>>33657It doesn't seem like a timely critique.
>having more muscle massGet a load of this Paul Bunyan guy…
>being generally largerYou're assuming that translates immediately to dominance, I suppose. You are aware of the comprehensive institutions of social humiliation and routine physical violence that were necessary to reproduce the male supremacy of mediaeval europoors, generally known as "rough music", I'm sure?
As a material condition, larger means easier to hit and easier to flee from.
>and more expendableOnly for a few years per kid, and industry has evened the score.