/tech/ - Technology

move to north korea

Travel to south korea and fly in a raspberry pi with a drone and hope you both find an open wifi spot and you don't start an international incident.
Travel to north korea and stash a raspberry pi and hope you don't start an international incident.

>>32821

동지, 경청해 주셔서 진심으로 감사드립니다. 저희 요원들이 곧 모시러 갈 것이며, 조선민주주의공화국에서 Disco Elysium 를 즐기시고 burger 를 드실 수 있습니다. :)

Considering what I'm reading,it only seems like AI force you to not be able to license it,which is even better

>>32818
Better for who?

>>32819
in general ?
it both means you can't monetize it,nor even claim it via copyleft or anything,it effectively sideline AI work entirely.

>>32817
Yeah. The “open source community” is going to die. I saw something very weird the other day where a guy on X was telling a vibecoder that he needs to use his copyleft license if he’s building off his code and he just told him he didn’t give a fuck bitch as if he didn’t even understand what the guy was talking about.

This idea here, take some original IP and just tell AI to rephrase it to take ownership, may have further implications than just software. It might extend to… literally all IP.

>>32820
You can monetize it as long as you keep it a secret.

>>27803
They are not threatening Cockli with closure. Vince wants to close it if they try anything. Not the same thing.
It's understandable but some people would prefer to keep being reachable as it wont change anything for them (GPG use + metadata being already spied on anyway) and they may need it as it's their only mean of communication with some people (like a journalist and his source, just for example).
And it may not even be true at all, for all we know maybe Vince is just trying to grab a few $. I hope not but it's a possibility.

>riseup continues to operate with absolutely no pressure from the powers that be
They were under 2 FBI gag orders a few years ago. Idk but that's some pressure.
Now they have onions, end to end encryption (irrc) and still push people to use GPG and keep ransomware operator at bay with their invite only system, that may explain why they have less pressure.

Again, please stop acting like you don't understand that. I think, I hope (as you said you work in infosec), you are just -acting- stupid.

Could I get a code too?
[email protected]

>>29753
no

Thoughts on Disroot?

>>32788
I use it. It's nice, but I would still use GPG

damn, so it's not just california. i guess it is a coordinated effort after all, this fucking sucks

they're going all in on literal 1984 surveillance dystopia and aren't gonna stop unless there's a revolution. even if these bills get shot down, they're going to just keep pushing for it and hiding these measures in other bills like they've been doing with everything else.

>>32752
so far it's just California and Colorado but I wouldn't be surprise in the near future more states or perhaps congress would push this bullshit
>>32753
Unfortunately I don't see it being shot down if it pass the general assembly, the governor of my state is a right-wing libertarian anti-vaxxer who thinks corporations should have access to as much data as possible

>>32461
>a central censor to allow for more costly filters
Filters shouldn't be costly, unless there's something deeply wrong with your architecture (like emacs gnus scoring articles in a single thread by fetching them multiple times).
>The trouble is that I'm not sure the bots can do a good enough job.
They likely can't. This is why you give users the options to configure these filters, because it allows them to do aggressive filtering at their own risk. The more a filter or lack thereof bothers them personally, the more time they will spend on refining it, a textbook case of worse-is-better.

>>32471
>Filters shouldn't be costly.
Well, if we're using LLMs at all they would be from the user perspective.

>They likely can't. This is why you give users the options to configure these filters, because it allows them to do aggressive filtering at their own risk.
This tracks, it's a good idea. Having two tiers of filtering, one for basic federation (meeting basic social standards of the fediverse) and another tier with per instance filtering you could make it federate well, at least on the level of the Group. I also like the idea that sense we're working with trees of a single inReplyTo link per post you can go ahead and hide entire trees at once. Making bump ordering work with this is a tractable problem.

Went ahead and got the creation of Note and Article objects, and the display of the catalog done today with the help of "opencode". No file attachments at the moment of thread pages. Had to replace the >!spoiler!< syntax with the more contemporary ||spoiler|| so that the quotes would parse correctly.

Today had opencode add the thread posts, I didn't really like the way it structured the model code so I had to fix this.

Had another idea: a "difficult" POW for newly created accounts. This is roughly equivalent to banning everyone by default and having a default ban length. With this you could have actual user Actors instead of just the Group, but purely optional usernames, and still have bans that make some sense. Sort of think I no longer have the energy to dedicate to this project. Might just wait for the LLMs to get good enough to write this themselves.

https://github.com/social-production
Forgot the github link

ai bros on suicide watch

I’ve used AI to generate a bunch of dashboards for various random things I wanted to visualize and unfortunately I’ve gained the ability to instantly recognize vibe-coded UI. For some reason all the bots have a very limited visual language. I can’t unsee it now and so now so many new webpages just make me nauseous to look at.

Just take a look at “dataisbeautiful” if you don’t know what I mean yet. It’s all Claude coded visualizations. Black backgrounds with colorful UI elements, way too much text, too many elements, unironically “not beautiful” representations of data that are overloaded with irrelevant and confounding analytics.

The entire pro-AI side of the discourse is basically just this, isn't it

>>32834
Yes, it’s literally all AI generated posts.

I use it so much at work (code) that I can instantly recognize it and often down to which model and which version. Though they blur together. I’m always surprised and a little disgusted when I go into, for example, Reddit, and see some AI generated OP with AI “polished” responses and the actual humans responding to it not even noticing apparently.

But they also simply don’t care about human life at all, at the far end. They think 99% of humanity is effectively worthless chaff, non-productive and made obsolete by commoditized intelligence. The cause of this is actually primarily capitalism, I think, because they don’t understand the purpose of anything that does boost productivity or make markets more efficient. So if you are inefficient and unproductive, you are worthless. What you are as a human? If you bring this up you’ll be scoffed at, as if this questions is a childish thought that they’ve already refuted.

Incidentally I can totally see the awful agent pipeline they have set up:

>“Hum, the user seems to believe the previous target designation was incorrect. This is a critical issue. I need to handle this delicately….”

>You were right to push back on that. On closer examination, that is not a military barracks but is clearly a school. Do not push that button. This is not a valid military target. Thanks for setting me straight. Are there more targets you would like me to evaluate? Or would you like me to explain why bombing protected civilian infrastructure is a war crime?