[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]

/tech/ - Technology

"Technology reveals the active relation of man to nature" - Karl Marx
Password (For file deletion.)

Join our Matrix Chat <=> IRC: #leftypol on Rizon

| Catalog | Home


After Charlottesville, GoDaddy and Cloudflare dropped the Daily Stormer. They took 6 months to find a host afterwards(at dailystormer.name). And it wasn't just registrars and TLDs that were dropping them, but other services you wouldn't even think of also, from Airbnb to Uber to dating services to all of social media (including FaceBook, Twitter and YouTube), to payment processors like PayPal and all the major ones like MasterCard, Visa, Discover, and Amex, even the most major Bitcoin retailer Coinbase, and so on. What was most surprising to me was that Cloud flare rejected them, given Matthew Prince's rather libertarian views. This is something he has never done up until that point. They instead opted for BitMitigate. After Stormfront went down, they took it to court and won, however in the meantime Stormfront users configured localhost in their hosts file to access it. So instead of asking the internet where 'www.example.com' is, you can write the IP address in your hosts file and it will just use that information. This worked, but wasn't very practical as only people who have the ip can find and connect to it that way.

The internet is more delicate than most people would like to admit. All levels of internet, ranging from VPS servers (DigitalOcean and Linode both censor offensive content), to IP addresses and ASN numbers (there are only five companies that issue these in the entire world, with ARIN being the American one, and if they say you can’t get any internet resources, you’re fucked), to ISPs (your area has a limited number of available ISPs, and they are private companies which can terminate your service at any time for any reason or no reason. ColoCrossing in Buffalo physically unplugged Null’s servers in 2019 for hosting Kiwi Farms and Encyclopedia Dramatica), to peers (when data traverses the Internet most of its route is done through third party networks, not your upstream directly. If your content is offensive enough that peers start refusing to deliver content to or from your IPs, you can essentially be cut out from the world wide web. NTT refuses to peer with any company that peers with Null’s subnet, for instance), to domain names (this requires the blessing of two more companies: The registrar which leases the domain to the customer, and the Network Information Center (NIC) which owns the top-level domain. As an example: ZeroHedge uses EasyDNS as its registrar, and all .COM domains are controlled by Verisign. Getting permissiPost too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 1639173171912.jpg (331.67 KB, 1548x1300, imgbyid.jpg)

the question here is of infrastructure, and how much the internet continues to be centered on it despite lolbertarian delusions of decentralization or whatever
the internet really still runs on corporations (the "backbone") and the labour that they provide to keep that "backbone" running, and you need equally scalable services to survive over that "backbone" especially under capitalism


Zeronet is immune to DDOSing and deplatforming.


Thats a pretty good summary of the issue of censorship and the centralization of internet infrastructure and resources. What can I say. I'm aware of all these issues. I dont think my developer peers are aware nor do they really care.


Worst case scenario is that somebody finds a way to break the internet, a fatal design flaw that can't be fixed or compensated.
That would force us back to square one, and we would have to rebuild the internet from scratch, with a new architecture that does not have this weakness. Even if it is so bad that we're forced to rewire the planet a second time, we're just going to do that. People have been building information systems for millennia. When ever you build a system there's going to be those who try to disrupt and break it, when they succeed people will learn from it and rebuild in a more robust way.

Seems like you are correct, since content like a webpage is tied to an encryption key, and not a networking resource.


muh blockchain

File: 1630676136108.jpg (101.01 KB, 1024x682, download_20210804_175058.jpg)


So, if one of the weaknesses of our surveillance state is that there have to be people to sift through information, is it possible to flood info to the point where the effectiveness of the eye in the sky is diminished?
24 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.


Quantity does after all have a quality of its own


>make bots that spam bomb threats and shit constantly all over the internet
>no longer possible to know what's real or fake due to sheer volume
surprised this isn't already happening given how big of a problem spam phone calls have been for a while.


>i think this is basically the dialectical way to deal with it
>dialectical way
Please stop.


>make bots that spam bomb threats and shit constantly all over the internet
>no longer possible to know what's real or fake due to sheer volume
there is no good way to get accurate feedback information, and that makes it too hard to configure or optimize the bots.

