[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/tech/ - Technology

"Technology reveals the active relation of man to nature" - Karl Marx
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1752600034757.png (516.82 KB, 720x934, GooglepheneOS.png)

 

GrapheneOS cannot be fully trusted because it runs on Google's proprietary hardware stack, which remains a critical vulnerability. While GrapheneOS markets itself as a privacy-focused alternative, its security is undermined by the fact that it operates on devices like Google's Pixel smartphones—hardware designed and controlled entirely by Google. Unlike other OEMs, Google does not merely integrate off-the-shelf components; it designs its own processors (e.g., Tensor chips) and develops the closed-source firmware and software that power them. Other manufacturers receive binary blobs from chipmakers, which they cannot modify, but Google retains unilateral authority to embed hidden functionalities or surveillance mechanisms directly into the hardware-software ecosystem.

This means Google could inject malicious code into the processor’s firmware—code that operates independently of Android (and thus independently of GrapheneOS itself). Such malware would run at the hardware level, bypassing the operating system entirely and evading detection. If Google exploits this capability in its proprietary GApps, the same logic applies to the foundational software controlling its processors. Since GrapheneOS cannot audit or modify these closed-source components, users are left exposed to potential backdoors.

If you trust GrapheneOS on Pixel devices, you must also trust Google’s closed-source hardware stack—the very same infrastructure that could enable pervasive surveillance. In that case, there is no meaningful distinction between GrapheneOS and stock Android; both rely on Google’s opaque technology. Conversely, if you reject GApps and Google’s data harvesting, you cannot reconcile that distrust with reliance on Google’s hardware. To truly deGoogle, you must abandon devices where the manufacturer controls the silicon itself.
66 posts and 15 image replies omitted.

>>30907
Why not a pinephone
>uber
Don't they have a browser webapp?

>>30905
>massive anti-GOS shilling

Where? Go to Reddit, Youtube or any mainstream plattform, the, are all pro Gos. Mainstream media is promoting and advertising Gos on a massive scale: "These phones are so secure, police can't break them!"

I have to own a smartphone for my job and the software my company uses is only on IOS, therefore I must own an iPhone to continue being employed. I have already lost my right to choose which devices or software I will or won't use in my work life, does it really make any difference if I take some principled stand against proprietary software during my free hours? Is everybody in the world supposed to quit their jobs if their jobs force them to use proprietary software?

kinda seems like a privacy oriented OS on your voluntary government sponsored wiretipe is not a thing

There are issues with GrapheneOS worth discussion, but most of what someone seems to be posting in this thread is very badly misinformed.

Pixels, like the Nexus before them, were the "developer focused" phone that got AOSP and similar development for it primarily, instead of contesting with whatever bullshit Samsung wanted to drop atop it, or how Samsung or Verizon decided to stop updating your OS or firmware in a year or two etc.
>Pixel hardware
Pixel hardware is exactly as proprietary as the rest of mobile hardware. Do you think that a Qualcomm Snapdragon chip is magically FOSS top to bottom? Hell, most Tensor chips were basically Samsung Exynos which again were certain proprietary bits. Like all other phone SoC, there are licensed bits and proprietary hardware elements, as well as closed baseband firmware and the use of binary blobs etc. This is common with just about any device. Do I wish it was different? Absolutely and we should leverage Google, Qualcomm and others into shipping more open hardware if possible, but there's nothing magically more locked down or suspicious with the Pixel line vs other manufacturers.
>but uh what if its compromised, i don't have any evidence it is but if it was it could be reading everything and saving everything etc
There's literally more evidence that Chinese made smartphones from their major companies have vacuumed up tons of data vs those from other brands, yet you're worried about a hypothetical like this? There's more evidence for and wider hypothetical potential for a lot of the chinese devices using chinese chips made in chinese factories etc.

These are issues with GrapheneOS and Pixel that are worth critiquing fairly, but nothing like what is being discussed here.



File: 1755099358255.gif (692.79 KB, 768x256, rain.gif)

 

Is there any reason to stick with jpg/png formats over things like webp/avif. Atleast for webp software support that once was not there now is. I'm not just talking about web, but in general bulk storage also.

