[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/edu/ - Education

'The weapon of criticism cannot, of course, replace criticism of the weapon, material force must be overthrown by material force; but theory also becomes a material force as soon as it has gripped the masses.' - Karl Marx
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

 

Everytime you visit /edu/, post in this thread. Tell us about what you're thinking about, what you're reading, an interesting thing you have learned today, anything! Just be sure to pop in and say hi.

Previous thread >>>/leftypol_archive/580500
Archive of previous thread
https://archive.is/saN3S

Excuse me coming through
A quick note on the video @ >>>/leftypol/1538283
Also [vid related] for archival purposes

Around the 29 minute mark Peterson criticizes Marx and Engel's for assuming that workers would magically become more productive once they took over.

This actually happened historically, most of the actually effective productivity tricks work places use now were developed by Stakhanovites.

https://soviethistory.msu.edu/1936-2/year-of-the-stakhanovite/year-of-the-stakhanovite-texts/stalin-at-the-conference-of-stakhanovites/
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
562 posts and 89 image replies omitted.

>>25969
Because I'm randomly checking out people on
https://www.indep.network/member-directory/



File: 1619942123710.png (68.81 KB, 1366x568, East Med 2.png)

 

Post Copy pastas, videos and books which debunk common Fascist, Liberal talking points which are repeated often.
149 posts and 64 image replies omitted.

>>25917
Stupid idea, the fact that Orwell did some bad thing it doesnt mean that his book was shit or something, same thing Michael Facoault was implicated of raping little boys (he was gay) too.



 

drop them PDFs, we will rebuild edition
317 posts and 625 image replies omitted.

>>25962
see the following highly in depth series
>>24318
>>24319
>>24320
>>24321



File: 1779060000701.png (2.31 MB, 1287x1222, ClipboardImage.png)

 

What explains bad grades in someone fascinated by subjects tied to above-average intelligence, who is also socially awkward and isolated? This is the worst possible combination. Meanwhile, 6ft 4 charismatic chads get perfect grades and enter the nation's best colleges for law or medicine.
6 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

File: 1779144489215-0.png (496.25 KB, 1024x724, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1779144489215-1.png (94.07 KB, 850x450, ClipboardImage.png)

>>25978
>Evopsych isn't real
Evolution shaped every organ except your brain, apparently. Your objection contradicts itself if evopsych isn’t real, neither is your cognition in arguing against it

Evopsych is real by definition as a field of study. Claiming it “isn’t real” is like saying geology isn’t real because you don’t like rocks.

Fuck off with your Freshmen philosophy

>>25980
I agree. Either ADHD or some sort of developed deficiency similar to ADHD symptoms.

>>25979
Above-average intelligence is a very low bar, c'mon. OP probably doesn't see himself as smart, he simply acknowledges that he's not stupid and that there is a disconnect between his (self and/or externally) perceived intelligence and "the fruits of one's intelligence" i.e. good grades, academic prestige, high paying jobs.
I for example have been conditioned to think of myself as very stupid due to my poor grades and academic score and lack of success in the job market, but everyone I know regards me as very intelligent. This is frustrating since it feels like some sort of pity of gaslighting, or worse: yourself being smarter than you think, but being unable to fulfill your potential due to some other factors at play. I understand the having potential meme being a coping mechanism for many, but for others it is the inverse and will only make you even more anxious.

>>25981
The brain being a product of evolution and evopsych magic being real are two different things. Video essay upon ye.

>>25981
You and anon are in agreement as anon accurately describes evolution. He probably means evopsych as the current body of knowledge rather than as a phenomenon.

>>25983
>Video essay
lol no



File: 1779094578415.jpeg (146.71 KB, 959x1500, IMG_3597.jpeg)

 

  • “The Great Brexit Swindle: Why the Mega-Rich and Free Market Fanatics Conspired to Force Britain from the European Union” by T J Coles

  • “BREXIT: The Great British Tax Avoidance Swindle” by Nolan Jazimreg

Anyone who would like to give more recommendations, post a reply. Thanks



File: 1763928931490.webp (191.41 KB, 545x600, OFbTauc.webp)

 

Choosing a language edition

I do not know why we do not have an active language learning thread, so here you go.
If you got other links you think are worthy of being on here, do mention them.

>Language learning communities

r/languagelearning
https://www.reddit.com/r/languagelearning/

Language learner's forum
https://forum.language-learners.org/

Linguaholic's forum
https://linguaholic.com/

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
46 posts and 27 image replies omitted.

Test

>>25414
Harder than English. Chinese sentence structure lacks all those redundant Germanic particles like "the," "an," and "of."

