[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/meta/ - Ruthless criticism of all that exists (in leftypol.org)

Discussions, querries, feedback and complaints about the site and its administration.
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1780525086234.webp (151.18 KB, 679x937, IMG_1347.webp)

 

this post responding to a user's racialist and behaviorist rhetoric not only resulted in a ban but was also deleted from the conversation. why is that?

if users are not allowed to argue against outmoded pseudoscience like racialism and behaviorism or even read any arguments against these ideas then how can this possibly be considered a "leftist" community?

doesn't help that every day there is at least one active thread on the board where users are talking about white birthrates and using terms like "replacement level", basically taking pages directly out of the far-right neoreactionary 4chan /pol/ playbook and trying to clumsily and bizarrely incorporate them into supposedly "leftist" discourse.

what are you people really about? because it seems like you're all just a bunch of fraudulent poseurs to me, it seems like you're all the typical angry white male nerds from 4chan but you've somehow convinced yourselves that you are not, you think that you can absolve yourselves of all your obvious deep-seated racist/ableist/misogynistic/transphobic/etc. sentiments by simply attributing all forms of discrimination to the capitalist system, like as if the world was completely devoid of bigotry until the 16th century. that's absurd.

and i think you know that you are frauds, you know that you still haven't learned out to deprogram yourselves of all of the western imperialist thinking that you were programmed for, but you also know that you don't want to be like the dumb rightoids on /pol/, you've got one foot on the right and one foot on the left and you're experiencing cognitive dissonance and you don't want to do the difficult and scary work of questioning your extremely square whitebread view of the world and you think that putting on a beret and regurgitating some historical slogans and waving some flags will let you off the hook.
12 posts and 3 image replies omitted.

>>45210
"This nietzschean anti-hegelian french academic is a totally a communist"
When are westoids going to stop falling for this

Have you ever considered that a philosopher can be wrong about what communism is, what it entails, how to achieve it, and what qualifies one to be a communist?

Like the whole point of Marxism, for example, was to distinguish itself from every other contemporary socialism, whom Marx thought were wrong. Same with Lenin.

Do you think it's enough to declare oneself a communist, and that's it? That it's a matter of opinion? Peak liberalism.

File: 1780576118452-0.png (97.08 KB, 1144x820, hfghfghhj.png)

File: 1780576118452-1.jpg (160.05 KB, 1161x861, Gpa8s9jbEAIlnhp.jpg)

All that super elaborate ontology only to arrive at "uh… we have to do what's already happening even harder, in hopes that it disintigrates on its own"

>>45212
doesn't make him an anticommunist, either

>>45199
why dont you show us the full text?
and anyway this is for /meta/

>>45199
How is it even reactionary to begin with, how does one define reaction? ( as opposed to progress, perhaps ) By a simple logic, I don't see any wish to restore an old ideal in the text.



 

my post on race and autism score has been deleted. you think your users are this stupid? you are trying to keep the old, pre-AI leftypol alive. the thing is, (uncensored) AI gives us all the opportunity to see the full picture of reality. it is not my goal to recreate a second /pol/. but you can't deny, that this new technology will have a massive impact on leftist ideology. we are not stupid. in the past, i could understand if you deleted posts on topics such a genetics. but today?? this is absolute intellectual dishonesty. and you know that.

>>44146
AI is a bubble that will burst. Like, companies are handing out cash to AI which eats more money than it generates in profit, which is why SORA was closed down anyway: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3w3e467ewqo

On the top of that, AI data centres are wrecking the environment and even the lumpen are noticing the disastrous externalities of the industry. Go back to X’itter you AI bro

>>44146
holy shit, the AI told you what you want to hear and patted your ass? well you must be right then



File: 1780059106919.jpeg (459.49 KB, 1280x872, IMG_5439.jpeg)

 

Can we just ban tor posting please, literally every shit thread ever comes from a glownonymous

body too short
body too short
body too short



 

>the social chauvinist faggot mods are blackwater apologists

lole
Lmao
xd

We will annihilate you
Your filthy charred corpses will be hoisted as a flag by the international proletariat

People's war on terror is a successful war on terror which has saved people from becoming terrorists by re-educating them instead of killing them.