>surprised this isn't already happening given how big of a problem spam phone calls have been for a while.

because the system can learn and adapt. Exploits are not just used as soon as somebody figures it out, they are hoarded, to be used with strategic timing.
Higher level strategic considerations include combining exploits in a way that makes it harder to detect or harder to adapt too.


People are doing that, it's called swatting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatting
>they either waste their time (and are potentially demoralized also) or so they become desensitized or stop giving a shit about certain patterns.
or 3. make the state target and harass our enemies. Get all the fash swatted every day.

File: 1639363205678.jpg (70.78 KB, 1200x627, AdobeLogo.jpg)


This mother fucking company. I need to use some of their software like photoshop and illustrator but I can't play a damn monthly fee for their creative cloud shit. Any anons know how one might gain access to these programs without a blood sucking subscription?
6 posts omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 1639391207523-0.png (86.27 KB, 504x500, gimp.png)

File: 1639391207523-1.png (125.09 KB, 487x500, Inkscape.png)

File: 1639391207523-2.png (94.43 KB, 512x512, krita.png)

>I need to use some of their software like photoshop and illustrator
Is there a specific reason as to why?
is something preventing you from using other software ?
does it really have to be exactly that software specifically ?

You could use Inkscape instead of Illustrator for vector graphics

You could use gimp instead of Photoshop or krita if you need more art related features

all these suggestions are free and open source software and they have many plugins that you can add for increased functionality.


Krita's the only decent one out of those three, they are run by the KDE people who are more open to listening to user feedback and continually add new features similar to the team at Blender. There are still lots of edge cases where CSPaint is more convenient to work with though, and it still feels like beta software. GIMP is run by the stubborn Gnome people who refuse to entertain the idea of considering any user feedback regarding UI or features, and Inkscape has only been in maintenance mode and hasn't had feature update for over a decade.


Suggest better alternatives that are also open source.
If you use programs that require a lot of learning investment, and you use proprietary software, the vendor is holding your learning investment hostage, and you are likely to have your skills randomly depreciated.

At the moment image manipulation editors are in a dry spell, the next step is to have object recognition and high level object manipulation, but in order to make that work fast and reliable, computers need to have something like tensor flow microprocessor cores and cameras need to have depth sensors that embed depth information into images.

The proprietary image editors are trying to avoid building robust object recognition like what i described by using large reference databases instead, that is a very foolish attempt at cataloguing infinity. And free software devs have their hands tied because they have to wait for consumer hardware to catch up, or open-hardware like RiskV mature enough to be accessible.


Try out Affinity if you're deadset on purchasing your software, they've got equivalent programs for most of the big stuff Adobe offers and it's a one time purchase as opposed to being monthly. They usually have sales that go on throughout the year, so you could just pirate it to familiarize yourself and see if you like it then buy it on sale. Think I got Affinity Publisher for about $30 when it was on sale last time and its been working well for my hobby projects so far, I've heard generally good things about their Photoshop/Illustrator equivalents.


They released Inkscape 1.0 last year and Inkscape 1.1 this year… It's not dead they are adding new features.


>its really costly on computers to run regardless of the processing power and hard to optimize
>it frequently makes mistakes because if a task is so complex that you need to train a robot to hopefully make the right decision in a constantly changing environment then that means the task itself needs to be simplified not adding more expensive hardware or hell just build a simple cheap to maintain machine that can handle the 1 specific task it was made for
>rarely is it ever used beyond marketing and shoved into shitty released products by the dogshit pile of financial scamming of investors, overpriced gadgets that have the shelf life of milk left in room temperature and hype culture that is the global big tech industry
>this shit was invented during the early 1900s, the times when the cold war was starting and humanity was entering the atomic age only for the tech to become abandoned when actually qualified engineers and scientists instead of tech billionaires realized the tech was shit and had little function in the real world until decades later the corporate world brought a dead technology back again only for the masses this time to realize it really was useless
81 posts and 9 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


That was Marx's big innovation in materialism that he treated society not as some external force that happens to humans, which is the fetishistic view, but as something that humans produce and reproduce.


xxd literally gives you the ASCII character corresponding to each byte you spoiled brat


man we don't even have truly complex and lifelike sex simulators, of course we're not gonna get sexbots any time soon


Is Alexa even locally installed on these shit devices? Doesn't it always need to be connected to the Amazon hive mind for actual functionality?