Mi estas lernanto esperanto

Perennial dabbler. I'm so decent at Chinese as my main but I always want to choose a third language. I've dabbled to varying degrees in Vietnamese, Indonesian, Korean, Russian (just on apps). Recently started a face to face Spanish course but I'm not that inspired by Spanish I've discovered. Still 8 more classes to go. I'm going to Vietnam soon and I'm hoping that will inspire me sufficiently to invest myself in studying the language.

>>25414
j'apprends le francais avec duolingo



File: 1779061333406.png (1.28 MB, 1242x682, ClipboardImage.png)

 

New research shows China leads research in 90% of crucial technologies & ignoring this means we're living in a delusional bubble, where we still think the West is the Sci-Tech leader.

I think a lot of people are in denial, or just can't accept that China is already the world's leading nation for science and technology. I can't blame them for their ignorance. Most English-language media studiously avoid mentioning it. Time and time again, I see topics like AI, space & robotics covered, with only developments in Western countries talked of, as if China doesn't exist. Despite the fact that it's now the leader in so many fields.

The problem with complacency and ignorance is that it gives you a really distorted map of reality. You can't understand how the 21st century is developing without factoring in China, and ignoring China means you're being delusional.

Source:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-04048-7
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/aspis-critical-technology-tracker-2025-updates-and-10-new-technologies/



File: 1686449203950.png (Spoiler Image,1.92 MB, 2000x1120, ClipboardImage.png)

 

the way i explain the labor to people is very simple. I cut straight to the chase.

I say these things, usually not all at once. I let people chew on each one:

> 1 If you’re a boss, and you own a business, you have to pay the worker less than their work is worth.

> 2 If you pay them exactly what their work is worth, you don’t make any money, your business won’t grow, and you’ll get bought out by some asshole who pays workers less.
> 3 If you pay a worker more than their work is worth, you’re losing money, your business will shrink, and you’ll go out of business.
> 4 the problem is the system, because the way the system is set up, workers have to beg for a job from people who own the places we work at, and the bosses only give the job to the lowest bidder, the people willing to do the most in exchange for the least in return.
> 5 everybody who can't get a job has to keep looking for a job until they get so desperate they start selling themselves for less and less
> 6 even with how little they pay us they think it's too much. so they constantly look for ways to make more money and pay less money.
> 7 they send our jobs overseas to where the labor is cheaper, and they want us to blame the people overseas even though they're the ones sending the jobs off and calling themselves job creators while they do it
> 8 they hire a bunch of overeducated nerds to make machines and programs to do our jobs for us, so they can fire us, and then they take credit for what those nerds make
> 9 they give the jobs to people who just got here and are usually running away from some fucked up shit like war and are therefore more desperate than even the average schmuck here is
> 10 despite all this shit they do to get rid of us or make us work for less money, they still need to sell the stuff they make, and if everyone's too poor to buy that shit, then they gotta lower the price
> 11 the faster they make stuff, the cheaper that stuff is because less work goes into makin it, and money is just a piece of paper that says some work got done
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
172 posts and 30 image replies omitted.

File: 1752265294053.jpeg (Spoiler Image,60.17 KB, 1080x756, lbufv720555e1.jpeg)

>>14135
truth nuke of unimaginable magnitude and potence

sorry leftoids, the workers WILL read the ruthless critique and they WILL agree.

>>14135
Literacy doesn't mean voracious reading.

>>19045
This is the only real good post on here.
Most talks about a glorious leftist revolution in the twenty first century is a farce.
At best it's lib left bs.
At worst it's just right wing rehash.

>>14136
>Illiteracy is on the rise in the US and child labor has returned. This isn't because workers are getting dumber, but because the bourgeoisie are getting more ruthless.

I have yet to see where child labor is being a prominent return with exceptions of some outlier factory using orphans.

Also, I find it funny how people are complaining about illiteracy in a time where everyone makes and reads text messages and/or essay posts.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>19918
>>19045
the only two replies ITT worth reading

>>22824
>So I tell all of you: Dumb it all down, simplify then make it simpler. Make it spread.

yes. an introductory comment on simplification in general. Not many people know that there is a primary synopsis of Capital, written by Engels himself (1868):
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/1868-syn/
Marx also makes early comment as to the serialisation of Capital by French editors in the 1872 preface:
<I applaud your idea of publishing the translation of “Das Kapital” as a serial. In this form the book will be more accessible to the working class, a consideration which to me outweighs everything else.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/p2.htm
Thus, Marx clearly cared for simple presentation and exposition, despite his verbose style, as he admits of in the beginning of the 1873 preface.