AVIF is a mess from a technical standpoint. designed by committee. it doesn't just store a straight up image, no no no. it splits the image up into chunks, each of which can be stored using any codec supported by the format. this is a huge hassle for the internal data model for many project, for example ffmpeg
WebP is OK, but getting support for it everywhere seems to be slow going. I'm not convinced it's sufficiently better than cjpeg to justify widespread use. JPEG itself has many features that improve its compression that no one uses for some reason. like pyramidal coding

>>30836
to elaborate on this:
https://calendar.perfplanet.com/2014/mozjpeg-3-0/
>Mozilla has done a study of image formats and concluded that WebP and JPEG XR are not a big-enough improvement over well-optimized JPEG. In the study only HEVC (H.265) was significantly better, but it’s a patent-encumbered format, so it can’t be used freely (shhhh!)

>>30806
>>30836
webp seems ok to me. I guess avif is technically more fancier, but it has no support. both can do lossy and lossless so that's not an issue

It just werks™



File: 1748879958296.jpg (321.79 KB, 1280x1280, 3e37vnj6l0t21.jpg)

 

Suckless seems like a great way to transition from rice to programming.
A good set of training-wheels for the bicycle of the mind.
However there's something extremely pathological about not wanting well designed and implemented features.
It's like cachexia from voluntarily avoiding healthy fats.

This isn't to advocate feature creep, which is ugly and doesn't add to the design of the system.
In rejecting big systemic components which integrate they may even make things more complex.
This is something like having a small standard library, avoiding RPC, or even loose coupling of components.
Implementing these can reduce duplication, and reduce complexity, while allowing more to be achieved.

Everywhere the minimalist takes something rich and make it small.
33 posts and 3 image replies omitted.

>>30345
Well I can't imagine that a microkernel is actually minimal nor keeping it simple stupid, since otherwise we'd not have to keep calling the bastard GNU/Linux because GNU would be using the Hurd.

>>30347
But a microkernel is more aligned with the UNIX philosophy.
I have heard that the issue with Hurd is that they are perfectionists, not that they can't get a microkernel working. Doesn't harmonyOS (huawei OS) have a microkernel?

>>30220
>It's absolutely terrible
What do you mean by this? The daemontools approach to service supervision is unambiguously superior to cgroups monitoring and other hacks systemd uses (see http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html). Runit sits on the lower end of daemontools derivatives, nosh is another one that can run systemd unit files http://jdebp.uk./Softwares/nosh/worked-example.html

>>30075
>However there's something extremely pathological about not wanting well designed and implemented features.
Think have walked back on this somewhat due to my wetware being inherently memory constrained.
Because of this reducing the state-space to hold in memory, and less so what one has to search over, is very valuable.
There's probably some nuanced position that involves getting the interfaces correct, and minimal.
For example the difference between a (composable) loop macro versus a large collection of iterator procedures versus loops.

Once again this is only because of a peculiar feature of my wetware.

>>30845
>loop macro
A small collection of iterators functions works just as well.



 

Let me tell you a little secret about flip phones: They run the same hardware as smartphones, just in a different form factor. They're even more proprietary black boxes than the average smartphone and its hard to get even basic specifications. I know because I have one. I'm trying to replace the old version of KaiOS it runs with PostmarketOS; unfortunately, the bootloader is locked. At least with a cheap Android phone you can replace Android with something else.
13 posts omitted.

>>30820
People are operating motor vehicles while looking at their phones. I've never seen anybody do that with any other tool. People look at their phones for an average of 4 or 5 hours a day. I personally don't have an issue, but smartphones are crack for most people and they'd probably be better served with a simpler tool.

>>30822
>I've never seen anybody do that with any other tool
because youre a zoomer who wasnt there for printed maps

>>30807
What a weird trend to buy more crap

>>30824
>>30820
If you're not going to constantly use your phone, it's worth it for the battery life alone, because you don't have to bother with charging it every day. I also got a dedicated mp3 player for $30 that can play 48h of music consecutively on a similar basis.

