/meta/ - Ruthless criticism of all that exists (in leftypol.org)

>>9948
I represent the userbase

>>9976
>They want
>a total ban on avatarfags
I don't. Who gives a fuck. I'd rather ban porn.

>>9976
The userbase doesn't think exactly like you do. I also don't mind avatarfags as long as they're leftists and friendly (which they are, most of the time). Soyjak spam, on the other hand, is spam.

>>10099
jannies suggested to me that instead of a blanket ban on soyjaks as for example reaction images, soyscript OPs would be getting the stomp, which I find sensible, maintaining board quality in addition to not being too intrusive

test lol

>>10173
same, i use the onion also and i only realized that there was any drama or domain change when i made that stirner chad thread and wanted to copy the url from where it usually sits

I hope other tor anons don't get tricked
this place is way more chill so far

>>10138
>That is just what they say cause they want to have their bizarro little 'covid skeptical' hangout.
Ah, good, hopefully the leninhat and the deranged leftcom stay there too.

Wait so we have two sites Leftypol and Leftychan?

Notto dis shitto again

>>10047
>>10053
>Dindu nuffin!

Nasty people tbh.

>>10056
I'm not white.

create a megaoverboard for all 3 of the sites

>>10060
That would imply cooperation and the autists in the staff of all three sites are unaware of how that works.

>>10084
Nah, you can just write a scapper that takes the posts and puts them all together.

did some people actually take the joke imageboard cultural revolution proposal seriously?allendeAllende

>>8647
Humor on /leftypol/ is no laughing matter.

Agree with everything but point 4, these questions are popular because they are important and we shouldn't punish users, especially new ones for talking about them.

>>8648
That's true, there is a distinct no fun allowed atmosphere here

In /b/left_communismLeft Communism

Someone please reply to me <a onclick="highlightReply('433821', event);" href="/leftypol/res/431727.html#433821">&gt;&gt;433821</a>

This is how we unionise the board: <br/><br/>Okay, so basically this is the gestalt official proposal, I was going to write a document with all the ins and outs of my reasoning, for that, you can go back through this chat and read what I have to say. Essentially, my belief is this: 1) there is somewhat of a consensus among mods and regular attendees to mod related discussions that some form of board democratisation is favourable 2) there are numerous different beliefs on what that should be or what it will look like 3) there is fairly wide consensus that the system of moderation decision making currently in place is not fit for purpose. 4) there is also a fairly wide consensus that, although democratisation is favourable to basically all, most recognise to a great or lesser degree real issues, among these, how can we prevent the subversion of such a system. 4) this leaves us in a position that, we must widen the scope of the decision making process on the board, I.e, democratise it, add more voices to the pool of those eligible to vote, while also making sure that pool does not become subverted with bad faith actors.<br/>My proposal therefore aims precisely to target these concerns, in order to complete the above objective of democratisation to some degree.<br/>While the ideal situation would be in my opinion direct democracy, there are very real threats to this, and very real problems with its implementation. Therefore, I suggest measures in order to smooth over implementation issues in a gradual, increasingly democratic fashion.<br/>Thus, in practical terms, I would like the mods to vote on these 3 separate but cohesive proposals 1) that a union of posters be allowed to created by the posters, this union will act as the mechanism by which posters can discuss issues with the board. It will be owned by the posters, so that it’s independence from the moderation team can be assured. Initially, this union would be a place of discussion, and the will of the board discerned by the individuals who made up the voting body of the union. These individuals would be, those collections of posters who are currently engaged in the board moderation and have been long term. Gradually, more and more people would be added to the voting pool long term, it would be the specific job of these individuals to oversee this expansion. 2) in order to solidify this, myself and soy noticer (the initial inspectorate) be inducted in the mod chat, which woulPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

this sort of thread should go on /meta/

oh i can post on /meta/

If I had a magic wand I would give everyone waffle hands

>>8571
not only that
unlike forums (and even newsgroups/usenet)
you only have the text of the message, not the author or the title to filter with.
regardins manipulation, imageboards are absolutely yhe worst of the lot

What's TheThingNoticer's endgame?

>>8585
share his brain infection with everyone else

Is the Tulcel spammer a hivemind? A k hive?

>>8455
they're driving me nuts, can't we ban all data center IPs?

We need a purge.

>>8589
It's not so bad when murica is asleep
maybe a captcha for burger hours?

>>8595
how about you do your fucking job

Disc: I am Tetra4Anon, that Olympics thread poster back in Leftypol.
1) I need the mods to be reformed (put leftists instead of polturds)
2) All RW talking points must be banned AT FIRST GLANCE.
3) Ban Leninhat, Leftcom, and their accolades

>>8626
Reddit

I am unable to find this ban, is it still active? Can you give the time or duration of the ban, or the exact ban reason?
I am willing to bring this up with the moderators, as it does not sound like an offense.

>>8447
It looks like i'm not banned, but there was "this user banned for this post" stuff at there
I just replied to hım with his own language
İt's at there the (my own) PKK-thread