>>16085>>16108>>16112This actually makes a much better case for OP. In a Soviet America, a musically gifted black boy from Detroit would be sent to an elite musical academy where he would learn how to compose beautiful, complex symphonies. He wouldn’t have to resort to pushing buttons on a sampler to make music but would be taught the highest of musical art form.
Look at China: they ban hip hop almost entirely. They don’t give their schoolchildren MPCs and teach them to “sample” but instead focus on teaching their children how to play classical music using legitimate instruments. MPCs and other samplers are products of the ghetto. The goal of socialism is NOT to romanticize the ghetto but to universalize the beauty that was once previously enjoyed only by aristocrats. It’s the same reason why the USSR had public classical music concerts and covered its buildings, subways and public spaces with SOCIALIST REALIST art.
What’s interesting is how Detroit also used to be covered in Socialist Realist murals like those of Diego Rivera during the New Deal. You saw paintings that turned auto workers into heroes. Now Detroit is ground zero for ugliness in America. If beauty is our second creator, what kind of people is ugliness creating?