another method of intelligence fencing.

>>10407
He advocates a bachelor tax for anyone who doesn't have kids, including heterosexual married couples. Why? Because the future labor of children sustains those childless when they retire. They don't contribute labor to social reproduction, so they cobtribute through more taxation to support social services: schools, hospitals, day cares, etc.

Homosexuality isn't decadent, but living off of other people's kids' labor without contribution is.

>>10574
>scientific laws
scientific laws do not exist as substantial entities. to regard them otherwise is vulgar materialism - there is absolutely no reason to posit fixed universal laws just because they would to conform then to some idea. we have just made that assumption. laws are simply regularities in the current forms of matter which we have observed. there is evidence that these regularities actually do change over time - notice how scientists have hitherto just played with the data under the unfounded assumption that various universal constants should stay fixed which is an a priori assumption that has no actual material basis
https://www.sheldrake.org/essays/how-the-universal-gravitational-constant-varies
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364123244_Strong_evidence_for_composition-dependent_gravity_from_Cavendish_experiments
let us think about the problem philosophically. hume pointed out that there is no reason to assume that our categories of causality and such were actually substantive entities rather than regularities and associations we have built up about the world. the only person to give a real answer to hume's problematic was kant, who explained the regularity of the cosmos by means of the transcendental unity of apperception - but of course if we are not to become correlationists or idealists, we must accept the possibility that this unity of apperception has a natural history, and so the categories of the judgement including those of causality are contingent entities that themselves could have evolved. you have to give a rational explanation that answer's hume otherwise you are making unnecessary assumptions about the fixity of the physical world. note also that my position is also more parsimonious. why? think about it this way. a good argument for evolution is that we make far less presuppositions starting with a simpler thing which eventually evolves into a more complex thing. in contrast, intelligence design would have all of that complexity already given from the very beginningPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>10584
>idealist word salad
scienfic laws are algorithms shorter than the results they describe. where are the laws about panpsychism?

>self-important faggotry
it's about the reproduction of labor power and having kids not about "what to do with the homosexuals."

>>10636
>scienfic laws are algorithms shorter than the results they describe
why assume such algorithms should be permanently applicable?
>where are the laws about panpsychism?
where did i mention panpsychism at all? i didnt even need any use for that hypothesis
>>self-important
i dont care about homosexuality much so i do not feel particularly targeted
>it's about the reproduction of labor power and having kids
if it is just about that why talk about homosexuals at all? and why should we care about this topic when we are not living in socialism?