Beginning with Carlo's Capital, we have a note upon translation, which by this time, Capital was limited to the German, Russian and French, with the first English edition being published in 1886. Marx died 3 years earlier. Carlo also gives a tragic fact that by this time (1878), Marx had failed to publish Capital Vol. 2 (1885), despite already having the groundwork and notes for Capital, cumulatively from the period of 1857-67. Of course, Engels only published the unfinished manuscript of Capital Vol. 3 in 1894, 11 years after Marx's death, and 1 year before his own demise. The unpublished "theories of surplus value" was also only brought into completion by Kautsky around 1910, and so it took over 40 years to convert Marx's notes into his "Critique of Political Economy" series (talk about procrastinating!). Many of the secondary and tertiary texts of Marx were also only published in the 20th century, largely through the USSR, by "progress publishers" (1931-). Carlo writes:
<Meanwhile Marx can fulfill his promise, giving us the second volume of Capital, which will deal with The Process of Circulation of Capital (book II), and with The Process of Capitalist Production as a Whole (book III), and the fourth and fiPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>19918
Nowadays, students are swamped with more work than minimum wage employees.
Having to finish a bunch of assignments and then go to work?



 

Hello comrades. I have doubts about materialism since the philosophical part of Marxism isn't my strength, but I want to be able to understand it better since materialism is the foundation of marxist theory and the communist movement.
I've had arguments in the past with people who claim that modern science doesn't prove materialism or that materialism cannot explain things like the origin of the universe or quantum mechanics. Well, where do I begin with this? Is materialism the truth? The most basic part of marxist philosophy is the assertion that matter is objectively real, right? How do I prove this then? Maybe one of you STEMlords around here can help me out with this. Any resources on this is appreciated.
50 posts and 10 image replies omitted.

>>20840
Why?

Have we discovered a "scientific value" of commodity? Ten yards of linen gets you ten scientifics. Balderdash !



>>1231
keep in mind that einstein was a socialist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu8lQKVcbOs

>The most basic part of marxist philosophy is the assertion that matter is objectively real, right?
Marx was not a "materialist", he was a naturalist. The only materialist assumption he made was in his critique of Hegel; that the mind proceeds material processes, and so the development of history is really just the advancement of material conditions, which he made equivalent to the development of commodity production. This he called "the materialist concept of history" (e.g. historical materialism). Dialectical materialism is a later invention by Engels.

On materialism, it is a false starter, since it posits that all things are made of a single substance, which in itself is no-thing, and so nothing actually exists, not even matter. The issue is not just ontological, but epistemological, where if the only way to know that materialism is true is a priori reasoning, then you become a rationalist, and thus an implicit idealist, by placing knowledge in the mind alone. Marx was careful to never subscribe to any positive (e.g. abstract) philosophy.



File: 1764903347246.jpg (493.68 KB, 2000x2000, 2599_Holy_Bible_cvr.jpg)

 

What's the leftypol take on this book? I'm not trolling - it's existence has haunted my life. I was raised catholic… Christianity has both ruined & saved my life and my opinions on it have only gotten more complex.

Some of the greatest art of all time has been religiously motivated. But the question of Christianity specifically is a big one. On one hand all manner of brown people are more sincerely christian than a lot of white people have ever been. It might be the one thing saving Africa right now!

But on the other hand The first Roman Empire & Greek empire were polytheistic & they might have achieved a civilizational peak that surpasses the situation we live in right now. Christianity is very homophobic & a huge portion of Europe/UK demographics are atheist & seem to be some of the happiest nations on earth. Christianity might even be the reason that the Roman Empire fell & is responsible for a lot of really bad imperialism & colonialism.

What am I supposed to make of it? Jesus was surely a good man, no? The word of god has saved homeless, sick, and morally corrupt. Where does the justification to do evil come from when people read this?
39 posts and 9 image replies omitted.

>>25888
>We all will become righteous because we are all sinners.
None is Good but God.

>>25447
The only bible that has my imprimatur is the skeptic's annotated version. I even have a hard back copy.
https://skepticsannotatedbible.com/

File: 1777750496243.jpg (611.48 KB, 2048x2001, 1777749099312129.jpg)

>>25741
I love you

God isn't real. Stop this retardation. All religions are false made up inventions, only useful to the modern world as a cautionary example of how large numbers of people can be fooled by manipulative ideas. Eventually the whole world will be atheist and this retardation won't even be studied as a historical curiosity because it's so boring.

>>25950
People will never stop believing in metaphysical bullshit
We replaced angels and demons with AI and other brain worms

But tbh I don’t think people believe in God as a literal cosmic anthropomorphic sapient but rather as a psychosomatic effect



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
Previous[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home