/meta/ - Ruthless criticism of all that exists (in leftypol.org)

>>27120
Trotchads keep winning

>>27115
>vidrel
you couldn't even crop the imperialist apologia b4 it turns from obligatory tragedy cope to obligatory "the superior ubermensch hero got away from the useless shiddy aim goons thoe!!1" cope?

they meant well, go in peace

>>27122
the british spooks are the ultimate bad guys in the movie, it's pretty good

Kek

>>26963
yeah yeah i know about those
stupid thread i guess just ignore me

Idk where to post this but what is the thread limit on AKM?

>%triforce
THEY WERE CHEATING THE ENTIRE TIME???

>>27005
It was an inside job?

>>26966
i counted 62 rows, so assuming I'm off probably 128 since that's an exponent of 2.

>>26926
Speak of the Devil and He shall appear.
I was gonna make a serious reply but just looking at all the absurd assumptions it's clear that it won't be of any use. First that is not me you are replying to and it's a mystery to me why they even bothered replying.
>shouldn't want
What's it to you what I want and don't want? My motivations are beyond your comprehension.
>dev resignation
If the Dev couldn't accomplish your goals, what chance do you have?
>a hundred replies
I don't count them of course. But here we are at the main point. Why is it that people should be allowed to slander me endlessly but when they get just the tiniest pushback, it's a big deal. Just think about that. Where is this dev? Why did he stop replying? All I wanted was to have a civilized talk. Or maybe a meta discussion. Like calling people cops is not a good idea in this milieu (if you want to have a civilized talk) which I also tried to impress upon him. I remember already telling him that a long time ago. Evidently, without any success.
So let me make suggestions for improvements. Either step the fuck up or back the fuck off. What this means is work to improve the site in whatever (limited) capacity without asking for things in return or don't try (trying here being following whatever instinct it is that compels you to try to pick a fight with me). Because, again, doing the same thing over and over again won't force reality to change. I have already laid all this out. There is no room for confusion here, only willful ignorance.
The world is not divided into those with fault and those without. I'd suggest you try to get over your religious delusions.

>>26932
>Stop making things up
>Pask made the commitment himself to stop posting in /meta/.
The announcement "Pask has agreed to stop posting on /meta/." uses the word "agree" which implied it was a proposal from another that they accepted. If I'm wrong, then sure, I'm wrong, we can't see your meetings and rely on the little communication we get to try and figure out how this place works.
I'm not 'making things up', I'm reading what was written. And if that's a miscommunication and I'm wrong, then I retract that accusation, and replace it with:
>Speaking of hyperfixation, aren't you the mod who made literally a hundred replies to the dev resignation thread and then agreed not post on /meta/ but did anyway?

>or else don’t get upset when we don’t listen to you.
Ignoring people because they gave feedback you think is false is an atrocious attitude. What the fuck.

>>26938
Hey, I just didn't expect to see someone else so smug and defensive replying. Take it as a complement, or something.
>What's it [that] you what I want and don't want?
Basic steps towards a decent user experience.
And that doesn't sound like much, but even super basic suggestions from other mods were ignored within a week, and complaints about posts deleted for no reason either ignored or mocked with shitposts.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>26941
>A wonderful dilemma you've given us. Improve the site or don't try.
Yes, I think so. See it as a koan. It's really not unanswerable tho.
Watch the video attached in the last post for further information. Then watch it again.

>because they gave feedback you think is false
Reasonable reaction to someone blatantly misrepresenting reality constantly.

>bound to
>going to become
These two sentences in general show a detachment from reality that impresses even me. Not only do you assume that the slander must be correct but there is not even agency assigned to those engaging in it! I have agency, you don't. Of course everything runs against you.

>didn't expect to see someone else so smug and defensive replying. Take it as a compliment
The height of mature civilized behavior. Disgusting. "I was wrong but this doesn't matter. And I'm right anyway because I feel vindicated. Also have more insults."
Is this the fabled me-me-me generation?
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Why was my thread anchored? What rule does it break?

