>>29711>leave thread after making my post>instant reeeing by all the liberals feeling called out and trying to deflect, cope and otherwise bring up false points>only one actual effort-response.
Effort post anon - (you) know who you are - while I disagree with your argument and think that you're approaching this lopsided, I respect you for actually arguing your point and criticism instead of lashing out like a child and screeching "N-nazis" at those you perceive to be incorrect. Ironically you're proving my point however, that if "patsocs" or whatever nonsense it is, post here and you can't write a proper response, or if you can't just hide and ignore, then that's on the others. Plenty of groups on this site are what I would consider fairly bad faith, but I wouldn't have them banned, unless a specific reason is given for an individual. I can argue and debunk a /pol/fag on their nonsense, just as easily as I can argue and out-debate a liberal, I've done so before on this site, such as in the /edu/ Debunk thread that I made years ago, and where-in a /pol/fag argued all sorts of capitalist talking points that I shot down methodically.
Again, if you are incapable of providing a a proper argument or rebuttal to your verbal opponent then perhaps you need to re-assess how well informed you are and what position you should be taking.