>>45140
it was good actually and liberals crying about it are too limp wristed to imagine any solution to the Islamic extremist suicide bomber other than putting the gibs into a cell for 5 months and releasing them or dropping more bombs than what were fired in the entirety of WW2 in a single day onto a goat herder village

>>44899
Soyack posting inflamatory stuff = not worthy of a thread

>>45142
>inflammatory stuff is when you criticise american freikorps employed by china to kill brown workers
Refer to what we will do to you in OP



File: 1779993932229.jpg (864.79 KB, 1550x1550, image (1).jpg)

 

cuckslamist mod removed +150 replies thread because the image triggered his scrawny pale ass


fuck cuckslamists
fuck cuckslamists
fuck cuckslamists
fuck cuckslamists



File: 1779636677916.gif (377.79 KB, 500x500, marxbabygirl.gif)

 

I propose this quote as a new one for the /tech/ header

>Instruments of labor not only supply a standard of the degree of development which human labor has attained, but they are also indicators of the social conditions under which that labor is carried on.

Karl Marx, Capital Volume 1, chapter 7
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch07.htm



File: 1748433522845.png (27.94 KB, 640x480, forums.png)

 

Can we ban Glownonymous.
They bring the overall quality of the entire site down with each post.
They dont even post creative bait, they just post weird nazi shit and are afraid to talk to girls or shower.
35 posts and 5 image replies omitted.

And yet I get a DATACENTERNODE ban everytime I try to post with VPN.

>>44528
>>44529
it was originally just "glowing anonymous" when it was first added. within a day or so it was shortened to "glownonymous".

no lol i need to whine about jannies without fearing the hammer

>>44849
rly tho i would agree but not under conditions of mods nuking 6 months of my post history for getting mad and taking the bait. i need tor to make borderline yet effortful posts because jannies fuckin suck

No i live in a shithole



 

I think word-filtering "degenerate" to "problematic" and visa-versa would be a fun bit because they're practically synonyms but the kind of people that would use either would be really pissed to have that pointed out.

>>45119
you're right, that is a good bit, I strongly support this



File: 1778537090739.png (896.6 KB, 1248x702, grumpy cat.png)

 

There are too many mentally ill attention whores on this site who monopolize certain flags in order to essentially be unfilterable spammers with main character syndrome. Please add a flag filter. I don't come here for attention whore drama.
4 posts omitted.

>>45016
Why don't you say what you really mean

>>45024
The fact that you immediately knew I was talking about you (among others) says it all really.

Ban flags
Or better yet remove the flag selection function

File: 1778895336458.jpeg (38.47 KB, 800x800, IMG_6881.jpeg)


>>45016
Meds now you obsessed chimp



File: 1776906661511.jpg (146.33 KB, 500x375, M.cerifera.jpg)

 

test

Dear Mods,

I got banned for DATACENTER/VPN/TOR NODE [auto] despite not actually using any of these when browsing (until now to file this complaint) and would like to at least have some sort of explanation or unbanning. my Ban ID is 152497 and the picture is the shrub species Southern Wax Myrtle.

Sincerely,Anon

I also apologize for accidentally creating a new thread in my hubris and impatience meant to post this in the general for these sorts of things

>>44785
Tor gets a global ban when someone abuses it retard, other people use it too, if you didn't do anything then it wasn't for you and the tor node should be back up for anywhere ranging from a few hours to a few days to a week or so

>>44787
while it is true that im retarded I have never actually used the tor node or any VPN while posting here until now

>>44788
mobile network? I can't post unless I'm connected to wifi.

>>44790
Same here



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home