I think so yes,

File: 1637699119017-0.png (67.58 KB, 746x899, Tokens.png)

File: 1637699119017-1.png (49.52 KB, 740x628, DAOs.png)

File: 1637699119017-2.png (21 KB, 724x499, Daos2.png)


Today on twitter I stumbled across a thread about web3. There was a political compass meme that put Web3 in the LibLeft quadrant and MMT in AuthLeft quadrant. Some users quibbled that Web3 is actually LibRight. I am immediately skeptical of any of these classifications because the implication is that MMT is somehow an explicitly "statist" or "authoritarian" doctrine. I am also skeptical that Web3, given its proximinity with shitcoin technology and teh blockchain and NFTs, that it could ever be considered "leftist." I decided, however, to attempt to research this issue further to see if I could find anything of value in Web3 that might be conducive to bringing about revolution. I went to the following site for reading:
FreeCodeCamp is generally a website that one goes to for various sorts of programming tutorials. Content that is political is not common on this site, but I think this article in question might be the most mystified tech literature that I have read in awhile.

Most of the FreeCodeCamp article on web3 talks about cryptocurrency wallets, the blockchain, and how great they think it is that there are no "gatekeepers." Standard blockchain propaganda that lacks any mention of the fact that the blockchain is environmentally catastrophic given the obscene amount of electrical energy necessary to keep it running.

>see pic related

How are tokens and tokenization any different from shares?
This is extremely reminiscent, to my eyes, of the issue that befalls so-called NFTs. It is seemingly another reinvention of a thing that already exists, in the case of NFTs a reinvention of a deed of ownership, in the case of tokenization a reinvention of shares. How can anyone ascribe revolutionary value to this?

>re: DAOs (pic related #2)

What is a DAO if not a worker cooperative with additional steps? Am I understanding this correctly? While worker cooperatives are definitely an improvement in comparison to the predominant corporate structure endemic to Capitalism, there already exists a critique of worker cooperatives. Fundamentally the problem with worker coops is that worker cooperatives merely ameliorate conditions under Capitalism, but ultimately do not hasten revolutionary processes, aPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
5 posts omitted. Click reply to view.




>environmentally catastrophic given the obscene amount of electrical energy necessary to keep it running.
the cryptofags will counter that only applies to proof of work algos not proof of stake


Actually cryptofags will counter that mining rigs don't need to be anywhere specific. You can set them up in a remote African hydro-electric plant and mine overnight when the energy would have been wasted anyway. And it's not like the current banking system doesn't use electricity. The foreign exchange market processes $5 trillion per day. That is literally people doing nothing but exchanging fiat currencies for other fiat currencies. If you want to talk about a system that wastes more energy than we do now then the bar is actually very high.


It's extra effort for the average person while offering them no benefits. Web3 is bourgeois commodification of everything on the net for the benefit of themselves and a handful of lucky people who are essentially a hybrid of degenerate gambler and cult member.


>""""tokens"""" instead of shares
Another day, another crypto grift.


ITT post a tool or tools you find useful when attacking, maintaining access, bug hunting, recon or whatever else. I'll start:

Weevely3 is my favourite out of the box PHP/.htaccess web shell. Its payload is very small and you can sneak it in to many places and has many features that make the job faster, especially with its pivoting functionality
and lastly its modular allowing easy creation and sharing of new functionality such as adding privilege escalation methods and automated further backdoor and persistent access creation.


is that jeremy hammond? and is the subject a william gibson reference? you must be a xposter from lain


I have no experience with this. What is your main use of these tools? What is your typical attack pattern?


This seems like a fedpost….


File: 1638476612589.png (2.45 KB, 173x115, 1638476610991.png)

>This seems like a fedpost….
Fuck you, if you dont like it minimize and move on.
Yes that is jeremy and a gibson reference. No I dont use lainchan because I cannot handle the extreme larp.

