>>4939you have to define the category 'middle class' for it to be meaningful. 'LGBT community' should also be defined (do you just mean "LGBT people" or do you mean the specific, online, english-language america-centric LGBT community?)
most of the online LGBT community are downwardly mobile lower middle class westerners, with a weird sort of distribution that means the
loudest voices are either unemployed and impoverished (lots of time to post, not much else to do), or upper-middle income. (they do a popular podcast about gay movies and posting hot takes doubles as advertising)
but this is a function of a bunch of selection biases (there aren't too many papuan tribesmen with an income of $444 a year posting in english on twitter.com even before you look for the sub-set who're LGBT, and the sub-set of that sub-set who want to talk about LGBT things with foreign strangers they'll never meet irl) rather than because of the distribution of LGBT people themselves.