>They're even more proprietary black boxes

People don't buy dumbphones to escape from proprietary software, they buy them because they just want a telephone and they don't want a complex general purpose customizeable device that demands so much of their attention.



File: 1734060573790.png (3.73 KB, 389x129, aisucks.png)

 

So, I'm a musician, who wants to have a musical career (a lot of communist musicians had stable careers) and meanwhile stupid porkies tell me that "no, we'd prefer if you were replaced, prole, because there if no place for people like you" and I hear, not only music, but other art, computer science, programming etc. will be replaced by AI. How do we stop this, so people are still prosperous in the real socialst societies?
613 posts and 87 image replies omitted.

>>30769
I thought about it and yes, this squares off with internal sergey brin emails that requests remaining google staff to put in 60+ hour work weeks, it's contradictory at face value, but what's going on is obvious, the gaps in staffing are actually being felt and are not being filled with AI, and they're requesting people to put in more work to make up for it.

ok i'm sorry for doubting mr altman, truly these things are the future. deepseek is a stuck up nonce and refuses to answer these important questions

>>30784
Well after the poor showing for chatgpt 5 altman has thrown in the towl on AGI, and declared it a useless term

Nope, it's quite possible with a lot more work; but not by burgers

>>30797
>Nope, it's quite possible with a lot more work
Not with LLMs, they are scaled quite substantially but still are unable to solve pre-schooler sokoban puzzles

>>30749
You can download full dumps of it so it's not like AI bros are forced to scrape the site.



 

what masks would you recommend to someone that will attend a gathering during which he will be recorded from all angles? itt we discuss such things, potential ways to mask ourselves in a way that makes it as hard as possible for future algorithms to: a. reconstruct the face; and b. match the face with already existing databases.

bonus points if the mask allows the person to view clearly without exposing too much of the eye area
29 posts and 9 image replies omitted.

>>26678
>inb4 camera doesn't detect infrared

File: 1738183150238.png (159.52 KB, 250x314, ClipboardImage.png)


File: 1752835365915.gif (926.16 KB, 320x240, twoweeks.gif)

>>28323
Rubber ARMS?? Is this to be a completely different color? Hardcore level there.

>>26397
Cops will just look at your phone location data and see if you left it at home to determine if it was indeed you carrying a provoking sign at the function

>>26701
Needs sunglasses at the very least



File: 1752773618291.png (97.37 KB, 1200x707, ClipboardImage.png)

 

where to get free uncensored deepseek online? huggingchat used to have it but now that's dead. I know I can run it locally on my own machine, but that's slow and I'm a mooch. what elase can I say?
2 posts omitted.

>>30604
oh idk i just don't feel like making an account on the website and heard if you use it in open source spaces you won't ever get a BS answer

also tired of everything needing a google email or phone number and rejecting temp email services. huggingface let me use a temp email service to access deepseek but the deepseek website does not. this is less about muh heckin epic tinyman square questions than it is about having a simple free and anonymous source for using it

>>30600
I think i know one, give me a day anon

>>30600

There used to be one by the name of oniongpt, but its gone now. The creator stopped working on it and accidentelly wiped everything when he was doing a project sorry bud.

Q: Where can I run it online?
A: Any time you have a question sensitive enough to warrant an uncensored model, you have a question sensitive enough to only run it locally.

Q: How can I run it locally?
A: Wait for a smaller more capable model.



 

I haven't personally seen this phenomenon yet, only saw someone on fedi joke about it, but have there been ads targeted toward AI training web crawlers yet? Like something illegible to human users but specifically made so the LLM would do an ad read their products when prompted for something (optionally) related? Or since a lot of bourgoises have went full koolaid about AI, trying to market to the AI as a consumer demographic itself?

Literally search for SEO journals, it's one of the few virtuous cycles in science and technology

I'd link some blogs, but I just got a mathematical and!! geometric proof for dialectical and historical materialism; implies scientific socialism; implies communism; implies concrete not abstract Full Communism implies and is implied by Abundance
not sorry

So I'll give you the QRD, bots love accurate, honest truthful, lovingly hand corrected artistisinal bot slop make it informative for a human in the zone of proximal development of your target audience and you gravy

We could teach the AI how to goon

# Kill them (they're likely stuck)
sudo kill -TERM 513163 514537

# If they don't die gracefully:
sudo kill -KILL 513163 514537

The above is an actual output of an actual AI.