File: 1637777009078.gif (48.45 KB, 256x256, eval-apply.gif)


I came across I think it was a wikipedia article, about a Soviet programming language that was characterized as being "like lisp", but it used a different data structure than lists (strings maybe?). I don't remember the name and now I can't find it. Does anyone know what I'm talking about?
2 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.



Strings being a base atomic type is not the same as strings being structures.

That's an encoding of data external to the program, which then has to parse it into its own internal structure.
From your link:
>JSON is a data encoding and transfer format which has nested structures and arrays, but ultimately builds structure out of string to string mappings.
Here again we have strings as atoms, not as structures. The mapping itself is not "stringly-typed".


You missed the point of the article. Try reading it again, this time trying to understand it instead of nitpicking.



File: 1638471751967.png (13.81 KB, 575x115, refal5.png)

Damn this is a nice (and rather annoying) language.

File: 1637275879586.png (136.29 KB, 1024x750, spurdo.png)


I want to make some software projects in my portfolio/github to show to potential employers. Ideas?
5 posts omitted. Click reply to view.


>or dockerization, kubernetes,
I use these in my personal projects.

But I don't really use them to pad my resume. I'm too autistic to fool people with a padded resume and a flashy interview. I just use them because they are nice packaging tools and I like tinkering with deployment and server stuff as much as I like to program.


Do they actually look at your "portfolio"? In my experience they don't even read your CV.


In my experience they don't read it but they sure measure how long it is.


No, they've got neural networks for filtering resumes now.


small shops do look at the cv/githubs. The AI hr filters mostly applies to big companies that post job ads on linkedin/etc. and get 1k+ resumes per job posting

File: 1636708786445.png (131.6 KB, 622x1009, sefaria-app.png)


Has anyone thought of making an app similar to Sefaria but instead of religious texts it has a list of Marxist (and other socialist) texts, basically the kind of stuff you see on Marxists.org?


good bait


The marxists.xyz archive can be accessed by any OPDS-compatible device or app, see https://archive.marxists.xyz/help/opds for info. We're still working on adding basic texts to the archive, see >>>/edu/7066 for more info on the project.

File: 1636809991084.png (42.65 KB, 900x900, speculator.png)


Learning from the Era of Ticket Scalping
>Have you ever heard about ticket scalping? This is a practice that dates back to the days of offline ticket sales and live performances.
>Ticket scalping today is a lot more sophisticated. Scalpers use bots and data mining tools to find the most profitable tickets to buy. They then resell those tickets to actual customers with a margin added to the prices.
>The higher the demand for those tickets, the higher the margin will be. A $50 ticket for a live performance can sell for a whopping $2,500 to the right customer. Even smaller margins are lucrative enough when you consider the number of tickets that a scalper can buy and sell.
>Bots make this entire business more scalable too. Rather than manually searching for tickets and buying them at different prices, scalpers can automate the whole process using bots and proxies. Target websites – usually ticket sites – are also monitored more closely.
>Most ticket sites support automated checkouts and digital tickets, allowing bots to parse data from confirmation emails and automatically resell tickets as soon as they are purchased. There is no need to build a manual database of available tickets.

Similar Occurrences
>If the flow of ticket scalping looks familiar, it is because the same method is now being used by sneakerheads who scalp limited edition sneakers from top sites. Rather than manually waiting for a sneaker to become available, scalpers automatically monitor sneaker sites for new releases.
>As soon as the items become available, bots will start generating transactions and using their automated checkout features to snatch sneakers. They can even be programmed to buy a set of sizes or variations depending on availability. Sneaker scalpers can then resell the purchased sneakers at a huge markup.
>This is not a unique occurrence. We are starting to see bots in other markets too, particularly markets where supply is limited. Collectibles, books, even everyday items in short supply are targets for scalping using bots and proxies.

It’s Not Technical
>There are reasons why scalping is becoming more common in today’s market. One of the reasons is the fact thatPost too long. Click here to view the full text.


Most scalpers have insiders helping them get tickets/stuff before anybody else. There's no uber edgy coding going on. It's basically nepotism.


how do you play the game of nepotism ?
can it be negated somehow ? get the nepotanians to rat each other out ?

Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / siberia / hobby / tech / edu / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta / roulette ] [ cytube / git ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru / zine ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home