/meta/ - Ruthless criticism of all that exists (in leftypol.org)

They often do, when they're on and the case is aggregious enough. They're light handed about it tho.

>>25533
report it when you see it and its bad enough
don't report just because someone disagreed with something you agree with tho, idk its a personal thing. If I see it, i throw out lots of reports because the poster/post isnt rule breaking or messing with conversation. I do bad for disrupting convo a lot, just there's degrees. If e.g. Wvobbly sees your report first, high chance it'll get dealt with. All you can do tho is just report. We don't see every post in every thread

It's on a case-by-case basis and there's degrees to this.

hey, that's hajime no ippo! I'm watching it right now and I'm loving it :3

>>25483
the white and dark mode debate is so dumb
PARCHMENT has always been the kino background color

This thread made me realize the dark red theme is ugly af. Im now using Yotsuba, big improvement

>>25492
I would like something like that actually. So far all of our image-background themes have had a little too much going on for me, but something like a space theme (maybe name it Sputnik or Yuri?) would be nice.
>>25509
Tzuki is my new favorite

>>25510
maybe these would work for it?

Do any anons have a better poll site than strawpoll? If so, mods should pin it. Also, I vote to continue the war on foreign 'jaks. Keep those filthy foreigners off of my board!

>>25505
The soyjak meme got popular here pretty much organically during the bunkerchan era and doesn't deserve to get banned like that.

>>25507
We used to say cancer is organic.
Or at least I think we used to say that, my memory isn't perfect, I am far too old.

>>25507
Mate, I didn't see the words "Soyjak Colony" in a Leftypol thread on that website's /raid/ board for no reason.

gemson on the log doe

>>24814
>mods cycling back and forth between banning /leftycel/ and leaving them alone
thats the best approach. You cant let the incel ideology take root but peope should also be comfortable talking about their situations

>>24290
Utter bullocks the mods are always at it, I agree with OP

>>25474
Yes, the mods are "always at it". This shop is open 24/7. Or do you see a "sorry we're closed" sign ever?

>>24285
Because only schizos find schizo takes interesting dicussion.

I'll take the worst shitpost over another 50+ posts of somebody freaking out about r/redscarepod or XYZ conspiracy theory

>>25456
>where is the source
>provides source
>not real
Jannies are spiralling ITT lmao.

We're back over 300 for no discernible reason.
There is really not any happening (a fucking balloon). Numbers go up, numbers go down, can't explain that.
>>25460
That's so Karen

>>25467
karen jannies taking L after L ITT

>>25460
Yeah I'm spiraling
I'm spiraling out of control
Just like these out of control super low prices
9.99$ for 20 chicken mcnuggies
4.20$ for 4 cheeseburger
(limitedtimeonly)

Furries win because healthiest and can wear suit. (not weapon)

Weebs 2nd place because non-MMA martial arts.

Fash dies first because meme diets and quackery. Immediately starts shouting at enemies instead of fighting.

I dunno, seems dumb. I would like this answered.
Also I don't know who wins but in a three way match-up the fascists lose cause the other two groups would gang up on them.

we need to know combat stats first
i would also guess the furries have strongest armour

does it have to be kingdom heart weebs specifically or just cosplay weebs in general

Furries will win bro, some furries can unironically throw hands

When two leftypolers fall in love…

Leftypol invented fucking.

*séx

SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEXXXXXX

>>25351
>it was fun to see some of the deranged shit that gets posted and people's reaction to it.
Well now we have 1 reason to keep it as a public matter and 0 to keep it as an internal one!

>>25340
>>25352
/gulag/ was made private since in some threads it contained links to illegal material or posts by spammers that are best not indexed by any search engine. /gulag/ was not intended for "public inspection", or put another way, the purpose of /gulag/ was not for auditing purposes. It was originally visible since there wasn't any reason for it not to. It was originally intended for threads to be "soft deleted". Usually from /pol/ or other reactionaries. Later on we started using it to collect spam and other stuff like that, and then we realized it was not a good idea to host spam, so the devs decided to make it inaccessible to the public.

>>25355
There we go! Finally, a proper answer. Now if only you had just said that earlier instead of all the condescending bratty responses.

Don't forget to take your morning pills Janny.

>>25357
That was unnecessarily rude. I was trying to put on the mod capcode, so you knew I was speaking as a mod. I did this for your benefit. Do better next time.

So did mods pass this stupid rule or not?

>>25389
>"communist" defends private property
many such cases

>>25498
They seem to be enforcing a frog ban inconsistently. This post (me) had the image removed with the stated reason of "frogposting": https://leftypol.org/siberia/res/391347.html#q391704

Yet there are three other frogs in that thread uncensored (one of which I also posted). I don't know why, I see no significant difference in terms of originality (neither frog I posted was OP). I was surprised that they took the time to remove the frog but not the time to direct me to this thread or some other resource indicating the ban was real, not sure what those priorities indicate. I thought the whole concept of banning frogs was probably just somebody making up drama until the mods actually removed a frog (but only one for some reason that I still don't understand). I would've imagined that a change like this would be reflected in the rules page or at least a sticky thread in meta. I don't even care about frogs, but a rule change like this seems like it belongs on the rule page. I'm still confused about what contexts the frog is banned in, because as far as I know nobody has said. I'm not running the place though, I just post here sometimes.

>>26354
Look, no offense but do you have autism? Don't try to understand what the mod team is doing. Most of it will not make sense.