/tech/ - Technology

Superconductors is this magical new supposable discovery solve all of capitalism problems and head towards eco-capitalism?

HA!

It might reduce eco waste but how many years will it take to make it factory assemble ready and will they use it?

https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/27/room_temperature_superconductor_paper/

> Join fbi.gov for community trying to opensource a clone of a popular game engine
> Look at game engine
< MIT License
> Leave

Is the entire gamedev community cucked? Nearly impossible finding a recent github project without some 'permissive' but non-copyleft license. Why would anyone as a reaction try to clone a game they feel should belong to the community while giving other usurpers the chance to turn it into a botched IP?

give it to me straight, /tech/. Does this mean my commie shitposts and memes that I post on /leftypol/ will be traceable to me?

Fucking KNEEL. You will die but C will live. C wont die out because of embedded systems. So long as there is electricity, C will be forever. C is used in kernels. I like to see fools who think C will die. C prioritizes the purity of atomic control, raw power, and a small and manageable feature set because that's what the rest of the computing world needs as a foundation. A feature not provided can't be flawed or slow - the fewer features are crammed into C itself, the less opportunity there is for bugs to creep in beneath the very feet of every OS and many interpreted languages at the same time. Python is the worst language to start with because it promotes bad practices and doesn't really teach you anything not to mention dynamic types make it hard to understand certain concepts like how data is actually represented and it creates this illusion that basically lie to people as to whats actually happening. having that much disconnect from processors that do very simple things to accomplish a specific task and over-engineering solutions because it conforms to language syntax is just stupid. there is no better starting point than C. C syntax is explicit and clear and actually lets you do exactly what you want to accomplish conforming to the actual hardware and not some made up language syntax. its why c will never truly be replaced. The current languages that are shilled in shillicon valley are all terrible. JavaShit is a complete disaster and we are stuck with it and that's the reason we have tons of dependencies and libraries with very sketchy glue code. OOP is also bad as it has a lot of hidden allocations that happen with constructors and make compile times more complex and harder to optimize or debug compared to simple functional direct code without a million rules that you have to follow giving you no real freedom to design software. There are reasons to redesign and make custom engines for handling specific tasks. Most languages cant exist without C, as their runtimes are all basically C, and it's the language that runs other languages and provides the abstractions people use. When you no longer have to think about hardware or what your code is doing that leads to ruin and slow sub-optimal code and libraries and dependencies. Python is ugly and hard to read. you have absolutely no idea what most of those libraries are actually doing and you lose sight completely of programming and live outside of reality. C syntax is explicit and clear and aPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Anyone watch those shows about prison inventions? I wonder what the most sophisticated onss would be. My three biggest questions would be

1.) A gun
2.) A computer
3.) Bombs
4.) A canera
5.) A jet pack

P much all improvised stuff you see in prisons are all essentially the same thing: pointed weapons. If you went to prison and you were squaring up with some hardened convicts who are all armed with shanks, you'd need to upgrade in technology to fairly face them head-on since the no. #1 rule in a fight is there are no rules whatsoever. For a gun I was thinking of a Gauss rifle (similar to the Arc Flash GR-1 Anvil which has the same amount of muzzle velocity as a .22lr (note that most "Gauss guns" you see on YouTube are harmless toys). They shoot small magnetic projectiles and are quite bulky in size. I was thinking you could propbably make one (including the capacitors) out of car parts, among other things like wires and stuff. Because I know there are automobile jobs available in prisons in the US. These guns require no powder propellant.

Second one is computers. I heard one story of an inmate in ohio that made computers and connected them through the ceiling straight into the WiFi network out of pre-made computer parts. Obviously not everybody has access to salvaged and repurposed computer (esp not ones that can easily be smuggled) so my idea would be to make a PDA out of the Electronic Control Units to a car (which connects to the Controller Area Network). But then again I'm no expert in engineering, but I do know that a lot of people in prison do, since all they have is time on their hands whereas most people are preoccupied.

As for bombs, I would think that whoever is in the woodshop could make a Roman-style Ballista + tin cans + airbag inflators from cars, again, from a prison job, since the older ones come in capsules that have sodium azide in them - which is a shock sensitive primary explosive (sometimes mixed with potassium nitrate and silicon dioxide to reduce harmful byproducts), whereas the newer ones rely on a mixture between Guanidine Nitrate w/ Copper Nitrate as the oxidizer. There was one Japanese company that sold ammonipum nitrate airbag inflators that ceased production due to lawsuits anx recalls that still might be on the streets even now. And aside from that, some newer cars use gases as some experimental thing (I think helium or argon-helium mix). But azide and ammonium nitrate-based ePost too long. Click here to view the full text.

https://junyanz.github.io/CycleGAN/
>Image-to-image translation is a class of vision and graphics problems where the goal is to learn the mapping between an input image and an output image using a training set of aligned image pairs. However, for many tasks, paired training data will not be available. We present an approach for learning to translate an image from a source domain X to a target domain Y in the absence of paired examples. Our goal is to learn a mapping G: X → Y, such that the distribution of images from G(X) is indistinguishable from the distribution Y using an adversarial loss. Because this mapping is highly under-constrained, we couple it with an inverse mapping F: Y → X and introduce a cycle consistency loss to push F(G(X)) ≈ X (and vice versa). Qualitative results are presented on several tasks where paired training data does not exist, including collection style transfer, object transfiguration, season transfer, photo enhancement, etc. Quantitative comparisons against several prior methods demonstrate the superiority of our approach.

Looks like fun to play around with and create trippy art if you have a GPU

All of their phones are overpriced fucking garbage and always have been. The products that aren’t phones can still be considered as useful as literal e waste and only exist so petit bourgeoisie can float about their Shri no one cares about in public like the rats they’re, no one gives a shit about AirPods watches fucking whatever they hell they call computer stands in the slightest and they improve nothing about electronic hardware. All of their products wear out in a year at best and god forbid you don’t have protection for any smartphone/Mac you have for those things because they will break instantaneously(reminder these rats will prohibit you from being allowed to fix your phone from private repairmen) and all of apples products might as well require you to file out your entire life’s story worth of info to use or download because that company couldn’t give less of a shit about how much info they collect on their customers and exist as a vassale of the American government. I wish it was just apple that was a noninnovative vapourware tech corporation but unfortunately the entire western big tech industry thrives on hype and stolen ideas and hasn’t pumped out anything innovative in over 60 years except for the might as well be dead corporations that are IBM and Intel that only make me moderately dislike capitalism less because they actually have humanity something that wasn’t complete and total utter fucking nonsense

This is what computers looked like in 1492-1932 (over the span of 440 years total, this is what people had to use before electricity became common).

Zag Forums is an 8chan archive disguised as a forum. It seems no one is posting in it and the site only serves as an advertisement space.
I came across unstructured link farms, fake filesharing sites and autogenerated reviews before, but this type of site seems unique to me if only because of the moderate effort needed to set it up.
Are these types of forums more common than i thought or may this have been an attempt at a type of spam site that never caught on?