You get all these complaints, but you keep fucking doing the same shit, because the users bully you on matrix lol

Apparently talking about how old the pyramids are is way too controversial and offensive, but Nazis asking idiotic questions about Marx or:
"Is there any social scientist with us who can tell us exactly when the revolution will happen?"
https://leftypol.org/leftypol/res/1477685.html
Intelligent question, amazing thread, /leftypol/ seal of approval, really made people think.

You encourage low-effort garbage, while anchoring actual discussion. I bet you all wonder why the site is dying, huh? Yeah, it's a big fucking mystery.

>>26947
i didn't sage your thread. i saw it, and i didn't think it was worth action, but i can see why it was and the thread you post here wasn't. your thread was a highly visible shitflinging competition that was really over as far as fruitful discussion by the third post. the thread you quote here was barely bumped six times and no one deigned to report it for low quality.

you'll be happy to know that since you brought it to my attention i've merged that thread with the QTDDTOT thread. thank you for doing your part, comrade.

I meant to post this in the moderation thread, didn't see I was in the catalog. whatever

>unique IPs
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

Not a vol but maybe post under the gay Nazi flag for more leeway?
It worked for shay

>>26919
What’s the banned post or IP

>>26939
Well I'm unbanned now
It was for 6 days, thanks

*Thems the r00lz
fucking autocorrect

Just accept your ban, appealing it here is going to make no difference at all.

>>26790
The Democratic Centralist board volunteers aren't that bad comrade they're doing a job that gives paid wagies PTSD for free

Seriously you can interact with them as human beings state your case and get a hearing

You can also go bat for other people you think are being treated unfairly and they'll sometimes listen

For the record I got unbanned almost immediately after the appeal

See we have the least worst mods on an anonymous imageboard or most forums for that matter

>>26790
>>26791
You are both right

no loss

>>26874
>What actually gets made here anymore? Fucking dayum?
I'm talking about the left as a whole, not just here. I don't think being SEObrained about it is gonna help. The advantage here is to not trick yourself into breathing manually.
>The characterization of leftist memes being preachy and wordy is still something you see everywhere
Because that's a subset of the whole "the left can't meme" trend that only relevant to itself. You don't see it outside that context. It's obvious protection when most memes leftists make aren't intentionally related to their politics if at all other than the absence of concurring with the right's stance on a culture war issue. While the right can literally only make memes about their politics lest be denounced by their peers for being woke.

>>26542
who the fuck is paying for soyjaks on this board or anywhere that isn't completely cartoonishly unhinged? get your head out of your ass before you start coughing up shit.

>>26876
>muh shopping cart

shopping carts are honestly the most efficient thing about capitalism, i never understood how corpoboiis can sell them to us for 25¢ each; you can get more than that in metal weight

>>26900
Taking shopping carts without intent to return them is stealing, you are not 'buying' the cart by putting coins in it

>>26900
True, I have a little crate cart and even that is probably one of the most useful things I own, I would get so much use out of a full-size 🛒 kinda cart.

Channers killing themselves when they realize having an IP address (an identity) is a prerequisite to using the internet

>>26877
So true. I feel our post are getting worse. Anything we need to talk about?

>>26835
Well there were definitely spam bots back then, but incelism wasn't that popular among children until around gamergate and related glowops of the time. The age of the cross armed rantsona YouTuber changed how kids interacted with the web for a long time, and trying to make a new Imageboard without that influence requires operating in secrecy and still being prepared for constant siege.

my god this thread is over a year old

imo the namefags haven't said anything extremely lolcow worthy in a while

>>26882
There was always resentful misogyny on the internet, it just didn't have a meme label yet

shouldf be possible. im not a dev but it should be trivial

Make a uBlock filter. I don't remember how but I did it once when a particular Eurasianism flag was treating every other thread like it /Ukraine/ (back when the jannies were having a hard time keeping reactionaries off of it, they still do but it was way worse at the time.)

They could do a filter by IP but then people would shadowban each other over the odd shitpost and the site would become even more of a ghost town.

learn to interpret and use flags properly kid
They're generally used to signal roles or personas

No one person owns any flag anybody can use them

They're basically an emoji 😊👍

Comrade, I implemented that in October 2021.
And another comrade wrote their own in March 2021 >>>/tech/7374