/dead/ - Post-Left

>>6103
Nyx is that you?

>>5925
I swear you are like the single most frequent poster on the entier site.

>>6121
me and who

Mostly putting this here because doesn't deserve its own thread.
I read the soulism (Anarcho-Antirealism) summary/explainer.

I'll freely admit that I am not post-left, haven't delved much into the psychoanalysis/philosophy side or at least the schizoanalysis parts definitely aren't clicking, so maybe I just "don't get it". But holy shit soulism is silly. It is, and I mean this is in a neutral psychological sense, a surrendering coping mechanism. And if someone's reality is so fucked up that they need something like this to get by to stop them committing sudoku, then fine, but it is an antisocial individualist resignation, destructive to the function of societies.

Look at the example they have for otherkin, people who self-identify as non-human species. If I insist you interpret me as a crocodile, then I'm self-identifying as a direct threat to your life, not unlike a Nazi does. Sure, you could could choose to interpret me as a very unusual unique and strange crocodile, but you aren't actually interpreting me as a crocodile the way that I intend, you've just transformed your reality to label or perhaps even classify me as a crocodile. But if I fall down and break my wrist, if you were to take me to a zoo vet and insist to them to stop pretending I have a wrist and that it's disrespectful to redirect me to a human hospital which specializes in this injury, then your reality (and perhaps mine) is directly and needlessly harmful to my health and therefore oppressive and must be dismantled. Hell, let's make it something life-or-death like a heart attack, to match the alleged benefit of these delusions (preventing potential dysphoria and suicide). What is the solution? To fluidly overhaul realities to be the least oppressive at any one time, identifying me as whatever category is the lesser evil at any point in time?

It's a botched utopian coping mechanism.

>>6125
You made up a really nice fake scenario to rationalize your desire to hurt others.

>>6127
Who do I want to hurt?

>You made up a really nice fake scenario
There are no real scenarios to use. That's why the text I'm criticizing also makes up fake scenarios.

wtf is this lol

>>4239
vaporwave

>>569
I just recently came across this band while browsing the "anarchist" tag on Bandcamp.

From The Normal Album by Will Wood. I recommend the whole thing TBH, it's very Nietzschean.

>>5716
Not really. It's just mainly thought experiments used to make people feel like they're doing something productive

>>5924
If you're willing to say something like this it means you don't know a single thing about science or philosophy and should probably shut your fucking trap.

>scientific analysis
<ideologies
Choose one.

>>5930
Kaheva is KOREAN

I wish people would actually move on to Bakunin, it seems that people only read God and the State if anything, everything else they know about him is from Marxist slander.

Is that lady Bakunin?

not even the context of that marx passage

okay Euronymous

>>6096
Fascists just don't really get it TBH. I just want to hurt myself.

i kinda get it? i just want to die in a war, get a little statue in a park. somewhere small with lots of shade. maybe with a pond.

>I despise others and I think I would really detest seeing a happier and better world.
Well, best way to do that is to spark a class war by killing someone like Musk who has a lot of fans, money and friends like Thiel with ungodly amounts of power.

>>6089
You've missed the point of everything

>passive spectator lives, lack of independent thought (via propaganda), disintegration of community and family, and unhealthy eating patterns, etc. than by extraction of surplus value.
correct they exploit imported ethnoslaves from mexico and africa to get that sweet sweet surplus honey. immigrants and sweatshops have repalced the old proles.

>Revolution will occur in the periphery or not at all
modern precision weapon tech and economic warfare techniques mean any revolution will end up like iran or cuba or liberated afghanistan. you get locked out of the system. revolution is possible but will fail. if the bolsheviks were trying to pull off a revolution today lenin would be like bin laden hiding out in caves from the total NATO kontrol authorities

because people are now moral relativists there is no way first worldies can pull off a revolution because they have no way of knowing whats right and wrong. they can't say "okay thats wrong we gotta overthrow these people" because in the woke nihilist worldview there is no good and bad just personal preferences

the self is also an oppressive structure absolutely. this u must not forget. marcuses assessments are broadly correct but wrong. he thought the student movement and the counterculture could replace the proletariat. he was wrong. they are among the stupidist of people.

>>5673
>Economic warfare techniques mean any revolution will end up [..] locked out of the system.
Nepal managed to avoid this, and the Ukrainian war seems to indicate modern measures to counter act such initiatives successfully.

>people are now moral relativists there is no way first worldies can pull off a revolution because they have no way of knowing whats right and wrong.
There is still a superego, given a large part of it is "not killing the vibe", "live and let live", or at least maintaining the necessary appearances. Another part of it is things like the Christians, or ethical consumerism, the uncommited movement, or the progressive movement, just to use American examples. The cynical and ironic near nihilistic outlook to life is not universal, nor is it isolated to those without faith.

>Marcuses assessments are broadly correct but wrong.
This may be fair, though he didn't think the working class could be replaced as you later claim.

bump.

Probably now reject almost the entirety of the thought here, though have not done a particularly full self-criticism.
At least what's written here completely neglected the influence of power to perpetuate these negative societal ills.
The analysis of revolutionary politics is very bad; but dual-power and civil-disobedience might be part of it.