 


about fucking time

>Focus group testing told Hyundai that people get ‘annoyed and steamed’ when using touchscreens in cars.
were they asking the same GenZ ipad babies who stole so many of their badly secured cars as a meme? lmao
https://www.vice.com/en/article/bvj5jv/kia-and-hyundai-blame-tiktok-and-instagram-for-their-cars-getting-stolen

Imagine banning holding a phone to your ear while driving on the basis it’s a distraction, but massive touch screens that you MUST look at to interact with, that have no tactility to feel for buttons without looking, let alone developing muscle memory for, were never questioned.

Age of the touchskkkreen has yet to begin for me, see you in 20 years if today's shitboxes aren't on the market still



File: 1608526010241.jpeg (573.58 KB, 1140x500, cyber_security.jpeg)

 

Comrades, we need a thread on privacy. Any decent activist should try ways of staying anonymous on the web and prevent being tracked by governments and corporations.General tips===* Use free software as much as you can.* Use GNU/Linux and keep it up-to-date, to be sure that you don't have unpatched security exploits* Don't use Flash Player, use youtube-dl instead for watching streaming videos online* Do not use Google, use DuckDuckGo or StartPage instead* Use a password manager like Keepass or for GNU/Linux users keepassx. Create new passwords for every site that you visit and use a strong password as a master password. A tip for easy remembering of your master password is to use a sentence. "i fucking love cookies and tits!" with extra capital characters etc. is easier to remember than some random characters and long enough to prevent brute force attacks of any kind.* Use the Tor Browser Bundle if you really want to stay anonymous.Firefox====* Go to Preferences -> History and set History to "Never remember history". * See for additional tweaks: https://github.com/amq/firefox-debloat and https://vikingvpn.com/cybersecurity-wiki/browser-security/guide-hardening-mozilla-firefox-for-privacy-and-securityAdd-ons-----------* Use uBlock Origin for preventing tracking etc. Bonus: use hard-mode to manually whitelist external domains on sites. Don't use uBlock but be sure to use uBlock Origin https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Blocking-mode:-hard-mode* HTTPS Everywhere* DecentralEyes: prevents CDN hosting from tracking you (Google for Jquery etc.)* Self Destructing Cookies: only allow cookies that you choose to allowOS==* Encrypt your hard drive or home partition at least* If you use GNU/Linux, you can try to restrict systemd or syslog from logging. * Use a distribution which takes security seriously. Also, be sure that you don't install a lot of things outside the repository. It will cover most of your needs.Real life tips===* Pay with cash if you canFeel free to provide tips to each other comrades!
265 posts and 25 image replies omitted.

>>30529
https://www.kuketz-blog.de/grapheneos-das-android-fuer-sicherheits-und-datenschutzfreaks/
Is reasonably comprehensive for other ROMs, but the closest thing here for GrapheneOS is the Datensendeverhalten section.

>>30530
This is not a professional audit of Graphene OS. This is just a blogpost.

>>30531
Yes. My bad.

What I’d like to add: I believe GrapheneOS has really become a kind of cult, and its followers can’t tolerate any factual criticism at all. The Kuketz forum is one such place. You absolutely mustn’t say anything negative about GrapheneOS there or you’ll be banned immediately. That’s also why I no longer trust Mike Kuketz’s “expertise.” His ideological blind spot on this topic is very obvious.

Where does the belief come from that GrapheneOS is the gold standard for privacy-friendly smartphone OSes? Simply because the developers claim it is. But without professional, truly independent audits, GrapheneOS isn’t any more trustworthy than the Braxphone.

It was a big mistake for Edward Snowden to publicly endorse GrapheneOS. People trust him, but in this case he actually has no idea and can’t objectively say whether GrapheneOS really lives up to its promises. Did Snowden review the code? As far as I know, he did not.

File: 1754254944485.jpg (40.95 KB, 718x404, a23fdh.jpg)

GOOD EVENING PRIVACY BROS



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home