/meta/ - Ruthless criticism of all that exists (in leftypol.org)

>>27849
lol no

nah

>>27864
evul radlib fuk u n get out of lefdypul

>>27855
in the log, duh.

>>27865
sure, we will consider that. appreciate the straight advice and not the otherwise typical passive aggressive jerk-off post seen ITT

>>27860
>instead of deleting them, i spoiler them with a content warning
Unironically based

>>27857
Maybe kill yourself instead of jacking of to cp and spamming sites all day every tupa?

>>27359
I'm starting to think that there was no spam. It was just a coup or a glowop.

>>27424
Considering that m00dy has used the justification of "spam" to collate and catalog 10,000+ posts on a hidden board, you are probably right.

qa won sharty won

>>33333
DEUS VULT
jannies tongue my anus

make a tongue-in-cheek temporary board for ledditfugees

>>27250
We had that for chapo, it was a disaster filled with bad faith posting, horrible liberal shittery and just plain autism beyond even usual leftypol fare. Terrible idea.

yes but push lemmygrad/lemmy instead

>>27253
Yeah, I think Redditgees should adapt to the existing board culture versus getting their own thread. It'll filter out the worst ones who were never gonna fit in to begin with and ideally leave the more quality posters.

>>27255
Yeah. Was discussing contacting lemmy about that to see if they wanted a shout out…
I take it we have different roles but we are both lefty sites with shared political goals as it were.
flood aaaaaa

Retarded discussion. Whatever triggered the flood detected isn't triggered by that word. It likely was the flood system fucking up and then not unfucking for a while.

Alright I rescind all my previous complaints. I was off my meds and all angry, but I took a couple Xanax and chilled the fuck out so now I realize I was being ridiculous. Apologies.

>>27210
Uhh okay you are forgiven lol. Thank you for not shitting up the rest of the site. Glad this was cleared up.

Bloody hell

There have been/are always people on the staff and dev team who understand the value in anti-JS and Tor.
But like someone already said, we didn't write most of vichan this is a good thing, it's shit, even its former maintainer begs people not to use it, and most popular IB softwares intentionally don't require JS. We did take small efforts to make sure features we added worked without JS, although that's about all.

>>27189
>and reporting seems to need js
It doesn't, did you get an error message? This can happen when the post is already deleted/moved. vichan is very unpolished like that.

Seems reasonable. Idk how this would be implemented tho

>>27120
Trotchads keep winning

>>27115
>vidrel
you couldn't even crop the imperialist apologia b4 it turns from obligatory tragedy cope to obligatory "the superior ubermensch hero got away from the useless shiddy aim goons thoe!!1" cope?

they meant well, go in peace

>>27122
the british spooks are the ultimate bad guys in the movie, it's pretty good

Kek

>>26966
i counted 62 rows, so assuming I'm off probably 128 since that's an exponent of 2.

Flood detected; Post discarded.
>>31130
>>31130
>>31130
>>31130

>>31130
Flood detected; Post discarded.
>>31131
>>31131
>>31131
Flood detected; Post discarded.

test

>>26926
Speak of the Devil and He shall appear.
I was gonna make a serious reply but just looking at all the absurd assumptions it's clear that it won't be of any use. First that is not me you are replying to and it's a mystery to me why they even bothered replying.
>shouldn't want
What's it to you what I want and don't want? My motivations are beyond your comprehension.
>dev resignation
If the Dev couldn't accomplish your goals, what chance do you have?
>a hundred replies
I don't count them of course. But here we are at the main point. Why is it that people should be allowed to slander me endlessly but when they get just the tiniest pushback, it's a big deal. Just think about that. Where is this dev? Why did he stop replying? All I wanted was to have a civilized talk. Or maybe a meta discussion. Like calling people cops is not a good idea in this milieu (if you want to have a civilized talk) which I also tried to impress upon him. I remember already telling him that a long time ago. Evidently, without any success.
So let me make suggestions for improvements. Either step the fuck up or back the fuck off. What this means is work to improve the site in whatever (limited) capacity without asking for things in return or don't try (trying here being following whatever instinct it is that compels you to try to pick a fight with me). Because, again, doing the same thing over and over again won't force reality to change. I have already laid all this out. There is no room for confusion here, only willful ignorance.
The world is not divided into those with fault and those without. I'd suggest you try to get over your religious delusions.

>>26932
>Stop making things up
>Pask made the commitment himself to stop posting in /meta/.
The announcement "Pask has agreed to stop posting on /meta/." uses the word "agree" which implied it was a proposal from another that they accepted. If I'm wrong, then sure, I'm wrong, we can't see your meetings and rely on the little communication we get to try and figure out how this place works.
I'm not 'making things up', I'm reading what was written. And if that's a miscommunication and I'm wrong, then I retract that accusation, and replace it with:
>Speaking of hyperfixation, aren't you the mod who made literally a hundred replies to the dev resignation thread and then agreed not post on /meta/ but did anyway?

>or else don’t get upset when we don’t listen to you.
Ignoring people because they gave feedback you think is false is an atrocious attitude. What the fuck.

>>26938
Hey, I just didn't expect to see someone else so smug and defensive replying. Take it as a complement, or something.
>What's it [that] you what I want and don't want?
Basic steps towards a decent user experience.
And that doesn't sound like much, but even super basic suggestions from other mods were ignored within a week, and complaints about posts deleted for no reason either ignored or mocked with shitposts.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>26941
>A wonderful dilemma you've given us. Improve the site or don't try.
Yes, I think so. See it as a koan. It's really not unanswerable tho.
Watch the video attached in the last post for further information. Then watch it again.

>because they gave feedback you think is false
Reasonable reaction to someone blatantly misrepresenting reality constantly.

>bound to
>going to become
These two sentences in general show a detachment from reality that impresses even me. Not only do you assume that the slander must be correct but there is not even agency assigned to those engaging in it! I have agency, you don't. Of course everything runs against you.

>didn't expect to see someone else so smug and defensive replying. Take it as a compliment
The height of mature civilized behavior. Disgusting. "I was wrong but this doesn't matter. And I'm right anyway because I feel vindicated. Also have more insults."
Is this the fabled me-me-me generation?
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Why was my thread anchored? What rule does it break?

You get all these complaints, but you keep fucking doing the same shit, because the users bully you on matrix lol

Apparently talking about how old the pyramids are is way too controversial and offensive, but Nazis asking idiotic questions about Marx or:
"Is there any social scientist with us who can tell us exactly when the revolution will happen?"
https://leftypol.org/leftypol/res/1477685.html
Intelligent question, amazing thread, /leftypol/ seal of approval, really made people think.

You encourage low-effort garbage, while anchoring actual discussion. I bet you all wonder why the site is dying, huh? Yeah, it's a big fucking mystery.

>>26947
i didn't sage your thread. i saw it, and i didn't think it was worth action, but i can see why it was and the thread you post here wasn't. your thread was a highly visible shitflinging competition that was really over as far as fruitful discussion by the third post. the thread you quote here was barely bumped six times and no one deigned to report it for low quality.

you'll be happy to know that since you brought it to my attention i've merged that thread with the QTDDTOT thread. thank you for doing your part, comrade.