/edu/ - Education

>>26311
Palestine is the foremost political issue of our time. I hardly think it's esoteric at all. We have strategy and tactic books in the thread already. This would be just one more.

Recommend books

>>26314
Lmao was it at least decent when it came to the history of it all or also no?

Will Prowse: Mobile Solar Power Made Easy!: The easiest beginner's book for off-grid and 12V systems (cabin, RV, boat). See also his YouTube channel and diysolarforum.com.

Michael Boxwell: Solar Electricity Handbook: A clear basic guide to sizing and design, updated regularly.

Joseph P. O'Connor: Off Grid Solar: Battery systems (lead-acid and lithium) covered thoroughly.

Solar Energy International: Photovoltaics: Design and Installation Manual: A professional-level textbook for when you have mastered the basics.

>>26317
Does it explain it tho.

>>26325
https://archive.ph/qZkiP
got archived

>>26334
which way western man

>>26336
thank dog there are tldr machines.

>>26332
He say that dialectics is dangerous.. you can return that to him. Like if a contradictions get ignored, you can show ecology, etc, you know.

Also google Right to distress Hegel. But idk if google will show you that, but for me it shows Kant. For Kant moral is empty or pure? So he consider this action still morally wrong. While you can see content in Hegels reply.

Ive decided to stay in school

School is what you make of it. You have vast libraries and professors of all kinds at your finger tips. You can literally learn anything and it’s way easier at a college than anywhere else. In law school I had a photography show and just walked into the art school deans office to ask him questions. I walked into the music department to learn piano. You could go find books on jazz or Egyptology and there will be some autist on campus who loves that shit and would be willing to help you. If you’re gonna be a doctor, you’d get your profs to introduce you to some doctors you could shadow. You could study all the brain surgery books on file.


God I miss school.

>>26267
College (University) isn't about learning, it's about passing so you get credentials, moreso nowadays that information is freely available and that literacy and numeracy is considered bare minimum and not a privilege atleast in the 'first world', not to mention that university isn't about learning when you have to pay or take on debt, then you have to pressure of getting something other than knowledge out of it so you can recuperate your losses into something material that can be capitalised on. There is literally no reason to go to higher education than to blag yourself into a career in the hopes of escaping manual labour.

dunno where you're from but you kinda need credentials to start cutting people up, but you do get to start stitching people up from your first clinical year of med school

also if you want to make it a career, then good luck surgery is hell

>>25920
The two articles where you got your two screenshots from

>>25921
Pew Research Center:
<Highly educated adults – particularly those who have attended graduate school – are far more likely than those with less education to take predominantly liberal positions across a range of political values. And these differences have increased over the past two decades.
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/04/26/a-wider-ideological-gap-between-more-and-less-educated-adults/

Variability Hypothesis:
<The variability hypothesis, also known as the greater male variability hypothesis, is the hypothesis that human males generally display greater variability in traits than human females do [including cognition].
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variability_hypothesis

Supporting Article 1:
<In the majority of countries, male variability is higher than female variability in both reading and math.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1162573

Supporting Article 2:
<Males are more variable on most measures of quantitative and visuospatial ability, which necessarily results in more males at both high- and low-ability extremes
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

In addition to the raised points on autism score, big 5 personality traits have good correlations: low openness, mid-high conscientiousness (rule following), low agreeableness, generally low neuroticism = rightoid traits, opposite profile = leftist traits.

>>25923
Most people are also moderate in their personality, so don't fall into extremism

>>25913
Excellent thread worth bumping. I recently read this book to better understand the rightoid mindset.

The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion (Jonathan Haidt)
<A foundational text in moral psychology that explores the intuitive and emotional origins of political differences. Through his research, Haidt demonstrates that the right-wing moral compass relies on different foundations than the left-wing one. While liberal psychology emphasizes care and fairness, the conservative mind gives equal weight to in-group loyalty, respect for authority, and feelings of sanctity and purity.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/11324722-the-righteous-mind

>Third-Worldism
Third-Worldism is another term for Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, or just Maoism, which situates imperialism as the "primary contradiction" of politics; hence it focuses on people's protracted conflict and the task of nationalism more than class warfare in general; viewing the working class of a ruling hegemon as exploiters of the so-called "Third World" (a sociological term invented during the Cold War to distinguish between the Western First World, Soviet Second World, and undeveloped Third World of geopolitics - so the term "Third World" isn't really applicable today). Practically, Maoism splits the workers' movement into racial grievances against "White People". We can say that the Left has largely substituted Marx for Mao today.
>Third-Positionism
Well, as a Classical Liberal, I consider myself "neither" Communist or Capitalist in orientation, so perhaps I am of the Third Position. In Dugin's "Fourth Political Theory", he counts Liberalism as the First political theory, so that may disqualify it, if we take his authority. In terms of various strands of Fascism, we can compare them against each other more than we can compare them with each other. Gentile and ᴉuᴉlossnW develop Fascism from 1919 onwards as a type of political Hegelianism which they term "totalitarian" by the maxim "all within the state, nothing outside the state". It is radically hostile to any individualism, yet still grants personality in the state Sovereign. It is above all a philosophy of "action" (which we see in Mosley's British Fascism symbolised by the lightning bolt). National Socialism is codefied in 1919 also, by Rudolf Jung, and gives precedence to race and volk more than a political state. Before ᴉuᴉlossnW and Hitler's partnership in 1936, ᴉuᴉlossnW was anti-racial, but afterwards, was a Darwinist, such as we read in the "Manifesto of Race" (1938). So, Fascism was originally non-racial, but unifying in its Nationalism, while Hitler was purifying in his racialism. This is a great divide. Nonetheless, both men believed in life as a violent struggle, which often alludes to Nietzsche's sentiments, but not his conclusions.

I don't know, man, there's lots of questionable assumptions here.

>status, reputation, and social capital
Very few people care about these. We are just captivated by the spectacle of those who do. Once people's material needs are met, most would just fuck off to do whatever they like to do.

>Abundance
Already here. Depends on who you ask but most leftist economists say that we'd only need about 30% of current productive forces to meet everyone's basic needs. It's not the lack of abundance that prevents doing that but the endless greed of a small minority.

>Capital accumulation
Isn't the point that by holding the means of survival hostage you can compel others to work for you? Why would you need to accumulate capital when robots do everything?

>AI-surveillance
AI surveillance only prevents organized resistance. If the rate of extermination becomes too high and people see their own extermination coming, more people will start doing terrorism and I'm not sure the system can survive that.

>>26290
You too are making assumptions

>>26290

>Very few people care about these.
Decommodified production doesnt magically erase human neurobiology. Its a well established fact that the human brain is structurally hardwired to seek social status.

>Abundance is already here.
You are confusing productive capacity with ecological limits. Yes we have enough factories and technology but what we dont have is infinite resources. The scarcity axis in this matrix isnt about whether we can manufacture enough stuff but instead its about the hard physical limits of this planet. This is why the socialist outcome requires strict rationing and centralized planning.

>Why would you need to accumulate capital when robots do everything?
This is the entire premise of rentism scenario. Even if the ruling class doesnt need your labor anymore they still wants to maintain their class position. They will enforce this artificial scarcity via patents and copyright. People wouldnt work in factories but would still have to pay rent in order to have access to basic needs.

>I'm not sure the system can survive terrorism
The system is literally engineered to survive this right now. The ruling class doesnt have to fear unorganized terrorism once they retreat into fortified enclaves guarded by autonomous drones while leaving the surplus population outside to live in slums. Gated communities but 9000x worse.

Flood